Businesses succeed or fail based on providing a quality product consumers demand, but they also depend on delivering good service and it is why courteous and proficient employees are as important an asset as product line. In the service industry, employees are a company’s greatest asset and it is why business owners are wise to take care of their workers and provide incentives for them to give customers an experience that encourages return business. Large retailers have an advantage over small businesses because volume buying allows them to reduce prices and still make a profit, but without friendly and courteous service, many customers will pay more to be treated well. In a different era in America, employees were treated with deference according to their worth to the business, and although employee salaries and benefits were a major expense, their value was instrumental to success.
Every business seeks to keep payroll costs to a minimum, and any business would jump at the opportunity for government to subsidize their employee’s salaries, but when a giant profitable corporation uses taxpayer dollars to supplement their payrolls, voters should be outraged. WalMart posted profits of $15.4 billion in 2011, and it enriched 6 WalMart heirs and heiresses whose combined worth is greater than the bottom 41% of American families (48.8 million households). Part of WalMart’s profits come from paying employees below poverty level wages, and to keep WalMart associates from going hungry and falling ill, taxpayers provided food stamps and Medicaid to make up the difference.
Because WalMart pays their employees slave wages, workers are forced to rely on food stamps and Medicaid which is how WalMart siphons money from taxpayers. The taxpayer dollars allow WalMart to pay their workers an average of $8.81 an hour without having them starving and homeless. Last week, WalMart Vice President of Communications, David Tovar, attempted to downplay their associates’ concerns about low pay, and reassure shoppers that WalMart has “got great associates” who are “going to do a great job for us this holiday season.” Tovar claimed WalMart was “working hard every day to provide more opportunities for associates” that included providing “a 10 percent discount card.” With the current poverty level for a family of four at $23,050, the typical WalMart employee is paid $22,100 a year, and because associates get a 10% discount to buy WalMart products, they are investing their below poverty pay checks back into the company that reported a 9% percent increase in third-quarter net income, earning $3.63 billion.
At a time when Republicans are proposing deep cuts to programs like SNAP (food stamps), and WalMart heavily supported Republican candidates in the recent election, it appears they have greater disregard for their employees than just paying them below poverty wages. A fallacy among many Americans, and one Republicans parrot mercilessly, is that food stamp recipients are lazy and living off other taxpayers, but a substantial number of Americans who rely on Food Stamps work full-time but are not being paid a living wage by employers like WalMart. In June, the House Agricultural Committee passed a five-year reauthorization of the farm bill that cuts $16 billion in food stamps, but they kept several subsidies for corporate agriculture intact. The bill, if it became law, would cut 2 to 3 million people from receiving food assistance and 28 million children would lose free school lunches, but the tea party caucus held out for larger cuts and as of yesterday, there is still not a farm bill.
The idea that large profitable corporations like WalMart uses taxpayer dollars to subsidize their payrolls and pad their profits because they pay employees slave wages is an outrage. Very few Americans would deny giving food and healthcare assistance to those in need, but when WalMart earns record profits and supports Republicans working to slash food stamps and Medicaid, taxpayers have a right to demand that WalMart pay their employees a living wage. If WalMart paid every one of their 1.4 million employees an additional $5,000 per year, besides lifting their employees out of poverty and over the low-income threshold, they would still make over $7 billion in profits for themselves and their shareholders. Additionally, by elevating the retail worker’s wages, more dollars would flow into local businesses, tax revenue would increase without raising taxes, there would be lower unemployment, and cities could hire more teachers, fire fighters, and police officers.
However, WalMart will not raise employee wages because they know taxpayers will make up the difference that costs them $2.66 billion annually in food stamps and Medicaid. WalMart’s intentionally low wages cost the country hundreds-of-millions of dollars in payroll tax deductions, restrict communities ability to hire and retain important public service workers, cost over $1.02 billion a year in healthcare costs, and $225 million in free and reduced price school lunches. As WalMart increases its wealth, its workers live in poverty and taxpayers subsidize WalMart’s payroll, and their profits.
In fiscal cliff negotiations, Republicans will demand the poor and middle class shoulder all the responsibility to cut spending, but reducing the number of people who need assistance is a better solution and since WalMart refuses to raise employee pay, increasing the minimum wage will force them to stop using taxpayer money to supplement their payrolls. Republicans have protected businesses from paying a living wage by refusing to consider a minimum wage increase because their ideology is that government exists to benefit corporations. Founding Father and second President of the United States, John Adams, America’s first conservative president had a different vision of government and he said, “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men,” and that includes WalMart.
WalMart is not alone in taking advantage of social safety nets to supplement their employees’ low wages, but they are the worst offenders and the most visible. They pay all of their employees substantially less than other large retailers, and while their employees live below poverty, they are posting huge profits. In a free market system, and without a decent minimum wage requirement, there is little prospect for change and it is troubling that the Walton family donated heavily to Republicans who demand drastic cuts to the programs that keep WalMart employees from starving or going without healthcare. The Black Friday protests were commendable, but until WalMart starts respecting their workers and sharing their obscene profits that employees helped generate, they will continue paying poverty level wages and demanding taxpayers supplement their payrolls. It is time for taxpayers to demand that Congress do what giant corporations like WalMart refuse to do, increase the minimum wage and reduce poverty.




clarence swinney
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 8:37 am
REVENUE + SPEND DEBATE
——Spending —-Revenue (% gdp)
1985—14————–17
2000—18————–21
2008—24————–17
2010—23————–16
Percent increase/decrease 2000-2010
Spend + 28%–Revenue minus 25%
We borrowed 7000 Billion
loading...
Jeanne Raynes
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 10:04 am
In the past I have shopped at Walmart because of the lower prices (I thought) also because I could get most things I needed in one stop. However I was aware that the employee pay and benefits were substandard. My daughter and my niece worked there so I had first hand knowledge of the way employees were treated.
With the last election and reading articles such as this one I stopped shopping Walmart. I find that shopping other stores, and locally owned stores is much more pleasant. The service is better, the employees are helpful, and the prices are not that much more than Walmart’s and the difference is not noticeable in the grand scheme of things. I will not be shopping at Walmart again and will urge my friends and relatives to shop elsewhere also. Walmart,s greed makes me think of the slave workers in China. We all gasp at that situation, without realizing that we are subsidizing the same situation right here in the USA, by buying at Walmart.
loading...
Eric Carrig
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 10:08 am
How can citizens, corporations and government share responsibility for building a society characterized by social and technology innovation? All citizens are paying more from our pockets or through payroll taxes for education, healthcare, retirement, public safety and more (or are simply not getting them) because those who run these programs are shifting costs to us. http://www.facebook.com/at10us?ref=hl
loading...
Fedup
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 10:56 am
Why can’t the Government pass the cost of saftey net needs, whether its monatary or healthcare back to Walmart plus a substantial fine for each employee that needs help from Government subsidies. I’ll bet it won’t happen to many times before there wages would go up to a competitive rate.
loading...
Tim
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 11:02 am
Corporate welfare has consumed our country and until we, the people, decide to change it we will have to pony up.
loading...
Tim Murphy
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Another adaptation of A Christmas Carol where Mr Cratchet can’t feed his family and Ebenzer Walton from Scroogemart gripes about how unfair it is that he has to pay these exorbitant(read measly)wages and that workers would complain about working on Holidays. Though I can’t see any ghost scaring Scroogemart into changing it’s ways.
loading...
Reynardine
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Even small-box chain stores are better to patronize. I have only gone to Walmart when, in the middle of the night, I realize I don’t have enough kibble for the morning, because dogs and cats are carnivores, and I’m made out of meat.
loading...
Edward Becker
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 12:54 pm
Why don’t they just get higher paying jobs if they don’t like the pay? DUH!
loading...
Rho
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 2:06 pm
and with more and more human resource departments demanding useless college degrees for jobs that do not really require them to be done, how will those whom did not build a huge debt by not going to college to find those jobs. Even tech school certifications are useless any more. Where are the better paying jobs that are close to home? Show us where, and this my change things.
loading...
Justin
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 4:48 pm
Useless college degrees? Sound like we have an uneducated one on our hands. Seriously though go to college.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 4:58 pm
I am not sure you are getting her meaning
loading...
Pete
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 1:39 pm
This article is basically saying that any profitable business that pays the government mandated minimum wage is being unscrupulous. That is ridiculous. Companies exist to make money. The government is responsible for setting up the parameters for the business to work. The government should raise the minimum wage if it’s below the poverty level. Blame Wal-Mart if they’re doing things that are illegal, not for maximizing profit (which is what every single company does). Employees work there because it’s their best option and they shop there because it’s affordable. This article also ignores the fact that if Wal-Mart paid all of their employees more money, they would raise prices, which also negatively impacts people below the poverty line that shop there. It’s time to stop knocking businesses for not being compassionate. That is what keeps them alive. They don’t exist as a social service. They are there to make money. It’s time that the world (and the author) realizes that. If you want political reform then fine, but don’t blame a company for doing the best they can within the parameters they are given.
loading...
NewDeal
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 6:56 pm
Conservatives say that if the government tries to intervene in the market in any way it will be catastrophe. They rail against taxes, minimum wage laws, child labor laws, anything at all that impacts the perfect efficiency of the free market. So we’re not allowed to use the government to intervene in corporate behavior.
But here you’re also telling me that it’s not fair for the consumers to stand up for what they believe in, independent of government. That we as consumers aren’t allowed to try to dictate corporate behavior through strikes or boycotts or bad publicity, because companies exist to make money, and holding them to a higher standard is just not right.
So we can’t use the government to make corporations behave a certain way, and we can’t act collectively as private citizens to make them behave a certain way either. Is your suggestion to just allow the very wealthy to trample the rest of us and stay quiet?
loading...
Maranon
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 2:10 pm
Walmart, with the faceless corporation.
Who makes the decisions on these policies?
Where is the good will towards the community?
Where are the good old Walton boys, that wanted to help America? they have sold out and thrown the communities under the bus.
They are a bunch of abusive cowards. The rest of us, need to break up the monopy it has become.
Start by supporting the workers in their struggle.
Boycott Walmart!
loading...
Tiffany Lathrop
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 4:19 pm
Wait. How you figure that raising the workers wages will put more mone into the local businesses? Walmart puts most of the local stores OUT of business. So where are these walmart workers supposed to spend these extra dollars. The food stamp, medicaid argument is sound, but this one is not.
loading...
Maranon
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 4:29 pm
What has happened when other stores went out of business?
Well, other people have a huge opportunity to start making and selling stuff. There are swap meets, farmers markets, mom and pop can start a new venue.
What was happenning before there was a walmart or mega stores? the same can happen again.
Remember when MaBell was the only telephone company in the country? the service qwas bad and expensive. Was it needed and inportant? yes, then it got broken into a bunch of smaller outfits and you can see that the phone service is competitive and has blossomed inta many different ways.
The wages the workers are getting are not even surviving wages. How is that good for anyone?
The walmart creeps make John D Rockefeller look like a philanthropist…ha
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 6:29 pm
Raising workers pay puts more money back into the economy. Thats just common sense. The fact is, there are STILL local business’s
loading...
netwrok
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 6:20 pm
That’s such a shame that Walmart treats their employees in such a way.
I guess I’ll have to get a Costco membership and support a great American company that pays its employees very good wages and benefits.
loading...
Jibran Martinez
Nov. 28th, 2012 at 10:33 pm
Raising the minimum wage will only force Walmart to reduce hours for employees or even lay off more. The true change comes from people choice to continue to buy goods from Walmart. In a true free market there would be no minimum wage because each individual would work for a wage that sustains their preferences (family, lifestyle, goods for consumption). You can cry out against wal mart to pay employees more but that will not change a thing until their bottom line is hit. Paying wages that are under the poverty level is the way Wal-Mart is playing the game we are all a part of named capitalism. And in this game money is the ruler. It’s simple, people keep paying WalMart resulting in record profits. Why would they change their practices? a reduction in profits for Walmart means that investors will not be happy reducing the market value of the company, which can have a great affect on many people, especially those who have retirement vested on their stock. They do not care about employees unless they have some other skill besides saying hello, allocating items or stocking them. If the money keeps coming in with paying minimum wage (not slave, stop using so much pathos to make argument) at non full time hours and government paid benefit, no one is business will oppose that. In todays world business is no longer about the exchange of goods, it about profit (first lesson in business school) people are labor, money is capital and it is all put together in a nice formula to maximize profit. People are numbers in Economics and are just another piece of the puzzle.
loading...
Albert N. Milliron
Nov. 29th, 2012 at 11:42 am
Slash? Name one Republican who wants to “Slash” food stamps. What is the reason for Walmart record profits? Walmart is a shopped by the poor during recession. Actually making those food stamps have more purchasing power. This attack on Walmart is just part of the class warfare tactics of the left. Walmart provides jobs for those who might otherwise be unemployed. And provides products for low income households.
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 29th, 2012 at 11:44 am
Paul Ryan
What your argument is, the people have nop right to an opinion except you and Walmart
loading...