Editor’s Note: The following is an op-ed by Robert Feldman
The actions, or lack thereof, by members of Congress during the last couple of weeks makes it abundantly clear that our political system is broken and cannot be repaired without dramatic and perhaps draconian changes. To do so will require the public to clearly demonstrate that we’ve had enough. Both our methods of enacting legislation as well as the legislators themselves require significant restructuring or the system will collapse. The simple truth is that Washington no longer represents us.
Our elected officials including the President and members of both Houses of Congress continue to provide disservice to this country. Collectively they have presided over the continuing erosion of public confidence and show no signs of being able to identify the fundamental problems much less the basic solutions to the political and fiscal issues that we face.
I remember studying what we used to call “Civics” back in grammar school many years ago. I remember learning how a representative democracy works. But it seems that what I learned no longer applies. Our elected officials have so re-structured the system so that the sole goal is re-election.
I also remember voting for my Senators and Congressman as well as the President. I voted for them by name and not be label or party designation. I can’t however, seem to remember when I voted for John Boehner to be Emperor of the House. (Since he ran unopposed for the Ohio 8th Congressional District, I am not sure if anyone voted for him.) I don’t remember anything in our Constitution that gives the Speaker of the House the absolute authority to prevent proposed legislation from ever coming out of committee and thus just dying in the black morass of Congress without the membership being able to do anything about it.
I still can’t remember the course I took in college, graduate school or law school that explained how self-made rules adopted by Congress itself can subvert the will of the People. How is it possible that we still do not have a Bill already introduced to ban assault weapons and multi-round ammunition clips? Is there any doubt that the bulk of the people want REASONABLE GUN CONTROL and want it NOW!!! Even the Supreme Court, after deciding they had the power to amend the Constitution themselves by deleting any reference to a “well regulated militia”, reluctantly agreed that the right to bear arms is not absolute but subject to reasonable restrictions. So, the people ask, “where’s the Bill?” Is it a new legislative requirement that in order to placate the 2 million NRA members that the wishes of over 300 million citizens be ignored? When will Congress act?
They call the House of Representatives the “People’s House”. What people? The only people they serve are the elected officials whose primary role is to be re-elected.
Why does my Congressperson or yours have to meet in a party caucus? I don’t want him/her voting as part of a bloc because some party leader wants him to vote a certain way. I have given my congressman my proxy to vote for me because I believe him to be capable of independent thought and to do what he believes is the right thing. I do not expect to agree with him on every issue, but I trust him. That’s why I voted for him.
But I didn’t vote for John Boehner or Eric Kantor or Nancy Pelosi for that matter. I didn’t give him the right to vote the party line. And how do our elected officials justify signing a “pledge” in advance, which is contrary to their constitutional oath. How can they agree in advance of hearing any arguments pro or con on a given issue to always vote in a certain way? Why don’t we just elect a group of pre-programmed computers with humanoid features. We can save taxpayer dollars by not having to pay for salaries, expenses, perks, fact-finding excursions, office staff, pensions, medical benefits and the like. Just press the “Enter” button and the machine will smoke, shoot sparks and record a “NO” vote.
It is shameful listening to these people congratulating themselves for pushing us to the brink of economic disaster and then reluctantly backing down and finding a more moderate approach conditioned by the promise that “we’ll be back in a couple of weeks”. They are not Gentlemen and Gentlewomen. They have become viscous venal fourth graders who have learned some curse words. They are quick to take credit for things they never did and always find themselves blameless when things go wrong. They have become experts in revisionist history. And it doesn’t make any difference as to which party is currently in power. There are demagogues and extremists on both sides.
There is no doubt that we have to curtail spending. We have a moral obligation to assist all members of society by providing education, social justice and assistance when needed provided that the assistance is coupled with genuine effort on the part of the needy. We do not have the obligation to guarantee success. Simple economic truths tell us that carrying the costs of 2 wars has to come from somewhere. It also tells us that a society that has more than 1 out of every 7 people on some form of local, county, state or federal payroll is in trouble. Common sense tells us that continuing to subsidize the oil industry with massive depletion allowances makes no sense nor do subsidies being paid to large conglomerate farm entities, We guarantee banks in time of need and their response is to curtail consumer lending to small businesses. It has to stop.
No more sound bites, no more pandering to special interest groups. No more gerrymandering voting districts so it’s virtually impossible to defeat an incumbent congressman.
The fiscal changes needed will place economic burdens on everyone, but these burdens cannot be equally shared. The inequality, at least for the short term, must fall more heavily on the haves and not the have nots. The details I leave to those far smarter than I and to those who believe they really can be part of the solution without the fear of a primary fight or the possible loss of an election. Not to worry. Given the quality of the current group (with some notable exceptions) anyone who is truly trying to come up with compromise solutions as opposed to merely pointing fingers, spouting meaningless stock phrases and auditioning to be a talking head on know-nothing television, has nothing to worry about.
So here are my recommendations. You may disagree with some of the details but hopefully not with the basic substance.
1. Term limits for all federal elected officials. 6 two year terms for congresspeople and 3 six year terms for the Senate.
2. No Senator or Congressperson can become a lobbyist without forfeiting his pension.
3. Changes in the procedural rules of the House and Senate so as to require all issues to come for a floor vote within 6 months of introduction.
4. Line item veto given to the President on all fiscal issues.
5. No amendments other than those directly related to the subject matter of any proposed piece of legislation.
6. A complete overhaul of the budget and tax code within 2 years. If Congress fails to complete this task, all members are dismissed and will be replaced with a new group.
7. Legislation to be adopted preventing the outsourcing of jobs, The only feasible method of addressing fiscal issues includes the creation of more jobs within this country. The Federal Government should invest resources into infrastructure improvements as well as alternate energy programs.
8. Public funding of elections with strict limits on advertising. An election cycle of no more than 90 days.
Are these solutions perfect? Far from it, but it’s a start. Are they simplistic-yes. But what’s wrong with simplicity. How can a Congress have passed a comprehensive Medical Insurance Act of more than 1,000 pages? Do we think that any elected official really read and understood it? What is clear is that fundamental change must occur.
Nor is the Executive Branch exempt from change. Our foreign policy must be dramatically overhauled. We cannot be the world’s unpaid policeman forever. We just can’t afford it. We went into Afghanistan for one reason and one reason only. Get Osama Bin Laden. Finally, 10 years later, mission accomplished. Why are we still there? How are real national interests being served? They’re not. Bring our troops home NOW not next year or the year thereafter. How much longer do we maintain a presence in Iraq?
On the domestic side our tax code is riddled with vestiges of failed social legislation. You don’t tinker with a tax code in order to fix social issues. You address the issues directly. There is no question as to continuing viability of the so called “entitlement” programs. They are going bankrupt and the promises made to me and my generation are being broken daily. And it is my children and grandchildren who will have to pay the price. That’s not the American way and it’s certainly not part of my family values.
I’m not smart enough to fix all the problems but I’m sure that we have enough clever caring people who are. But you have to start by tearing down and discarding the failed policies and procedures of yesterday. They say that insanity can be defined as repetitive actions with the expectancy of different results. I regret that I do not trust the Congress to do their part without severe pressure from you, the electorate. If we had the ability to have a Vote of Confidence they’d be out of work tomorrow. To those elected officials who really care, I apologize. But you’ve got to change the system. It just doesn’t work. The changes will require sacrifice and a basic restructuring of the legislative process. Let’s start today.
So here’s the challenge to everyone. If you agree with some or all of these sentiments pass them along. Feel free to add your own constructive thoughts. Send them to your friends, neighbors and most importantly to your elected officials. Let them know if they won’t change their methods we’ll change their jobs. Ask them if they’ll take the real pledge and agree to term limits without the need for a Constitutional Amendment. And if they won’t VOTE THEM OUT regardless of party affiliation.
I am not advocating any drastic form of social revolt but rather a common sense approach to real democracy. Set the standards for our elected officials and if they fail, replace them. No more allowing them to close their eyes, point their fingers and blame the other guy. As Walt Kelly reminded us in the Pogo comic strip, we are the other guy. Make them fulfill their obligations to serve the people and not themselves.
Enough is more than enough.
Robert Feldman




Nancy
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 6:03 pm
This is great!!! Ty Mr. Feldman! Well said!
loading...
Janice
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 6:34 pm
Outstanding! Now let’s get to work!
loading...
Royella Jaynes
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 7:28 pm
Well written, sir! You’ve echoed so many of my own thoughts so well. I’ve written,repeatedly, not only to my own senators and congress-people, but to those who have really annoyed me. You’re so right that we should not have to be babysitting our elected officials, but it’s required at this time that our voices be heard often and loudly.
loading...
Churchlady
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 7:30 pm
Some of these are good. But others are a disaster.
Term limits do two things – 1. increase ignorance as a factor in all members. 2.INCREASE the power of lobbyists to write legislation due to factor 1. Term limits do not assure better representation. They assure more roles for the party hacks in picking the people as successors. MONEY will play an ever greater role as name recognition and familiarity and trust have no role.
Line item veto? Think Reagan and Bush and say good bye to Social Security,Medicare
You DO want people like Joe Biden who served dutifully for years and did NOT sell his soul. You WANT dedication to public service – and with term limits you do NOT get that since service is not the issue.It’s power and faster greed. Get it fast, get it NOW, because you will be termed out.
What you DO want is far greater citizen involvement in choosing candidates, far greater roles in voting. There actually is nothing WRONG with parties and their roles IF ordinary people become more involved. But then think about what happens when someone DOES represent his or her constitutents – they get called ‘sell outs’. Think of Blue Dog Dems who SERIOUSLY represent their constituents. Faux progressives act as if they are all bought and paid for by corporations or the Right thinks they are cop outs.
We have to alter Citizens United – but we have already proven we CAN elect good people even in the face of such overwhelming financial odds. 2012 was the year of the people.We refused to let our brothers and sisters be disenfranchised or be intimidated out of voting.We refused to stand down and be rolled over for crappy candidates.We refused to give up or give in. THAT is what we need in every election.Get on party councils. Shape the platforms, and oh yeah – give money to groups who advocate FOR YOUR PRINCIPLES because fully one third of lobbyists at state and federal level are there for YOU. THAT is reform. DO it!
loading...
Reynardine
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 7:32 pm
I don’t agree with 4, because I know damn well how the likes of Reagan and the Bushes would have used it. The other numbered suggestions are all good.
loading...
terry
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 7:48 pm
Robert,
You are just masturbating. Right here in front of everyone. Why don’t you stop fantasizing and go back to Professor Tribe’s text.
1. ) Term limits are antidemocratic. They deny voters the candidate of their choice.
2.) Fine. So his wife or his son or his lawyer can become a lobbyist.
3.) You want every introduced Bill to have an up or down floor vote without any culling, negotiating, deliberation, staff work, at the committee? Yeah, right!
4.) Why just “fiscal issues”? You already forbad legislative negotiations so who is going to draw those “line items”? You make the president a tyrant.
5.) This one has merit. That’s why Florida limits bills to “one subject” but who is going to enforce a deviation from this, the Supremes?
6.) Er, “Congress fails to complete this task, all members are dismissed and will be replaced with a new group.” Who will do the dismissing and replacement, Rahm Emanuel or David Axelrod? Who would enact this provision: Congress?
7.) If that would deport Piers Morgan, maybe, but you can’t eliminate French cheese and wine, Irish whiskey, Brazilian musicians, Danish pornography, televisions, radios, computers, cell phones, Liberian latex, Japanese cameras, Australian actors and African Kwanza decorations. Stop being silly. You are educated. Act like it.
8.) We are totally broke without a pot to piss in, people can’t afford gas or their water bill, but you want a massive transfer of taxpayer money to television, radio, magazine and newspapers, billboards, advertising agencies, all profit making corporations to support the candidacy of which candidates exactly? Only the ones who pass muster at the Ministry of Information?
Such ideas might be adorable to a room full of drunks or pot heads but not to any serious or intellectually honest person. You’re just masturbating, Mr. Feldman. Not that there’s anything wrong with that…
Flames to my email please, oldfox@gmail.com. I…
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 8:54 pm
Actually # 1 is not antidemocratic.
If it stops corruption and purchased representatives theres no reason it cant be done. All congress has to do is vote on it
loading...
Nancy
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 10:55 pm
Clearly you didn’t read this & I think your comments are vile!
loading...
knight4444
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 1:34 pm
@terry!! FUX news called! they want their talking points back! government is broken is like saying FUX is a news outlet! term limits are perfect! the only thing these politicians EVER worry about is losing THEIR job!! not yours! not mine!! THEIR’S!!! why are republicans scared to death of the Koch brothers or the flea party? it’s called getting primaried!!! get it??? John McCain was half way sane until the tea party ran a candidate against him several years ago!! and now he’s as far right as it gets!!!! So get you’re head out of FUX delusional world OK!
loading...
Churchlady
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 2:43 pm
Bravo, well said! These comments reflect a serious understanding of how our system works, warts and all.
Those who embrace term limits? You just have to look at states that have them. They make dysfunction PERMANENT and to the BONE. CA recently took the bold (snicker) step of making time in office longer – and it will help, but you sell your soul when you have term limits. YOU deprive yourself of good people and hand over the choices to party hacks, money, and lobbyists. Ask yourself if we REALLY would have been better off without Kennedy in office all those years? VOTING is the best remedy – so get engaged and do it. Hate the party? Get involved and change the selection.
These are all right on the money. Cheesy and cheap solutions produce cheesy and cheap outcomes.
The system worked well until Reagan – what the HELL is wrong with going back to what works?
loading...
charlie
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 8:29 pm
1. Term limits- I’m all for it…I might even go for less than the author suggests.
2. Forfeiture of pension for a Congressman to become a lobbyist? – Wickedly delicious.
3. Require all issues to be voted on in 6 months- sounds good… okay, I’m with ya.
4. Line item veto for Prez. for all fiscal issues- that might get a little tricky…let me think about it.
5. Heh…I reeeally like this one.
6. Wait…maybe #6 is even better than #5. Overhauling the tax code and budget within 2 years otherwise they all get the boot? Start the clock….
7. Legislation to prevent outsourcing of jobs…well, there are pros and cons on that issue. Let’s talk about that one more first.
8. Yes…yes and yes.
I’ll sign on to 6 out of the 8 right here, right now. Do you just get the feeling the majority of Americans would agree with most of it too?
loading...
C.
Jan. 5th, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Well I agree more citizens need to be paying attention to all of what Washington and Congress is doing, and that we need to be more involved.
That involvement should start at city level, by either running, supporting good people and paying attention to just who is climbing the political ladder that leads often leads to state legislatures, governorships and to Washington.
I’ll leave it at that, without going into my biases.
We need good people involved and paying attention.
loading...
Tina
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 7:39 am
Government isn’t broken…it’s”fixed”
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 9:39 am
My favorite bitch is a bill(in fact all bills) end with the term “And other purposes”
That angers me to no end. No bill is written just for the purpose of why it was written. Its written to carry out other agendas.
Term limits yes, make the corps pay huge money real quick to buy these people. Makes you wonder why the tea party with all its superior ideals hasnt put an end to lobbying. It cant, its the GOP
8 Good ideas
loading...
knight4444
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 1:19 pm
Welcome to corpocracy!! I’ve always said this country is center left but our politicians are center right and that’s on a good day!! Good ole Bill Clinton is the one who brought forth welfare reform and didn’t do anything to stop the ”fairness act” which help conservative media spread like a cancer here! Clinton and Obama are brilliant men that talk a good game in fooling liberals into believing their on our team but as soon as their in office it’s a different story!! The republican party is at an all time LOW!! why in God’s name are we negotiating with them on a 70/30 basis “THEIR FAVOR!!??? if the democrats were in this black hole of political confusion and republicans were in charge they’d stomp the life out of us! with a smile!! Obama is the worst negotiator in political history!! He should have done a Cheney style lynching on republicans!! did Reagan play negotiator with dems?? Welcome to corpocracy folks!! Why do democrats always come to a gunfight with a knife!!!!!! don’t agree with me?? ask the dems liberal caucus! I’ve heard Bernie Sanders say basically the same thing I’m talking about here! truth be told we haven’t had a progressive dems since FDR and we had to kick him in the butt to be progressive!!!!
loading...
sherrie heckendorn
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 4:19 pm
Very good article and most of the suggestions echoed my own thoughts.
loading...
Inez
Jan. 6th, 2013 at 10:23 pm
NAFTA was the beginning of outsourcing of thousands of jobs in perpetuity,,,,,Now , we awaken to this reality. Americans need jobs. Losing a pension to a lobbyist is agood idea, unless the “broker” pays more in the long run. Sitting on bills and keeping them from a vote should meet the 60 day rule. Term limits can induce “under the table” deals prior to term ends. All elected officials should pay a percentage of their health care coverage premium.With a limited “work day” each year,maybe salaries should be based on productivity, like most Americans are paid. The constituenst of each of their districts should be sent a rating questionairre for completion and return to a designated oversight committee.
loading...
knight4444
Jan. 7th, 2013 at 9:30 am
It’s Jan 7th and because progressive radio was turned off here in metro Detroit 1310 am GONE!! unreal! anyway I’m listening to progressive radio via the internet!!!!!!!!!!! Stephanie Miller and guest Davis Shuster of MSMBC said Obama is the worse negotiator PERIOD!! he actually said Obama is acting like a ”wuss” I wouldn’t go that far myself but Obama promised to us he learned his lesson on dealing with republicans!! remember? election night! he said he made mistakes and said things would be different! how??? by putting social security up for red meat to republicans??? yeah ok Obama
loading...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 7th, 2013 at 10:13 am
I think you need to wait and see. You also notice SS was yanked right out from under the GOP
loading...
FauxRomney
Jan. 10th, 2013 at 10:53 pm
So where is the president “providing disservice to our country?”
Thank you.
loading...