Americans who support Republicans in Congress must be extremely proud of their representatives for the lies they spread leading up to the 2010 midterm elections. The primary lie was that the GOP was going to focus on “jobs, jobs, jobs” if they were elected and since the start of the 112th Congress, they have focused on religion, Christianity, and more religion to satisfy their fanatical Christian supporters. In an upcoming vote in the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Republicans will once again turn their undivided attention to disregarding the Constitution’s ban on promoting religion, and ignore their promise to focus on job creation and growing the economy.
Republicans in the House will attempt to pass a resolution reaffirming that the nation’s motto is “In god We Trust” because it will waste time and divert attention away from the GOP’s total lack of interest in creating jobs or bolstering the economy. The concurrent resolution is sponsored by Representative Randy Forbes (R-VA), and he claims it is to focus attention on “supporting and encouraging the public display of the national motto in all public buildings, public schools and other government institutions.” At the start of the 112th Congress, Republicans held a reading of the Constitution, but apparently they either skipped over the 1st Amendment completely or decided that the Founding Fathers made a mistake when they included the part that says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.“ Whatever dysfunction Republicans labor under, the notion of encouraging schools, public buildings, or any government institution to display a religious “motto” is patently unconstitutional because it is in direct conflict with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The proposed resolution gives a brief accounting of references to god in the history of the government and says, “If religion and morality are taken out of the market-place of ideas, the very freedom on which the United States was founded cannot be secured.” It is highly irregular for Republicans to come out openly for establishing religion in the government and especially in connection with the security of the nation because they usually are stealthy in promoting god. Republicans have heavily promoted god since they took control of the House, but they did so by attacking Planned Parenthood, women’s right to choose, and anti-gay agendas in the states and at the federal level. One of the Republican’s arguments for the resolution is that it will help turn the tide against their imagined effort to remove references to their air-fairy from public buildings.
The resolution’s sponsor, Forbes, wrote back in March that, “Federal agencies and departments have been instructed that the phrase not be posted in those buildings. The effect on our public schools has been chilling, as teachers and administrators do not know whether they can post our national motto on their walls.” The effect has been chilling on teachers and administrators? Apparently, since Republicans are so fond of fabricating imagined outrages and lying to promote their agendas, describing the Constitutional ban on religion in government as having a chilling effect is just another tactic to enrage the Religious Right and their superstitious sycophants to rally behind the GOP that has not fulfilled any of their campaign promises to create jobs or grow the economy.
Democrats said spending time on a divisive issue when the nation is suffering from high unemployment is a waste of time. They wrote in the committee report that accompanied the bill that, “Instead of addressing any of these critical issues, and instead of working to help American families keep a roof over their heads and food on their tables, we are debating whether or not to affirm and proliferate a motto that was adopted in 1956 and that is not imperiled in any respect.” The Democrats also said that, “Without question, the Judiciary Committee has many important and time-sensitive matters within its purview. The majority, however, seems intent on diverting the committee’s time, resources and attention to a measure that has no force of law, only reaffirms existing law and further injects the hand of government into the private religious lives of the American people.” The resolution does not have the force of law, and is indeed just a waste of time meant to enrage conservative Christians against “godless liberals.”
There are a majority of Americans who cannot comprehend that the ridiculous motto was not included in the Constitution and do not believe it was meant as opposition to Communism in 1956. But facts are always an issue with conservative Christians who are under the fallacious assumption that the Founding Fathers meant for America to be a Christian nation because it is their goal to return to a time and place that never existed. It is outrageous that Republicans are promoting an unconstitutional agenda of forcing the public, especially school-age children, to acknowledge belief in a mythological character from ancient Jewish mythology, but the real atrocity is that Republicans are doing anything to avoid creating jobs or help the economy.
It is an absolute outrage to think that an ignoramus motto will help Americans find good paying jobs or pay for their daily food. Do the Republicans and their acolytes in the Christian religion really think plastering a stupid slogan in schools, government buildings, and public places reflects all of America’s citizens trust that an imaginary being will do anything positive for the country? The slogan has been around for 55 years and America has been attacked by terrorists, lost countless lives in worthless military conflicts, and suffered Republican malfeasance that nearly destroyed the entire world’s economy and that alleged trust in god did not prevent any of those devastating events from occurring. Christians may believe that trusting in god will save America, but intelligent Americans believe that trusting in politicians who are serious about taking care of the population is preferable to hoping god will create jobs and keep the nation safe. Apparently, trusting in god is as worthless as trusting Republicans to keep their campaign pledge to help the American people by creating jobs and growing the economy.
Republicans are clueless about job creation and as usual, they revert to the tired canard of invoking god as if it will have any consequence except to impose religion on the entire country. However, the only thing Republicans worked at for ten months is pandering to the religious right, the wealthiest 1%, and corporations so it is not that surprising they revert to the only thing they know; when all else fails, invoke god and purport that without a stupid slogan “the very freedom on which the United States was founded cannot be secured.” If freedom cannot be secured without a stupid slogan and trust in god, the country will become a corporate controlled plutocracy where 1% of the people control 80% of the wealth and 99% of the population will fall into poverty. Oh wait, America is already there and it arrived with the policies of Republicans and since 1956; the nation’s trust in god.



Reynardine
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 10:08 am
I think they mean the voting populace to read that as, “In GOP we trust.”
loading...
robyn ryan
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 2:05 pm
The national motto is “E pluribus unum.”
“in God we trust” was a Cold War conceit gone toxic.
loading...
ibwilliamsi
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 3:16 pm
“E Pluribus Unum” = “Out of many, one”
Somehow it just doesn’t fit in with the exclusivity of the R’s.
loading...
mjira
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 3:54 pm
Agree with the two of you, such craziness. Let’s not let them hijack the US and country with this BS
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 10:43 am
I don’t think the GOP is clueless on jobs, I think they are supposed to not create jobs. They are doing as requested.
I would take bets that 90% of Americans go through life without ever thinking of “In god we trust”. As for myself I think the subject is totally meaningless. A motto?
And why do they push this? They are telling the people that are not in the 20% that own the 80% of the wealth to trust in god and charity. Neither of which exists.
loading...
Reynardine
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 10:49 am
You’re right that they’re not supposed to create jobs. In effect, this is a nationwide lockout.
loading...
Ingarose
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 11:02 am
They cannot create jobs, that would help Obama’s reelection. They are already downplaying the somewhat good economic news last week. And the stock market is way too high.
loading...
marcus hurley
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 11:38 am
the idea that religion and morality are synonymous is the height of sophistry
loading...
Mike Peake
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 12:48 pm
Their god is the dollar bill. No thank you.
loading...
Larry
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 1:39 pm
A constitutional ban on religion in government. But a mandate from the voters to create jobs. Actually jobs are created by DEMAND. The rich and the GOteaBaggers do not and have NEVER created any jobs. How does spending less (laying off workers) create any jobs? I may have been born at night but it was not last night. Try to explain it to me again. You must spend money to create DEMAND and then you will have J O B S. No amount of money given to the rich and ultra rich will ever create jobs. Trickle down is where the wet yellow stuff runs down your leg. And that is not money. Time to figure it out and quit listening to the goptards. They shore can talk but cannot produce.
loading...
CBinAlabaster
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 8:30 pm
Actually Larry, if you had been born last night you would have more intelligence than you have acquired since your actual birth. I guess Bill Gates and Steve Jobs never hired anyone and their creativity and wealth never provided an economic advantage to anyone? You have been consummed by your emotional outrage and refuse to recognize the problem isn’t rich people or Tea Partiers – it is an over-reaching government that has choked the life out of our economy and that, you can blame on both parties if you have the courage to deal with the truth.
loading...
-
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 5:35 am
Doh. “Both” parties are conservative.
loading...
-
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 6:19 am
“over-reaching government that has choked the life out of our economy and ”
… christianity.
religion in government: mutually assured destruction
loading...
-
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 6:22 am
“I guess Bill Gates and Steve Jobs never hired anyone”
Nearly true. They haven’t hired ms or apple employees since perhaps the early years. The board “hires” executives (and effectively, vice versa). HR and managers hire the serfs.
loading...
-
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 6:35 am
“and their creativity and wealth never provided an economic advantage to anyone?”
Those 2, as employees, grabbed *some* of the wealth produced by microsoft corporation and apple (computer), inc respectively.
AFAIK, Gates was never a hardware engineer and only briefly a weak coder.
AFAIK, iJobs has never been other than a product conceiver/critic and a sales/marketer.
While microsoft has often written adequate software (in my opinion), historically microsoft relied on *destructive* methods to dominate certain technological markets, rather than *creative* methods to objectively compete. (More infamously: Wordperfect and other victims of Win3 API deceit. Blackmailed PC makers regarding Beos. Proprietary ‘lockout’ code, which has inadvertantly bitten microsoft’s own butt in the form ie6 legacy enterprise dependency)
As Jobs himself “admitted” in a 1996 interview, apple only beat other companies in market timing. In fact, no apple products have been revolutionary, but rather price-point appropriate for apple customer base. “Leadership” in some products has “relayed” among apple, rim/blackberry, and palm.
____
But Larry has simply noticed that the wealth of the majority (aka “99%”) has produced and always can produce far more productive employment than the wealth of the “1%”
e.g., the 2 you named.
If gates and ijobs took *no* income from their respective employers, their employer’s sales would have been the same. Therefore, gates’ and jobs’ *wealth* is irrelevant to customer benefit from employers’ activities at ms and apple. (And other employees and investors would have had slightly higher income.)
Personal hiring?
A portion of gates’ personal wealth has paid (e.g.) groundskeepers or housekeepers. This amount would have been more productively spent by people of lower income. In the absolute moral sense, 2 greencards at Disney produce more benefit than 2 greencards at gates’ estate.
However, ijobs home resources-consumption are/were unusually relatively sane.
1 mulsanne vs 10 camry hybrids.
Relative wealth correlates to less productive consumption. Relative wealth correlates to higher portion of “investment”. However, all investment eventually converts to consumption.
So, the moral “bottomline” is the value of actual consumption.
Take off your tea-stained glasses.
loading...
Jim Faubel
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 2:27 pm
God responds to the GOP: “Forasmuch as the people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me….” Isaiah 29:13
loading...
martin jones
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 2:33 pm
Everytime they talk abortion or gay marriage they violate the constitution. Their ideas about such things are based on their reading of their bibles.
loading...
required3
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 12:17 pm
Uh, in the Bible, life begins at the first breath, not at conception.
loading...
Sally
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 3:32 pm
Had a guy in a Bible study recently tell all of us that not only was God in the Constitutional, the Christian Founding Fathers put Christ in there too. (I guess they were just Deists on the side?) When I disagreed, he said, “In the original documents, it’s all there. They have been changed over time.) Unhuh. And this same guy is certain that he knows many secrets the government is keeping from us, like the fact that there are armed foreign troops camped out all over the US, just waiting for their orders to attack!
Now, I attend a Brethren church, one of the peace churches, not an evangelical GOP praise God and pass the ammo group. He freaked me out.
The GOP is out to destroy this nation. They are unhappy that women are educated and not willing to stay home and raise six kids each. They are unhappy that minorities can not only vote, but are also educated and making positive contributions (Cain excepted.) They are unhappy that even though THEY don’t follow Christ in the least, that other people are allowed to worship Allah, Buddah, or no one at all.
So what do the unhappy wealthy white male KKK members do? They demonize all the groups they despise. They put forward morons like Perry, Gingrich and Santorum to lead their dwindling followers further down the road to ruin. We are not going to let them win. This is OUR country too, and it will be free…from these morons and they Koch money.
loading...
SinghX
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 6:59 pm
…”And this same guy is certain that he knows many secrets the government is keeping from us, like the fact that there are armed foreign troops camped out all over the US, just waiting for their orders to attack!”
Uh-ohhh…somebody has been up late watching “Seven Days in May”.
Bert Lancaster plays a hard core right wing General who has secret army bases stashed all over (the main one in a Texas, of course) ready to take down communication towers after he kidnaps the president; the general considered the president a “weak sister” because he signed a disarmament treaty with Russia. And of course, there’s a smart woman who loves them both…sigh….she stays home (full pitcher of martinis) or went to parties (and drank). Ask this guy where the bases are actually located…if he says Texas…
loading...
mathazar
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 5:12 pm
Can anyone please explain what the hell it even means ?
Are we all supposed to have faith in a mythical omnipotent force which
cannot possibly be proven to exist ? Couldn’t we just as easily say “in the
Easter bunny we trust, or in the tooth fairy we trust” ?
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 5:23 pm
I have at least SEEN an easter bunny
loading...
Darklady
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 5:19 pm
I miss the days of E Pluribus Unum.
loading...
SinghX
Oct. 30th, 2011 at 7:11 pm
Maybe this is one of those “signs” that if Satan sees or hears it while try to escort gay people for marriage license, he (and the gays) will run away knowing that the “god club” has already been there and Satan can’t go in with a message over the door where everyone inside trust god, not Satan!
Whew, got that one taken care of, right Senator Imhoff? I’m assuming he’s one of the bill’s sponsors as it sounds like the same stuff he tries all the time…C Street morons strike again!
loading...
OooSillyMe
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 9:36 am
And this will create jobs how?
loading...
required3
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 12:08 pm
The phrase “In God we trust” was coined (so to speak) in 1864 by Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase. Yes, the guy the bank is named for. Chase Bank, the one that charges you a usurious 30% interest on your credit card.
The banksters, God, and Mammon all wrapped up together. It’s perfect. One could say, priceless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust
loading...
Jim Faubel
Nov. 3rd, 2011 at 3:05 pm
Indeed, they operate similarly. Banks do not create wealth (except for themselves). They create DEBT and then SELL IT as money. Religions create GUILT and then sell “salvation” as the remedy for the guilt they created.
loading...
Zeus
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 5:47 pm
What God do we trust?
Zues
The Father of all Gods
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 31st, 2011 at 5:58 pm
Not to mention he was also the pilot of the starship
loading...
starr
Nov. 1st, 2011 at 4:54 pm
We need some leadership to trust right now. Maybe we should trust an imaginary being because we sure can’t trust Congress. Is this their way of telling us something…
loading...
G. Leslie Sweetnam
Nov. 2nd, 2011 at 10:35 am
You don’t have to describe God as a “mythological character from ancient Jewish mythology” to get this progressive to agree that right-wing pandering to their group of christians is unconstitutional, but you stand with intolerant extremism when you dismiss my faith. I’m fine with your atheism if it works for you but don’t assume I’m delusional for seeing divine purpose behind my human belief in turning my cheek or loving the stranger as my neighbor as myself.
loading...
-
Nov. 3rd, 2011 at 5:54 am
“… divine purpose behind my human belief ..”
I suggest that accept your nature. Why waste effort in blaming your attirbutes on a ‘god’?
I like that you’re a decent person. I don’t care if your avocation is knitting, churchgoing, mixing melted crayons, or praying in solitary.
(And theocracy (this page’s topic) *is* a problem.)
loading...
G. Leslie Sweetnam
Nov. 3rd, 2011 at 8:37 am
Actually, I’m not blaming, I’m thanking, and I hope you don’t mind that I pray with others as well as solitary. I’m not trying to convert you or anyone else. My point is that there are plenty of religiously-motivated liberals out here who it would be folly to alienate.
You can attack theocracy without also attacking theology, in fact I’ve found theology rather useful in drawing religious people away from the kind of seductive right-wing hypocritical pandering which is this page’s topic. It works better than ridicule.
loading...