In most civilized countries, a leader’s religion is not germane to their fitness or ability to serve in government and it is a testament to true separation of church and state. In America’s Constitution, it clearly states in Article Six that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office,” and yet Republicans have questioned and challenged President Obama’s religious affiliation in their perpetual attempt to demean him as not American since 2008. Last week, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) claimed that President Obama’s campaign team would “throw the Mormon church at him (Romney) like you can’t believe” and it informs that Hatch expects Democrats to stoop to the same despicable and unconstitutional level as Republicans. Hatch, like Willard Romney, is a Mormon.
It is unclear exactly why Hatch would state categorically that President Obama would bring Romney’s Mormonism into the campaign, but either he was attempting to conceal the church’s influence with politicians, head the Mormon issue off early, or inhibit the possibility of exposing valid concerns many Americans have that a Romney presidency would do the Mormon church’s bidding. Whatever Hatch’s reasoning is, it is painfully obvious that he is worried about what an examination of Mormonism can and will do to Romney’s campaign. In recent history, there are precedents of politicians obeying religious leaders in the execution of their duties, and besides being unconstitutional, it is troubling that an alleged secular government’s politicians would use their political offices to further a particular agenda that has as its basis religious dogmata.
The recent attacks on contraception coverage in health plans was instigated by the United States Council of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and pursued by Catholic legislators with assistance from conservative Christians and Republican presidential hopefuls, and there are signs that the USCCB is not yet finished using Republicans to influence American government with Vatican dogma. There is, however, a fairly recent incident involving Hatch and twelve other Mormon legislators using their offices to exert pressure on government at the request of the Mormon organization.
In Switzerland, new employment rules banned religions from sending missionaries (paid or unpaid) to their country to proselytize. The new law did not set well with LDS senior leaders and thirteen Mormon members of Congress sent a letter to the Swiss ambassador objecting to the ban and demanding an exception for Mormon missionaries. The letter, sent in late 2010 read, “We respectfully request that senior leaders of the LDS Church be given the opportunity to discuss this matter at the highest levels of the Swiss government,” and it precipitated a response from the Swiss ambassador that was polite, but rejected the notion that a foreign government acting on behalf of a religious organization had the right to interfere with a sovereign nation’s laws. Orrin Hatch commented that, “To me that was very disappointing, and that battle may not be over yet,” and it portends a serious problem if the thirteen Mormon lawmakers are representative of how a Mormon president would handle directives from the LDS faith’s top officials.
The Swiss incident does nothing to allay fears of some Americans that if church leaders can influence members of Congress who are Mormon with a simple request; what influence would the First Presidency have on a Mormon in the White House? In 2008 Willard said “I don’t try and distance myself in any way shape or form from my faith, but my church doesn’t dictate to me or anyone what political policies we should pursue.” It is typical for Romney to lie, but his remark is fallacious in light of the letter from the Mormon legislators to the Swiss government. Romney also said that during his four years as governor of Massachusetts, no-one from his church ever called or contacted him to take a position on any issue. It is hardly believable that the church hierarchy would contact thirteen lawmakers to object to a foreign government’s laws and yet never called on Romney to take a position favorable to the church or its moral beliefs, but that is Romney’s assertion and if he never lied, one could take him at his word.
According to Mormon scriptures, it is unjust “to mingle religious influence with civil government,” and yet the church had no compunction to use legislators to attempt to influence the Swiss civil government. LDS scriptures also say that governments should “secure to each individual the free exercise of conscience,” but Romney is on record opposing a woman’s right to choose and same-sex couples’ right to marry the person they love. But that is the problem with many religions; their scriptures appear to say the right things, but their leadership pursues contrary policies that restrict freedom and impose church doctrine on the entire population. Mormons also teach that god created governments to benefit mankind, but Republican Mormons in Congress have been relentless in using the government to assault the poor, children and senior citizens with cuts to safety nets while they work tirelessly to benefit the wealthy; and themselves.
It is possible that Orrin Hatch is frightened of a thorough investigation into the Mormon religion and how it influences Romney’s decision-making, and at what level his allegiance to the church supersedes secular government. It is difficult enough to comprehend, on any given day, what Romney’s position is on myriad issues, but with a little insight into his faith-driven beliefs, it may be possible to understand his hypocrisy, love of wealth, and penchant for lying. President Obama’s campaign team does not need to attack Romney for his religious beliefs because he has given Democrats a wealth of issues to challenge him on with everything from more tax cuts for the wealthy to pre-emptive war with Iran to concealing his finances to avoid paying taxes. The President will not “throw the Mormon church at Romney,” but there are advocates for truth who will.
Any American who has met a Mormon family will agree that they are kind and friendly people who give no outward appearance of untoward behavior; kind of like Willard Romney. However, outward appearances can be deceptive and based on Romney’s tendency to lie and diligence in promoting the wealthy over the rest of the country, it is prudent to discover how a lifetime of indoctrination in the Mormon cult shaped his wealthy elitism. Based on financial and business practices of the extremely wealthy LDS church, someone needs to throw it at Willard Romney to see what sticks. That Hatch is attempting to squelch the Mormon issue so early with no indication that the Obama campaign team intended to bring religion into the race leads one to believe that Americans may have one more reason to dislike Romney and his policies when they learn where they originated.





Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 10:18 am
this really encourages me to think deeper about the religious obstructions and invasions into our government. Up until now I really thought it was only the Dominionists to a major degree and the Catholics to a very minor degree that were trying to push their way into government and policy. I now wonder if it isn’t a desperate attempt by any and all religions to be in power in the government. I had not thought very deeply about met Romney and the Mormon influence. But the Mormon church has no problem insinuating itself into people’s lives. the fact that 13 Congressman wrote to Switzerland in support of a religion seems to me to be very unnecessary. The Mormon church should’ve handled that on its own given how is one of the largest landowners on Earth and extremely rich.
loading...
jlt
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 4:46 pm
It is not that he is mormon but the level he went to in the church…Bishop in a church that is both sexist, homophobic, and marginally racist! The bishops are insular as is Mr. Romney..disaffected and disconnected….Then there is that for profit incentive that is preached!
Mormon beliefs at that level are nothing short of patriarchal and elitist and piously dictatorial! That is why he can neither touch or be touched by other than his family! And why he does not do well except when he is in charge!
loading...
jjm
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 10:27 am
Mormons are taught they MUST try to takeover the top spot in any organization, non-religious, of which they are a part. This seems to me to be Romney’s ONLY motivation for wanting to be president.
That and the planet he would get to rule over after he dies.
Really, what else could be motivating him? He has zero ideas, zero vision, no passion for anything but money. Really someone should start asking him WHY?
loading...
Reynardine
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 11:08 am
I think what influences him most of all is being a spoiled little snot. His father, George, was fairly impressive, and in general, I had no misgivings about the Udalls. Full of mItt is altogether different. He was made by nature to be the puppet of a cadre; between pleasing his various puppeteers and designing himself for different constituencies, he resembles nothing so much as a chameleon crossing a mosaic tiled floor. How did he become so? I don’t know, but if you look into his eyes, what you see behind them is…absolutely nothing.
loading...
Anne
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 12:24 pm
I agree with you about the vacuous, empty look in Willard’s eyes. It’s the same look that Scott Walker and Paul Ryan have. All of them are a bunch of heartless, soulless creeps. I was watching “Morning Joe” this morning while preparing for work, and they showed a poll that indicated President Obama leading Willard Romney significantly in just about every category, with the exception of jobs and energy policy where it showed Willard leading by double digits. I wish I could ask them, on what basis do they think Willard would do a better job in these areas or any others? This is someone whose state ranked 47th out of 50th in job creation while he was its governor, and he has a richly deserved reputation for firing thousands of people while he was raiding the companies they worked for. As for the energy policy, what expertise do they think he has that hasn’t been brought to light at this point? I suspect that dissatisfaction with gas prices under the President who doesn’t control them is at the heart of this response. But there is absolutely nothing in Willard’s own record that should inspire confidence.
loading...
Reynardine
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 6:10 pm
It looks as if the glassy-eyed nothing is the party’s pick, all right. Sanitarium just quit.
loading...
YellerKitty
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 10:32 pm
Well said!
loading...
A Walkaway
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 1:20 pm
I lived with my parents in north central Utah in the late 50s and early 60s, and maybe their “scriptures” and religion are supposed to encourage treating others right, but that wasn’t the reality.
They left me for dead on the side of the road one time – as a little boy (told me “You’re nothing but a gentile brat anyway” as they left me lying there was a badly injured foot – I remember it to this day and my parents have told the story to my wife on several occasions). They persecuted and discriminated against my parents on a continuous basis as long as we lived there (my dad worked as a contract engineer and was sent to a facility near the town) and it was a big relief for my folks to leave. They even brought my little brother and myself into the home of one of their bishops, and told us how terrible people our parents were because they weren’t Mormon. (My brother and I were allowed into their houses where they’d try to proselytize, but my parents weren’t welcome.) I don’t remember the latter situations, but my mom was NOT friendly to that church for many years afterward because of what all they did.
They were very much like today’s dominionists, but with better masks.
While I think that Romney being a Mormon will help us (because the dominionists HATE Mormons – just as they hate anyone not like them), at the same time I would worry about their church dictating to him if he became president. Just as I also worried that the RC church would dictate to Santorum if he won.
loading...
Greg Henson
Apr. 11th, 2012 at 9:35 am
I lived in Salt Lake City for much of my life, as a non-Mormon, and I and many others I know would have to disagree with the first sentence of the final paragraph. While some Mormons and their families are friendly and kind, many others are not. They were frequently cold, rude and condescending, and I’m glad to live elsewhere now.
loading...
A Walkaway
Apr. 11th, 2012 at 12:39 pm
At least in this area, Romney being a Mormon means he’s going to loose votes – a lot of them. That is, unless the Mormons and the Dominionists somehow come to a truce/understanding (which could happen but I think unlikely). Mormons were officially not welcome even in the mainstream churches we attended in this area, and the rhetoric against them approached the levels of the rhetoric against the RC church in the more fundamentalist/dominionist churches.
I don’t want the bastard anywhere near the White House. However, I get the feeling that Santorum or Gingrich would be harder to defeat (and just as bad) and so in that sense it helps us.
I think his Mormonism is going to end up being a liability in the Republican party.
loading...
Daddycool
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 1:31 pm
Anybody who has read The Godmakers understands that Mormonism is a cult. That shouldn’t matter because all of the presidents have been part of some kind of cult or club.
Hatch is nervous because he knows that HIS cult will now be examined thoroughly by the media. He probably wishes that Romney wasn’t the nominee. (Just like most other republicans do.)
He might as well just blame it on Obama. Go ahead. The repubs blame EVERYTHING on Obama already. It’s not gonna make any difference.
loading...
rod
Apr. 10th, 2012 at 4:39 pm
I wish people would have the good sense to read up on and investigate the Mormons and let the truth be brought to the light. Mitt Romneys loyalty is to the Mormon Church, NOT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!
loading...
j
Apr. 11th, 2012 at 7:54 pm
Romney escaped to Paris during the Vietnam war to avoid service, he spent his time trying to convert the French to Mormonism, I don’t think he had a great deal of luck with that. Romneys 5 strapping sons have not spent a day in the service of this country, they prefer to spend time worshiping the almighty dollar.
loading...
Darlene Fields
Apr. 11th, 2012 at 10:56 pm
Well, I wonder if I should admit that I am a Mormon to this group. Not only that, but I chose to be a Mormon. #1. Mormons are different across the country, just like Christians. #2. I believe as all Mormons do that Jesus Christ is Saviour, Lord and King of Kings. #3. Members are not the same as the hierarchy of any church. #4. Mitt Romney lies and changes his mind so often I wouldm’t vote for him if whatever his religious persuasion. And I think he has brought shame to my church. #5. The church shouldn’t have asked and the members of congress shouldn’t have said yes. My church doesn’t force me to do anything. #6. There are good and bad people in all churches, there are extremes in all faiths, I have seen the good faithful Mormon people and I have seen the uppity ones that need a long week just reading the scriptures again. 7. Bishops in our church are no more than a local pastor or priest in one of yours. They are unpaid, usually serve 2 or more years, while still working full time to support their own family. With our Women’s Organization, the Relief Society, they feed families, help with rent and utilities, make hospital and nursing home calls, lead repair weekends for the elderly whose homes need repair, make visits to widows, hold funeral services, etc. etc. They are in charge of the Bishops Storehouse that our tithes and fast offerings pay for and then in turn the food that comes from our church farms and orchards, that are canned in our canneries, are used to feed anyone that needs feeding member or non-member. In Salt Lake, when word of earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, tsunamis (2004), hurricanes, etc anyhere in the USA or the rest of the world supplies are gathered and sent to whomever needs them at the moment. Members in the area are dispatched to clean and repair or whatever is needed to help suffering people.
I guess what I’m saying is that there are times when organizations get to big, things happen that shouldn’t. We aren’t unique in having leaders say one thing and do another. I am comfortable that you are happy in your faith and I am happy in mine. I am happy that you belong to a religious organization that does not cross that church/state line. But I think if we look hard we will find many members of the current national and state legislatures that have and the important thing is for all of us who feel that this behaviour is wrong is to 1. get them out of office or make sure they are not elected and 2. make sure our church leaders know we will not allow this crossing the line again. Not for any reason.
loading...
Rmuse
Apr. 11th, 2012 at 11:54 pm
Darlene – The problem with Willard is lying about his faith…and nearly everything else. He certainly does not reflect any religion except greed, and he dishonors what are arguably decent people and that is shameful. All religions have issues, but as long as they do not affect anyone else, there is no problem. However, as you noted, like all faiths, the LDS hierarchy has become too big, financially corrupt, and controlling. For the record, I am steeped in reality, not faith.
loading...
Darlene Fields
Apr. 12th, 2012 at 6:17 am
Well, as I said in #4 I wouldn’t vote for him regardless of his religion. I am a firm believer in support the constitution, not the Bible when taking public office. And I am an Obama supporter all the way. I am a Democrat because I am Mormon, not in spite of it. You are right, individual rights end at the other person nose. My dad used to tell me that when he was telling me what a great country this is. Thanks for all your columns. In fact there really isn’t anything on PoliticusUSA that I don’t enjoy and learn from.
loading...
KatzKids
Apr. 12th, 2012 at 8:06 am
Willard has been groomed by the SLC hierarchy since he was very young to achieve the highest political offices. He’s a 7th generation descendent of one of the founding apostles. His father, despite his popularity, didn’t make it in his bid for the Presidency so it’s now up to his heir. I agree with Rod, Willard’s only allegiance is to the Mormon Church and his blind ambition & desperation to achieve their mutual goal is apparent in his willingness to claim any position, tell any lie to achieve it. Hatch is desperate to keep this agenda secret and I think, made a strategic error in bringing it up. If there weren’t anything to see, he certainly wouldn’t be afraid that it will happen. Media needs to do some deep investigative reporting on the Mormon cult. I won’t hold my breath though. They are exactly like the Dominionists in their core agendas and have been operating under a stealth take over for decades – like the Dominionists – until recently.
Here’s a link to an excellent article about him & his connection to the White Horse prophecy that Mormons are called to take over the Civil government & rule the country for Zion – the 1%.
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/29/mitt_and_the_white_horse_prophecy/
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 12th, 2012 at 8:25 am
It shocks me that any blue blooded southern Baptist could vote for him.
loading...
KatzKids
Apr. 12th, 2012 at 10:20 am
I agree! I can’t see why anyone would vote for him – especially all the AmeriTaliban. He’d be their worst nightmare and they’re too ignorant to know it. Their “anybody but Obama” rants will lead to their downfall. RFLMAO!
Let me also add that IMO our President will be elected by a landslide!
loading...