On Tuesday afternoon, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels did as promised and signed HEA 1210 into law. With that, Indiana enjoys the ignominy of becoming the first state to ban federal funds for family planning services from Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood, as reasoning people understand, is not primarily about abortion: its services include birth control, cancer screenings, HIV testing, and more.
HEA 1210 “Cancels state funding for any current contracts with or grants to any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed,” and
“sets requirements for performing an abortion after the first trimester but before the earlier of viability of the fetus or 20 weeks of postfertilization age of the fetus (current law requirements are based on viability of the fetus).”
The new law:
- Requires that a physician determine the postfertilization age of a fetus before performing an abortion, and allows for the discipline of a physician who fails to do this in certain circumstances.
- Adds information that a pregnant woman must be informed of orally and in writing (current law requires that the information be given only orally) before an abortion may be performed concerning the physician, risks involved, information concerning the fetus, available assistance, and existing law.
- Requires a pregnant woman seeking an abortion to view fetal ultrasound imaging unless the pregnant woman states in writing that the pregnant woman does not want to view the fetal ultrasound imaging.
- Requires a physician who performs an abortion to: (1) have admitting privileges at a hospital in the county or in a contiguous county to the county where the abortion is performed; or (2) enter into an agreement with a physician who has admitting privileges in the county or contiguous county; and notify the patient of the hospital location where the patient can receive follow-up care by the physician.
- Requires the state department of health to post Internet website links on the state department’s web site to materials setting forth certain information concerning a fetus and abortion.
- Prohibits qualified health plans under the federal health care reform law from providing coverage for abortions except for in certain circumstances.
GOP rhetoric surrounding HEA 1210 has been typically ugly. When Rep. Gail Riecken (D – Evansville) argued for an amendment to make exceptions for victims of rape and incest, the bill’s author, Rep. Eric Turner (R – Marion) asked his colleagues to vote against it because a woman could “simply say I’ve been raped” in order to get her abortion covered. Claiming the rape provision would be a “giant loophole” Turner said,
“I want to be careful. I don’t want to disparage in any way someone who has gone through the experience of a rape or incest – but someone who is desirous of an abortion could simply say that they’ve been raped or there’s incest.” Riecken’s amendment was voted down, 54-42.
Think Progress reported that,
Outraged by Turner’s allegation, state Rep. Linda Lawson (D) — who spent six years as a sex crimes investigator for the Indiana police — delivered an emotional rebuke. Describing her experience with both elderly and young children who had been raped, she forcefully informed Turner that “they don’t make it up.” “Women don’t make this up! My Goodness!” she exclaimed. “This is the state of Indiana!”
The bill is also dishonest: It requires doctors to provide women with misleading and medically-inaccurate information prior to an abortion (“misinformed consent”). By law, doctors are now required to tell women seeking an abortion that it will increase their risk of breast cancer even though it is not true.
According to the American Cancer Society,
The issue of abortion generates passionate viewpoints in many people. Breast cancer is the most common cancer, and is the second leading cancer killer in women. Still, the public is not well-served by false alarms. At this time, the scientific evidence does not support the notion that abortion of any kind raises the risk of breast cancer.
Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, on behalf of Planned Parenthood of Indiana (PPIN), has filed for a temporary restraining order and injunction to keep it from being enforced.
“By signing this bill, the governor has put the health care of thousands of Hoosiers who rely on federal funding at risk,” said PPIN President and CEO Betty Cockrum. “And by signing when he did, he put patients with appointments tomorrow at PPIN health centers in danger of not getting their birth control or physical exams. However, we’re not going to let that happen. We will see all patients who rely on federal funding that have appointments until we receive a ruling in this case, and will cover those costs out of our Women’s Health Fund.”
The ACLU of Indiana says it “expects the U.S. District Court in Indianapolis to rule on the temporary restraining order beginning at noon tomorrow, May 11, 2011.”



Shiva (Moderator)
May. 11th, 2011 at 8:55 am
Have fun while you can GOP. If the people of your state are smart, you wont be there much longer. Putting peoples health at risk simply because an entity provides abortion is sharia law to me.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
May. 11th, 2011 at 9:25 am
Indiana senators received 70,000 letters of protest and passed it anyway. 22,000 low-income men and women in Indiana are the primary beneficiaries of this Republican punitive measure. The Republicans aren’t listening and as you say, will pay the price in 2012. They seem to forget their state went Obama last time around.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 11th, 2011 at 9:38 am
The Dems have so much ammunition this time around. If they dont use it, we are the ones that pay
loading...
Mark
May. 11th, 2011 at 7:19 pm
No.
The GOP/Teatard party will be strengthened by this. You’re not all that familiar with IN politics, I see. In additionk the GOP/Teatard party ALWAYS doubles-down when faced with facts and reality.
Next step is the incarceration of anyone who performs an abortion.
loading...
sherriww
May. 12th, 2011 at 2:19 am
Yeah,and THIS is one of the guys who wants to be PRESIDENT! SO HE CAN IMPOSE THAT AND HIS OTHER WEIRD IDEAS ON THE WHOLE COUNTRY! Anyboby votes for a GOP for Anything,will get the government you deserve,no doubt about that!
loading...
Mike Lieman
May. 11th, 2011 at 9:02 am
Is it time to just start posting the instructions for a DIY At-Home D&C procedure all over the Internet yet?
loading...
english saddle
May. 11th, 2011 at 10:26 am
Sadly they will and people will die from it. Prolife means pro death of women
loading...
Anne
May. 11th, 2011 at 9:40 am
They are so ideologically hide-bound that they positively cannot see the forest for the trees. The end result will be more pregnancies, more illegal abortions, denial of access to critical exams for breast, cervical, and prostate cancers, and more unwanted kids subject to abuse/neglect, whose parents won’t be able to care for them. These Republicans are drunk with power, which is why they are oblivious to the protesters who are aware of the ramifications of this piece of legislation. They are doing incredible damage, and I hope people remember their actions well enough to vote them all out during the next election cycle. But, Hraf, is it true that there are people in that state who are getting ready to file lawsuits against this? I sure hope so.
loading...
Mark
May. 11th, 2011 at 7:20 pm
But the voters won’t vote them out. They will vote in even MORE of them next election cycle.
IN is a SOLID red state.
loading...
Mark
May. 11th, 2011 at 7:21 pm
They’re solid red despite going Obama last election. That was a fluke.
loading...
Anne
May. 12th, 2011 at 1:56 am
The fact that they are “solid red” means that they have been voting against their own best interests for some time. I wonder what will wake them up to the fact that voting Republican is a suicidal act? If this doesn’t, I don’t know what will.
loading...
sherriww
May. 12th, 2011 at 2:28 am
I never realized Indiana was so nuts! I always thought they were pretty sensibile folks over there,but if they go with Repubs after THIS year,well,theres no hope for them,or anyone else who does!Good Lord,Wake Up America and kick these EXTREME IDIOTS to the CURB! EVERYWHERE!
loading...
Reynardine
May. 11th, 2011 at 11:21 am
Theodore Adorno, writing in the 1940′s, theorized that authoritarianism attracted sadistic personalities, and that sadism was an intrinsic trait of its extreme. Clearly, this was not “mere” theory, as whackwingers like to sneer. His observations of Axis regimes suggested it; his research supported it; and I submit what we are seeing now confirms it. Authoritarian/ sadistic types see women, children, and the poor as weak, and weakness as something to be continually punished. Yet these “weak” people cannot be permitted to become stronger, because the possibility of upward mobility suggests that of downward mobility, and because, if allowed to escape their victimhood, they might take revenge. Authoritarian personality types fantasize about living in a “great chain of being” where everyone stays in their place, but they always imagine their own place as being exalted. We see them here, smirking that this country is a “republic, not a democracy” (ignoring that a republic is a representative democracy) and maintaining that “democracy is mob rule”. I admit that my own sadistic impulses are aroused by their smirkiness: fantasies of, say, driving a maul twice into their rotten crotches with first the blade and then the sledge. We civilized people don’t give in to that, of course, but revulsion at them is based on something much deeper than doctrinal discord.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 11th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
a very modest example of what you say is to be seen In my high school graduation. All of the bullies turned out to be cops. And it took about one year for one of them to be jailed for abuse
loading...
Liz Chase
May. 11th, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Each person who supported this decision, each legislator who voted for it should adopt 5 children who were born to parents who knew they could not raise them. one will be born with addiction issues, 2 will have special needs, 3 will have children of their own by age 15, Good luck, what a superb decision you have made, not just for yourself, but for all of Indiana, this generation, future generations and their descendants. Think things through, not based on your life, but on the lives of those who will be affected. Then make a decision.
loading...
Grace Creek
May. 11th, 2011 at 2:45 pm
Little Mitch will be enjoying this victory for such a short while. Short term benefits include looking more attractive to the far right, while continuing to attract Republican moderates by looking like a candidate that can win. But he’s got to explain those two nights in jail for the marijuana, and then there’s the whole hinky story about the missus leaving him and their four daughters aged 8 to 14 to run off to California for three years, after which she returned and Little Mitch took her back and they remarried. There’s a lot wrong with that picture, and it won’t be private for long.
But it won’t really matter, because what gets him the nomination will lose him the election: Planned Parenthood speaks to women’s health needs for those moderates and independents he’s going to need.
Oh, and then there’s that gig as Bush’s OMB director, famously underestimating the cost of a war, when he wasn’t busily “managing” to turn Clinton’s huge surplus into today’s huge deficit.
That’s a lot to answer for. And that’s before Newt takes off the gloves.
loading...
Grace Creek
May. 12th, 2011 at 10:25 am
Today Mrs. Daniels is peaking at an event, with many watching to see if she seems inclined to undergo a national campaign’s scrutiny. Apparently in the past she has had very limited roles in campaigning, and now reads to school children for literacy, and shows up at the state fair to milk cows.
loading...
Mark
May. 11th, 2011 at 7:17 pm
Hey, look.
The party of small government just stepped in to your sex life.
Again.
loading...
Scorpie
May. 11th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
I sure hope that this question doesn’t sound too stupid. How can a state stop federal funds from going to a national organization? Makes no sense to me.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 11th, 2011 at 11:27 pm
The monies go to the state, then are distributed. The state can determine what to do with the money.
loading...
Scorpie
May. 12th, 2011 at 8:58 am
Thank you Shiva.
loading...