Texan Ron Paul is thinking about Iowa and New Hampshire and his campaign is dropping a hefty sum of cash to sway voters away from the new Texas phenom (six figures to air the commercial alone excluding production costs) and back to his own camp. In a new ad, Ron Paul goes after Rick Perry, pointing to his own support for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and contrasting with this Rick Perry’s support for Al Gore in 1988:
“The establishment called him extreme and unelectable, they said he was the wrong man for the job. It’s why a young Texan named Ron Paul was one of only four congressmen to endorse Ronald Reagan’s campaign for president, believing in Reagan’s message of smaller government and lower taxes.”
What is remarkable is that Ronald Reagan is here held up as a paragon of Republican virtue when, in fact, the late president’s every policy was anathema to a libertarian and to the GOP/Teahadist mantra – increased spending, growing the federal government, raising taxes.
Reagan’s department of veterans affairs alone added 60,000 to the federal workforce (Clinton, in contrast, a Democrat, shrank the government by over 370,000 jobs). And sure he offered an initial tax cut – then he raised taxes, and continued to raise them – eleven times – wiping out fully half that initial cut. He raised the gas tax; he raised corporate taxes(!) he raised taxes to pay for Medicare and Social Security. And the debt Republicans make so much fuss over? While Reagan was in office the debt went from $700 billion to $3 trillion.
Yes, Ron, you supported Ronald Reagan, which means you stand for,
1) Increased government
2) Increased taxes (including corporate taxes)
3) Increased federal deficit
4) Support for Medicare and Social Security
What part of this is in line with Republican political theology in 2011? It is in point of fact, all of it, heresy. Yet these are your selling points, Ron Paul? This is why Republicans should vote for you? Shouldn’t any fact-based comparison with Reagan take the form of condemnation, not blatant self-promotion?
Of course, it’s not the real Ronald Reagan the GOP is selling in 2012 but an idealized Reagan as he should have been.Uneducated white Christian voters are sure not to notice. But Rick Perry’s campaign did – sorta. Without condemning Reagan’s un-Republican performance, the Perry campaign had this to say about Ron Paul:
“Rep. Ron Paul’s newly released attack ad refers to the congressman as, ‘the one who stood with Reagan.’ But his 1987 letter announcing his resignation from the Republican Party indicates Reagan drove him from the party.”
Ouch. A neat diss and no pesky facts interfering with illusion.
Paul’s ad has for that rascally Rick Perry:
“After Reagan, Senator Al Gore ran for president, pledging to raise taxes and increase spending, pushing his liberal values. And Al Gore found a cheerleader in Texas named Rick Perry. Rick Perry helped lead Al Gore’s campaign to undo the Reagan revolution, fighting to elect Al Gore President of the United States.”
All this ad demonstrates is that both men are opportunists and willing to sell their souls. Ron Paul knowingly misrepresents Ronald Reagan as a Republican Saint and Rick Perry’s devotion to fundamentalist dogma is about as sincere as his devotion to Gore. Whatever gets him ahead.
The ad ends by giving America a false choice: “[N]ow America must decide who to trust. Al Gore’s Texas cheerleader, or the one who stood with Reagan.” Essentially, we have a choice between two grafters who both evince a lack of courage of their convictions – political whores. Some choice, GOP. Stay classy.



Anne
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 9:00 am
The irony of Ronald Reagan as an icon of the far right is that he did everything they consider anathema while in office. But then again, they are well-known for seeing only what they want to see and hearing only what they want to hear. They are a bunch of losers.
loading...
nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney baldwin ventura sheehan
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 9:01 am
So you children of the world listen to what I say
If you want a better place to live spread the word today
Show the world that love is still alive you must be brave
Or you children of today are children of the grave
Al Gore tried to give us Joe Lieberman as VP
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 9:49 am
And?
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 9:57 am
for the life of me I have no idea why people want to emulate Ronald Reagan are to admit that they supported him. He may have talked like a conservative but his administration was not conservative at all. Does that mean that former Gov. Sarah “I quit” Palin will raise taxes and increase the national debt out of her love for Ronald Reagan?
every once in a while I agree with Ron Paul. The since I’ve gotten to know what he stands for better I would certainly never support him. But less face it he is a person who stands alone with his convictions. the last thing on earth he needs to do is align himself with Ronald Reagan because it certainly isn’t get Sarah Palin any votes or anyone else. He gets the support he needs today from people who see him as he is, someone who stands apart from the rest of the bought off Congress.
however, just like Reagan, what he says and what he does is two different things. He has had no problem with getting federal money for his district’s
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 11:00 am
And of course, this very day in Reagan land, Bachmann faces off against Perry, as two more try to emulate a “saint” who exists only in their fevered imaginings.
loading...
Sarah Jones
Sep. 7th, 2011 at 1:08 pm
So funny. Reagan would be rejected now by the modern day TP, and Ron Paul is supposed to be small gov — still wondering why he takes a paycheck from the taxpayers since he’s against any kind of govt at all.
loading...
jake
Sep. 11th, 2011 at 5:19 am
He’s not against any kind of government at all. To say that means you’re not listening to him.
loading...
Ken
Sep. 8th, 2011 at 1:27 am
Paul supported Reagan until Reagan failed to live up to his promises.
Try to catch up.
loading...