It’s 9/11, so right on schedule here comes the Republican Party with a story about how Obama has made America less safe. Only this time, the American people aren’t listening.
The right wing propaganda machine started spinning with former Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen’s claim that Obama has attended less than half of his intelligence briefings. Dick Cheney then picked it up, and through a spokesperson told The Daily Caller, “If President Obama were participating in his intelligence briefings on a regular basis then perhaps he would understand why people are so offended at his efforts to take sole credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden.”
The megaphone for the right wing masses, Rush Limbaugh, put the talking points out there this way, “The New York Times today has a piece excoriating Bush about 9/11 because of that daily intelligence brief on August 6th that they want us to believe he ignored. If he had not ignored it we would have known bin Laden was coming. Nowhere do we read that Bill Clinton was offered bin Laden three times on a silver platter. Nowhere do we read — you have to find it in the Daily Caller, Chatsworth Osborne, Jr.’s website, Obama is not even attending half of his intelligence briefs. He’s playing golf. I don’t know when the guy works. George W. Bush attended the intelligence briefing every day. Obama has not even attended half of them. He sends surrogates. That to me is significant.”
A full scale promotional effort is underway as the right is working hard to get this one off the ground, but they are already meeting with failure.
Republicans appear to be trapped in the delusion that the country is still trapped in post-9/11 hysteria and they think they can scare America into believing that the nation is at risk because Barack Obama is president. It worked on John Kerry in 2004, so they think it will work on President Obama in 2012, but the White House’s response has already killed their ploy dead in it’s tracks.
When Press Secretary Jay Carney was asked about Obama’s attendance at intelligence briefings, he responded, “The president of the United States gets the presidential daily briefing every day. There is a document that he reads every day when he is not — well, he always reads it every day because he’s a voracious consumer of all of his briefing materials. And when he is physically here, most days he has a meeting in his office, the Oval one, with participants in his national security team.”
Carney then told Republicans to look at the scoreboard, “I believe if you compare our foreign policy record with the one that preceded this one, we’re comfortable with that comparison,” Carney said. “And this president is very much steeped in the details of national security issues and the information that as president he received.”
The biggest reason why this attempt by Republicans to paint President Obama as a risk to our national security has failed is that this president’s record contradicts everything the right is pushing.
Yesterday, it was announced that the #2 leader of al-Qaeda in Yemen was killed in a missile strike. Whether you agree or disagree with these tactics, there can be no denying that the Obama administration has either killed or captured most of al-Qaeda’s leadership.
The Bush administration talked a good game about a war on terror, but it is the Obama administration that is wiping these terrorists off the face of the earth. The difference between the two administrations is that the Bush administration intentionally launched an unending unwinnable war against a concept for political gain, while the Obama administration is targeting the people and organizations who plot and carry out acts of terrorism.
For Republicans, their war on terror was a political strategy that allowed President Bush to claim limitless war powers through the perpetual existence of a conceptual war that would be limitless and unending. Republicans have no interest in ending their war because it fits in with their interpretation of Executive Branch powers and they view it good politics for them.
The whole purpose of this attack on Obama is to try to reclaim the political terrain that has been lost to Obama’s actual and effective foreign policy. Mitt Romney’s foreign policy team is loaded with Cheney disciples who all believe in the former boss’s war on terror.
This line of attack is another attempt by the Romney campaign and their supporters to try to halt Obama’s momentum, and place the president on the defensive.
The problem for Republicans is while Bush and Cheney attended intelligence briefings, they gave up on getting Bin Laden, let al-Qaeda run wild, adopted polices of torture, and domestic spying, and most importantly led the nation into an unrelated and unjustified invasion of Iraq.
What matters isn’t the number of intelligence briefings attended, but how intelligent a president and his administration are. Intelligence is nothing more than raw data and information. Briefings can’t replace good decision making skills, and Obama’s record on terrorism shows a president who has made many excellent decisions.
Not only does this attack by the right have flop sweat all over it already, but it has the full potential to backfire and remind voters about all of the Republican failures on terrorism and national security.
This smear will play well with those on the right who believe Obama has failed at everything, but to the rest of us on Earth who understand the president’s record, today’s gambit is more spaghetti thrown against the wall by a desperate Republicans who see Obama gaining steam towards winning a second term.


Gindy53
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 3:52 pm
If Bush had done what Obama has, no DEM would ever get elected to president again. The GOP could have run on saving Americans from terrorists forever. Too bad for them, and great for the US, that they were too short sighted and stupid to do it that way. Greed will get you every single time.
Now all they try to do is project their own inability to deal with the threats (briefings ignored by Rice, Cheney, Bush anyone… pot meet the kettle) onto President Obama. Epic fail especially with the NYT article released today about the lack of attention the Bush admin paid to every briefing they got on terrorist cells in the USA back in 2001.
loading...
Kate Vasey
Sep. 12th, 2012 at 2:28 pm
Ain’t that the truth! Surely the ghastly toxic Romney will disappear gracefully now, leaving the Republican party to lick its wounds for a generation. They need to spit out the snake oil and swallow the strong medicine, every democracy needs a loyal opposition.
loading...
1voice1vote
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 3:53 pm
The more R/R and the Teapublicans stroke their rabid base, the more they lose both their moderate base and independents.
National security and defense intelligence as 2012 campaign issues for Republicans are lose/lose.
Bring it, Teapublicans!
loading...
Ex-Dominionist
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 3:54 pm
The Atwater/Rove strategy is ALWAYS about finding a “spin” to cast a Dem opponent’s greatest strength as their greatest weakness. (e.g. SwiftBoating Kerry — you all know that was complete lies, right?)
By now, more and more of us have caught on.
Begone, Cheney, Thou Demon of Deception and Avarice! The power of Christ compels you!
loading...
David R. Kruse
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 3:57 pm
George W Bush was involved more than you think. Bin Laden was his friend and oil business man.
loading...
Reynardine
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 4:05 pm
In fact, he helped the whole Bin Ladin extended family get out of the country on a special chartered flight before they could be questioned, while no other civilian flights were allowed in our airspace.
loading...
Timothy Griffy
Sep. 12th, 2012 at 12:52 am
That report turned out to be false. See http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp.
loading...
Moongal6
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 4:29 pm
Saleem Bin Laden (Osama”s brother) gave junior his first loan to start Arbusto Oil. Which of course, Junior bankrupted. Gee, then poor ol’ Saleem died at an airport in Texas in a ‘freak’ accident.
loading...
John Hay
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 5:41 pm
I very much appreciate the work this site is putting in to reveal facts concerning and an intelligent analysis of events. It is pleasing to be able to refer other supporters to your articles and videos.
Thank You.
John Hay
Australia
loading...
TigerLily
Sep. 11th, 2012 at 7:07 pm
They’re trying too hard. Which shows their desperation to make this president of ours look as stupid and uninformed as they are. He’s not. Unfortunately the LSM always compares both parties..we both do it. No. WE ARE NOT AT ALL LIKE THE RW. We are a civilized people. I don’t know what they are.
loading...
majii
Sep. 12th, 2012 at 1:19 am
I think today’s attack on PBO’s foreign policy record was to distract Americans from Eichenwald’s scathing NYT article that exposed the negligence and ineptitude of the GWB administration, and how it enabled the 9/11 planned terrorist attack to succeed. Knowing that the article would be published today, Cheney crawled out of his Wyoming bunker to try to mitigate some of the damage. The GOP has worked hard toward making GWB disappear, only to insert him back into the election in a big way. The more they flap their gums, the more it will remind people of GWB and all of his failures. Sometimes when people plot to take down someone else, they end up doing more damage to themselves in the process.
loading...
Kevin Shinn
Sep. 13th, 2012 at 10:28 am
Lost in the noise and chatter is the interesting detail–publicly reported at the time–that President Clinton was indeed offered possession of Osama bin Laden by the Taliban, following the attack which damaged USS Cole and killed 17 sailors in October 2000; just one concession requested however, no silver platter in my book: recognition of the legitimacy of their regime as the government of Afghanistan, which only Saudi Arabia and Pakistan of the world’s nations had extended.
That was indeed a steep price I’d not have paid, and I stand by Bill Clinton on refusing to pay it.
loading...
Laura Zlogar
Sep. 13th, 2012 at 11:19 am
Listening to Wisconsin Public Radio’s discussion this morning of the turmoil in Libya and Egypt, I heard these exact talking points raised by a caller. So, this narrative is out there, people are hearing it, and repeating it. It is not a complete failure.
loading...
Bruce
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Hate to tell you this guys, but it’s not a smear that’s flopping. It happens as reported and people are justifiably concerned. There’e no need to spin a quote about Barry being so sophisticated he just needs to quickly scan the Readers” Digest version of an intelligence report and he’s good to go – for a round of golf. The man’s arrogance is profound and his administration’s attempts to defend hims increasingly foolish. He’s goin’ DOWN!
loading...