
Promise Broken! Announces PolitiFact.
President Obama said he would sign the UN Disability Treaty but the Republicans blocked it, so it’s a broken Obama promise on the “Obamameter”.
Here’s the “broken promise”:
“As president, Barack Obama will renew America’s leadership by making the United States a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; the first human rights treaty approved by the UN in the 21st century and a vital foundation for respecting the rights of people with disabilities worldwide He will urge the U.S. Senate to ratify the Convention expeditiously.”
Never mind that former President Bush negotiated the Disability treaty, Republicans voted no on it because you know, there’s nothing they won’t vote no on in order to make Obama look bad, even when voting yes is clearly the only morally right thing to do. The Treaty basically says you can’t discriminate against the disabled and that the disabled are entitled to the same freedoms as other citizens. This shouldn’t be too difficult, especially for a Party that allegedly supports our troops, many of whom return from war disabled.
No matter, the Republicans blithely walked by 89 year old former Senator Bob Dole in his wheelchair and still voted no.
Republicans cited concerns over passing something in a lame duck session. If this had any merit, then Governor Rick Snyder’s Republican legislature in Michigan wouldn’t be shoving Right to Work legislation down Michiganders’ throats during a lame duck session, especially since their legislation was brand new (ostensibly, though modeled on the Wisconsin legislation, but new in the sense that for years Snyder has been saying he had no intention of introducing Right to Work laws), not offered for debate, and by all accounts not open to public debate.
Whereas, the Disability Treaty was already negotiated under Bush, signed by Obama in July of 2009, and modeled on the United States” Americans with Disabilities Act. Furthermore, the treaty already gained consideration last month in a 61-36 vote.
Republicans also cited concerns over the state having authority over parents (and yet, Republicans want authority over women’s doctors) and then there was the usual GOP UN freak out. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said this could lead to abortion freedom for the disabled and Sen. Jim Inhofe, (R-Ok) said, “I do not support the cumbersome regulations and potentially overzealous international organizations with anti-American biases that infringe upon American society.”
Of course, the treaty does not necessitate any change to U.S. law. We already have the Americans With Disability Act, upon which the UN Treaty is based. The purpose is to enhance the rights of the disabled around the globe, and to protect American citizens including our troops who are overseas.
Republican Senator John McCain, a supporter of the treaty who sees it as the right thing to do for our disabled veterans, pointed out that since the 1970s, the Senate has voted to approve treaties 19 times during lame duck sessions. He also called baloney on his Republican colleagues’ arguments that the treaty affects U.S. abortion laws bad politics and wrong, “With respect to abortion, this is a disabilities treaty and has nothing to do with abortion. Trying to turn this into an abortion debate is bad politics and just wrong.”
All Democrats voted yes, and 8 Republicans joined them.
So, the President’s own party supported the treaty, but it’s a broken promise because he couldn’t make Republicans give a crap about the disabled.
Here’s PolitFact’s logic:
Even though Obama has signed the convention and forwarded it to the Senate, and even though his party unanimously supported it in the Senate, our rules do not allow us to call this a Promise Kept until the treaty is ratified. However, since treaties, unlike bills and other legislative measures, remain available to the Senate from one Congress to the next, it could be considered again, and when the new Congress convenes, the Democrats will see their caucus increase by two members. For now, though, we rate this a Promise Broken.
Fact-checkers like PolitFact offer a valuable service to the public. Their stated goal is “PolitiFact.com is a project of the Tampa Bay Times to help you find the truth in Washington and the Obama presidency.” It’s a real shame when their “rules” force them to undermine that purpose by misleading the public in this way. While they do a good job of explaining what actually happened, when people want to read about promises kept and broken, they often read the general list and not the detailed explanation. Furthermore, this will be cited by the media as a broken Obama promise because PolitiFact said so, and thus further misinform the public.
Given the historical obstruction of the Republican Party under President Obama, PolitiFact should consider creating a new section: Promises kept but blocked by Republicans. That would be a real public service and provide needed education about how our government is actually operating.
After all, calling this a promise broken is quite simply daft. It serves to aid and abet obstructionism rather than keep a true record of the facts, and makes PolitiFact look a bit of the willing tool of the Republican Party’s games.




Kerry D Teverbaugh
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:42 am
So congress blocks it, therefore Obama fails. You are Idiots. I am unliking you and removing from mailing list. What did you guys do, get in bed with FOX TV?
Kerry Dean Teverbaugh
loading...
Jason Easley
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:49 am
Kerry,
This article is criticizing PolitFact for blaming Obama for something that he did not do. You might want to go back and read the article again. ALL OF THE ARTICLE.
loading...
TStMauro
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 3:27 pm
This isn’t the first time they’ve done something like thiis. They really should remove the word “fact” from their name.
loading...
Sabyen91
Dec. 9th, 2012 at 1:41 am
Their “lie of the year” was a joke. Ryan does indeed want to destroy Medicare as we know it. Politifact has fallen prey to the same “balanced” approach as NPR. They don’t want to seem left so they criticize every little thing on the left to even out their criticisms of the right (even though reality is not on their side).
loading...
phyllis
Dec. 9th, 2012 at 10:33 pm
this comment on President Obama was truly not ready or qualified to be rated–there was no cut and dry answer to it
loading...
Darlene
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:45 am
Why is Politifact making “promises broken” by Obama a thing, and then completely ignoring Republican obstructionism, which really is a thing, is a BAD thing, and which is directly supported by Politifact’s “promises broken” by Obama thing? Maybe Politifact should be called PolitiFOX NEWS.
loading...
djchefron
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:53 am
This right here is why the village is in the stage of denial
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/812/jp3ah.gif/
loading...
Jill
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:53 am
I think the big money of the GOP has also bought bought PolitiFact…I agree it is now PolitiFoxnews!!!
loading...
Anne
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 11:55 am
This attempt by PolitiFact to blame the president for a concerted effort by Senate Republicans to insult a fellow Republican in order to make the president look bad reeks of the kind of false equivalency that has often undermined the credibility of so much of the media. The behavior of Congressional Republicans ever since President Obama’s first election underscores the utmost importance of having a president and a Congress that can work together for the good of the country. Anyone who chooses to ignore that critical fact deserves to be roundly criticized. They are the same people who would call him a “dictator” if he chose to go around them to do what he wants.
loading...
Jerry Blackburn
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 12:09 pm
How hard it is to add a level of rating that says “PROMISE HIJACKED: Maximum Effort was employed to Fulfill this Promise, but outside forces prevented the promise from being fulfilled”???????
Clearly, by PolitiFact’s own admission, their rules do not function to provide a clear picture based upon their rating alone. You’d think that a professional business dedicated to providing rankings of truth would bother to spend a minute on their own rules to make sure that they were in fact, FACTual without having to go around the corner to find a truth.
I mean it is ridiculous. It would be like rating a person as breaking a promise who did exactly what they said they would do within their power. Does that make sense to anyone? Is it so cataclysmically catastrophic to alter their own rules to be let’s say oh FACTUAL?
loading...
Karen J (@KaJo503)
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 12:13 pm
I agree with Sarah that calling this failure by Republicans to ratify the Treaty a “Promise Broken” by President Obama is just moronic.
Politifact has a category in their “Obama Scorecard” that’s much more appropriate — “Stalled”. Why didn’t they use it? Even “In the Works” would have been more appropriate.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/
loading...
eqfan592
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 4:47 pm
I said the same thing you did, Karen J. Either “Stalled” or “In The Works” would have been far more appropriate here. “Promise Broken” is beyond misleading.
loading...
Dolores m. Joyce
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Politifact definitely should add a category promises kept but blocked by republicans thereby providing a valuable service to the public!
loading...
Dolores m. Joyce
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Politifact needs to use common sense and provide information that lets the public know what is really happening.
loading...
dd
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 1:17 pm
I guess Politifact just lost a whole lotta credibility.
loading...
Debbie
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Just?! Just lost credibility? They lost me after giving a pass to the Paul Ryan Kill Medicare Plan. In fact, I think they had to retroactively re-adjust their mission statement in order to stay in business because they found that facts have a liberal bias, as someone once said.
loading...
Christopher
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 1:35 pm
Hardly the first time Politifact has done this. I’ve thought for a long time that there should be a separate category titled “Congress Didn’t Go Along”.
loading...
46A9MA
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Big mistake, PolitiFact. Big mistake.
loading...
j
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 6:21 pm
Perhaps politiFact should make one more statement – ie that the republicans have found another group of people to hate! Now the disabled.
Are there any groups they like other than old white rich men?
loading...
phyllis
Dec. 9th, 2012 at 10:37 pm
let them keep up the good work–they’re doing us all a favor by insuring they won’t be getting voted into many more offices
loading...
Debbie
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 8:02 pm
The poster writes that Poli-Fox “serves to aid and abet obstructionism rather than keep a true record of the facts, and makes PolitiFact look a bit of the willing tool of the Republican Party’s games.”
You say that like it’s a bad thing. (snark).
loading...
majii
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 8:27 pm
It seems that by holding the president responsible for the actions of a group of ignorant, fear-filled, conspiracy-loving members of Congress, PolitiFact has wandered far off the path of fact-based reporting. It’s partisanship is a major reason I stopped following the organization on Twitter and take everything it reports not with a grain of salt but use the entire box. IMO, PolitiFact’s credibility was shot a long time ago when it decided to deny the obstructionist role the republicans have played that have prevented many of the president’s policies from making it through Congress.
loading...