An error stemming from ignorance, misinformation, or sheer delusion is sometimes labeled a formal fallacy or simply an invalid argument, and in America, it is the identifying feature of a segment of the population steeped in paranoia that government tyranny threatens their existence. Most sane human beings rightly categorize paranoid anti-government advocates as delusional, and hardly consider them a threat to society, but after the tea party inflicted damage on the nation over the past two years, most Americans realized political power in the hands of lunatics is as great a threat to America as a foreign invader. The 2012 election gave voters an opportunity to marginalize the tea party, but instead of reconsidering the efficacy of their anti-government rhetoric and tempering their outrage, they have embraced the National Rifle Association’s “tyrannical government” oratory and are threatening armed resistance against the government.
Since the Newtown school massacre in December, the national gun control discussion incited the tea party to ignore the immigration and budget debate in Congress leaving just one thing on their agenda; guns. The idea of background checks, limiting access to assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines to reduce gun violence is adding fuel to the teabaggers’ fallacy their rights are being trampled and is increasing the anti-government paranoia that drove the movement in 2009. Around the country, tea party leaders are using the gun debate as a new rallying cry for the movement’s anticipated resurgence with a wave of protests to decry “tyranny of the Obama Administration” that drives teabagger anti-government rage.
The NRA leadership droning on that the Obama Administration is waging a war on the Second Amendment has led disaffected patriots across the nation to believe they face an existential threat that fuels their “If we don’t fight, we’ll lose our rights” sentiment. The single most absurd 2nd Amendment fallacy, and deliberately promoted NRA lie to incite opposition to President Obama, is “the Second Amendment is there to protect us from losing the rest of them.” That sentiment, by a teabagger with his 3-year old daughter in one arm and a rifle in the other, is driving the tea party’s tyrannical government narrative and inflaming those waiting for a reason to begin a war against the government. Regardless the historical record that the Second Amendment was to ensure a “well-regulated Militia” was available to put down insurrections and uprisings against the government, extremist conservatives hold that the right to keep and bear arms is to fight government tyranny. Only a fool would believe that America’s Founders adopted the Second Amendment because they wanted an armed population that could battle the U.S. government, and yet this is a widely held notion among gun fanatics. It is insane on its face and a fallacy of epic proportion fueling the growing threat from gun-fanatics that “this is the fundamental issue on the founding of our nation, and job one of ours–to protect gun owners from the assault on the Constitution. Might we have to have to take up arms against the government? Yeah.”
All of this anti-government sentiment did not begin with the gun debate, but with provocation by the NRA and patriot groups, it represents a threat all the same. It is fortunate that the tyranny rhetoric is not overwhelming the sanity of an ever-growing number of Americans, including NRA members, who dispel the Republican and conservative myth that the public does not support stronger gun laws to keep Americans safe. In a comprehensive poll conducted by Republican Frank Lutz seven months before Newtown, 87% of NRA members agree that support for Second Amendment rights goes hand-in-hand with keeping guns out of the hands of criminals. 74 percent of NRA members and 87 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring criminal background checks of anyone purchasing a gun, and yet the NRA and Republicans in Congress vehemently oppose them today. If the tea party is depending on a wave of support because they champion armed conflict over requiring background checks, they are incredibly delusional.
Despite widespread support for stricter gun control laws, Republicans in Congress and state legislatures embolden the gun-crazed crowd by pandering to the gun lobby (NRA) and giving credence to the teabaggers’ belief that their rights are being trampled with little option but to take up arms against the government. Mitch McConnell, Wayne La Pierre, and conservative pundits have attempted to use fear to garner support against gun controls, and although they are successful with gun fanatics, they are losing favor with the public and the tea party is gullible if they think their ticket to electoral victory rests with threatening violence against the government. The greatest allies gun control advocates have are not necessarily President Obama and Democrats, but crazed fear mongers like La Pierre, McConnell, and conservative pundits that Fox News and liberal critics challenge publicly as insane.
Last week, La Pierre said “I think without any doubt, if you look at why our Founding Fathers put (the Second Amendment) there, they wanted to make sure that these free people in this new country would never be subjugated again and have to live under tyranny,” but most Americans, including NRA members, do not equate gun control with tyranny. The entire “tyranny rhetoric” is a straw man for opposition to an African American President and began long before the current gun control debate, and calls for violence predicated on “tyranny” are cover for racism. In fact, no so-called patriot can cite one instance of tyranny or assault on the Constitution, but it is politically incorrect to call for violence because an African American is President, as evidenced by similar calls during the healthcare reform debate.
The rising calls for civil or revolutionary war are the result of President Obama’s re-election. Nearly a year ago, Virginia Republicans called for a revolution if the President was re-elected and the gun crowd is answering their call. Teabaggers carried signs during the healthcare reform debate that read, “We came unarmed this time,” and they are fulfilling their promise at tea party gun rallies across America today. Their tyranny rhetoric, guns, and calls for war will never garner widespread support, but with NRA, Republican backing, and a cause based on a fallacy, a well-armed group of lunatics cannot be taken lightly.




Reynardine
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 10:54 am
What their antics will get them one day, if they go much further, is likely to be martial law, which will enable those outside its purview to scream, “Tyranny!” the louder. I think that is what the real instigators are hoping for.
loading...
ED HINO
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 10:58 am
maybe its time for the tea party patriots to be called what they are anarchists and hate groups,and any one whose associated with one is a government subversive ,even the the neo nazi koch brothers are a threat to the united states of america it citizens and our duly elected government and democracy and treated as such
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 11:30 am
You could probably just call them Republicans and achieve the same thing
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 11:29 am
The tyranny rhetoric is exactly just that as you described it. Complete bunk. Only a complete idiot would absolutely think that the government is going to fight the population. Or vice versa.
While there is little doubt that little Wayne of the NRA is truly quite insane and in the pay of the gun manufacturers, I have to take the extra step and also say that our representatives both Democrat and Republican are in exactly the same boat. It doesn’t matter who the manufacturer or the Corp. is, all of them are owned in some manner the same as little Wayne of the NRA. We have Democrats who vote to keep the big oil subsidies simply because they live in an oil-producing area and are almost wholly funded by big oil. Big oil, is not a citizen nor is it a voting citizen. They do not represent us in any way the same as little Wayne does not represent the people of the NRA
loading...
montag
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 12:45 pm
How many of these reactionaries understand that to be the owner of a gun as part of a well regulated militia, they had to be enrolled in the militia. In fact enrollment was required. Enrollment is also known as registration, a process the Founders were quite comfortable with.
loading...
Peter Barnett
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 1:28 pm
I think this is a little unfair. I mean come on. The NRA is the National Rifle Association. Of course their focus won’t be on immigration or the budget. It’s on guns, and their prime job is to get the representatives and president focused on it. It’s what their job is. Just like any other lobbying organization. It’s the fault of the president, the senators, and the representatives of BOTH parties of not even speaking about the budget since the start of the new term.
loading...
phooeyrat
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 1:52 pm
Why cant; “We The People”; Hold a National “Public” Debate on this Subject and Any Other Subject that is Considered a “Hot-Topic” by the Citizens of this Country and the “Rest”of the World in one of this Country’s many “Sports-Arenas”(Or the “OK”Corral for that matter); Invite the “Teams” and their “Sponsors”to Make Their Case in Front of the World and let the Response of the People be Their Score. Like the “Super-Bowl”; But A “lot” more Important (In my opinion). And it would get a lot of more Folks “Informed” as to what is “Really” Going-On in this Country and the World Today and Also let them Know “Who” Is Involved in making things Happen Both Good and Bad. Do You think there would be a Sufficient Amount of “Sponsors” and “Media Coverage” for an Event like this to be Successful ?
loading...
Ol' doodlebugger
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 3:14 pm
It never ceases to amaze me how the right wing zeros in on the second sentence of the second amendment while completely ignoring the first sentence. And never noticing that the preamble describes the purpose of the constitution. Capitalized words being the most important. (note to right wingers : Welfare is capitalized, defense is not.)
loading...
Mark
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 5:02 pm
All gun owners are white racist teaparty republicans. Talk about uninformed…-smh
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 5:10 pm
Point out where that was said
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 5:15 pm
Im a gun owner and I am a white coffee party Democrat
loading...
Reynardine
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 5:59 pm
Ditto, more or less.
loading...
John Taylor
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 6:36 pm
Before this is done, some stupid bunch of “militia patriots” are going to try shooting up some government building in the hopes of starting a civil war. After the miltary shuts it down, maybe the survivors(if any) will understand that an AR15 with a hundred round drum is still a losing proposition. At that time, assault style weapons will be banned and extremely restrictive gun laws will be put in place. The dummies will get the exact opposite of what they are wishing.
loading...
jackiestbird
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 10:47 pm
Obama has NEVER wanted Americans to have guns. Newtown has nothing to do with this. Chicago has the strictest gun control and the highest murder rate. This is basically from gangs, which Obama is very lenient on. Now, as far as the ‘teabaggers’ are concerned. Obama has signed several Exec Orders that concern MOST citizens, not only the ‘teabaggers’. Obama has a kill list, this is proven, this also concerns many Americans. Obama also has signed a decree to kill American’s this also has many upset. FEMA has decided that anyone who is ‘patriotic’, was a Ron Paul supporter, against big government is a ‘terrorist’. Any wonder why ‘teabaggers’ are concerned? When Hillary said to protest was a “right” and didn’t make you any less patriotic, did that only count for the Left? The DHS is using drones in America, does this not concern you? YES the Constitution did say that the reason for the 2nd was to protect from a TYRANNICAL govt. Do you think that cannot happen? You are very sadly misinformed if you really think that can never happen because we are America. In Obama’s first campaign he said he wanted a BIGGER, BETTER FUNDED CIVILIALM FORCE. (I Have video) why? Why do we need an armed civilian force? Why has DHS bought 1.6 Billion hollow point bullets? They can’t be used overseas in the wars. As yourselves these questions and GOOGLE them if you like. It should concern ALL of us, not just the ‘teabaggers’
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 11:22 pm
You have just proved why you are an idiot. The gun laws in CHicago are not relevant when you can go to states with lax gun laws and buy all the guns you want. How narrow minded do you havwe to be to think all people in chicago buy their guns only in chicago? Mail order come to mind?
Obama doesnt care if you have guns or not. This is the same guy who signed bills allowing idiots like you to carry in state parks etc.
You totally missed the point of civilian force.It wasnt military. It was people for people.
You are way too dumb to post here
loading...
UncaJoe
Feb. 5th, 2013 at 3:28 am
Funny, my copy says
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 4th, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Who played the race card?
loading...