The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) reported on Friday a huge victory for science and education – not to mention sanity, against the forces of superstition as represented by the supposedly non-partisan but staunchly creationist Discovery Institute in Seattle, Washington. In fact, this think-tank is so non-partisan that Bruce Chapman, its president, has declared that “Intelligent Design” is the institutes “No. 1 project.”
The Texas Board of Education “has unanimously come down on the side of evolution.” Yes, they voted 8-0 to approve “scientifically accurate high school biology textbook supplements from established mainstream publishers – and did not approve the creationist-backed supplements from International Databases, LLC.”
We have all been worried about Texas sliding out of the 21st century and into the dim and superstition-laden past. The 13th century looked like a likely destination. This turnaround stands strongly at odds with the message being sent out by Texas’ gun-toting, Bible-thumping governor, Rick Perry, who is about to take the stage as a genuine Lonestar messiah. Perry, as is well known, espousing a Bronze Age understanding of climate science and meteorology, thinks prayer is the answer to drought.
NCSE previously reviewed the creationist materials, Joshua Rosenau writing, “International Databases’ materials are not only laced with creationist arguments, they are also remarkably shoddy, teeming with misspellings, typographical errors, and mistaken claims of fact.” Another reviewer at the Dallas Observer noted that they “have the grammar prowess of a fourth-grade book report and the aesthetics of a middle schooler who just learned PowerPoint.”
As Rosenau observes, “{t}he materials describe ‘intelligent design’ as a ‘legitimate scientific hypothesis’ and even as ‘the default position,’ despite the consensus of the scientific community that it is not. Examples of these claims are posted (PDF) at the TFN’s website.” (See examples below):
Dr. Eugenie Scott, NCSE’s Executive Director is celebrating the decision. “These supplements reflect the overwhelming scientific consensus that evolution is the core of modern biology, and is a central and vital concept in any biology class. That these supplements were adopted unanimously reflects a long overdue change in the board. I commend the board for its refusal to politicize science education.”
There is no downplaying the significance of this victory.
No doubt creationists will continue to push their anti-science agenda. The Republican War on Science has been with us since at least the presidency of George W. Bush (see Chris Mooney, The Republican War on Science, 2005) and the Discovery Institute already lost an earlier case in Dover, Pennsylvania (2005). After all, facts can’t stand in the way of belief. The Bible cannot be trumped by science and it cannot be trumped by the U.S. Constitution. For fundamentalism, it is the other way around, and it is the Bible that is the trump card, to be played whenever reality takes that inevitable liberal bias.
The Discovery Institute, as observed by Chris Mooney, is an “ideological think tank” and its president, Bruce Chapman, is a primary leader of the crusade against evolution. Chapman served in the Reagan administration and when Reagan turned toward evolution so did Chapman. Chapman outdid Reagan, calling evolution a “theory in crisis”. He claims he has become more conservative as he has grown older; an argument could be made that he has also grown less intelligent.[1]
Intelligent Design should be relabeled “unintelligent” design and were time machines possible, Chapman and the folks at International Databases sent back to cavort with cavemen and dinosaurs. Sadly, we can’t be rid of them that easily. But as the news from Texas shows, they can be thwarted. Stay tuned for much foot-stomping, holding of breath, and other forms of tantrum in the days to come. They’re not done with us yet.








The Platzner Post
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 3:43 pm
Let us pray that common sense has returned to the Texas Board of Education!!!
loading...
AFM
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 6:16 pm
The only way is if they elect a democrat moderate governor. What is upsetting is these people are going to hurt young people who want to be scientist.
loading...
Pete
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 12:15 pm
In light of the fact that Darwinian thinking is not only anti-science, but anti-social in that it breeds racist thinking, the time has come to examine the root philosophical cause for the Norwegian terrorist attacks.
http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust
loading...
Hawker40
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 2:19 pm
In light of the fact that the Nazis burned the books of Charles Darwin (for being “Anti-Christian”), I think you better look harder for the philosophical cause of the Norwegian terror attacks.
http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/whose-books-did-hitler-bur/
loading...
Luis
Jul. 27th, 2011 at 7:41 am
Darwinian thinking is only anti-science if your definition of science necessitates that magical sky-daddies are a better ”explanation”.
Face it, you’re losing.
loading...
wilson201
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 3:56 pm
Finally, some good news! Thanks for sharing this :O)
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 4:39 pm
But the human footprints next to the dinosaurs! I swear I seen them together!
I dont think Rick Perry believes a thing about religion. I think he thinks all of texas is fundies and wants to get on the ride
At least Texans have a chance for education
loading...
DannyEastVillage
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 5:01 pm
I think you’re dead-right about Perry. He would say he believed the earth is mounted on the back of a gigantic tortoise if it would get votes.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 5:45 pm
I agree. As I said here before, Rick Perry’s faith is skin deep. Look at his tithing. Actions speak louder than words.
loading...
Pete
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 12:19 pm
Rick Perry’s faith is not in -question here, it’s whether or not the Texas Board did its job, and clearly they didn’t. The fear of Left-wing Secularist reprisals, not sound scientific education was a motivator in their decision. If they looked at the science, they would’ve seen the anemic case for overarching Neo-Darwinian hypothesis and its Achilles Heel, abiogenesis.
loading...
ElFedericoo
Jul. 27th, 2011 at 2:43 pm
Pete, Pete, Pete: Abiogenesis is a mutually exclusive issue–it has nothing to do with speciation. Why aren’t you complaining that the Theory of Gravity is BS cuz’ it doesn’t explain the Pythagorean theorem? The school board DID it’s job. ID has no business being in a science course–it is not science. To link Social Darwinism to Darwin himself and the scientific community just illustrates to a moral certainty that one doesn’t understand the most rudimentary definition of science. Besides, Hitler’s main inspiration for the holocaust was always Martin Luther’s dirty little book, “On the Jews and their Lies.” Furthermore, using the Norwegian attacks from a right-wing, creationist, fundie, extremist to support one’s own right-wing, creationist, fundamentalist ideology is baffling. As for, “Fear of Left-wing Secularist” besides being a grossly laughable moniker, are you seriously suggesting that the left strong armed the school board to get their way; why on Earth would one need to do that to keep non-science out of science classrooms?
loading...
Snooze Hamilton
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 5:36 pm
Sane People: 7
Crazy People: 0
That said, I WANT a print of “Jesus” with the wittle baby velociraptor!!!
Think I’ll call him Digby . . . .
loading...
boil
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 6:06 pm
the kockbros will find a way to delay it or keep it in texas courts for years. you watch.
meanwhile fred flinstone still only exists in cartoons, although having a dino might be cool…
loading...
Reynardine
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 6:19 pm
I’m glad the Earth still goes around the Sun, and is about four billion years old. But was Jesus’s footprint beside a dinosaur’s? Maybe: the modern chicken has DNA which is closer to that of T. rex than is that of any other surviving animal, a finding with which anyone who encountered my Rhody rooster, Roger, would heartily concur.
loading...
Virginia Lyons
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 1:48 pm
I want to see the mounted marine plesiosaur that Noah hooked from the stern of the arc. Wow what a trophy!
loading...
Sally
Jul. 23rd, 2011 at 6:46 pm
My grandkids will be starting public school in TX in a few years, and I have two nieces already in. I’m terrified at the misinformation, outright lies, and the religious training that passes for public education there. We are NOT a Christian nation, by design (and those Founders, had Palin, Bachmann and Perry bothered to actually read their work) were pretty damn intelligent. I wish I could say the same for even ONE person claiming to be conservative now. They are all nuts.
loading...
openminded
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 7:27 am
“…were pretty damn intelligent. I wish I could say the same for even ONE person claiming to be conservative now. They are all nuts.
Way to change one system of intolerance and close mindedness for another.
Build bridges not burn them.
loading...
soxfan4life
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 1:57 pm
Our Founders did indeed base this Country on Christian beliefs, and we are a Christian nation by design, or we were set up to be, somewhere along the way we veered off of the path.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 2:02 pm
No they didnt. They based it on British common laws and other older European laws
loading...
soxfan4life
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Well we will have to agree to disagree there, while the founders did not want state sponsored religion, they were fleeing the Church of England, Christian beliefs were an important part of their ideals.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 2:31 pm
There was a long time distance between the people who fled the church of england and our founding fathers. Thats a real tough connection. It was over 200 years after the pilgrims came here that we had a constitution.
loading...
coomback
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 12:47 am
http://www.nobeliefs.com/pagan.htm
loading...
ElFedericoo
Jul. 27th, 2011 at 3:01 pm
Quite patently, we are not a Christian nation. We were founded by secular deists. All one has to do is to check out the only federal document addressing the idea, “The Treaty with Tripoli” {mid 1790′s). What about the Separation of church and state? Or read any number of quotes from Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Hamiliton, . . . So by design our government is/was intended to be areligious; with the residents being masters of their own religiosity. By definition Not a Christian Nation. A nation with many Christian maybe–but NOT a Christian nation.
loading...
Sophie Amrain
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Great news, but I would have appreciated some background information, such as: did the Schoolboard change? Did some liberal, democratic groups push for reasonable candidates? As it is, the welcome news comes out of the blue.
loading...
David
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Evolution: The Creation Myth of Our Culture
http://www.trueorigin.org/evomyth01.asp
*
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/07/eugenie_scott_misrepresents_th048621.html
*
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/07/ken_millers_inaccurate_and_bia048321.html
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 1:51 pm
The only myth is creationism
loading...
Pete
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 12:21 pm
That’s your subjective opinion, based on your Leftist/Secular philosophical beliefs, not objective facts.
loading...
Sophie Amrain
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 7:01 pm
Hey David,
can’t you make a coherent statement on your own? Need to take the talking points unaltered from the misinformation websites?
And in any case, why do the bible thumpers consider being a myth something negative?? As in ‘your ideas are a myth just like ours’ Shouldn’t you embrace myths?
And finally: Why is the genetic code universal, hm?
loading...
David
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 7:40 pm
Why is the genetic code universal? Take your pick: common ancestry or common Designer.
From question 8:
http://www.trueorigin.org/evomyth01.asp
On Sept. 29, 2009 Richard Dawkins was a guest on CBC’s The Hour. (Watch the interview here.) The host, George Stroumboulopoulos, asked Dawkins: “What is one single thing that you can say that definitively proves that evolution is a fact?”
Dawkins’ response: “Comparing the genes molecularly across all animals and plants. It falls on a precise hierarchical pattern, which is obviously best interpreted as a family tree, and this becomes possible–becomes quantitatively possible–because all living creatures have the same genetic code, which means you have literally reams and reams of textual information, just like a book, in every cell of every body, of every creature, and every plant in the world.”
So…a pattern of highly organized textual information, comparable to books, is evidence there wasn’t any intelligent design involved?
Henry M. Morris wrote: “A number of evolutionists have even argued that DNA itself is evidence for evolution, since it is common to all organisms. More often is the argument used that similar DNA structures in two different organisms proves common evolutionary ancestry.”
“Neither argument is valid. There is no reason whatever why the Creator could not or would not use the same type of genetic code based on DNA for all His created life forms. This is evidence for intelligent design and creation, not evolution.”
http://www.icr.org/i/pdf/imp/imp-331.pdf
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 8:04 pm
“This is evidence for intelligent design and creation, not evolution.””
Actually could be evidence for both. The DNA across the animals and flora on this planet can be a read like a book, but its only supposition that someone designed it. A better supposition is that no one designed it because of the changes in DNA from samples of any given genus over time. Would not intelligent design NOT have to improve or become extinct? Randomness is a creators mark? I think not. Would man not have been created and not changed in his perfection?
My opinion, pure evolution, purely natural and constantly improving and adapting
loading...
BillyJoe
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 9:11 pm
The Texas Board of Education announced Monday that it will order new Bibles for Texas schools that remove all references to Jesus on the grounds that his teachings are “too liberal” for the classroom. The changes will likely impact Bibles sold throughout the U.S. because Texas buys more Bibles than any other state.
The board approved the changes in a 10 to 5 party-line vote with unanimous support from Republicans. Dr. Don McLeroy, a dentist and leader of the board’s conservative faction, said the changes were approved without any input from theologians, in keeping with the board’s practice of editing schoolbooks on its own and ignoring experts.
“I know there’s folks who will say we in Texas have no business teaching religion in the classroom, well frankly a bunch of ignorant zealots like us have no business meddling with textbooks either but that’s didn’t stop us from doing so,” McLeroy said. “Here in the republic of Texas we don’t give a lick what the rest of the country thinks, unless of course we need federal money or help with stuff like hurricanes.”
While the move to strike Jesus from the Bible took some board members by surprise, McLeroy said it was important to restore a sense of conservative balance to what he called “an awfully preachy book.”
(continued…)
http://www.thechicagodope.com/2010/07/12/jesus-removed-from-texas-bibles/
loading...
Karl
Jul. 24th, 2011 at 10:04 pm
Evolution is more impossible than the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and the Headless Horseman. See http://www.lifescienceprize.org/ for a list of bluffing evolutionists.
loading...
Aqua Rose
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 1:51 am
Sorry Karl, your friends are 20 years behind the times. This has been done already.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLean_v._Arkansas
Second paragraph “Judge William Overton handed down a decision on January 5, 1982, giving a clear, specific definition of science as a basis for ruling that creation science is religion and is simply not science.”
Try to keep up.
loading...
Aqua Rose
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 1:53 am
Oh dear, looks like I made a mistake. Your friends are 30 years behind.
loading...
David
Jul. 25th, 2011 at 2:13 am
In May 2000, Michael Ruse (philosopher of science wrote: “Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion–a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaint–and Mr. Gish is but one of many to make it–the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”
If religion cannot be taught in science classes, why is evolution taught in science classes?
Ruse, M., “How evolution became a religion: creationists correct? Darwinians wrongly mix science with morality, politics”, National Post, pp. B1, B3, B7 (May 13, 2000)
http://www.omniology.com/HowEvolutionBecameReligion.html
http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9404/ruse.html
http://www.arn.org/docs/orpages/or151/mr93tran.htm
loading...
SteveC
Jul. 26th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Just because evolutionary science doesn’t have all the answers doesn’t mean that you need to insert a designer to fill in the gaps- the god of gaps – as it has been referred to.
The one question ID people won’t or more likely can’t answer is who designed the designer.It’s an infinite loop and it doesn’t answer anything.
loading...
David
Jul. 27th, 2011 at 4:04 am
SteveC wrote: “The one question ID people won’t or more likely can’t answer is who designed the designer.It’s an infinite loop and it doesn’t answer anything.”
I don’t know about ID people, but the question has been discussed by creationists:
http://creation.com/who-created-god
http://creation.com/if-god-created-the-universe-then-who-created-god
*
Most cosmologists and astronomers believe the universe wasn’t eternal, but had a beginning.
So… which statement requires the most faith/belief?
In the beginning, NOTHING.
In the beginning, a SINGULARITY.
In the beginning, GOD.
I don’t have as much faith as the atheist!
loading...