In the first presidential debate, Governor Mitt Romney claimed he had a bipartisan record as Governor, but history tells another story. In 2006, his last year as Massachusetts’ Governor (in which he was absent more than half of the year), Romney issued 250 vetoes, all of which were overturned by what the Romney camp dubbed a “hostile” legislature. It’s not just Democrats who didn’t get along with Romney, though.
Most of Romney’s vetoes were overturned, sometimes unanimously. Romney used the vetoes to claim he was a budget hawk, but in addition to his budget vetoes, he also vetoed a bill to raise the minimum wage, a stem cell bill and a bill to make the morning after pill available over the counter, among others. All were overridden. The Concord Monitor, observing Romney’s “frosty relations with legislators” noted in 2007 that this, “effectively remov(ed) Romney from the final stage of the state’s budget process.”
At the first Presidential debate, Romney said, “I figured out from Day 1 I had to get along, and I had to work across the aisle to get anything done.” But Romney liked vetoes so much, he used his vetoes in an ad titled “I like vetoes” during his 2008 run. Watch here:
In the ad in which Romney tells us how much he likes vetoes, and he ends by saying, “I can’t wait to get my hands on Washington.” These are not the words of someone who is bipartisan, but they are also not the words of someone who understands the power of the Presidency. Unlike a Massachusetts governor, the President can’t line-item veto.
Vetoes don’t scream bipartisanship, and Romney had so many of them that it’s obvious he was on bad terms with the legislators from both parties as Governor. All told, Romney issued 800 vetoes in his one term as Governor. 800. Nearly all of them were overridden – 707 to be exact. Romney doesn’t mention that part in his “I like vetoes” ad.
In fact, Romney didn’t like having to work with Democrats so much that he spent his first two years trying to change the party makeup of the legislature and when those efforts failed, he pulled a Palin. That is to say, he gave up. He was gone – out of state – for 212 days of his last year.
Romney was never around for the last two years of his governorship. A March 2005 poll found that only 32 percent felt Romney should be re-elected if he ran for a second term as governor. It got worse. In 2006, Romney spent 212 days out of state, campaigning.
A Republican grumbled that Romney was never there:
“He was basically never here,” says Kilduff, a Republican who says she was annoyed when Romney poked fun at Massachusetts and also when he swooped in to take over the Big Dig project after a woman was killed in a tunnel accident.
“I don’t think anyone should be micromanaging when they’re not here.”
Romney told the Boston Globe that he was giving up on party building, “From now on, it’s me-me-me.”
Jim Rappaport, a former chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party, told The Concord Monitor that Romney “likes vetoes, but most of his were inconsequential. They were like writing in the sand: The waves came in and wiped them out.”
Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom claimed in 2008 that this was due to the hostile makeup of the legislature, assuring the people that things would be different in DC because the legislature would be more “balanced” there. However, it looks likely that Romney would be facing a Democratic Senate if he does take the White House.
A Massachusetts political scientist noted “Romney’s veto record reflects his strained relationship with lawmakers.”
A Republican state representative said that Romney had a tough time dealing with the legislature, especially in his first year, because he was used to giving orders as an executive, rather than working with people to reach a consensus. Republican George Peterson said, “He was used to being a top executive, ‘and this is where we’re going, and this is how we’re going to do it.’ And this animal [the state Legislature] doesn’t work that way. Not at all. Especially when it’s overwhelmingly ruled by one party.”
Mitt Romney’s approval as governor tanked until 65 percent of residents disapproved of his job performance in 2006. It bounced back up as he left (not a good sign), to a whopping 59 percent unfavorable.
Obama is leading Romney by a wide margin in Massachusetts. Not since 1916 has a candidate lost his home state and won the White House. The only saving grace for Romney is that while he is also losing his other home states of Michigan (where he grew up) and California, he has had residences in several other states that he could ostensibly call home, although certainly the folks in Massachusetts and Michigan know him best.
In contrast, President Obama has issued 2 vetoes in four years with 111 pocket vetoes. (A pocket veto occurs when the President doesn’t sign a bill within the 10 days allotted. It then becomes law without his signature if Congress is in session.) Who’s going to reach across the aisle again? But if the vetoes don’t tell the story, the story of the “Imperial Governor” is told by the ropes denying access to his office and the hijacked elevator (just for Mitt) do. “Mitt is always the star,” said one Massachusetts Republican to Vanity Fair. “And everybody else is a bit player.”
So dies yet another Mitt-perpetuated myth about Romney.
Additional Sources: Phillips, Frank (March 11, 2005). “Poll shows Romney bid for president faces hurdles, The Boston Globe. Wangsness, Lisa (December 26, 2006). “Voters voice regard, regret over Romney – Huge potential unment, some say”. The Boston Globe.
Update 7:18PM: Corrected “raise” for “wage” in second paragraph.





j
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 9:24 am
Just fumed through another Romney ad saying how Obama had got the country into the most debt ever and borrowed from China, will someone please explain in an easy to understand article that before Obama the repubs did not recognize the cost of the wars in the budget, they just added them to the debt, the wars have added about 4 trillion to the debt (Obama is showing them in the budget now which adds to the deficit (which he has decreased in 2012)
No-one is making the argument!
loading...
Herb Picotte
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 4:32 pm
Ask and you shall receive… http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/obamas-and-bushs-effect-on-the-deficit-in-one-graph/2011/07/25/gIQAELOrYI_blog.html
loading...
Bobforesi
Oct. 26th, 2012 at 7:46 pm
Where is the ad about this! I had to search for this. Wake up Obamma campaignsa. 800 vetoes should be a prominent attack
loading...
Anne
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 9:32 am
Willard has always been dictatorial, an unappealing trait that has surfaced repeatedly during this presidential campaign. It emerges when someone says something he disagrees with, particularly when the disagreementis from someone he considers an underling. The teacher at the roundtable discussion on education, the NYC father who said that parents of students and unionized teachers there have a good relationship, and his pushiness in lying at the first debate are examples of this. So, it’s not surprising that he alienated Democrats and Republicans alike as governor of Massachusetts with that kind of high-handed arrogance. It’s a particularly bad sign when the people of the state he once governed are against him, because they are in a position to know better than anyone else what it was like to have him as their state’s chief executive. No wonder he doesn’t mention his tenure there very much.
loading...
Gitane
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 2:43 pm
Blaming President Obama for all of the bad things in the economy is just absurd. If you want to blame someone, feast your eyes on the Republican Party. George W. Bush and the GOP Congress watched and congratulated themselves as the mortgage bubble grew and then burst, causing the Great Recession, the worst downturn in 80 years. Obama and the Democrats were able to stop the bleeding and restore a semblnce of order to the economy, but a population that expects instant results wasn’t satisfied.
The GOP was elected in 2010 to get things moving even faster, but they’ve largely stood by and done nothing for almost two years now. For example, a year ago September 8, President Obama submitted the American Jobs Act to Congress, and most of the bill still sits in the House. They won’t take it up, they won’t discuss it, and they won’t even offer up an alternative. It just sits there, because they can’t bring themselves to do anything that President Obama may take credit for.
Even so, to claim we’re not better off now than four years ago is absurd. Whether it’s willful ignorance or a faulty memory
`Mill Shook~
loading...
Middle Molly
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 8:03 pm
And the repulsive Republicans actually claim that dozens of bills to roll back environmental protection are “jobs” bills and they complain that the Dems in the Senate have not acted on those bills! And millions of stupid people out there believe these manipulative traitors who call themselves Republicans.
loading...
Diane
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 9:57 am
Laugh out loud at LIARS!!!!
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 10:04 am
oh we do we do! And Romney tops the class
loading...
Reynardine
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 10:04 am
The ideal Republican candidate would be:
Brilliant like W
Modest like Mitt
Honest like DeLay
Chaste like Newt
Sober like John of Orange
Such a lucky party, to have so many in its upper echelons that meet its ideals. And meanwhile, I would propose we retire Mitt to his very own Hall of Mirrors, but I fear he would prove too fierce a rival for his own affections.
loading...
bess moore
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 1:58 pm
God help us!
loading...
Kenneth Morgan
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 10:28 am
Looks like Mitt does not play well with others. By this article, he would be a pull-toy for the republican agenda pushers. He wants to be King.
as an aside, I just saw a little clip from the Biden/Ryan debate on the Melissa-Harris Perry show. The topic was paying for the tax cuts. Ryan was trying to explain the deduction issue in a broad sense. No specifics, as usual. Anyway he said we take the tax cuts, start with the rich… This just shows me he will cut taxes for the rich first and the middle class is an after-thought.
loading...
heidihaspaws
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 11:44 am
I saw that on MHP also. I did not catch that little nugget when I watched the debates.
He could have said start at the bottom, or the middle, but no…..the top first.
loading...
James Threadgill
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 1:12 pm
Romney is the quintessential representative of the party of ME, er, I mean the GOP.
http://regressivewatch.org
loading...
bess moore
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 1:56 pm
How can people be so blind? Romney and Ryan do not care about the middle class. God help us!
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 4:43 pm
Are you volunteering to pay for the bandwidth?
loading...
Linda
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 4:44 pm
I’m almost out of words to describe Mitt Romney and the people who want him to win.I’m just shocked and scared right now. He is a narcissistic, sociapath ticking time bomb
loading...
Noname
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Just a heads up for a possible type in the second paragraph. “a bill to raise the minimum raise”.
loading...
Sarah Jones
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 7:20 pm
Thanks Noname. Corrected it.
loading...
ilegal guerrero
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 6:46 pm
Knits record is deplorable he just wants to be president so he can get the highest boy scout badge he has no idea as to what the country needs and wants sara,ryan has no idea as to how to balan ce his own house budget let alone the country’s
loading...
Rixar13
Oct. 14th, 2012 at 11:32 pm
“Vetoes don’t scream bipartisanship, and Romney had so many of them that it’s obvious he was on bad terms with the legislators from both parties as Governor.”
General Romney I’m not nor will I ever be ready for…
loading...
Pogonip
Oct. 15th, 2012 at 4:04 am
Generalissimo Romney?
loading...
Scott Norcross
Oct. 19th, 2012 at 3:20 am
Mitt Romney is not presidential material. He’s a liar and a cheat that just wants to be the “top boy.” We have to vote with common sense this year , and vote Barack Obama, we need another four years. Put it like this, do you want Progression?(Obama), or do you want Regression?(Romney) . I’ll be voting for our current President of the United States, Barack Obama ;)
loading...