Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Mitt Romney Tells Fox He Was Wrong to Make the 47% Comments

You can bet that Mitt Romney had planned at Wednesday’s debate to say he was wrong for getting caught on tape saying:
“My job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives….. There are 47% who are with him, who are dependent on government, who believe that, that they are victims, who believe that government has the responsibility to care for them. Who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing.”
But President Obama never gave him the chance to tell the 67 million viewers that he was wrong, so Mitt Romney had to tell the relatively smaller audience at Fox News last night. Romney said, “Clearly in a campaign with hundreds if not thousands of speeches and question-and-answer sessions, now and then you’re going to say something that doesn’t come out right. In this case, I said something that’s just completely wrong.”
So, Romney was stuck telling the only people who agreed with him about half of America being victims that he was wrong. And, he was not given the chance to reinvent himself on this matter to the American people Wednesday night.
After the debate, many pundits wondered why Obama hadn’t hit Romney with the 47% comments. Apparently Romney couldn’t wait until the next debate to show off the rehearsed grand apology, so he spilled the beans on Fox. I can’t imagine that audience was too pleased to hear that Romney thought it was wrong of him to hate half of the country.
Romney’s 47% comments were the first thing that endeared him to much of the Republican base, though rumor has it they were stirred by his braying mania during the debate – so eager are they for another bully-in-chief. They obviously missed the part in the debate where Romney adopted Obama’s policies and moved way to the center, leaving what passes for conservatism these days in the dust of his ambition. He was all slick “empathy” and help the middle class Wednesday night, in quite a startling contrast with his actual policies.
Factcheckers have been spent the last 24 hours scrambling to unveil the seemingly endless inaccuracies that came from Mitt Romney during the Denver debate, but there’s no way to fact check Romney’s real feelings about his words, except to look at his actual policies. Have they changed any? No. His tax plan still hits the middle class and those of you with pre-existing conditions can find an emergency room unless you are lucky enough to pay $650 a month for COBRA and even luckier to find new employment that offers a group policy that won’t kick you to the curb.
Given that Romney presented his harsh policies with utterly false rhetoric during the Denver debate, I’m issuing a caution flag on his admission that he was “wrong”. Romney also announced Thursday that victory was in sight for him, proving that he really doesn’t know very much about the real Barack Obama. But we can all thank him for the good show, which might bring his big corporate donors back to him just in time to abandon the House and Senate races they were fleeing to in the wake of Romney’s relentless fails.
Romney had one “win” thus far in the entire campaign season, and he got it by lying the entire night. No one seemed to disturbed by it, either, though I note that as usual, they blamed Obama for not stopping Romney from lying, as if somehow Barack Obama could force Romney to tell the truth when no one else has been able to do that yet. The narrative that should have come out of that debate was what is wrong with Mitt Romney and why was he so dishonest?
Instead, we apparently awarded points for rudeness, bullying and lying, which suggests that our media has bought into the misguided notion that strong, effective leaders are obnoxious jerks. How this plays into being a good diplomat and strategist, as a President should be, I have no idea, but I am quite sure that they should be held accountable for missing the boat on this one. The right question to ask is “Why was Mitt Romney lying so much?” and “What does this say about what kind of president he would be?”
Well, Victims, you got the closest thing you’ll ever get to an apology from Mitt Romney. He said he was wrong, he didn’t say he was sorry or that he would change his policies to reflect his new awareness of how wrong he was. Nor did he admit that if anyone is a 47% tax dodger, it’s him. He did not clearly articulate that his ideas about the 47% were wrong, leaving us to wonder if he meant he was wrong to say it rather than wrong to think it. At any rate, this conflicts with what he said right after he was busted, which was that he was meant what he said but he had been “inelegant”.
Not to worry — Romney assured Fox, “When I become president, it will be helping the 100%.” And you know what his word is worth.
Mitt Romney tried to walk away from his 47% comments last night by calling them "wrong". Not so fast, sa ...
The reaction is pouring in, and the consensus is that Mitt Romney lost the second presidential debate. T ...
Obama for America's new ad calls Romney out for his spectacular debate "performance". When the cameras r ...
With the third and final presidential debate happening on Monday, the Obama campaign has helpfully put o ...
President Clinton explains Mitt Romney's $5 trillion tax cut and how middle class families with children ...
Paws
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 9:44 am
Oh, yes, he says it is wrong now…because he’s been hammered by it in the Obama ads and polls show those ads are working against him. He doesn’t really think it is wrong; the notion that people are just freeloaders is a belief ingrained in the Republican Party. He’s just sorry that he got caught.
His actions and words demonstrate quite clearly that this man does not care about people, nor does he care about governing. The Presidency is a prize to him.
There is not a force on earth that would make me vote for Romney.
loading...
faye
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 11:37 am
What he means is it was wrong for us to hear him say it. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t feel that way.
loading...
Sandra
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 3:44 pm
One only has to listen to the tape again to hear the anger, disgust and contempt for the 47% who he thinks are a drain on society and the rich. Anyone who believes he’s sorry is really stupid and desperately in need of help. This man is nothing but a greedy, money worshiping, narcissistic low life who does not love his country or his fellow Americans despite his claim that he does.
loading...
Colleen
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 11:52 am
The problem with his lies is that all his supporters refuse to listen to the side of the factcheckers and take everything he says as gospel. They are all so close minded. He is a pathological liar and will say anything to make people believe him.
loading...
Conservative Heart
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 12:00 pm
Mitt Romney: spits on Sesame Street, will swallow for Wall Street.
No wait… I meant spits on Wall Street, will swallow for Sesame Street.
Um, hold on, maybe it is spits on Sesame Street, will swallow for Wall Street.
No, no…okay, I got it… definitely, Mitt Romney: Spits on Wall Street, will swallow for Sesame Street.
That one tested better, right?
What? The camera’s off? Well then, SCREW Sesame Street! Big Bird can suck on Mitt’s big bird! And SCREW Main Street! THOSE 47 percenters can kiss Mitt’s pimply ass!
Wall Street, front of the line! MItt’s ready for you now!
loading...
Annierae
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 3:16 pm
Mitt-twit is wrong; but he’s not sorry!! I was taught, growing up, the words that first come out of your mouth are the words you meant to say and saying I’m sorry will never take them back.
loading...
Voiceof America
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 3:48 pm
It seems a bit unethical to point to a correction by an individual and simultaneously throw them under the bus for doing so. Either you embrace people taking the time and effort to acknowledge their mistakes or you don’t.
It’s fine to insinuate that it wasn’t genuine or simply politically motivated… but I don’t see that same level of expectation put on the Democrats by the Left. So… standing on a moral high ground is pointless it you don’t live by the same standard. NOT excoriating or criticizing your own side for the same or nearly similar examples.. only sheds light onto the already existing bias. Which then begins to legitimize the stereotypes branded by the other side.
If you disagree with the stereotypes.. it would serve you well to demonstrate a fair application to both ideological wings so as to eliminate or tamp down the fuel for the oppositions fire.
Intellectual Honesty people… lay down the rhetoric and the stereotypes and bring back civility to the conversations.
loading...
Sarah Jones
Oct. 5th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
It is not a reflection of bias to report the truth. However, it is a reflection of bias to assert that the truth, as it can best be determined, is biased. It is a demonstrable fact that Romney has misled the voters on purpose over and over again in this campaign, only to have his campaign come back later and quietly issue a retraction of his promises.
How is it dishonest to hold Romney accountable for these turnarounds? Why haven’t his policies changed to reflect his alleged turaround? Why are you asking that I take his word for something, when his word has been proven to be worthless over and over again? Do you know how many times I’ve given him the benefit of the doubt, only to have his campaign quietly take back what he just told the public an hour later? I’ve been burned too many times by Romney’s flip flops. He is what he is, and I’m not going to play the both sides do it game (until they actually ARE doing it) just to appear “fair and balanced”.
loading...
Voiceof America
Oct. 6th, 2012 at 5:40 am
@ Sarah Jones – The primary context of the post was surrounding the statement Romney made about being wrong when he originally said the comment in question. So my comment is fairly noticeably directed at that point. If you want to then broaden that into EVERYTHING that Romney says or does than the post loses it’s relevance since he hasn’t apologized or stated he was wrong on many other things.
In a general sense… I don’t disagree that Romney has played footsie with statistics and facts. But that IS what Politicians do lol.. this shouldn’t be some shocker of a news bulletin.
Dislike if you choose… I have no problem with that. But I am so sick and tired of listening to people proclaim that “their side” is the good and the “other side” is the pack of lying evil monsters… FROM BOTH SIDES.
If people want to question Romney’s integrity or ability to speak truthfully… they should do so equally to their own side. There is NO reason or mentally sound justification that squares with why people don’t see the BS from their own team.. or call their own team out when they see or he the BS.
To insinuate that the Democrats or Obama or his Administration are immune or innocent of the same ethically challenged behaviors is simply dishonest. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the parallel behavior and nearly identical ethically challenged actions within the Party’s day to day activities. It’s politics… and like it or not… it’s what the do. BOTH SIDES.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 6th, 2012 at 9:16 am
“If people want to question Romney’s integrity or ability to speak truthfully… they should do so equally to their own side.”
Why? When one side has been so incredibly unfaithful to the truth for over 18 months? Sorry but it doesnt work the way you want it. You want people to accept ROmneys lack of honesty
loading...
Anne
Oct. 6th, 2012 at 9:42 am
One consistent tactic of Romney defenders is that of false equivalency. No one is suggesting that Democrats have never lied, but pointing out the blatant lies that Willard tells incessantly. Apparently, they are happy with his boorishness and bullying, as well as his numerous lies–because they see him as “winning.” As you can see, they are unable to deny what is obvious to any rational, thinking human, so they resort to their predictable deflection and false equivalencies that do nothing to alter the truthful observations on an aspect of Willard’s character.
loading...
CarolO
Oct. 6th, 2012 at 12:09 am
Now maybe he can apologize for all the lies he told at the debate, too. Romney stated he was going to make cuts of 20% for everyone and still keep the tax cuts for the top dogs. That comes to 5 Trillion. At the debate, he denied saying that.
Two weeks ago at AARP, Ryan stated Medicare would end. At the debate, Romney denied it, and said he would make Medicare stronger.
Romney said no school budgets would be cut but he was on TV telling teachers 4 months ago there would be numerous cuts. Romney said he would remove those regulations for the banks that got us in this mess. At the debate he said he would keep regulations.
At the debate, he said he worked with Democrats to get the healthcare through in his State. What he showed there is that a Republican can work with Democrats and get things done. Romney did NOT have to work with the TEA PARTY. Totally different!! Another debate lie is that Romney’s healthcare plan covers pre-existing conditions. A member of this staff said AFTER the debate that simply was not true.
His plan leaves out 86 million people….a good many of them seniors.
loading...
DobieTracker
Oct. 6th, 2012 at 3:15 am
The only thing this narcissist is sorry about is that he got caught.
Also: remember that for Mormons, it is ok to
“Lie For God.”
Romney must be one of God’s favorites :)
loading...
Magdalena
Oct. 7th, 2012 at 10:24 am
Romney believes he is the “Chosen One” that Mormon leaders spoke about that will “One day rule a Nation and save its people.” This whole campaign is about that power that the White House represents. Even Ann stated that “It’s now our turn…” They are not very tolerant people as is evidence by Ann and Mitt’s outbursts when people disagree with them. Romney sees the first debate as a Win, when in actuality President Obama gave him all the necessary rope to hang himself. We will see that hanging on the next debate.
loading...