John Boehner won’t tell you this, but the “common sense cuts” he referred to that would avoid the sequester, will eliminate food for 1.7 million Americans.
In a statement responding to President Obama’s call for a balanced approach to avoiding the sequester, Speaker Boehner said, “Today the president advanced an argument Republicans have been making for a year: his sequester is the wrong way to cut spending. That’s why the House has twice passed legislation to replace it with common sense cuts and reforms that won’t threaten public safety, national security, or our economy. But once again, the president offered no credible plan that can pass Congress – only more calls for higher taxes. Just last month, the president got his higher taxes on the wealthy, and he’s already back for more. The American people understand that the revenue debate is now closed. We should close loopholes and carve-outs in the tax code, but that revenue should be used to lower rates across the board. Tax reform is a once-in-a generation opportunity to boost job creation in America. It should not be squandered to enable more Washington spending. Spending is the problem, spending must be the focus.”
While it is technically true that the twice passed cuts that won’t jeopardize public safety or national security, Boehner didn’t mention what his cuts really do.
The cuts that the House has passed twice would end funding for the “Meals on Wheels” program. Meals on Wheels serves up to 1.7 million seniors with food security issues. According to Meals on Wheels, “1 in 7 Seniors is threatened by hunger. 8.3 million Seniors faced the threat of hunger in 2010. This reflects a 78% increase since 2001 – and a 34% increase since the start of the recession in 2007. The threat of hunger for seniors increased in 44 states since 2007.”
John Boehner isn’t the only member of House leadership to support cutting food for seniors. On December 20, 2012, Majority Leader Eric Cantor called them, “common sense spending reforms.” On Sunday, Paul Ryan called ending funding for food assistance and also throwing 600,000 children off food stamps and Medicaid, “smarter cuts.”
The fact that Boehner, Cantor, and Ryan all agree that these spending cuts are common sense demonstrates that this is the stated policy of the House Republican caucus. The House leadership, much like history’s most infamous dictators, believes that denying food and medical care to children and senior citizens is good policy.
This is what President Obama has to deal with as his opposition. There can be no middle ground for Obama when Republicans are advocating for starving kids and seniors.
There is nothing common sense about cutting aid to vulnerable people during a time of economic hardship, but to Boehner, Cantor, and Ryan, children and seniors are “takers.”
Speaker Boehner doesn’t want to tell you the truth, but it is time for you to tell him something.
Boehner has been quite active on twitter lately, so send him the message @SpeakerBoehner that there is nothing “common sense” about taking food and medical care away from seniors and children so that the wealthy can avoid paying a tiny bit more in taxes.
Speaker Boehner and his fellow House Republicans need to understand that the American people know what they are up to, and they aren’t going to get away with it.





RMuse
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 5:40 pm
Anything to hurt the poor is “common sense” and “smart” in Republicans’ minds. Not surprising they think it, but putting it on record is a sign they’re completely off the rails and they mean to follow through. It is such a seriously sad commentary, that my European and Australian colleagues are repulsed and predict America lost all credibility in promoting humanitarian efforts. “If your leaders hate your own people, what must they think of the rest of the world’s underserved?”
loading...
meals
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:51 pm
meals on wheels should be stop most of the people that gets these meals already gets food stamps i thought thats why they got food stamps to by food with just a waste of money
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Then you think we should just let them die off?
You really have no idea whats being said here do you?
loading...
mjh
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 2:40 pm
You really have no idea whats being said here do you?
Nor does he have any idea how to say it — at least with punctuation . . .
.
loading...
Pompeii
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:19 pm
I’m a senior citizen and I live in an apartment for people 55 and over. Several people here get meals on wheels. They do not need them anymore then I would. They take them anyway and a lot of times they throw them away. They have plenty of their own food. We even go out to eat on occasion.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:31 pm
So with your thinking we should just end the program.I hope you are consistent because according to you the defense contractors committing fraud needs to go
Shocking Report Reveals the Pentagon’s Addiction to Fraudulent Contractors
http://www.thenation.com/blog/164103/shocking-report-reveals-pentagons-addiction-fraudulent-contractors
Report: DoD awarded billions to firms despite fraud
http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110203/ACQUISITION03/102030303/Report-DoD-awarded-billions-firms-despite-fraud
Defense Dept. Gave $431 Billion to Contractors After They were Convicted of Fraud
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Defense_Dept._Gave_$431_Billion_to_Contractors_After_They_were_Convicted_of_Fraud_/16238/0/38/38/Y/M.html
loading...
CC
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 5:30 pm
how many people do you even know getting meals? any at all? I doubt it. Many if not most are unable to prepare a meal on their own, this meets their food and nutritional requirements to live. for the most part, these people DO NOT RECEIVE food stamps, but why let fact get in your way. so mean spirited. could be your grandparents needing this or the disabled neighbor…
loading...
Pat Major
Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 4:30 pm
John Boehner wants to Eliminate Food?? I SAY … START WITH HIM. Fire him now. Take away his income, no more Congressman salary. Put yourself in my shoes for 3 months and use FOOD STAMPS. Use foodstamps ONLY. You can’t use your own $$$$$$ (and we all know, you are a millionaire!!!!) You will starve, I know that for sure.
loading...
Dolores Campbell
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:04 pm
Boehner is a true bone head, no true information can get through. Maybe Eric the worm is causing the blockage.
loading...
nocashdav
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:16 pm
fear tactics on the part of the president..the sequester was voted on by the congress an the president signed it.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:20 pm
So the entire republican house was afraid of the pres? Interesting
loading...
mjh
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:24 pm
Oh — so, it’s “fear tactics” on the part of the President who signed it, but not on the Congress who passed it.
OK, got it . . .
.
loading...
Jon Weiss
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 7:18 pm
The point is that Obama once again diverts attention from his underhanded crookery. No one is clean in this mess, Obama is as guilty as the Congress in ripping off the people.
loading...
Sammy
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 8:25 pm
Was this one of the gems on the talking points memo you received fron the teabaggers?
I am sure that you have a whole list of this underhanded crookery on the part of President Obama?
Let’s hear them.
P.S. You are aware, are you not, that many of the people who receive assistance in this country claim to be republican? Also, too, most of the people receiving assistance are not black or hispanic?
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 8:32 pm
How was you ripped off?
loading...
Shelly
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 11:55 pm
Yes … let’s hear examples.
(Of course, this is where the accuser normally will go into a tirade about the President’s parentage, or citizenship status…. and usually devolves further into deranged name calling and total lunacy.)
loading...
Vince
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 7:53 pm
Not only that but he is the one who came up with the idea
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 8:01 pm
I got 98% of what I wanted
The following is a transcript of that interview:
Leaders race to garner support for debt bill
Even with deal, federal debt to rise by trillions
CBSNews.com special report: America’s debt battle
Boehner: We’ve got divided government in Washington. We’ve got big issues confronting us. We have a very open process and society. And as a result, we have healthy debates about how to move forward. This has certainly been a long, healthy debate.
Pelley: Give us a little bit of insight. How did the grand bargain fail? What was the breaking point? How did you tell the president you were walking away?
Boehner: It really boiled down to two issues. President was insisting on more taxes. President never got serious about the kind of spending cuts that were necessary in order to get America back on a sound fiscal footing.
Pelley: You don’t think he negotiated in good faith?
Boehner: No, I do believe the president was negotiating in good faith. We had a lot of productive conversations, a lot of tense conversations. But it became pretty clear to me that I wasn’t going to be for higher taxes, and the president wasn’t going to cut spending as he should.
Pelley: What did you say to each other?
Boehner: I told the president I’m not going there. I can’t do that.
Pelley: If this super committee that you talk about recommends raising revenue, can you support that?
Boehner: We’ll see what it does. But I’m confident their focus will be on reducing expenditures coming out of Washington.
Pelley: Can you image Republicans backing increased taxes?
Boehner: I think that would be a stretch. It doesn’t seem likely to me that that would be recommended, much less supported, but I’ve been surprised before.
Pelley: You were unable to get your own caucus behind your bill a few days ago. Do you intend to remain Speaker of the House?
Boehner: I do. When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the white House, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I’m pretty happy.
Pelley: Folks at home have been watching the acrimony, name calling, finger pointing. And I wonder whether the Congress has lost something, an ability to talk to each other, to settle down and make agreements?
Boehner: Well, there’s the public noise and then there’s the private discussion. Some of the most liberal members of Congress are great friends of mind. But the American people don’t see the cooperation that exists off camera that really are the glue that holds this place together.
Pelley: Are you saying it’s not as bad as it looks?
Boehner: It’s not as bad as it looks.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-20086598/boehner-i-got-98-percent-of-what-i-wanted/
loading...
mjh
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:18 pm
John Boehner Calls Eliminating Food for 1.7 Million Americans ‘Common Sense Cuts’
Hey, JB — the next time you wonder why the Congress has a 14% approval rating, just think back to this.
Oh wait, I forgot — you guys are on recess and don’t give a shit. Never mind. Please proceed . . .
.
loading...
503me
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:28 pm
Sometimes I wonder if the GOP have been assured by their ‘owners’ not to worry about voting, because they will make sure the votes are rigged. Okay, that’s probably out there, but on a serious note, don’t they realize that we the people outnumber their ‘owners’ and we read and listen and see everything they do in congress, If only we the people had the means to ‘impeach’ all members of congress that refuse to ‘work for the people and by the people’ We as a society are never judged by how the best able are treated, but rather how we treat those least able (like elderly, disabled, children and the working poor’ By GOP standards all that counts to them are their owners, and its up to we the people to stand up for those unable to stand. Sorry didn’t mean to get so lengthily.
loading...
HR676
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:08 pm
You know, the best way to “impeach” members of Congress is not to elect these corporate lackies in the first place. They didn’t just miraculously appear in Congress—Americans voted for them and sent them to Congress. Americans get what they vote for.
loading...
menotu
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 5:33 pm
Just another liberal lie.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 5:39 pm
What part is the lie?
loading...
Larry
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:39 pm
The only thing Boehner has proposed or passed involves tax cuts for the rich. They already have money Mr Boehner. They did not create jobs. So try to explain how giving them even more might give us jobs? I do not see it. We know that consumption creates demand. Demand creates jobs, not money. The poor are already suffering at the hands of the rich. The rich earned their dollars off the backs of their employees and they are poor because the rich did not pay enough to their employees. The rich owe society a great debt for the business that made them rich. Now it is time to pay that debt. By the way, why is the rich being allowed to pay less in taxes percentage than the middle class? Who can afford the taxes easier, the rich or the middle class? Or another way to put it is who has the most left upon which to live after paying their taxes, the rich or the middle class?
loading...
John
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:46 pm
It is so good to see that those idiots aren’t trying to win newer votes during the 2014 midterm elections. Lets cut loose their dead weight.
loading...
Glenn Parker
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 6:55 pm
Speaker Boehner is right on! The only way to eliminate our deficit is to quit spending on entitlement programs. For those of you who do not know what entitlements are, here is your lesson: Entitlements are made of “free money”; nothing has been earned, e.g. Social Security Retirement is NOT an entitlement-you paid in for that; however SSI is an entitlement; Medicare is NOT an entitlement-you paid in for that; however, Medicaid is an entitlement.
People need jobs-so do not cut money for infrastructure-road building, water/sewer projects, airports, etc.
Cut entitlements, but leave a safety-net for those who truly can’t work, which is a small minority of those who receive handouts.
It blew my mind the other day when I asked a little fellow what he wanted to do when he grew up: a fireman? a policeman? a teacher? “None of those” he replied; a scientist? a carpenter? a businessman? “Nope” he said. Well then, what are you going to do? “I am going to get a check”, he said. Generations on welfare is what this country has produced over the last fifty years. Case closed!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 8:20 pm
I agreee with you. We should just shoot everyone over 50 becuase the GOP sure isnt going to help create any jobs for them. I mean really, you and I are jsut for the very rich anyways.
loading...
mjh
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:48 pm
Speaker Boehner is right on! The only way to eliminate our deficit is to quit spending on entitlement programs. For those of you who do not know what entitlements are, here is your lesson: Entitlements are made of “free money”; nothing has been earned, e.g.
- gov’t subsidies to Big Oil
- tax breaks to the wealthiest 1%
Case closed!
.
loading...
Shane Gann
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 2:00 am
No! Case not closed. That needs to end! You are right. So do handouts to people who have earned nothing.It really does not matter what any of us think. We cannot keep this up. The problem is entitlements. We can either try to figure out who really needs a safety net and throw the rest of the porch-sitting, no-working, low-life scum off the roles or we can continue like this for maybe four or five more years until the country collapses. Then, nobody will get any govt. handouts, the ones who think they are “entitled” to handouts will start rioting and robbing. They will try to take from those of us who have something and know how to make a living, grow our food, etc., and when a mob of them come to my house to rob and plunder because they are pissed off because nobody will give them shit, I will have to shoot them! We cannot go on like this. We have too many people who are just simply to damn lazy to get an education and be productive. I know! I teach. I see everyday what generational dependency does to people’s ambitions….takes it away!
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 6:45 am
You do know ayn rand is a work of fiction
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 8:12 am
You are getting as little carried away. The number of people perpetually on welfare etc is a tiny fraction of the people on it who need it due to our economy. We recognize your need to kill however.
loading...
sidneyselt
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 8:26 pm
Shane, one can tell a liar in the details presented. Your wrote: “They will try to take from those of us who have something and know how to make a living, grow our food, etc., and when a mob of them come to my house to rob and plunder because they are pissed off because nobody will give them shit, I will have to shoot them! We cannot go on like this. We have too many people who are just simply to damn lazy to get an education and be productive. I know! I teach. I see everyday what generational dependency does to people’s ambitions….takes it away!” How interesting that you teach…if that is true, you must not be much of a teacher for the very ones you say you teach are unable to get an education and be productive…is that due to you being their example…use a gun when needed because I can’t think of other ways of resolving problems except through the barrel of a gun. What a great teacher you are…let the looting begin and the guns aimed at you be 100 round automatics…problem solved. What a knucklehead you have turned out to be compared to truly educated.
loading...
Steve O
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 6:48 am
you make the statement about tax cuts for the rich and big oil subsidies – how about obama with all the FAILED subsidies to the ‘green energy’ platform – what about all the extra (22 i believe) new taxes in obamacare – gun-control – which is not about guns – however it is about control – you libs really have a mental block – wake up and stop drinking the garbage coming out of washington – dems or reps – all are mostly corrupt – until this country decides to do their own thinking again – we the people are screwed
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 6:57 am
Turn off your Reich wing propaganda and do something that people who have something constructive to say do,RESEARCH!!!
$90 Billion for Green Energy? A Closer Look
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/04/90-billion-for-green-energy-a-closer-look/
Every energy industry gets support, not just renewables
http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/subsidies-subsidies-165046466.html
Bankrupt Green Energy Firm Got Grants From Obama, Bush Administration
Republicans may smell blood from A123 Systems going belly up, but the firm has had bipartisan backing.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/bush-adminstration-also-gave-grants-and-praised-fa
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 8:29 am
Gun control thats not about guns? Its about control? Control of what? He will be in office for 4 years, what comes after? Does he get some perverse jolt of electricity for knowing he controlled you for 3 years? Can you really be that stupid?
Obama gave money to a company that failed? Yes? And? Bush cost us well over a trillion is an unneeded war. And?. So?
Sorry, you are at best a joke poster
loading...
HR676
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:37 pm
Health care is never an entitlement whether it is Medicare or Medicaid, it is a human right. We need Medicare for all paid for by taxation so that your tax dollars go for your healthcare and not for some healthcare profiteers villa. We need the power of a Government on the side of the people to wrestle the corporate bullies to the ground and set our priorities upright. As for SSI very few receive it by choice but rather by dire circumstance and I for one gladly pay my taxes on their behalf.
loading...
HR676
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:48 pm
Healthcare is never an entitlement be it Medicare or Medicaid, it is a human right. What we need is Medicare for All paid for by taxation so that your healthcare dollar goes for your healthcare and not some healthcare profiteers villa. We need the power of a Government on the peoples side to wrestle the corporate bullies to the ground. As for SSI recipients, very few receive it by choice but rather by dire circumstance and I for gladly pay my taxes on their behalf.
loading...
CC
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 5:46 pm
…”It blew my mind the other day when I asked a little fellow what he wanted to do when he grew up: a fireman? a policeman? a teacher? “None of those” he replied; a scientist? a carpenter? a businessman? “Nope” he said. Well then, what are you going to do? “I am going to get a check”, he said. Generations on welfare is what this country has produced over the last fifty years. Case closed!”…
Just how old was this “little guy”?? when my son was about 8 he wanted a kitten from the pound— i said I could not afford it and he said — but all you need to do is write a check mom! most kids dont understand the concept – parents come home with a check, they write checks or get from an ATM magic money to a child – get a grip
loading...
Jon Weiss
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 7:16 pm
If the Federal Government didn’t waste so much on trivial garbage, like $325k on creating mechanical squirrels, of $400k to keep open airports that no one uses, or $505K on pet shampoo research or $7 million on Presidential vacations and golf outings, they could easily afford food programs for the elderly without raising taxes on the middle class, as Obama has done. Obama claims that he has lowered taxes on the middle class, but I make less than $60,000.00 per year and my taxes have increased by $180.00 per month since Obama has been in office, not to mention the price increases caused by his raising taxes on businesses.
loading...
LookingForward
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:31 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robosquirrel
Check your facts about our little mechanical squirrel, the majority of that grant went to future Research projects. The robo squirrel cost a couple hundred dollars. But, your inflammatory statement sounds better to people like you.
loading...
PSzymeczek
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:04 pm
Do you have any estimates on how much George W. Bush spent on his vacations? You are aware, aren’t you, that George Bush was on vacation three times as much during his first term as President Obama was during his first term.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:22 pm
“President Obama has been on vacation 78 days from 2009 to 2011. At the three year mark into their first terms, George W. Bush spent 180 days at his ranch in Crawford, Texas and Ronald Reagan spent 112 vacation days at his ranch in California. ”
Bush was on vacation 32% of his two terms. Of course when I came to President Bush being on vacation the Republicans always say that he had his staff with him. But of course president Obama doesn’t have that luxury according to right wing nut jobs and teabags.
Presidents don’t really get vacations. President Obama gets to go swimming a little bit and play a little golf, Bush had things that he did on his ranch. Reagan spent a lot of time trying to remember who he was
the president is on vacation too much argument comes from people who know nothing and only repeat what they’re told
loading...
Callah
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:06 pm
I think we should eliminate his $174,000. a year, because I don’t think he is doing a job worth paying him nearly $500. a day…or $14,000 plus a MONTH…
loading...
mjh
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 2:55 pm
Lemme guess — you probably think he and Michelle should be working as Domestics on the WH staff too, right?
.
loading...
Howard
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:10 pm
What ever happened to the children assisting in the care of the parents who raised them?
Perhaps we could make cuts in what we donate to other countries, in what the government wastes in grants that should be investments from private investors. The government should be protecting the tax payers dollars, protecting the economy from profiteers and those who would undermine the system (like the housing bubble). Govern to keep all men free and equal with equal oppertunity.
Welfare should be administered by the local governments and communities to insure the needy get assistance, and the available money for assistance is distributed in an equitable manner. We can not continue to spend more than we make.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:27 pm
I agree with you except for one thing. Look at Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida and Ohio. Koch owned states whose main goal it is to make sure the rich get rich and the poor get poor. I dont want to see a thing being trusted to the states. Way too corrupt.
We cant continue to not have full employment. If we had good employment we would not have a spending problem
loading...
Howard
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:45 pm
Governments are made of a body of people, Elected Officials should be held to acts of treason for violating the public trust.
I am not aware of the incidents you cited, but I am aware of the corruption in all manner of governments. And the potential for misuse and misdirection of intended funds.
It is truly sad we have so few honest men (and women) amongst us.
For me it is really sad to look out the window and know this is not the same America I grew up in. I still remember a time when people helped each other and worked for a common cause. We are so divided as a nation.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:54 pm
I know you didnt just land here. In Michigan workers rights, peoples rights to representation have been taken away, You have to know about Walker and Wisconsin.
And yes, this is a long long ways away from what I grew up in, in the 50′s and 60′s
loading...
narcysus
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:31 am
What happens if “the children” are in their mid 50s and get laid off from their jobs where they have worked for a coupla decades or more? And if the children did what they were told and invested/saved their money in 401Ks that went bust, or bought real estate, or a dot.com, only to lose everything. How are they supposed to care for their aging parents then?
loading...
SJ Reidhead
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 7:41 am
There are numerous seniors who have absolutely NO family. I gather they are the dregs on society who simply need to be allowed to die by libertarian, Randian Koch sponsored death panels, right?
I don’t like to wish ill on anyone, but I do hope that the libertarians and Randians who think that everyone should take care of themselves or be allowed to simply die by the wayside should find themselves in need, in very real need, and see if anyone is going to help them. You see, even the wealthy can end up, through no fault of their own, in need. It happens all the time to unsuspecting seniors who are taken advantage of by vulture brokers and bankers.
I truly hope when those in the far right who don’t believe in any sort of gov’t assistance are in need, someone will be there to help – after they’ve spent a few months agonizing over their fate, where they will get money for their medications, food, power, and insurance.
SJR
The Pink Flamingo
loading...
PSzymeczek
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:06 pm
The “sandwich generation” is caring not only for their elderly parents, but also for their adult children who can’t find employment that pays enough to allow them to live on their own.
loading...
gsb
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Mod: is there some way that all these comments could be sent to Boners twitter acount? If so please do so
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:31 pm
It wouldnt make difference.Now if we ponied up for a bottle of Johnny Walker blue all bets are off
loading...
mjh
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Now if we ponied up for a bottle of Johnny Walker blue all bets are off
That, or chipped in for a home tanning booth . . .
.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:48 pm
You can copy them and tweet them to @speakerboehner or @johnboehner
I would have to do it the same way as you.
loading...
Kerry M. Berger
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 10:40 pm
That’s it. I’ve lost it with John (bonehead) Boehner. I simply cannot ignore his complete disregard for American/human life. He is basically sentencing 1.7 million children and the elderly to death. Do you freaking people out there comprehend that? This is making an excuse for allowing a genocide, not to mention a blatant human rights violation of the worst order. We need to send a petition to the IWC and the United Nations against the United States Congress.
loading...
narcysus
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:35 am
I like that idea, Kerry. I think in no more than 2 years, we could have a very viable case of human rights violations in this country. No health care, people starving in the streets, (and not enough prisons to put them in), all sorts of insane sh–. If we were looking at this mess in another country, we’d be readying for war and dropping tons of food. Too bad this “Christian” country missed that verse about the beam and the mote.
loading...
Kris
Feb. 19th, 2013 at 11:13 pm
This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. Ezekiel 16:49
When I quote something from the Bible, I like to actually include the book and the verse.
loading...
David
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 10:29 am
Maybe if that 1.7 million would get off their A$# and go to work, the rest of us wouldn’t have to subsidize them? I’m tired of providing cell phones, food, gold teeth, 20″ rims for cars, bling and free medical care. GO TO WORK.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 10:45 am
You do know white people make up the majority of people who receives assistance.You do know it was republicans who started the so call free cell phones.You do know you are a idiot.I cant call you racist because you have blah friends.
loading...
PSzymeczek
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 12:12 pm
Most of those who benefit from Meals on Wheels are 1) Elderly, and/or 2) Disabled. As in unable to work. As in having an illness or other disability that makes it difficult or impossible to leave their homes to buy food, or prepare it in their homes.
loading...
mjh
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:06 pm
Maybe if that 1.7 million would get off their A$# and go to work, the rest of us wouldn’t have to subsidize them? I’m tired of providing cell phones, food, gold teeth, 20″ rims for cars, bling and free medical care.
Yeah, well I’m tired of subsidizing oil companies like ExxonMobil — who made a profit of $104 million PER DAY in 2012 — especially given how high gas prices are . . .
.
loading...
Dick Gill
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 2:56 pm
John Boehner: The President Is Raging Against a Budget Crisis He Created!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:03 pm
president Obama created a budget crisis? That’s interesting I wonder how he did that?
loading...
mjh
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:12 pm
president Obama created a budget crisis? That’s interesting I wonder how he did that?
I wonder, too — especially since, according to Rush Limpballs, he’s “an incompetent man-child.”
Of course, that’s only on the days he’s not “a wannabe dictator.”
(P.S. — I downvoted you by mistake; sorry)
.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:03 pm
I know you wont answer because that the way CONS roll but how did the President create the budget crisis?Remember Boehner said he got 98%of what he wanted.
loading...
Libs Aint Smart
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 3:41 pm
Wow, them Libs is dum.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 4:12 pm
Wow, talk about the pot.Its dumb not dum.Inbreeding and homeschooling is no way to go through life.
loading...
MaverickCoast
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 6:57 pm
You Liberals live in your own little fantasy world where you make up things that agree with your warped Liberal ideology! Republicans have NEVER endorsed taking food from people WHO NEED IT! But, keep lying to yourselves. Some day it will catch up with you. What goes around, comes around!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 7:03 pm
Really? Read the Ryan plan and get out of your own little fantasy world
loading...
William Sampson
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 7:51 pm
Hard working Government employees face furloughs soon. The “cogs and gears” of everyday administration will grind to a halt. Yet some how the House and Senate seem it demeaning to take a pay cut or even suspend pay during a sequester. What would it really take for these asses to get it.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 7:58 pm
Unemployment
loading...
mybused
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 8:10 pm
Politicus USA– what a crud of baloney!
This information is so bent it cannot go further over without cracking.
Just how do all you liberal politicans think that we are going to continue to feed the gluttonous pig called welfare?
Oh, yeah, let’s reduce our military…that’s what we should do. We should reduce our own ability to protect our nation in order to continue providing welfare funds and benefits to a majority of recipients who do not need it and who abuse the system to get it.
Yep that’s it. Let’s keep screwing the taxpayers through fear and misinformation so we can give it to those who do nothing.
Don’t even give me the sob story about taking food from old people and children– GO DO YOUR homework first– I do not care what ethnicity people are– the majority of people receiving welfare are not the children– the adults get the benefits and waste it on things that I, a tax paying citizen of 35 years cannot afford. While I have friends who work or are retired and can barely get by… and they have neighbors living a solid life from welfare and other assistance programs!
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 20th, 2013 at 8:34 pm
You know whats funny?All you CONS come on here and say the same thing.I know moochers who eat steaks while I work hard or the two-fer my neighbors that dont have nothing have to pay for them and their baby mommas and grannys gold teeth and on and on.Damn tell your friends to come up with another spiel its getting boring
loading...
Liz
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 9:27 pm
So do any of you liberals think that this might have something to do with the fact that our dear leader, President Obama, cut cost of living increases for seniors for two years? Just sayin’!!!
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 9:44 pm
WTF Do you even know whats going on?Have you heard of the Budget control act of 2011?Do you know who writes laws?Do you know anything about separation of powers?
loading...
UncaJoe
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 9:47 pm
Which branch of government allocates funds? Would that be the Executive branch?… No. How about the Judicial branch?… Wrong again. That leaves the Legislative Branch doesn’t it.
Just answerin’
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 21st, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Funny I googled that and there is no response for that claim. SS just had an increase in cost of living. Can you provide a link or are you a one post pony?
loading...
Steve
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 5:20 am
Oh demonize Boehner, even nice picture they post of him, But the real bone head sits in the oval office. obama is willing to let all americans die just to raise taxes. Everbody wants to demonize Republicans, just wait till you get what you want, you won’t want what you got,
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 22nd, 2013 at 9:06 am
With friends like this we dont have to say anything else.LMBAO
Tea Partier: ‘John Boehner Is A Socialist’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsasy3MoU9U&feature=player_embedded#!
loading...
sue
Feb. 27th, 2013 at 9:02 pm
meals on wheels is not free, i pay 65.00 dollars a month. and as far as food stamps go they need to drug test
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Feb. 27th, 2013 at 9:03 pm
I think every public employee needs to be drug tested.
Or test no one which is what should happen
loading...
sue
Feb. 27th, 2013 at 9:04 pm
meals on wheels is not free i pay 65.00 a month for my mother and as far as food stamps go they should drug test
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Feb. 27th, 2013 at 9:18 pm
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Dont tread on me indeed
That is all
” My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total.” Barbara Jordan, 1974
loading...