We need a President with a business background, someone to get the economy growing and stronger. That has been the talking point of the GOP for many months. The two most prominent GOP candidates with a strong business background are Mitt Romney and John Huntsman but unfortunately both of these gentlemen have been either creating jobs overseas or buying crumbling companies, splitting them off and outsourcing American jobs.
Let’s first take a look at Mitt Romney. As an executive, Romney would buy struggling companies, break them up and ship parts to foreign low wage countries. Now many people on the right will try to defend this as doing what he was paid to do, which was to take companies and turn them around to be profitable. The problem is, he could have turned them around, made a healthy profit, restructured them and finally kept the jobs here in America. Romney didn’t do that. He decided to make an even bigger profit by destroying communities through outsourcing. He didn’t stand with the workers of factories or other businesses at all. He decided to stand with the shareholders ONLY and I am sure some of the shareholders weren’t even American.
Now we have John Huntsman, he is another successful businessman and potentially strong GOP contender. On the social issues he is more moderate and would be a more attractive candidate to the swing voter but with the economy being the primary focus of this election, Jon may need to explain himself on why his business opted to create more jobs in China and India than he did in the United States.
According to Bloomberg Businessweek
Huntsman can make a convincing case that he knows something about putting people to work. One of the world’s largest chemical makers, the company he once helped run employs 12,000 people and had revenues of $9.25 billion in 2010.
That would be a killer applause line, except by the company’s own figures just 2,174 of those employees are in the U.S. The rest work around the world. The company declined to provide country-by-country details, though it did say that Huntsman Corp. has 1,151 workers in China.
“We now employ more people between China and India than we do in North America, which is really quite phenomenal when you consider that about 90 percent of our associates 10 years ago were in North America,” Chief Executive Officer Peter Huntsman, 48, a younger brother of the candidate, told an industry conference this month.
In the article the company says they never outsourced one job. They have never stopped producing something in America to outsource the job to another country. While that may be true, there was nothing stopping them from hiring American workers and shipping it around the world, many companies do that everyday.
As a CEO, you make those decisions based on one thing, maximum profitability. The question I would ask is are profits and dividend checks to shareholders more important than keeping Americans working?
Now Jon is a more palatable candidate than Mitt, essentially because Romney was like a vulture, circling dying companies, busting them up and outsourcing the jobs. Huntsman could have made a profit with his company also, just not as large as $9 billion in 2010.
America can not afford a CEO President who put the shareholders’ interests and lives above the stakeholders, which is you and me. We need a President willing to stand up for the worker, because out of all the corporations and wealthy people in this country, it is the middle class who needs a real champion.


Cathy
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 10:12 pm
Which is exactly what we have in President Obama–a President who understands the middle class. He has continuously been hampered in his agenda by Congress. He understands it takes time to correct our problems, which is why it is imperative that he be elected to a second term. We need to work together to give President Obama the political capital to continue the fight–and give him four more years to straighten out the mess of the Bush administration.
loading...
MrNativecolor
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 10:16 pm
Here!Here! Bravo Cathy!
loading...
sherriww
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 10:22 am
@Cathy:Amen!On everything you said above! To deny Pres.Obama his full eight year term,to complete the straightening up of this nation would be the real END of life as we have known it in America! to trust a REPUB? Good Lord,I would like for Americans to STAND UP TO THESE REPUB/TEAPUB FOOLS AND IDIOTS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! And,I pray Pres.Obama will NOT give in on this,and sgree to cuts without new revenu,and I say this from a position of one who has a great deal to lose,if the stock market blows up!But,never the less,Mr President :you must NOT let Repubs conrol this stuation any longer,whatever happens!
loading...
MrNativecolor
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 10:19 pm
C’mon folks, open your eyes for Americas sake and Vote for OUR interests as AMERICANS! Don’t just say you’re a Patriot, BE a Patriot!
loading...
Reynardine
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 10:25 pm
I think we should outlaw burying or cremating our dead. They should all be turned over to private stock feed and fertilizer companies, who can ship them to China to be turned into these and other useful products and shipped back, thus aiding the economic development of Asia. Once we’ve built up a market, we won’t even have to wait for them to die. We can just scoop up our old people, food stamp recipients, Head Start and school lunch program kids, disabled veterans, and other useless eaters, put them on a freighter to Asia, and really improve the bottom line. Yes, let’s run this country just like a business!
loading...
Gus
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 10:55 pm
This is highly hypocritical BS! Yes Romney and Huntsman are notorious corporate gangsters, but Bill Clinton forced NAFTA and China PNTR and Obama wants Panama and, Terrorist State Columbia, trade deals.
loading...
Reynardine
Jun. 24th, 2011 at 11:48 pm
Glad to offend you, Gus.
loading...
Ray Medeiros
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 7:48 am
Hypocritical? NO! I have been consistent in my outrage in regards conservative corporate lead leadership. NAFTA was Clinton’s and HW Bush’s legacy.
loading...
US_Patriot
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 11:47 am
@Gus you don’t know the history of NAFTA, let me educate you.
1st) George H. Bush along with the Presidents of Mexico and Canada made an agreement for NAFTA. Republican President
2nd) The House passed NAFTA by a Republican majority
3rd) The Senate passed NAFTA by a Republican majority
4th) Clinton signed the bill into law
So, NAFTA started by Republicans and passed the House and Senate by Republicans and signed by a Democrat makes NAFTA Clinton’s fault ergo Democrats. Your logic is faulty. The only thing Clinton could have done was Veto the law that would have went immediately up for revote and would have passed the veto override.
loading...
Don
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Huntsman cannot make the product here and ship it overseas as most companies do. The economics of their chemicals is such that you need to produce them close to the end user which are the growing mfrs in China and elsewhere. Otherwise it would be Saudi Arabia that would make all of these chemicals that are largely derived from oil. That Huntsman is a major player that grew up with pkg innovations close to the US end market is proof of these economics. The author confuses growth in demand in Asia, which Huntsman does not control, with job losses in the US that Huntsman did not contribute much to. Further, Jon does not run the company and cannot be held guilty of sins of the father or brother.
loading...
Ray Medeiros
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 5:09 pm
Perhaps DOn, you should take issue with Bloomberg newsweek, where the majority of my information regarding Huntsman is derived.
loading...
CJ
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 1:30 pm
This author is oversimplifying a world market. As “Don” has posted, many of the end users are in the areas where various items are produced. This isn’t always the case. But, look at Ford. They build cars in Brazil – and then sell them to Brazilians. Besides, if you want to look at these two guys (and criticize them), lets look at how many jobs were outsourced because of policies that were created by Clinton. Or, how about looking at how many jobs Obama and his Democratic buddies (controlling both parts of congress) created. Obama has certainly made a mess of things in many regards.
loading...
Ray Medeiros
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 5:08 pm
CJ, This current Administration has overseen GDP expansion in the PRIVATE sector, especially in manufacturing. While it is SLOW, it is in the right direction
loading...
allen
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
look CJ, for u to deny that outsourcing is hurling american into 3rd world status for the benefit of the super wealthy and ceo’s is just mind boggling in it’s ignorance….
i’m still employed as an engineer in what’s left of the US manufacturing sector and i’ve seen with my own eyes hundreds of fellow american workers, ppl just trying to pay their bills and raise their families thrown out of work…
while i do blame Clinton, it’s by and large pushed by right wing economic think tanks such as CATO and Heritage foundation
let’s just deal with reality for a change
loading...
Ross Parot
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 2:12 pm
The 2012 election will involve ONE decision for voters:
Do you want a president who represents the HAVES or do you want a president who represents the HAVE-NOTS.
It’s simple as that.
Mr. Huntsman cannot be serious about creating jobs for Americans.
He is concerned with one thing and one thing only: His Own Pocketbook.
loading...
Gus
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 7:17 pm
@US_Patriot I must take issue with your argument that Clinton was helpless in his signing of NAFTA, when he in fact pushed the legislation, more like rammed it, thru Congress. Granted, it was originally H.W’s brainchild, however Bill Clinton was indeed a steady and forceful proponent of so-called free trade. Please read Davis Sirota’s Hostile Takeover for reference http://www.amazon.com/Hostile-Takeover-Corruption-Conquered-Government/dp/0307237346 or Jeff Faux’s The Global Class War: How America’s Bipartisan Elite Lost Our Future http://www.amazon.com/Global-Class-War-Americas-Bipartisan/dp/0470098287 Or Byron Dorgan’s Take this Jib and Ship It (someone who was actually in Congress during the pressure campaigns for so-called free trade) http://www.amazon.com/Take-This-Job-Ship-Brain-Dead/dp/B0012BTBVK/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1309043685&sr=1-1
I don’t know how you concluded that Clinton was not corrupt during the process of bringing NAFTA to course? STOP OBAMA’s trade agenda!
loading...
pb92603
Jun. 25th, 2011 at 7:36 pm
Romney also made a business of helping corporations & wealthy individuals avoid taxes in USA through “tax shelters.” He points out he didn’t break the law. Did he break the spirit of the law? Does he put Country first? Does Mitt put Mitt first? Does Mitt serve the public interest or Mitt’s interest?
loading...