Human beings are programmed with a need to control their environment whether it is in their place of abode, their job, or their community. There are countries in the world where government is chosen by military might, religious institutions, or by royal birth, but the people have little control of their own lives. America’s founders did not believe every resident had a right to choose their representatives, and it has taken over two hundred years to give every citizen a voice in choosing their representatives in government. When America invaded Iraq, one of the first tasks the military accomplished was providing Iraqi citizens with free and fair elections for the first time in decades, and it was a watershed moment for the people who suffered under the oppressive regime of Saddam Hussein. It is ironic then, that in America, the prospect of free and fair elections is being threatened by an avalanche of reports of voter suppression and fraud by the Republican Party.
Republicans are notorious for projecting their beliefs and practices on their opponents, and for the past two years their state legislative arm, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) passed restrictive and harsh voter ID laws to combat what they claimed was massive voter fraud. Over the past few months, reports of voter suppression and registration fraud have built up to the point that, like Iraq, this country’s election will be monitored by an international group to stop fraud and intimidation. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) is a United Nations affiliate that will deploy 44 observers around the country on Election Day and an additional 80 to 90 members of parliament from nearly 30 countries to monitor American elections. The OSCE election monitors are from its human rights office that focuses on democratization, and they will be looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups.
Americans should be embarrassed the country best known for promoting democracy around the world requires human rights monitors to ensure free and fair elections at home. The founder and leader of True the Vote, a conservative group seeking to crack down on election fraud was outraged and said, “activist groups sought assistance not from American sources, but from the United Nations,” but after months of reporting fraud, and Republican leaders refusing to follow court orders, there was little choice but to appeal to an outside source. The Justice Department cannot possibly keep up with the overwhelming number of cases committed exclusively by Republican groups who claimed voter fraud had reached epidemic proportions, but as usual, it is Republicans committing fraud.
OSCE is monitoring the elections after reports of “coordinated political effort to disenfranchise millions of Americans — particularly traditionally disenfranchised groups like minorities” that makes it a civil rights as well as an election issue. It has been widely reported (in liberal blogs) that the RNC hired a known Republican strategist with a reputation of voter registration fraud and attempts to suppress Democratic voter turnout for $3.1 million. Reports of destroying voter registration forms in Virginia last week drew minor attention from local media, and on Friday in Ohio, a Republican election official blamed a computer glitch for sending out notices to three precincts with improper polling places and news the election was Thursday, November 8 instead of Tuesday, November 6. There are myriad reports of voter suppression and fraud that one expects in young democracies like Iraq, and over the weekend two Iraq combat veterans noticed a parallel between elections in America and Iraq.
The young men served in Iraq leading up to the nation’s first free and fair elections, and it was their only source of pride at having served in Iraq. Although they felt betrayed and deceived at being sent to war over a lie, they said it was worth it to see Iraqis participating in their first fair election. Both men felt betrayed that after fighting to give Iraqis the right to participate in a fair election, their party was guilty of suppressing the vote and wondered if they should be deployed to protect Americans’ right to vote. They had heard a World War II veteran was purged from voter rolls in Florida, and opined that the President should send a squad of Rangers to guarantee the veteran was allowed to vote.
Americans should be outraged at Republican attempts to suppress votes, but the media has been negligent by not reporting the rampant voter suppression. In a large newspaper in Central California, there has not been one article or story reporting voter registration fraud or suppression efforts throughout the campaign. The paper said it was not “that big of a deal” and that it would cast unfair aspersion on Republicans so close to the election, so they would not report on it. Recently, it was brought to their attention the Republican chair of the Committee on Legislative Ethics committed voter fraud and faces removal from the ballot, but they demurred again because “it was a Southern California senator and not that big of a deal.”
Therein is the problem, and why Republicans continue flaunting the law, suppressing votes, and committing fraud; because “it’s not that big of a deal.” However, it is a big deal to the American people who lose their right to vote, and it is a big deal to an international human rights organization or they would not send monitors to stop “a coordinated political effort to disenfranchise millions of Americans — particularly traditionally disenfranchised groups like minorities.”
It is a sad commentary when America needs an international organization to monitor a general election, but it is crucial to save our democracy from Republican malfeasance. The founders believed only wealthy land owners deserved the right to vote, and after valiant struggles and Constitutional amendments, instead of celebrating every American’s right to vote, Republicans are suppressing voting rights. Hopefully with international monitors in place, every American who wants to vote will get the opportunity, but at the rate the GOP has suppressed the vote, it does not look very likely. It is a shame that the country that sent its soldiers to protect Iraqis right to vote cannot deliver that assurance to its own people; maybe the United Nations will do the job and save America’s democracy.




Rhonda
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 11:23 am
It is so sad that America has come to this. I would be ashamed to say I support the Republican Party at this point.
loading...
stormskies
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 11:28 am
And within this fact lies the fact that the corporate media is actively complicit in creating one of the biggest con jobs on the American public that has ever occurred.
Once again the corporate media is one of the greatest enemies our country actually has. The corporate agenda in the form of the props they use, called pundits, could not be more clear.
Are we supposed to ‘believe’ that as of the first debate where Obama was pulling away before the debate from Romney in all the polls that the first debate was/ is the cause of the Romney surge ? Even though he lied 27 times in 38 minutes.
And then Biden destroys Ryan, and Obama destroys Romney in the final two debates. Yet there is no ‘surge’ for them ? And that the ‘momentum’ is still with Romney based on those 38 minutes of the first debate ? And we have propaganda emanating from places like the Politico that pretends that Romney has won the ‘debate season’.
This is a fucking monumental CON JOB being pulled of by the corporate media. And they do this deliberately of course in order to make people ‘believe’ that which is not true.
And by doing this they then create an affect in which those that are still deciding who to vote for want to vote for a ‘winner’. Stupid people do such things. It’s called ‘behavioral contagion’ in psychological terms.
The corporate media knows this thus they have created on of the biggest con jobs in our history. They are, indeed, one of the greatest enemies to our country.
loading...
Reynardine
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 12:21 pm
I do not believe the point of this is even demoralization. I think it is intended as cover for impending election theft.
loading...
wildee7
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 11:31 am
Kudos to Obama for having the guts to bring in outside help! It makes me sick, after all my life of voting in every election, it has come to this. And if people think it doesnt happen, watch this programmer, whose company was paid a million dollars to write a program to FLIP votes to win an election in Florida, and he went on to testify in front of Congress! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcOFBu-Thds
loading...
Reynardine
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 12:17 pm
That is an extremely revelatory link! I have passed it on, including to two computer programmers.
loading...
K from Bellingham
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 12:50 pm
This is about the continuing flow of millions of dollars in campaign ads to the media giants. If it doesn’t appear to be a horserace, contributions for the apparent losing candidate dry up.
loading...
Nanette
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 1:22 pm
1. Why isn’t voter suppression as illegal as “voter fraud” since the suppression is also fraud? It’s shocking (or not) that the Virginia AG will not investigate dumped voter registration forms…
2. Corporate media is more concerned with keeping viewers watching and have an incentive to make the race as close as possible – truth be damned. They would rather pontificate opinions rather than take the time and do the research to point out Romney’s revolving positions and lies – too much work to get the facts.
3. What would happen if we banned election/candidate based TV commercials just the same way we stopped hard liquor commercials?
4. People who formulate their voting decisions based on TV commercials will probably not take the time to fact check debates – in a middle school or high school debate competition Romney would lose because he lied – and…..
5. Interesting the Repubs loved Romney’s aggressive nature in first debate and turn around and criticize Obama for being aggressive in last debate.
6. As stated in the article…Americans should be outraged at the Republicans attempts to suppress votes – and EVEN MORE OUTRAGED at the number of times Romney changes his position and lies!
loading...
A Walkaway
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 1:33 pm
Time for a “truth in reporting” law, with teeth.
Prison time for the talking head/reporter, and shutdown for the station or network that it happens on.
loading...
cheryl
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 1:47 pm
This absolutely makes me sick. America can’t shake their finger at any other country about democracy.
loading...
j
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 6:13 pm
Now we know the voting machines, the type that is easy to flip, and is banned in Europe are owned by the Romney family, could we get a conflict of interest investigation?
loading...
clennis05
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 7:34 pm
This really gets my goat! I heard rumors about the U.N. but thought it was just rumor. How dare those racist bastards insult the people that fought and died to grant us this right.
loading...
zyxomma
Oct. 23rd, 2012 at 8:08 pm
“Therein is the problem, and why Republicans continue flaunting the law.” This is an excellent post, but please correct the above sentence. You meant flouting, not flaunting. Common error.
loading...
Churchlady
Oct. 24th, 2012 at 1:13 am
Nov. 6 is a great day to pull off a federal crime – all FBI agents will be at the polls. That’s how bad this has become.
It would be VERY helpful if we could have an article about our rights at the polls. Understanding that this is variable, state by state, there are basics such as do I have any obligation to respond to a Truth the Vote person at all? Can anyone question my right to vote? If someone can, who is it – and who is it NOT? If someone tries can I sue the SOB for civil rights violations? Can I call the cops?
Tons of my friends who are lawyers are spreading out to other states to watch the polls. They are legally empowered by the feds to intervene on behalf of voters’ rights. But we are so sanguine in CA we think it can’t happen here. So what might happen and how do we handle it – and is there any revenge we can legally get?
Thanks if anyone can tackle this issue!
loading...
labman57
Oct. 24th, 2012 at 9:46 am
The (publicly stated) rationale for all of the restrictive voter ID laws emanating from Republican-controlled state legislatures — “voter fraud”.
There is a world of difference between voting fraud (i.e., fraud perpetrated by the voter at the precincts on election day) and voter registration fraud. There is very little evidence for the former in the U.S. (other than that being perpetrated by O’Keefe’s not-ready-for-prime-time players), yet conservatives are hell bent on enacting legislation to combat it, suggesting an ulterior motive is at play.
Mailing out voter registration forms to non-eligible or nonexistent individuals is not, in of itself, election fraud. Completing and submitting said forms is a form of election fraud, but these acts would not affect an election unless the regional election authorities validated the registrations and then somebody actually attempted to vote using this fake registration.
If Republicans sincerely want to tackle real election fraud, then they should focus their efforts on deceptive practices used to prevent some citizens from voting, as well as what happens to the votes after they are cast.
In other words, election fraud DOES exist … except that the fraudulent party is not the voter:
- it is the political party tactician who attempts to mislead a subset of the public with respect to date and/or location of the voting process, or the hired thug who attempts to intimidate selected citizens who show up to vote,
- it is the opposition party’s tactical team which fronts faux candidates to run against an authentic party candidate in state primary elections,
- it is the contracted or county voter registration worker who throws out registration forms, or the state official who decides that some registration forms “appear” to be fraudulent (i.e., the last name ends in “-ez”),
- and it is the local election official who conveniently misplaces ballots or runs out of ballots at precincts that traditionally…
loading...