The Three Blind Mice are now leading the GOP race for the presidential nominee according to a new CBS poll as Newt gains ground sucking off of Cain’s sexual harassment losses. So now we have Herm, Mitt and Newt. Newt, Herm and Mitt. Mitt, Herm and Newt. It sounds like a new kind of new preppy grain.
But no, this is the best and brightest of the Republican Party.
Herm is losing a bit of ground with women and Tea Partiers after the sexual harassment charges, and so we see Newt rounding the corner on the outside gaining speed on Herm. Mitt is the 2008 reject. Newt is a reject from way back. And Herm is…well, he’s the Palin factor. Apparently, for every election from now on the Republicans are going to need a Palin.
Oh joy.
Aside from Cain’s obvious problems with women and his inability to do math or answer problems on foreign policy or understand the economy, Cain suffers from a profound lack of seriousness.
Between his “Princess Nancy” comment and his doubling down on the suggestion that being accused of sexual harassment is a BONUS not a negative, he shows himself to be eagerly following in Sarah Palin’s Naughty Monkeys. Rile up the crowd, play to the fake resentments, blame Democrats for what your own party is doing to you, and get by with a wink and a jingle.
No one in the press has pushed Cain to explain why he feels free to demonize the “Democrat machine” even though he admitted he had NO proof that anyone in the Democratic Party was behind the revelations about his sexual harassment history. This is after he blamed Perry’s campaign for this and had to apologize.
Why is it acceptable for a potential world leader to blatantly lie about another person or party? Probably because his base (the Tea Party) suckles on the teat of their resentment like a starving baby. It’s been so long since they have been steeped in self-pity and rage! Why, I think it’s been since Sarah Palin blood libeled herself. But now, now they have Herman Cain and his mean accusers to hate on.
Yesterday Rush Limbaugh fell down on the sword of his own stupidity and revealed just how old he really is when he made some “joke” about the accusers synchronizing their periods. Meh. Not even bad enough to tick me off, Rush. You’re losing it (and proving that he doesn’t know diddly about a live woman’s cycle). However, I would like to point out that if they really were able to do that, I would suggest that Herman Cain and his enablers might wish Rush had never suggested it.
Perhaps they can make that happen at their press conference.
Back to the grain.
Mitt is hated by the Tea Party base and not exactly beloved but certainly backed by the party elite. It’s also “his turn” as they do it in the Republican Party (authoritarianism trumps merit). It doesn’t matter that he stands for nothing, knows only slightly more than Herm, and changes his positions more than Perry forgets his own. Mitt is losing ground among men, and in the Republican Party, that is soooo not good. As the men go, so goeth the party.
Cain (also called “Herm” by the trademark known as Sarah Palin) is loved by the Tea Party base, or was, after the failures of the other flavors of the week (Rick, Michele, Sarah). But we didn’t expect this one-night stand to last and it probably won’t. The majority of voters in the poll said his sexual harassment charges won’t impact their decision about him, and yet the support for him among women and Tea Party members and conservatives fell in the last month perhaps due to the 30 percent or so who said it would matter. Shhh, don’t tell them. You get into bed with – oh, never mind.
And then bringing up the rear, so to speak, is Newt. Mitt and Newt are now tied for second place (praise the gods that Barack was not named Skip). Newt is known as the “intellectual” of the Republican Party. What a prize. Remember, all things are not equal- this compliment is bestowed upon him as a matter of relativity. Newt, who cheated on his wife while leading the charge to bring down Clinton for the same and caused the destruction of the Republican Party back in the 90’s doesn’t seem ideal to lead the 2012 charge, but when have you ever known the pompous and privileged to doubt themselves?
With both Romney and Cain losing support in the last month and Newt gaining, we may be looking at a Newt v Mitt scenario (I’m sure nothing would please the party elites more than a bite of this fail sandwich; e.g., Republican strategist Steve Schmidt was all atwitter re Newt on MSNBC). I warned you (facetiously, or so I thought) on March 30 that Newt was a shoe-in for the nomination after he praised Governor Walker:
Newt Gingrich led the “Republican revolution” against President Clinton as Speaker of the House from 1995 to 1999 and resigned his seat in disgrace after bringing the Republican Party’s short majority to a close by trying to oust President Clinton from office over what turned out to be exceptionally hypocritical claims to family values, given that Newt left his first wife while she was in the hospital recovering from cancer in 1980 and then after marrying his mistress, cheated on her with a House of Representatives staffer 23 years younger than himself while he was screaming about Clinton’s blue dress. Newt has recently claimed that love for his country drove him to have these affairs.
In case you’ve been in a cave and forgotten just how petty Republicans can be, as he left, Newt whined, “I’m willing to lead but I’m not willing to preside over people who are cannibals. My only fear would be that if I tried to stay, it would just overshadow whoever my successor is.”
In our last flashback to Newt’s leadership skills — after all, praise should be vetted via the source — Newt shut down government after he felt slighted by President Clinton who refused to discuss the budget with Gingrich on the plane ride home following a funeral. In spite of having ruined the GOP with his pettiness and hypocrisy, Gingrich is still touting his shut down of government as “doing what Americans elected them to do” and says it was definitely not a mistake. In 1997, he also made history as the first Speaker to be disciplined for ethics violations. All of this should warn you that he is a shoe-in for the Republican candidacy.
And so it goes. Mitt, Herm and Newt. Coming soon to a GOP field near you while intelligent, coherent, and experienced candidates like Jon Huntsman get ignored. I can see Barack Obama’s second term from my kitchen window.
Follow Sarah on Twitter.

EmmaLib
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 5:50 pm
Sounds like the three stooges, Moe, Larry, and Curly, or Mitt, Newt and Hermie!
loading...
mags
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 5:56 pm
I wish I was as optimistic as you…the Koch brothers are going to pull out all stops to gain the White House. As I understand it, they have called on all right wing groups and people and are looking to develope a data base of voters. With their money, they can do anything from paying people to vote to fixing the machines. Scarey stuff to my mind and I’m not even an American!!
loading...
F Joy
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 6:04 pm
Amen
loading...
tifosa
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 8:13 am
…not to mention Fox, unrestrained by truth, appealing to the nuttiest/angriest elements of the electorate, the PAC that is not bound by political action committee rules.
loading...
GD2011
Nov. 13th, 2011 at 6:46 am
Only republican voters watch Faux News anyway.
loading...
F Joy
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 6:08 pm
Thanks Sarah for my hopeful and humorous moment of the day. It’s so embarrassing for our country for these people to be actual candidates for the most powerful position in the world and to be the Commander in Chief of thousands of our troops. And on a more serious note, the fact that there’s a remote chance that one of these candidates could be our President is so frightening I can barely sleep at night! America, please…. we can’t let this happen. Elect Obama 2012!
We need to work on our educational system asap because to even consider one of these candidates or more Tea Party members to our Congress, Senate or GOP nominees to our Supreme Court will be devastating to America and just plain dumb!!! Americans used to be known for being smart. The GOP’s brainwashing with the help of the MSM has been extremely damaging to our country. We have to stand up for the sake of this country.
loading...
kimbutgar
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
One thing that we have going on is the OWS movement. It is going to grow and no matter how much money the Koch’s think they can put in the system the people will fight back. That said we should canvas everyone we know to register to vote or pay (if you can afford it to get them an ID) and educate them to what would be in store for us if Mitt, Newt or Herm became president and how we would all suffer if we stayed home and pouted. These three stooges have provided Obama and the Dem’s a lot a video to use against them. And no Koch money can change that.
loading...
k. mac gardner
Nov. 14th, 2011 at 4:39 am
I think you just made a statement that I never thought about regarding the forced purchase of a state ID in order to vote. IT IS IN FACT A POLL TAX, unless the states are providing them for free and we know that they are not. Poll taxes were outlawed under the Voting rights act of 1964. Not only should the states be giving these ID’s away for free, but they shoujld be going door to door like the census workers do, because it costs money to leave your home, pay for transportation costs, pay for caregivers’ time in the case of many of the elderly, etc., which puts an undue burden on the elderly and the poor, which are both likely democratic voting blocks. If the republicans had their way, we would go back to the days of the “founding fathers” which they are constantly longing for. In the early days of our country, in order to vote you had to own a substantial amount of property, usually including slaves, to be allowed to vote. This is exactly what the Kochs are trying to achieve-the concept that the elite should be allowed to buy the elections and run the country, because they are the “job creators” Ib fact, the Kochs “home run in business began when they inherited oil refineries and began their struggle on third base. The same is true for both of our US senators. One inherited a LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and managed to bankrupt it, but ended up a multi millionaire. The other inherited the proceeds of the sale of his family’s optical lens company. None of these people have any idea of how Americans really live, because they have no contact with the “great unwashed”, unless somebody was late for their golf game at the country club, and missed their morning shower.
loading...
SinghX
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 6:36 pm
Thanks Sarah…I suppose this year’s GOP “cotillion” is all about style, not substance, or the making of a charismatic with instinct/no brains or, the creation of a synthetic personality so republican voters can just “absorb” like a sponge…
The GOP formula is to over-used, shriveled and kaput from the waist down, like Lilli Von Schumph…oye, it’s so tired and worn out…
loading...
k. mac gardner
Nov. 14th, 2011 at 4:47 am
Hey cowboy, Is dat a 10 gallon hat or are you just enjoying de show?
loading...
Hugh Mann
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 9:04 pm
Love the photo of ‘Bling Bling’, ‘Flip Flop’ and ‘wheah da white wimmin at?’. Did Perry forget the photo shoot?
loading...
Dragonpuff
Nov. 11th, 2011 at 10:55 pm
A serial cheater, a serial liar and a serial harrasser. . . . .
loading...
Anne
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 12:56 am
I am cautiously optimistic. The reason is that I underestimate neither the capacity of the Koch brothers to raise infinite amounts of money nor the penchant of the GOP to rig elections in their favor. That’s why it’s critically important for those of us who oppose what these Three Stooges of the Right have in store for this country to get out the vote. Willard Romney’s relative “sanity” doesn’t make him any less dangerous, because he reoresents his party’s effort to disguise its nihilistic polices under a facade of “reasonableness.” Newt Gingrich is morally bankrupt and he has no new ideas to help the country. But he is willing to go for the jugular of his opponent and engage in the worst kind of character assassination just to win an election. These things, plus his role in shutting down government in 1995, should tell anyone that his deficits would be magnified if he ever became president. As for Herman Cain, I see him as a black, male version of Sarah Palin. Aside from also being morally bankrupt as shown by his record of sexual harassment, he is abysmally ignorant about national and global issues. He also has a very short fuse, which is not something we need in a president. But all three of them support an agenda that works against the well-being of this country, and none of them would hesitate to enact that agenda.
loading...
tifosa
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 8:19 am
If leadership of our country wasn’t at stake, it would be a laughable dog-and-pony show. Honestly, I have NOT counted Jon Huntsman out yet. Big R money has held back~ for him?
loading...
KatzKids
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 8:56 am
Excellent Sarah – thanks! All three of the stooges are also corrupt crooks of with countless scams to their “credit,” no exceptions. ARE there ANY non-corrupt Republicans?
Just one tiny correction – Sarah called him “Herb,” not Herm. Herbie baby, I hope you get the gold prize. It’ll be a pleasure to see you run as nominee against our wonderful President!!! Popcorn for all.
loading...
Sarah Jones
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 11:41 am
In the spirit of largesse, I gave her the one related to his actual name as it was very hard to tell over the entire length of the interview – sounded as if she used both Herb and Herm, but considering her issues with speech, I’m not going to defend Herm:-)
loading...
ronny Cardona
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 9:58 am
Have these people even considered RON PAUL. in 3rd place, where did newt Gingrich come from? lol he has 7% chance of winning the primaries. I do not understand the news sometimes. yes these are like the 3 blind mice, But not Ron Paul, and that could also be why hes not in this line up. This journalism is nuts. :)
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 10:39 am
Ah yes Ron Paul and the fantasy land of unregulated industry of environment destroyers. You think paul stands for the Consitution and to a degree he does. But you would not like life under Paul very much.
loading...
robert chapman
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 3:54 pm
NO. RON PAUL IS AN UNMITIGATED DISASTER. You like him, good for you. But that does not mean he can handle the job or that libertarianism is a good idea.
Back in the old days, libertarianism was never even considered, not because they were unimaginative, but because in previous ages they realized that just as the road to hell is paved with good intentions, the road to dictatorship is paved with libertarianism.
Libertarianism is merely a dressed up version renunciation of responsibility. Libertarianism will lead immediately to the rule of the strongest and most lawless and leave us defenseless before it.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 5:14 pm
I agree. These people have no idea what life under Ron Paul would be like
loading...
Davos Brodie
Nov. 13th, 2011 at 6:47 am
If you stop shelving people under ideological categories and start actually looking at their policies, you might just get somewhere. Divide and conquer, Caesar said, and that’s just what the Koch brothers and the banking cartels are doing to America. That’s why politics in the US of A is so dysfunctional right now. It’s all left and right, right and left. It’s designed to distract you from the real issues with non-issues (or at least issues that can wait) like gay marriage and the abortion debate, and mystify why things are going to shit when the reason is really quite simple.
The USA needs BADLY to get corporate money out of politics, it needs BADLY to dissolve the Federal Reserve Bank (which is neither Federal, nor a reserve, nor even a bank, is literally above the law, congress and the president, and is PRIVATELY OWNED) and get rid of this whole bipartisan system where the same rich pricks pay the election costs of both parties, thereby derailing your whole democracy. That’s why these candidates are a joke. Not because America lacks leaders, but rather, because the REAL leaders, the leaders in private industry, with all their wealth and influence, don’t want leaders in politics who might actually have enough competence and spine to start undermining their grip on policy in the US and, by extension, the world. So they throw their money at the political process and the party hierarchy – Democrat and Republican, both are bought and owned.
The whole point of democracy, in its inception, was to separate economic power from political power – in the old days, the days of kings, the two notions meant exactly the same thing: he who held the throne, held everything. Unfortunately, the system doesn’t perform this duty effectively anymore. It’s been sitting around for centuries – too long – being eroded away, slowly, insidiously, by economic interests – not by some freakishly orchestrated freemason conspiracy, but rather by the cumulative efforts of hundreds, thousands, of individuals over the years who, in the interest of just that little bit more profit, that small personal benefit, have created loopholes in the system, never knowing how truly damaging their actions are. Small actions, but they build up, until corruption becomes the status quo. Now democracy is just a convenient tool for deflecting or placating peoples’ frustrations by fooling them into believing they actually have a say. In other words, people wonder why democracy doesn’t seem to work, and the answer is simple – it’s because the system isn’t a democracy anymore. It hasn’t been in a long time.
It’s hard/nigh-impossible to trust anyone in politics these days, or ever really, but, at least superficially, if you look at his policies, Ron Paul is the only one with his eyes on the real enemy. He wants to dissolve the fed, return to commodity-based currency and get the corporations out of the political process. That’s not deregulation – quite the opposite. And for that matter, libertarianism is the theoretical basis of democracy. It holds individual rights above all others and whoever said that that is the doorway to dictatorship is either a raging fool, has never picked up a history textbook in their lives, or is, more likely, a public relations troll.
The sad thing about Ron Paul is that, knowing what happened to infinitely more popular and well-connected Kennedy when he went against the Federal Reserve in 1963(they killed him, and, that very day, his deputy repealed the executive order Kennedy passed that took control of monetary policy from the banks and gave it back to the American people), it seems likely that, granted that the elections were not flat out rigged and Ron Paul actually won, he’d be dead within the week. No doubt, the “Iranian terrorists” would get the blame for that as well.
To those who think they’ll get a better deal from the democrats, be careful. As an observer outside the US, it seems to me that Obama is, unfortunately, a show pony. He got in on the mantra of “change”, and then surrounded himself with the same corrupt “economists” who caused the financial crisis with their reckless greed and pandering to the financial industry and then used the American tax-payer as a get out of jail free card. A year later Wall Street is making record profits and, would you believe it, getting tax rebates. Yes, “socialism” seems to be a naughty word on your side of the pacific when it’s designed to benefit the poor, but if it’s socialism for the rich, then well, that’s just darn patriotic. Oh, and of course, we need lower corporate tax rates too, if the republicans are to be believed – an effective rate of 0% is too high!
The irony here too is that, not only is the US no longer a democracy, it’s not even capitalist anymore. It’s a pretty basic rule of capitalism that you dissolve bankrupt entities. You don’t bail them out and reward their inefficiency, or, in this case, corruption, negligence and incompetence, with other peoples’ hard-earned tax dollars. That’s just bad economics, Ben Bernanke.
In sum, until you all forget this whole left-right thing, realize that ultimately both parties serve the same masters, and get corporate and banking interests out of your politics, you all are seriously fucked, and, for that matter, so am I, given that China seems unlikely to take up the mantle of upholder of democracy any time soon. Maybe after they’re done torturing the Dalai Lama. Unfortunately, looking at history though, it’s nigh impossible to root out such entrenched corruption in a political system once it has set in, so I can’t say I’m optimistic. To do so you need some sort of revolution – a very dangerous notion in the most militarized nation on Earth. Reform just won’t cut it.
So… seems you’re looking at another term of democracy in name and not truth, and we’re looking at another term of putting up with the USA, pathological hypocrite and bloated tyrant of the world.
loading...
joe
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 11:37 am
.
Maybe you need that window cleaner on that commercial where the birds think the windows are open, and fly into them…. You said you can see obamas 2nd term through your kitchen window.. You should look harder, because the 3 stooges are with him, and they don’t play fair! =)
http://www.allvinyl.info
http://www.allvinylsidingandwindows.net
loading...
dana jones
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 1:37 pm
The next election will be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin’s bus tour was really canceled? Know what leaked out? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she’s not running? She’s dodging the media now because of this
http://PalinsDirtyLittleSecret.blogspot.com/
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 1:44 pm
Please, tell me you don’t buy into that. Pretty please?
That is so far beyond absurd it hurts
loading...
robert chapman
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 3:43 pm
Mitt is hated by the Tea Party base and not exactly beloved but certainly backed by the party elite. It’s also “his turn” as they do it in the Republican Party (authoritarianism trumps merit).
To the author, this a is a self contradiction. After lambasting the other candidates and showing how inadequate they are for the nomination, it is logically inconsistent to accuse the GOP of authoritarianism for backing the alternative, which is Mitt.
loading...
Sarah Jones
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 5:24 pm
Mitt was never the alternative for the GOP. He is the chosen one and he has been the entire time. This is an issue between the TP and the establishment GOP. I am not accusing the GOP of authoritarianism for that would imply that it was a hypothesis needing to be proven and instead, it is an established fact inherent in their party’s ideology and manifested for all to see every presidential election cycle. The base doesn’t like Mitt but the party establishment has chosen him because, just like with John McCain, it is his “turn”. That’s not exactly a meritocracy at work.
I am a reasonable person, therefor I lambaste the party for their current crop of candidates (save Jon Huntsman and Mitt Romney). Americans deserve better.
loading...
robert chapman
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 3:56 pm
Thomas Frieden has just written a book with a title taken from one President Obama’s speeches, that used to us.
Mr. Frieden criticizes that President for a failure to spell out his grand strategy. I have to admit that there is more than a bit of truth in that criticism and to urge the President to lay out his plan.
loading...
Bobg
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 5:04 pm
I am a registered Republican. I voted for Obama in 2008 after McCain picked Caribou Barbie as his running mate. I am so ashamed at the candidates my party has elected to trot out before the American voters that I usually don’t admit that I am a Republican. I told my daughter last week that I should run for President…I’m crazier than they are.
loading...
Anne
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 5:49 pm
The problem is not that you are a Republican,but that your party has been hijacked by lunatics. I have always known that there are sane,reasonable Republicans that I can respectfully disagree with and at times find issues on which to agree. As your example proves, there have always been Republicans who saw “Caribou Barbie” exactly for what she is from Day One. In response, you either voted for President Obama or not at all. In fact, you are in good company because Colin Powell, Julie Nixon Eisenhower, and Susan Eisenhower (the former president’s granddaughter) all voted for Barack Obama.
loading...
laingirl
Nov. 12th, 2011 at 7:27 pm
Chris Buckley also voted for President Obama.
loading...