For the past month, Republicans have preached to the American people that the country is broke and that without Draconian spending cuts to social programs, the deficit will continue to grow. The Republicans have defied business logic and made cuts while refusing to consider raising revenue through tax increases on corporations and the wealthy. John Boehner and company say that a typical American family would follow suit in their personal budgets and cut back to make ends meet. With gas prices at $4.399 per gallon nationally, Americans are cutting back on travel and when possible, are holding down more than one job to augment the family budget.
The country is certainly cash-strapped, but Republicans are making sure the oil industry is flush with taxpayer money. Yesterday, it was revealed that the oil industry’s profits for 2010 were $60.9 billion for the top three oil companies. The most profitable company in the 2010 Fortune 500 list, Exxon Mobil, recorded profits of $30 billion that was helped by record gas prices, oil subsidies from taxpayers, and tax breaks for exploration and drilling. If America is broke like Republicans claim and they have to cut entitlement programs for the poor, why aren’t they cutting oil industry entitlements?
Apparently, the record profits are not sufficiently obscene for Republicans because they voted to extend taxpayer-funded oil subsidies as recompense for campaign contributions from the oil industry. There is also a small matter of royalty payments for oil captured off the outer continental shelf. When an oil company explores and drills for oil on federal land, after they recoup their expenses they are supposed to pay royalties on drilling leases. As it stands now, oil companies are not paying royalties on oil from federal land regardless the record profits they make.
In a House oversight and Government Reform Committee meeting in early March, Representative Dennis Kucinich informed the committee that, “Due to a flaw in the 1995 Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act, numerous oil companies are now drilling in the Gulf of Mexico in federal lands and paying no royalties to the federal government.” Republicans have resisted attempts to correct the flaw that would force the oil industry to pay the royalties the same way they resist ending subsidies and tax breaks for the oil industry. According to a report (pg. 200) from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), “Special lower royalty rates granted on leases issued in the deep water areas of the Gulf of Mexico from 1996-2000 could result in $21 billion to $53 billion in lost revenue to the federal government.” During the hearing chaired by Rep. Daryl Issa (R-CA), the Republicans feigned surprise at the revelation, but it turns out they voted against reworking the leases so the oil industry could avoid paying royalties indefinitely.
It is bad enough that Republicans are giving subsidies to the oil industry with money taken from programs for the poor like the WIC (Women, Infants, & Children) program to assist with health and nutrition needs, but the oil lobby’s puppets in the GOP are giving huge tax breaks to companies like Exxon Mobil. The company’s CEO collected $21.5 million for gouging the government and the American people, and because of loopholes created by the industry’s lobbyists, Exxon Mobil paid no income taxes for their record profits and in fact, received a $156 million rebate from taxpayers. Republicans facilitate the oil industry to rape taxpayers at the pump, with subsidies, no royalty payments, and no income taxes; and they have no intention of changing anytime soon.
There are some Republican lawmakers who dispute the assertion that the oil industry receives subsidies or tax breaks and agree with oil industry executives who complain that eliminating subsidies is tantamount to a tax increase. Exxon’s vice president, Ken Cohen, complained that by eliminating subsidies, what President Obama really wants is, “to increase our taxes by taking away long-standing deductions for our industry.”
Tim Pawlenty, a presidential hopeful said eliminating subsidies is “ludicrous and a tax increase” and that “the worst thing we could do is raise the cost burden on costs on energy and oil…What he’s proposing is a tax increase on energy at a time when the gas is $4 a gallon. It’s preposterous.” It is not preposterous and eliminating subsidies will not end our dependence on foreign oil, eliminate jobs, or impact the price of gasoline at the pump. Pawlenty is echoing scare tactics used by oil lobbyists to perpetuate the billions of dollars in subsidies and tax breaks hard-working Americans are giving to the oil industry.
Pawlenty typifies Republicans’ largesse with taxpayer money for the most profitable corporations in the world who, like Exxon, pay little or nothing in income taxes. From the lead-up to the 2010 midterm elections to the present day, congressional Republicans led by House Speaker John Boehner said they were doing the work of the American people. It is reasonable to assume that the majority of Americans do not approve of Republicans giving taxpayer dollars to the oil industry. However, Americans must remember that Republicans work for the oil industry and protect their interests at all costs. When President Obama said he would hold BP responsible for the ecological disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, Republicans apologized to BP and criticized the president for treating the oil giant unfairly.
The Republicans in Congress must cease giving the oil industry taxpayer money and start working for the American people. If America is broke like Republicans claim, it is only because they take what little revenue the government collects and give it to the oil industry. Instead of only cutting spending, Republicans should follow good business practice and increase revenue by making oil companies pay royalties and income taxes. As it stands now, Republicans give Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars directly to companies like Exxon and BP, and to pay for the oil industry entitlements they cut services.
Congressional Republicans told their constituents they want to end oil subsidies, but voted unanimously to continue the unfair entitlements. Republicans disparage spending on the American people because they claim the deficit is too high but they will not increase revenue. The oil industry is flush with taxpayer money that is better suited making infrastructure improvements that creates jobs, or providing health services and nutritional assistance to low-income families. If Republicans have their way, it won’t be long until every American is forced to sign their paychecks over to big oil and the government will transfer its assets to companies like Exxon and BP. The Republicans have almost achieved that goal.


Reynardine
May. 6th, 2011 at 11:11 am
We are getting no oil royalties because Republicans and Blue Dogs are getting such good lube jobs.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
May. 6th, 2011 at 11:35 am
Best one sentence assessment I’ve ever seen, Reynardine
loading...
Rmuse
May. 6th, 2011 at 10:09 pm
I agree! Great one-liner.
loading...
sherriww
May. 6th, 2011 at 4:40 pm
@Reynardine:IS a good assessment for sure! You know,with so much going on lately,I have now forgotten which oil co. is was,evidently not exxon or bp,but one of the big ones,their CEO just said about a week or so ago,that they do NOT NEED those subsidies any longer,and that he had NO PROBLEM with them being cut back,with the country having so much right now! Maybe someone can figure out which co.he was from,but that syayement was NOTplayed up in the news at all,lost to all these other things,but it SURE is enlightening!Proves how all the other oil companies,and the Rethugs are REALLY messing us over, to gain more “contirbutions”
loading...
Sarah Jones
May. 6th, 2011 at 11:59 am
I would very much like someone to ask one of these Republicans to prove that their oil subsidies create jobs. Prove that subsidies to any corporation create jobs and then prove that tax cuts to corporations create jobs. Sometimes, as in the case of film credits, they do “create jobs” but then Republicans say those are the wrong jobs or those are manufactured jobs because that company wouldn’t be shooting there without the subsidy. This is true; subsidies create a false market and when allowed to be given on a per state basis, further mess with the “free market”.
They’ve been saying this for so long it has become accepted as fact. At the same time, real conservatives know that subsidies alter the free market and any time you do that (according to their own belief), you mess with the system and create false a inflation of the subsidized, thereby wreaking havoc on the entire system. And yet they claim to be proponents of the free market.
So, which is it?
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 6th, 2011 at 1:07 pm
The dems squandered the time they were in charge. So much of this stuff should have been taken care of. I hope to the thousands of gods that they get the house back and do something important for us.
loading...
Realist
May. 6th, 2011 at 1:40 pm
I agree with all your points, but you sure aren’t showing much of that bipartisanship so vital to the functioning of this nation.
When one chooses to castigate someone for an opposing view, one should consider the totality of that person’s positions. I am today being a bit heavy on you, but in reality we agree far more than we don’t. I’m just more willing to be vocal about Obama’s fails (such as not taking the oil industry to the woodshed) than you are.
loading...
majii
May. 6th, 2011 at 3:14 pm
I would agree with you on President Obama “taking the oil industry to the woodshed” if he could do it by force, but he can’t. I recall clearly how Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) apologized to BP after the Deepwater Horizon disaster when President Obama got them to agree to set up a $20 billion fund for the Gulf residents affected by the accident. There are also some dems in Congress who would fight him tooth and nail to preserve these payouts, along with the republicans. Also, since this is a democratic republic that operates under a constitution, President Obama cannot introduce ONE bill into either house of Congress that c/would end these subsidies . The key to ending these subsidies must begin in Congress.
I’m all for bi-partisanship, but I realize that in order for that to occur, both sides must be willing to negotiate in an honest manner, and that is just NOT the way that the republicans in the 112th Congress have decided to conduct our nation’s business. Mitch McConnell declared in January 2009 that the goal of the GOP would be NOT to do the business of the American people but to make President Obama a one term president.
The latest evidence of the unwillingness of the republicans to seek bi-partisanship occurred earlier this week. At a bi-partisan dinner, President Obama spoke of finding common ground on the budget, but as soon as the republicans left the dinner, Politico reported that Cantor said that there would be no compromising with the WH on the budget. Compromise requires two or more parties that are willing to work together to solve problems, but that is NOT what President Obama has to work with. For these reasons, I refuse to lay all of the blame for certain things not being accomplished on the shoulders of President Obama because it’s not a realistic accounting of what is happening/has happened since he took office in 2009.
loading...
Tina
May. 7th, 2011 at 7:05 am
I,for one,am not surprised by the flip flop of the R’s on the oil subsidies.You can NEVER believe anything that comes out of their mouths.When will Americans wake up to this fact?Maybe as soon as the msm wakes up.
I can dream can’t I?
loading...
2Cents
May. 7th, 2011 at 12:39 pm
I’m shit for math, so feel free to check it, but:
If the U.S. consumes about 400m gallons of oil a day, that’s about 146b gallons per year. At $3 a gallon, that’s $438,000,000,000; at $4 a gallon, that’s %584,000,000,000. Take into consideration the top three companies made 60.9b profit then that’s 14.6% at $3, and 10.1% at $4. So that would mean .40 per gallon is profit to the oil companies. Depending on which state you live in, you pay about .456 per gallon in taxes. If that’s the case the government is reaping 66.58b a year as well. Why would the Republicans or Democrats do anything to stop that? Instead of complaining about the Republicans, wouldn’t it be better to cut back on the 400m gallons of oil we use a day and become less dependent on foreign and domestic oil?
You can’t honestly expect any business to make less than 10% of profit on their goods or there would be no point in starting/owning a business.
loading...
Chris
May. 7th, 2011 at 6:15 pm
No offense but, I don’t trust or believe in EITHER major party right now. One is in bed with big business and the other spends way too much all the time. Both are pretty much set on the same thing, destroying the economy so that their elite butts can be sitting high and mighty while everyone else is poor.
loading...
Sarah Jones
May. 7th, 2011 at 7:13 pm
I’m sorry, but it was the Rpeublican’s spending that got us into this mess – the meme that Democrats are big spenders is a few years out of date after Medicare D, two wars left off of the budget, and massive borrowing under Bush.
loading...