
wolves
Buried deep within the Republican Budget Bill that recently passed the House is a two line provision suggested by Rep. Mike Simpson (Idaho) that would remove gray wolves from the Endangered Species Act. The language Rep. Simpson, who chairs the appropriations subcommittee overseeing the Interior Department, introduced directs Interior Secretary Salazar to reinstate a 2009 provision that removed wolves from the endangered list in most of the Northern Rockies, specifically Montana, Idaho, parts of Oregon, Washington and Utah.
While wolves would still enjoy their protected status in Wyoming, the desert southwest and the upper Great Lakes, removing them from the Endangered Species Act in most of the Northern Rockies will put the wolf population, once again, in grave danger from hunters. This is likely why Wyoming is specifically not mentioned in Simpson’s language because in Wyoming an animal that has been designated a predator can be shot on sight.
Last century the wolf population was nearly decimated by hunting and with the intercession of environmental groups, who reintroduced wolves into Yellowstone National Park and Idaho, wolves have made a great start in recovering their population. Their numbers are now estimated to be about 1700 and they inhabit territory in 5 states.
Now that there are the 115 packs spread across 5 states ranchers are angry because sometimes wolves take one of their livestock for their lunch or dinner and hunters are angry because wolves take down big game to survive. The ranchers and hunters were so irritated they have tried, most recently twice, to remove the wolf from the Endangered Species List but those attempts were reversed by a federal Judge in Montana.
The rancher and hunting lobbies are large and powerful and have been stomping their feet and kicking up a dust storm of wolf hatred so much so that Rep. Simpson saw fit to bury language in the budget bill. In a rather diabolical maneuver to circumvent court interference, Simpson’s language also provides that the Department of the Interior would be shielded from legal intervention and that Congress would have the final say in whether or not wolves would be removed (or put back on) the List.
At the end of the day though, this is not about trimming the budget, this is about mollifying two powerful bodies of voters who are crying because they think they don’t have enough big game to pleasure hunt and because they’ve lost a few head of livestock to an animal they decimated into almost extinction once before.
If you do not agree with the removal of the wolves as an endangered species then please call your Senator to have the Simpson language stripped from the budget bill. Allowing it to go forward sets our environmental protections back into the last century. The Republicans are trying to turn back the century clock on women’s rights; don’t let them jump into their pretend DeLorean and turn back the clock on any human right or environmental concern — it only spells disaster and decimation of life.

Sarah Jones
Feb. 25th, 2011 at 9:55 pm
Excellent work again Janine. It’s like shock and awe lately – you don’t know where to turn.
loading...
janine
Feb. 25th, 2011 at 11:42 pm
Thanks Sarah! I appreciate your kind words.
The Repubs have really put forth an effort to introduce bills in a lot of states and in the House to limit our rights!
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 25th, 2011 at 10:52 pm
Little doubt in my mind politicians along with lawyers need to be hunted themselves.
I read tonight that the republican party does not listen to little people. And neither does the Democrats. It stands to reason its not hard for the rich to influence them to destroy not only the environment but the inhabitants of said environment as well
loading...
JC Everson
Feb. 26th, 2011 at 12:55 am
The problem is that the Federal Government will not allow the State of Wyoming’s competent Game and Fish Department to manage the wolf population, as they do other game populations.
The recovery of the wolves has been phenomenal, but their populations numbers need to be controlled to balance the ecosystem for all the creatures who live there.
Let the people who live and work on the ground in these states be the deciders, not people like Janice who are “arm chair animal management specialists”, too.
Perhaps Rep. Simpson is wrong to include the measure in a budget bill, but not allowing the states to manage their own animals is also wrong.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Feb. 26th, 2011 at 6:51 am
The problem is that the states need federal help to manage their human populations too, JC. That was recognized when the Constitution was written. The federal government oversees the country as a whole. Thus was have national parks as well as state parks. I know its popular to denigrate federal regulation but we need federal regulation and oversight. There are very good reasons for keeping these decisions at the federal level. An endangered species is the common property and concern of all Americans, not just the folks of Wyoming.
loading...