The lies are rolling off Mitt Romney’s tongue at a rapid pace during the second presidential debate, but here are his 5 biggest of the first half of the debate.
1). Romney claims fewer people are working today than when Obama took office.
The Truth: From CBS News, “The job market has been improving, sluggishly but steadily. Jobs have been added for 24 straight months. There are now 325,000 more than when Obama took office.”
2). Romney said Obama took Detroit to bankruptcy.
The Truth: Romney was fudging the facts. According to The Washington Post, “Ultimately, along with getting nearly $80 billion in loans and other assistance from the Bush and Obama administrations, GM and Chrysler did go through a managed bankruptcy. But many independent analysts have concluded that taking the approach recommended by Romney would not have worked in 2008, simply because the credit markets were so frozen that a bankruptcy was not a viable option at the time.”
3). Romney claimed oil permits are down under Obama.
The Truth: The real story is quite what Romney was telling voters. According to CNN, “But it is an overstatement to say that “all of the increase” has been on private lands — since, by definition, new permits and licenses have been granted for federal lands (bringing in more gas and oil). Romney’s claim that Obama’s administration has “cut the number of permits and licenses in half” for federal lands is also not on the mark.True, there has been a significant drop — one tied, in part, to the unprecedented Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Yet the actual numbers of permits and licenses haven’t been “cut … in half.” As mentioned above (and including data from part of the Bush administration), there has been a 42% decrease in leases and 37% decrease in drilling permits — not 50%, as Romney implied. Even the Institute for Energy Research acknowledged that “this decrease isn’t a result of President Obama’s policies exclusively, but it is the result of decades and policies that have systematically reduced energy production on federal lands.”
4). Romney said Obama will raise taxes by $4,000 on the middle class.
The Truth: According to FactCheck.org, the Romney claim of a $4,000 tax hike on the middle class is nonsense, “Mitt Romney falsely claims in a series of TV ads that President Obama “will raise taxes on the middle class by $4,000.” That’s nonsense. The ads cite a conservative group’s study, but even the group itself doesn’t say Obama will raise taxes on middle-income taxpayers. It says his budget could result in a “potentially higher tax burden” over the next 10 years.”
5). Mitt Romney claimed his tax plan cuts taxes for the middle class and not the wealthy.
The Truth: According to Reuters, “Republican U.S. presidential challenger Mitt Romney’s proposal to slash income taxes by 20 percent across the board would boost income for the wealthiest taxpayers while reducing it for the middle class, according to a nonpartisan analysis released on Wednesday. The report by the centrist Tax Policy Center found that Romney’s tax cuts would boost after-tax income by an average of 4.1 percent for those earning more than $1 million a year, while reducing by an average of 1.2 percent the after-tax income of individuals earning less than $200,000.”





Jim H.
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:11 pm
Romney can’t Gish Gallop anyone this time around.
loading...
Dave
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Lie #6 – Gas on L.I. was over $3.00/gal. four years ago, not the $1.86 that Romney stated.
loading...
Neil
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:38 pm
Romney is starting to stammer again.Er Uh.Governor stutter.
loading...
Brian
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:55 pm
This article is seriously friggin weak. quoting CBS as ‘proof’? calling a simplification a ‘lie’? come on.
“There’s no way to bring industry back to america, That’s not happening. Those jobs are GONE, American’s wont work at manufacturing jobs. we’ve got to focus on bringing high-paying jobs back to america”
now that’s a lie.
loading...
majii
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 2:17 am
Where’s your documentation? Either provide documentation, or go away. Go spread your sh*t all over RW blogs where you can lie and provide zero documentation because we don’t play your kind of game here.
loading...
Gene
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:08 pm
The facts spoken here are misleading. Dig deeper. You will not be a happy liberal if you do. Romney is clearly the best choice. Obama can’t run a country or a business. How about let’s let a business guy run the business.
loading...
Anne
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:34 pm
GW Bush was a businessman and a horrible president. There’s no way any sane person wants to go back to that. As for Willard, he obviously did a poor job as Massachusetts governor, judging from all the unfavorable comments from that state about his tenure. But above all, a president cannot run a government like a business. The responsibilities, objectives, and qualities necessary for an effective presidency are entirely different. There are 2 other branches of government a president has to work with, which is another critical difference between being a businessman and a president. Besides, Willard has that CEO mentality in which he doesn’t like being questioned or challenged.
loading...
Cynthia
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 11:54 am
Excellent point, Anne! And let’s remember, too, that the way that businesses “balance their budgets” is with massive layoffs. It certainly isn’t by reducing income, bonuses, etc., to management!
loading...
Kevin
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 2:03 am
Such as?
“Study it out!”
loading...
Anne
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:29 pm
I LOVED the way Candy Crawley corrected Willard on the matter of the president’s immediate words in the aftermath of the attack in Libya. Willard just KNEW he had a good soundbite, but it backfired when Candy Crawley confirmed the truth of the president’s words. I also liked the way that President Obama tied the issue of women’s reproductive rights into the issue of economics, unlike Willard. He was his usual bullying, lying self, but Ms. Crawley was time enough for him.
loading...
Ron
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:55 pm
The 12,000,000 jobs Romney says he will create will be created but not by Romney. These will be created in the next four years regardless of who is in the white house
Romney is an arrogant *** no matter how you look at it. He is very rude in his actions.
I also noted that he could not seem to shut up after his 2 minute time and by doing this he created less time for the new questions to be answered as well as cutting into the final time for each to speak. Also, the moderator did not cut him off as she should have when he went over the time. The prior debates I remember (other years) The moderator would usually warn the debater that time was running out and would hold them close to the 2 minute mark. This was a flaw in Cindy’s job as moderator.
loading...
SinghX
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 7:41 am
“… prior debates I remember (other years) The moderator would usually warn the debater that time was running out and would hold them close to the 2 minute mark…”
But, but,but, Mittens is way too special to shut up and move on! Crowley, as Leher DID cut him off several times but he just talked over them incessantly and pushed and pushed like the proverbial salesman with their foot in the door
Plus, when they did yield him time, he kept going backwards, stuttering nervously as he spewed his defense. The fact is, he’s a very poor listener; he not only lies during the debates, he cheats and is “unprofessional”–
–did you see him walk away after, not taking the Presidents hand to shake? The President stood there, waiting and, Mittens turned on his Gucci’s and ran to Queen Ann…I don’t know if that was just his infamous petty anger or an intentional snub planned ahead. That body language alone should have told Americans how they, as well as the global leadership will be treated if he’s in office.
The only way to “handle” him is to shut off his mic…and I’m sure this has been considered.
loading...
Billdo
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:59 pm
@Gene
America isn’t a business unless your talking about the people who profit from war and by closing down companies to get a dollar in their pockets.
loading...
genie
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 11:37 am
I noticed his wife mumbling something nasty to Mitt Raccoon!! Not surprising at all
loading...
Tyler
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 12:34 am
Lie #3 You have a typo: “The real story is [not] quite what Romney was telling voters.”
loading...
majii
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 2:13 am
We always have an infestation of RW trolls when things aren’t to their liking. They refuse to acknowledge the fact that Romney is an habitual liar. These are the same folks who voted for GWB while knowing he was also peddling lies when he ran for president, and they’re the same ones who are loathe to mention GWB’s name now. They know GWB f*cked up big time. They want everyone to forget that it was republican politicians’ lies and policies that led to the financial downturn of 2008, and the loss and maiming of thousands of our troops. They are angry that we are refusing to buy into Romney’s lies, just as angry as they were when we said GWB would make a lousy president, there were no WMDs in Iraq, and Iraq was a war of choice. We were right. They know we were right, it sticks in their craw, and I hope they chock on it. There is no excuse for electing a liar to become the most powerful man on the planet. They may not have learned from the recent past, but I certainly have.
loading...
majii
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 2:14 am
***choke***
loading...
Chips Handen
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 9:49 am
Middle Class will see more taxes starting as of 1/1/2013 under Obama. Regardless of what media and Obama is saying, you will be paying for ObamaCare. If you already have medicare the MINIMUM you will be taxed is $695 per person in a household up to 3 people. So most middle class families will see an increase of roughly $2085 a year.
loading...
Mic
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 2:13 pm
Got a reference or do we have to trust you like mittens?
loading...
Tom Scruggs
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 8:58 pm
Chips Handen, the problem with your logic is that most middle class families don’t already have medicare. So your statement that “So most middle class families will see an increase of roughly $2085 a year” can’t be correct.
loading...
clennis05
Oct. 18th, 2012 at 12:55 am
Majii, please, don’t accuse uncle Mitt of being an habitual liar. That’s kinda rude. Mitt’s an Excellent, Well-Polished, Semi-Patriotic Liar. And walks funny too, by the way. Obama/Biden & Bo/2012.
loading...
Fred
Oct. 18th, 2012 at 3:41 pm
I figured out where he keeps his vault key. Watch the way he walks; ass tightly squeezed, hips forward, short steps. For sure there is something up there he doesn’t want to fall out.
Maybe he keeps his secret plans there as well.
loading...
D.Silvester
Oct. 18th, 2012 at 1:07 am
@ Scruggs and Mic
the proof is on my pay stub …before obamacare I was paying 105.00 every 2 weeks for my health care ..that was 2730.00 a year and now with obamacare it is 210.oo every 2 weeks and that is 5460.00 a year …that’s double and I got no more coverage ..I still have to pay co-pays and deductibles …no better coverage , no discounts on glasses or dental work …I just pay more for the same …why??? so that obama can say “I got everybody insurance” but funny thing is …he doesn’t pay for any of it and he gets a guarranteed retirement for what???? I have paid into social security and medicare for 32 years and it is not going to be there when I retire…the retirement that I have been paying into will not even equal my earnings now and his is guarranteed for life and that is all Presidents included …Obama has not done his job of taking care of america really
loading...
Michael Powers (@louiszwu)
Oct. 18th, 2012 at 10:01 am
Being a businessman is no qualification for being President (besides which Romney was horrible at it). Government exists specifically for the things that business shouldn’t involve itself in. Safety, Security, Infrastructure, and, or course, regulating the excesses of business. You think that the Army, Air Force, and Navy are there to make a profit? Please. They have one mission, and trust me, it’s enough.
If you want a corporate theocracy, and loss of personal freedom, vote for Romney. It will be cold comfort for me to say, “I told you so” ten years from now.
What am I saying? Most can’t even remember the last news cycle.
loading...