It was a good night for America – in Ohio Governor Kasich’s SB 5 was repealed by the people of Ohio and in Mississippi, the totalitarian-style personhood amendment, a total war push on Women’s Reproductive Rights, went down in defeat. The Mississippi ballot initiative organized by Personhood USA, opposed by Planned Parenthood, the ACLU and others, formally known as Measure 26, would have, if passed defined zygotes, embryos—even a fertilized egg—defined as a person.
Women will be unable to have an abortion even in the case of rape or incest – even if her life is in danger, and IUDs, birth control pills and other forms of contraception would have become illegal.
CBS News reports that “The so-called “personhood” initiative was rejected by more than 55 percent of voters, falling far short of the threshold needed for it to be enacted.” According to the LA Times, “As of 10:40 pm ET, 57% had voted to reject the measure, compared to 43% who supported it. ”
This, despite the support of the state’s largest Christian denomination, the Mississippi Baptist Convention. The day’s results show that sometimes our citizens still get what they want, not what somebody tells them God wants.
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said of the night’s results:
“The message from Mississippi is clear. An amendment that allows politicians to further interfere in our personal, private medical decisions, including a woman’s right to choose safe, legal abortion, is unacceptable.”
Americans have good reason to feel satisfied this morning, but the threat is far from abated. As NARAL Pro-Choice America reports, “In fact, the anti-choice groups behind Initiative 26 are pushing similar ballot measures for 2012 in California, Florida, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, and Oregon.” And that’s not all. The Mississippi bill went down in defeat, but an almost identical bill now exists in the U.S. House of Representatives and if passed into law would affect the entire nation.
The Sanctity of Human Life Act (HR 212) proposed by Rep. Paul Broun’s (R-Ga.) “includes” reports Mother Jones, “language that directly parallels that of the Mississippi personhood amendment.” According to HR 212, “the life of each human being begins with fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent…at which time every human being shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood.”
From CBS News:
Keith Mason, co-founder of the group Personhood USA, which pushed the Mississippi ballot measure, has said a win would send shockwaves around the country. The Colorado-based group is trying to put similar initiatives on 2012 ballots in Florida, Montana, Ohio and Oregon. Voters in Colorado rejected similar proposals in 2008 and 2010.
It is unclear how much of a dampening effect the Mississippi defeat will prove to be. Outgoing Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour had problems with the wording of the bill, telling MSNBC on Tuesday that “It’s unnecessarily ambiguous.” According to Barbour, he wasn’t the only one concerned: “the ambiguity of the wording is striking a lot of pro-life people here as concerning.”
The Times reports:
He also criticized the strategy of sending it to voters rather than to the Legislature — a blunder he attributed to people in Colorado, who wrote the measure — and said it would not be a good test case with which to try to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.
Mississippi already has very restrictive laws on abortion but the women of Mississippi should be relieved, as should women in very other state if the defeat adversely affects similar legislation in other states. But neither women nor Americans in general should feel content with beating back this assault on women. As the bill taking shape in the U.S. House demonstrates, the fight is far from over. As in the NFL we need to take this victory, just as we would take a defeat, and put it behind us, moving on to the next battle with a game plan directed at each specific opponent.
You’ve come a long way, baby. But you’ve got a long way to go.
Edit (10:18 AM): Here is another take on the personhood amendment from Jezebel.com The Creepy Castration Rhetoric Of The Personhood Campaign
Photo: LA Times




Reynardine
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:19 am
Most interesting how puritanism and prurience go hand in hand: the agressive promotion of “family values” has treated us to the spectacle of “right-thinkers” shoving their noses up women’s vaginas.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:29 am
They obviously think they have more right to your vagina than you do
loading...
Sarah Jones
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:22 am
“at which time every human being shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood.” — what he meant to say was every human except women.
Because I’m quite sure that my freedom is not protected when the government can tell me I can’t use birth control.
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:28 am
Disgusting as all this is, there is always Rush Limbaugh to go over the top, telling women to shut up and put on burkas if they don’t want to be harassed…I swear to all the gods, I keep hoping I will wake up and this idiocy will have all been a dream
loading...
robyn ryan
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 2:43 pm
Every generation has to fight for its freedom. Think of it as our fight for our freedom. The kids will appreciate it, some day.
loading...
wow
Nov. 18th, 2011 at 12:33 am
Which kids? The ones who are worthy enough to be born? Isn’t it amazing how the only pro-choice people are folks who have been born? lol
loading...
jlt
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 9:49 am
Think there were victories across the board for the PEOPLE…
Now on to removing the likes of walker, walsh, mcconnel, cantor, kasich, et al!
Just pull up Broun and you can see have the Peter Principle works in the republican party..Elect the most outspoken brainless!
Call him out 1.866.311.3405
loading...
Anomaly100
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 11:18 am
It would only be a matter of time before they outlawed ALL birth control if this had passed and we’d have to abide by Puritan laws. My sister was one of the activists trying to pass Personhood. I asked if they thought all forms of birth control would be affected by this law. She said she wasn’t sure. I got worried. Really worried.
loading...
Paul
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:29 am
This is good news but still; the percentages mean out of 100 people, 43 would still think that would have been a good law??
loading...
Reynardine
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:43 am
Yeah, and if there’s anyone who should have practiced birth control, it’s those people’s parents.
loading...
Deeptoad
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:34 am
This is simply not the way to lessen the occurrence of elective abortion. When you prohibit something, you create a black market for it. A black market for an invasive medical procedure doesn’t strike me as a terribly good idea. Pregnancy resource centers seem to be rather helpful. Access to affordable and safe birth control also works pretty well. Draconian and over-reaching laws such as this one not only fly in the face of the Constitution, they will almost certainly force desperate women back to the kitchen table. Sorry to be explicit, but that’s what we’re dealing with.
loading...
Reynardine
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 9:13 am
A (then young) woman who worked with me in a couple of psychiatric hospitals in 1973 and 1974 told me how, two or three years previously, prior to Roe, she had come home to find a trail of blood leading from the driveway, through the open door, to the dining room, where she found her roommate face down on the floor, exsanguinating from a black-market abortion. She was able to get her to the Jackson Memorial emergency room in time to save her life. The laws of Florida at that time punished only the abortionists and their procurers. Under many of the laws now being proposed, the young woman who was exsanguinating would have been faced with a choice between instant death and a long prison termv and even her friend who helped her get to the hospital could have been implicated as an accessory after the fact. Mississippi’s proposed law would have been far more draconian than the pre-Roe legal state, when proposed abortions would in all events be passed on by individual hospital committees if a pregnancy posed a threat of death or permanent bodily harm to the woman, and where no criminal penalty attached to terminating a dead pregnancy.
loading...
EmmaLib
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:45 am
I was really delighted to wake this morning to the news in Ohio and in Mississippi, sanity still reigns. These past eleven years seem unreal, trying to fight for one’s life. livelihood and family in these economically stressed times, the GOP is trying to destroy unions, take our right to basic health care away, take our to freedom of choice, cut budgets so drastically they create substantial job loss…. while the GOP is not working on anything the AMERICAN people demand, they are re-affirming that “In God We Trust” remains on our money, and other frivolous stuff that should not even be a topic of conversation among the idle rich and stupid tea-baggees.
WE SERIOUSLY HAVE TO RID CONGRESS of these treasonous people, who wish to destroy America. Vote BLUE 2012 and into infinity!
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 8:49 am
Memo to ELEC, Baptist’s, NAR and all other groups. We will not go back to the 5th century with you. You do not determine peoples rights for your own power gains
loading...
Anne
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 9:59 am
I am so relieved that the majority of Mississippians rejected a measure that would have created the worst kind of police state. Anyone who truly hates “big government” would have found the consequences especially abhorrent since its passage would have resulted in numerous unwanted pregnancies with no way to prevent them, as well as a surge in illegal abortions. Congratulations to those Mississippians who organized against it. Just the same, we still have to be vigilant against the do-nothing Republicans in Congress who would like to impose such a law on a national scale.
loading...
Nobody Special
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 10:03 am
What I find really shocking is that 43% supported this garbage.
loading...
V ictoria
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 11:27 am
Although I am happy that this measure failed, I am not pleased by the percentages. Furthermore, we should realize that this approach is a way of moving the bar. Next time they may put “get rid of elective abortions” on Mississippi’s ballot – and that will look sane in comparison and just might pass.
loading...
Brett Cottrell
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 2:31 pm
There is no “I” in uterus, but there was almost a Mississippi.
Mississippi thinks eggs are people, and the Supreme Court thinks corporations are people. Does this mean corporate eggs will be people? All those tasty eggs you buy at the supermarket? People. That Egg McMuffin you ate for breakfast? People. Quiche? People, too. It’s a scary thought, unless you’re a cannibal…
http://brettcottrell.blogspot.com/2011/11/there-is-no-i-in-uterus-but-there-is.html
loading...
Johnee
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 3:18 pm
Yes! At last some sanity in the southern states. Get this through your fucking thick skulls you backwards, Dark Ages thinking, David Barton loving, embarrassments to our country – an egg or an embryo cannot be a person!!! There is no brain, body or nervous system, just a few microscopic cells!
Get with the program you dominionist Gomer Pyles. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to realize you idiots are on the wrong side of history, and that high school kids are going to be laughing at you 30 years from now.
Evolution is a FACT
Sexual preference has NOTHING to do with whether one is a good or bad person.
Religious fundamentalism is B.S.
Oh, and did
loading...
Johnee
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 3:21 pm
(Cont.)
Oh, and did I mention a fucking EGG IS NOT A PERSON!!!
Whew, I feel better now.
loading...
Makarios
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 6:06 pm
Good on Mississipians for defeating it–this time. But it ain’t over. Those people never, never, never give up. They are like a horror-movie monster that keeps getting killed and keeps coming back to life. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.
loading...