Call it the 2012 Presidential campaign shot heard ’round the world. In a contest marred by gaffes and PR debacles of the diverse kind, Mitt Romney is staring down the barrel of hard video evidence that he just doesn’t give a damn about Americans occupying social positions outside the privileged one percent.
By now we have grown used to the candidate’s willful ignorance. Everyone not living in the United Kingdom enjoyed a good laugh at Romney’s clumsy insult directed at London, the host city of this year’s summer Olympics. Nothing was destroyed but a planning committee’s delicate feelings. Silly Mittens.
But Romney’s foreign policy ineptitude took a turn for the more serious last week when U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens was killed in a terrorist attack, and the GOP challenger immediately sought to leverage the tragedy for political gain. Without waiting for full details of the incident and before expressing his condolences to victims’ families, Romney made an inexcusable, disingenuous play to tar Obama as an American apologist. As anti-American protests rage in areas where not so long ago, we celebrated “Arab Spring” democratic revolutions, it is important to ask to what extent Romney’s careless words fed the growing fires of Middle Eastern hatred.
Romney doesn’t give a fig what kind of trouble he stirs up overseas. As America works to restore its image from the out-of-touch “Cowboy Diplomacy” of the George W. Bush era, yeoman’s work in which President Obama has been largely successful, Mittens runs around shooting his uneducated mouth off about the long-running Israel/Palestine conflict and other issues which may score him points with his political base, but do nothing to reflect the traits of a leader who understands 21st century dynamics and a hyperconnected, interdependent world ecosystem.
However, until this week it was reasonably safe to assume that Mitt Romney’s blunderous foreign policy soundbites were unfortunate blabber from an unelectable candidate who nevertheless genuinely loves his country. Most of us are not so partisan that we can’t disagree with a man without questioning his patriotism (behavioral patterns of the far right wing notwithstanding). Apologies to the remaining voters who tried to believe that no matter who wins the November election, a real effort would be made to create jobs and otherwise throw the drowning middle class a lifeline.
We have all made dialectical miscalculations in the private company of friends and family members. Comments that would sound gauche in mixed crowds seem palatable around the familiar. Presidential campaigns are particularly scripted, messaged and strategized so when given a chance to go “off the cuff, ” who can throw stones at an exhausted, 24/7 news cycle-beleaguered contender? In making the case here, consider most of Vice-President Joe Biden’s dunce-cap worthy messaging errors.
Mitt Romney’s latest rhetorical scandal cannot be categorized as the mistake of an exhausted, relaxed man in the company of likeminded souls. How do we know this for certain? Just ask him. According to a report earlier this week from Yahoo! News, “Mitt Romney stood by his comments captured on a hidden camera at a closed-door fundraiser earlier this year in which he called supporters of President Barack Obama ‘victims’ and said they are reliant on government handouts.”
Well then. Allow me to take the opportunity to thank Romney for his honesty and candor, an occasion members of the voting public are not awarded often enough. I have to disagree with New York Times columnist David Brooks when he writes “Mr. Romney, your entitlement reform ideas are essential, but when will the incompetence stop?” Brooks’ rhetorical question implies that Mittens’s characterization of Obama voters as lazy, needy bottomfeeders is merely an error, but in order to accept this position, one would have to willfully suspend belief in the candidate’s own words at the hastily arranged late-evening press conference. I don’t think most of us are prepared to do that.





Tim From LA
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
“Should We Forgive Romney’s ‘Off the Cuff’ Remarks In a Word, No”
Hey Becky, great story and to answer your question, I’m an atheist and nope.
loading...
stenc
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 12:36 pm
If Romney were to, somehow, steal and suppress their way into to the White House, it would be like having a combination of Nixon, Goldwater, and Bush, with a new and even more dangerous Cheney in the other little character, Ryan.
I don’t believe in entitlement, that is, at least when it comes to your kind feeling they’re entitled to the White House.
loading...
Reynardine
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 12:39 pm
As far as I am concerned, he is a walking gross-out, an embodiment of all the cruel, using, snobbish, bigoted heritage of the whole Randian/Friedmanist cancer that has eaten the character of a once fair-minded people. Non-1%ers who vote for him can only be the true “victims”…of this moral malignancy, people so eaten up by malice towards the Other that they can’t see that Romney and his retinue only love them the way Minute Maid loves oranges, and that, once they’ve gotten all the juice and good out of them, will throw them on the garbage heap with the other rinds.
loading...
Diane B
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Sam Harris just wrote the other day that this candidacy would be laughable (risible) if it weren’t so depressing. While I understand a lot of people will vote for him just to get Obama out of office—we were in that position with Kerry/Bush—they are not looking at the big picture. I agree, Romney is the worst candidate in history. The conservative collective should be ashamed of themselves.
loading...
Geek Hillbilly (@GeekHillbilly)
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 3:18 pm
HELL NO!Romney & The GOP are way past the point where redemption was possible.Now a good old fashion ass kicking needs to be applied
loading...
Monica Lucas
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 3:52 pm
It frightens me to think that there are many who would place this bozo and his sidekick into the most powerful seats on earth.
loading...
Suzanne Longo
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 3:59 pm
No, absolutely not. He has disdain for anyone who gets “government help”, although he fails to mention that his running mate got through college on Social Security benefits. I realize in Mr. Romney’s eyes, that’s somehow “different”. I’m sure he will say he didn’t mean senior citizens or men and women in the service. So exactly who did he mean? His behavior after the Libyan embassy was attacked was disgraceful. I was embarrassed that he thought he spoke for our country. I am also concerned about his comments about the Palestinians. They don’t want peace? I want a man with a heart for President and Mitt doesn’t have what it takes. No free passes for him.
loading...
ArtofEpiphany
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
I just got off the phone with an old friend of mine whom I’ve known since HS, back in the 70s, when we were card-carrying hippies. She is voting for Romney and cannot be swayed. One of the reasons she is voting GOP (she voted for Obama last time) is that she looks at the “lowlifes” on the subway, who “don’t work, but always seem to have money for new shoes, designer accessories and expensive hairdos.” She readily admits that she’s become a bigot in her “old age” and she’s been working her ass off her whole life, and is sick of “supporting these moochers.” (She is also in the banking industry and a fairly religious Jew for whom the security of Israel is an issue.) She is a very smart, educated, sophisticated NYC woman who actually supported the Occupy Movement, but these are the issues that are important to her. She is not rich by any means (single, never married, living in a studio apartment) but she, like the very rich, buys into the concept that SHE works while others freeload. Romney’s message was actually right on point to people like her. It’s not going to dissuade them from voting for him. THEY want to give him a high five! (Oh, and she also believes that Obama is a Muslim! Couldn’t convince her otherwise!) So, this is the opposition…NOT necessarily toothless trailer trash Tennessee Teabillies. Know thine “enemy.”
loading...
Sarah Jones
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 4:13 pm
I find it hard to take anyone seriously who thinks Obama is a Muslim. She’s obviously in that fringe element, and I would question if she actually voted for Obama in 2008 as a Jew thinking he’s a radical Muslim. See how that doesn’t make sense? At any rate, someone who is a bigot is prone to prejudices inherently and resenting the “other” for what they feel entitled to. That is the entire psychology behind bigotry as a weapon of the elites. Your friend is a fool, but that’s her right. Luckily she doesn’t represent the majority of Americans.
loading...
Lynne Gillooly
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 4:28 pm
When so many people believe the lies, propaganda and smears of Obama from the corporate rightwing media it puts our so called democracy in danger. Talk radio, Fox and other media outlets will say ANYTHING to protect the oligarchs they work for.
I used to chalk it up to ignorance, but there is NO EXCUSE for it anymore.
At least follow Reagan’s statment “Trust, but verify”. Once I began looking up information and questioning what I heard or read I found out quite easily that the GOP is basically a lobbyist group for the 6 big industries that own and control this country.
Please, for the love of God and country stop believing the repetative lies and plain BS from these “news” sources that manipulate Americans to vote against their own interests. Ignorance is NOT bliss
loading...
Kyle
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Soooooo 3rd party anyone? Seriously, if it’s bad to the left and bad to the right. Why not just go down the middle? I mean come on, regardless of the outcome chances are we will have a competent president the term after. The people voted for Obama because they wanted change. That hasn’t worked. Change it again.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 5:56 pm
There are no valid 3rd party candidates
loading...
TigerLily
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 5:06 pm
HELL NO!
loading...
Sylvia
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 6:01 pm
This is not a forgiveness issue
.this is a dude interviewing 4 the top job in USA & his character is the issue. He is showing behind closed doors who he is…& it is not pretty…
loading...
j
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 6:11 pm
What about Anne saying her horse has more class than those people!
loading...
Julie Clarity
Sep. 20th, 2012 at 10:13 pm
We receive no entitlements. Almost every other family I know with a Stay At Home Parent does. Food stamps and energy assistance to name a couple. I have no problems with that, however, when it came time for us to get help in our income bracket and situation, there currently is none.
We have even resorted to skipping groceries which, I hear, is pretty common with other people in our income bracket…waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay below $100,000 per year is where the Middle Class actually starts, in fact, it starts somewhere a bit under $47,000 a year if one has a small family. Very chilling.
I’ve been writing all along to my politicians about our trials in seeking a refinance…a very frustrating venture, to be sure.
loading...
suan
Sep. 21st, 2012 at 4:51 pm
I skip groceries all the time on social security, I have to….Oh, I forget, I’m a bum….
loading...