While her husband is blaming ‘you people’ for his loss, Ann Romney is blaming the media for Mitt Romney’s defeat.
Video:
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
WALLACE: Well, I want to pick up on that, because there were reports that you and your oldest son, Tag, were frustrated with the Romney campaign, that they didn’t, quote, “let Mitt be Mitt,” that they didn’t let him show his more open, compassionate side. True?
ANN ROMNEY: Well, of course. It was partly — it’s true. But it was not just the campaign’s fault. I believe it was the media’s fault as well, is that he was not giving — being given a fair shake, that people weren’t allowed to really see him for who he was.
WALLACE: All right, what about the media?
(LAUGHTER)
ANN ROMNEY: I’m happy to blame the media.
(LAUGHTER)
WALLACE: Do you think the media was in the tank for Barack Obama?
(LAUGHTER)
ANN ROMNEY: I think that it’s — anytime you’re running for office, you always think that you’re being portrayed unfairly.
And, you know, we — of course, on our side believe that there’s more bias in favor of the other side. I think that that’s a pretty universal — universally-felt opinion.
It was entitlement overload in this interview. Mitt Romney blamed minorities who want free stuff for his defeat, while Ann Romney blamed the media and President Obama’s unfair campaign against her husband. Ann Romney is so much like Sarah Palin that it is almost scary. Palin has spent the years since the 2008 election blaming the media for her defeat in 2008.
It wasn’t the media’s fault that the Romneys were completely unlikable. It wasn’t the media’s fault that Ann Romney spent her time on the campaign trail torn between acting entitled to the presidency, and pitying herself. The media didn’t worry that Mitt Romney was losing his mind on the campaign trail. The media didn’t lecture the Republican Party that they were lucky to have Mitt.
The reason why Ann and Mitt’s denial matters is because it is reflective of the attitude within the Republican Party. After a brief moment of reflection, the Republicans have gone back to making excuses for their lack of popularity. It wasn’t that Mitt Romney had terrible ideas. Nope, the problem is that the media was out to get the Romneys. The Romneys reflect the belief within much of the Republican Party that there was nothing wrong with nominating a candidate who had no idea how regular Americans live.
Even after being soundly rejected by the voters, the Romneys remain wrapped in their own arrogance. The problem for Republicans is that Ann Romney’s excuse making reflects the prevalent attitude within the Republican Party.
PoliticusUSA
G+
Facebook
Tom
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:11 pm
yeah and his time in France was JUST LIKE fighting a war too. Please proceed to shutting these two up!
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:35 am
Stupid just can’t keep its’ mouth shut.
loading...
oreosmom
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:53 am
Beautifully said!! I am not even a Democrat,btw,but was totally turned off by the arrogance that both Mitt and wanna-be entitled to be Queen Ann displayed during the entire campaign! Mitt has(once again) shown his arrogance and his bigotry in this interview and Ann has shown that she,cannot accept 1 of the few(if not the only0 defeats that these people have ever suffered in their lives with grace and humility. I really was not happy with the Presidential choices this time around,but was not about to help elect this spolied,entitled man and his wife who believes to this day that she deserves to be “Queen”…having forgotten that we don’t actually have one of those in this country. I wish they would get over themselves and realize that the 2 of THEM lost the election.
loading...
Madme Lily
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:56 am
Please, even our school history books portrait Mormons as bad. You expect people to throw away what has been drilled into them from elementary school. I don’t believe so. Think about it!1
loading...
Asia
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:31 pm
Wow, you actually studied about Mormonism in school. You must be really old, because religion has not been allowed in school for a long time. How old are you?
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:37 pm
I studied the mormon history in school. Not the religion. The mormons did not, as lily says, have a good reputation especially in the west
loading...
The Voice of Reason
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:57 am
Hey Guys. Don’t worry. Gary believes that Fox is in no way biased to the left. So you see
Gary = Crack Pot
This is what happens you smoke too much Rush and Fox.
loading...
Don
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:03 am
Gary,
I find it amazing that many Repbulicans continue to blame someone else when their candidates don’t get elected. This is both an insult to the electorate’s intelligence and a symptom of the Republican’s refusal to take responsibility for their actions. Actions have consequences and losing is one of them.
loading...
John
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:30 am
@Gary,
Love your use of “you people”, just shows the monumental ignorance of the right. Ann Romney is nothing more than a bitter old woman, just look at the disapproving set of wrinkles around her mouth. Wrinkles such as Ann’s come from a lifetime of holding her face in that disapproving grimmace. She, as this article accurately states, is just another Sarah Palin clone, never their fault, always someone else’s. Accept the fact that you are dumb as a pile of rocks and the quality of your lives should improve. Move away from the image the two of you have created, the Palin, Romney angry witches.
loading...
SinghX
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:22 pm
These two are utterly incapable of comprehending that they are incompetent spoiled brats from an era gone by.
The are again, utterly incapable that they’re private “members only” habitat fuels their white privilege and social bigotry, rendering them useless patricians.
loading...
Scott Reed
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:31 am
While it is unfortunate that Ann Romney is still embittered, there is an absolute media bias toward Barack Obama. The Bengazi debacle is a prime example. Frankly, it isn’t as much as a bias against the Romney’s, but a bias TOWARD Obama. You’d have to be a blind fool not to see that.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:36 am
What Benghazi debacle?
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:22 am
If you don’t know what debacle Brian Loudermilch is referring to, then you’re a lost cause. 4 people died, including our Ambassador, remember? After asking for more security and being either ignored or turned down. That debacle.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:50 am
asking for more security for which the Republicans had turned down the more money to do it with? The same bill that they are still holding up in Congress that would’ve put more money towards Embassy security? Is that the debacle you’re talking about? Or are you talking about the debacle of where the over 40 people died in Embassy attacks under George W. Bush and you never said a word? That debacle? You must be a lost cause, I didn’t hear you talking about the over 40 people who died under Bush.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:09 pm
3000 PEOPLE DIED!!!”Now you covered your ass”Remember that.Here is a refresher dummy
The Deafness Before the Storm
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=2&
You cant provide more security whan reich wing teabaggers turn you down
GOP Rep: I ‘Absolutely’ Voted To Cut Funding For Embassy Security
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/
You reich wingers so effing stupid that you elect reps who instead of attending the briefings decide instead to go prance on faux.Debacle?Debacle deez nuttz
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:46 am
Sorry, I should have said Scott Reed, not Brian Loudermilch.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:49 am
Please provide references of the 40+ people who died in US Embassy attacks under George W. Bush.
And as far as the appropriations for more security begin held up by Republicans is concerned, I’m certain the State Department has a bloated budget and could have found money for more security if they had bothered to look hard enough. I believe that’s why the bill is being held up. Perhaps the Administration should consider submitting a budget to run the federal government, something they have yet to do from what the media reports. As a taxpayer, I am perplexed beyond belief that we can run a government with no budget in place for this long. I certainly couldn’t do that, and I realize my finances are 1/1,000,000th as complicated as the federal government, but shouldn’t a token attempt be made to get something down on paper?
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:54 am
I find it really funny that all of a sudden you are worried about four people when George W. Bush murdered well over 4000 Americans and hundred thousand Iraqis. All the while you did nothing but set on your thumb
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/10/libya-consulate-embassy-attacks-obama-romney
http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2013/01/benghazi-bs.html
The budget was submitted some time ago.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget
Bloated so its being held up? When they didnt have enough money for security to start with?
Did we smoke soemhting this am?
loading...
Stephen
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:14 pm
That was bad but not as bad as September 11, 2001. Why didn’t congress drill Rice the way they drilled Clinton. It was sad to lose 4 people even 1 is bad.
2001 we lost thousands and they actually had warnings as early as May of 2001. However, we did not want to disrupt the economy and spend money on security on planes.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Yeah, I’ve smoked a few cigarettes this morning. So what?
And your other moderator friend calling me and others “dummy” and “debacle deez nuts” does a lot to convince me that anything he says is intelligent. Go ahead, insult me, I could care less. I’ve been a taxpayer for over 40 years, pal. And I have no idea what the federal government does with my tax money, really. Nor do you.
As far as the reference you provided, I did read it and obviously those attacks were not as widely reported as the one in Libya. Is it my fault that I didn’t hear about them? Now I’m supposed to know things that weren’t even in the news?
Finally, the budget. Why do I keep hearing in the media that no budget has been submitted? Obviously one has. I think the media needs to clean up its act and report the truth for a change. And I’m not just talking about Fox News. I watch CNBC, MSNBC, CBS & ABC News and hear the same thing on all of them. Why do they continue to report things that aren’t true, and under-report things that the American public should know?
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
I have been a tax payer for 44 years. Am I happy with the state of things? No.
I dont blem you for not knowing about the attacks, they were not reported nor was much of both wars reported period. Even today you would think we were at peace if you listened to the news
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Your concern about what happen in Benghazi would be noted if it wasnt your for your faux outrage.Oh Obama what did you do?GTFO!! Did you protest when Rep.Issa breach security protocols when hr outed our undercover agents in Libya ON A SMEAR CAMPAIGN? Well did you? Knowing things that werent in the news?Are you really that stupid or just naive?
What Did Bush Know Before 9/11 Attacks?
Briefing Notes May Hold Key to Crucial Question
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1114-08.htm Check the date that was in 2003 and if I really want to discuss this further I can go back before that.Hell even the fucking onion a source know for satire knew something wasnt on the up and up in 2002 http://www.theonion.com/articles/what-did-bush-know-before-911,14439/
And you going to sit hear and say you didnt hear anything.No wonder you are a republican .Just plain ignorant
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:23 pm
shiva,
Thanks, it’s good to know you are level-headed enough to understand that we can’t control the media or what gets reported.
djchefron,
You, on the other hand, are the exact reason people like me who think conservatively can’t have an intelligent discussion with most liberals. We get tired of being called stupid and ignorant, and many of us will continue to vote Republican just to spite know-it-alls like you, Bill Maher, and the rest of the self-righteous liberals. I’ve had this same discussion with my liberal-thinking kids and I’ll tell you the same thing I tell them: Go screw yourself. I don’t believe in gay marriage, I think all illegals should be deported, and I think Chicago proves that gun control doesn’t work. So that makes me a homophobic, Mexican-hating, gun toting nut job, right? That’s what I expect your next reply to say.
We should be focusing on the economy and jobs for awhile, something to get this country back on the right track. Instead, we waste too much time and effort concentrating on these types of social issues, and ignore the serious issues right in front of our faces. So again I say to you: Go screw yourself.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:37 pm
Trust.You not spiting me by voting against your interest because of what I say.My point is this and I apologize for my tone but when you bring up Benghazi when everything points to there is no there there,I get upset.Not a peep about 9/11 and when one use ignorance as a defense, well I’m sorry that dog dont hunt.
We can find common ground on economic issues as soon as conservatives admit their philosophy dont work.Never has never will
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:59 pm
“Go screw yourself.”
If only I could.
Let me comment on one thing. The gun laws in Chicago have absolutely nothing to do with how criminals get guns. Many of these people go to states with practically no gun control and they are able to buy large quantities of weapons and take them and sell them anywhere is in the United States. Until we have laws that prevent people from doing this, we will have gun problems. Killings are always noticed more than a city than they are in the country. But they happen in both places
My feelings on illegal immigration don’t make be very popular here, but as far as people being gay and being married? If you believe in the Constitution you believe that they have the right to do as they wish.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:02 pm
djchefron,
I tend to vote for the party most aligned with my views. If you consider that voting against my own interests, that’s you opinion and you’re entitled to it. 9/11 was a bad error on the part of the Bush Administration. You won’t get any argument from me there. But ignorance of things not widely reported is a viable defense. How was I supposed to know? How was 95% of the population supposed to know? As far as the economy is concerned, I am no economic expert. But I do know that anyone that spends more than they take in is headed for financial ruin. Bush did it, and Obama has escalated it. All I’m trying to say is that we cannot continue the current policies. I was in favor of a 15% percent tax hike on EVERYONE during the fiscal cliff crisis so I’m willing to pay my fair share as long as everyone else does. Raise the rates until the debt is gone, then ban deficit spending in any form. That’s my solution. Probably not practical, I know.
shiva,
I didn’t say I don’t support the Constitutional rights of gays if they want to get married. I just don’t believe in it. As Rod Stewart once sang in a song: “She claimed that it just ain’t natural.” So if gays want to marry, have at it. I’ve been married 3 times myself, why should they be denied the same agonies I’ve endured?
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:18 pm
OK,Cool I dont know what your interest are and what party not only speaks about them but act on them.I admit I detest republicans and conservative thinking because I ask myself what do they want to conserve.White male supremacy? A plutocracy?Religious extremism?The right to treat women as second class citizens?
Maybe as a conservative you dont believe what they stand for and if not then what does conservatism means to you.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:09 pm
I certainly don’t believe in conserving any of the things you mentioned. Anyone that does is nuts and not a true conservative, in my view.
What does conservatism mean to me? Strong States rights and a limited Federal government to start. A country that has a surplus budget and can negotiate from a position of strength. An armed force strong enough to protect the country, but does not force agression. Did I believe in invading Iraq? Not entirely, and after the news came out that there were no weapons of mass destruction (another goof-up by our intelligence community) we should have pulled out immediately or soon thereafter. We should get out of Afghanistan. Let those people settle their own disputes. They’ve been fighting in the Middle East for thousands of years, we’ll never change that.
Also, I consider a strong family unit to be a good thing. People that learn young to take care of themselves and their family are more likely to be productive citizens, meaning more taxpayers. We have too many single parents these days, and many rely on the government for subsistence. They can’t work full-time because they have to raise their children, often in very poor conditions. I think the facts bear this out, it’s not just me saying it. It’s not a popular thing to say, but it’s true. And I do feel sorry for the children, believe me I do. They are living in abject poverty through no fault of their own, but though the fault of poor decision-making by their parents. We as a nation do have to take care of them, I get it. But there are so many and the number is growing every day that it is going to be unsustainable at some point.
Lastly, strict regulations on banks and financial institutions as the fiduciary agencies that they are. Nobody has gone to jail for what happened in the financial meltdown, yet I feel there are hundreds or even thousands out there who should have. So many were culpable but none were held accountable. That’s just plain wrong. They knew what they were doing was a house of cards, but as long as there was a buck in it for them or their company they continued the shady practices. They knew better, and that’s the key. The should be held responsible.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:34 pm
You mean strong Koch owned states rights.
They already have 7. Would you give them and ALEC more power and wealth?
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:04 pm
Strong State rights?To me thats code to maintain white supremacy and if one respects history prove to me thats not true.So you are a fiscal conservative?Thats funny seeing that its Democrats that when in power the country does a whole lot better financial.Again just the facts http://www.thepragmaticpundit.com/2012/05/democrats-v-republicans-debt-and.html
On intervention in other countries affairs that is not a conservative value.See Robert Taft.We spend more money than the top 15 countries combined how much more do you want.
And there you go again with people mooching off the government.Are you piss off about the banks getting 83 billion of taxpayer money so they can appear profitable.That dont sound like the free market to me which conservatives worship like a golden Idol http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-20/why-should-taxpayers-give-big-banks-83-billion-a-year-.html I feel you about jailing the real criminals and one of my complaints about The President is he didnt go after them and appointing Timmy to head treasury.
As far as family I take of mine as best I could and I cannot blame anyone for what they do or dont do for their families.And people who go around preaching about family values more often than not have no values.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:44 pm
I do not subscribe to the Koch brothers’ stance on States rights or conservatism.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:17 pm
But that what defines conservatism
loading...
PSzymeczek
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:49 am
Oops. I did not intend that thumbs-up.
loading...
SouthernDem
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:21 am
The right wing has an entire, formidable network dedicated to its cause–FOX NEWS. And I found bias in the fact that Jeremiah Wright was fair game, but the sordid and occasionally homicidal history of the Mormon Church was not explored at all.
We didn’t even hear anything about the non-crucifixion of Christ, baptizing dead folks, or the Mormons’ white supremacist views. How come?
Even Billy Graham, who had formerly called the church a “cult”, demured in favor of Romney.
Delusional media blame aside, Romney’s ideas were based on winning long-lost social wars and approaching modern demographics with a Leave-It-To-Beaver-era approach. Mitt’s fate was sealed because of it.
And Ann should have about a dozen seats right about now, she’s quite annoying.
loading...
Kevin
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Have you forgotten already in your haste to post bigoted, racist fueled nonsense? The Republican controlled House deleted several hundred MILLION dollars from the security portion of the foreign service budget. That would be the REPUBLITARDS who allowed 911, Iraq and Afghanistan and previously ILLEGALLY sold arms to get the hostages from Iran.
Wake up and smell reality. The PEOPLE of this country voted for Obama by the millions, not the paltry thousands that elected Bush.
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 5th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
States rights is code for white supremacy? Mooching off the government?
Koch brothers are the definition of conservatism?
I never said any of those things. You are both great at the liberal talent of attack, attack, attack until the opposition relents. You’re also real accomplished at putting words in people’s mouths, as in “if you said this you must mean this”. This is exactly why our federal government is so dysfunctional. Regardless of what an idea or thought might be, if it comes from the other side or from someone who doesn’t think the same way you do it has to be stupid, ignorant, and not worthy of consideration as having any validity.
I suppose we’ll just have to agree to disagree. You aren’t going to change my views, and I’m not going to change yours. But I think you’ll find that eventually when you are speaking to no one but those who believe the same things you do, all intelligent conversation will cease to exist.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 5th, 2013 at 1:51 pm
If I was a white southerner states rights might mean something entirely different to me.But as one of the blahs states rights mean one thing to me.he subjugation of my civil and human rights on no other basis than a sense of white male dominance.History has shown that and its not up to me to prove that I am wrong.Even today after all the shenanigans in the last election people want to get rid of the voting rights act on its the right of the states not the feds to regulate voting.Its that simple when one talks about states rights.If not then what rights do you want the state to have?
When I think of moochers I think of the people who have lobbyist in Washing ton bribing the government for their benefit.I know the face of moochers to America is the poor.But if we really are honest we know that is not the case so I get piss when I hear talk of its those others entitlements that need to be cut.Excuse me but why is the health industry spending over 5 billion dollars a year to rig the game in their favor http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?indexType=i wheres the outrage of cutting their fat?
I agree with you we do have moral crisis in this country but its not single parent households.People like to beleive that Rome fell because of the barbarians.Thats not true.Rome fell because the rich felt entitled to more and more without giving back.Their largess fueled the empire to it got to the point where it could no longer sustain it.But the elite wouldnt accept the facts and as they say the rest is history.Conservatism will be the death of America because of its own greed.Thank you.
loading...
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:11 am
Thurston Howell III and Lovey seemed more grounded in real life compared to these two. Interesting how what was satire in the 1960′s is more believable than reality in 2013!
loading...
Inez
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:06 pm
AAWWW…have you no heart.?? I have two gross of crying towels to send them, but I need an address.
loading...
Carl
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:23 pm
What a waste of time to interview these two losers!
loading...
CM
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Umm… how about just stop talking???… Ever think of that Ann? You’re not doing yourself any favors by flappin’ those lips… Remember.. loose lips sink ships…
loading...
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:26 am
That might be referring to the lips downstairs.
loading...
Nick
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:30 pm
Right, it’s the media’s fault Romney lost. This is the same supposed “liberal media” that gave up on pursuing the issue of his tax records. Did anyone else notice that by the time the debates rolled around, no one was talking about him not releasing his taxes anymore?
loading...
labman57
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:30 pm
“Liberal media bias” — translation: Mitt is incapable of accepting full responsibility for his own mistakes, failures, and shortcomings.
And Ann, who is accustomed to telling others what to do, is still indignant and outraged that lowly citizens of meager means and limited social stature were even allowed to have a voice (and a vote) in deciding her husband’s fate.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 5:53 pm
Reminds one of Sarah “I blame Katie and the lame stream media for my fuckups” Palin
loading...
red wing
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:17 pm
I do not usually read lib views on this website. I am amazed at how you people seem to hate any conservative viewpoint. If you read the Christian Science Monitors take on Ann Romney’s remarks,you might get a little different view ,rather than just reinforcing your hate of all things conservative.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:23 pm
The conservative viewpoint has undermined this country for the last 30 years and counting.What do you want hugs and kisses
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:16 pm
Don’t paint all conservatives with such a broad brush. I think Bill Clinton was the best President we’ve had in the last 25 years. His policies made sense, he leaned more toward the middle as a President should if he’s going to be President of ALL the people, and he balanced the budget. Quite a stellar record until he allowed the relaxation of credit requirements late in his 2nd term when pressured by Wall Street and Fannie Mae. That led to the financial meltdown 8 years later, though Bush had a large hand in it too by continuing to allow more and more deregulation of financial institutions until they became akin to shooters at a craps table.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:25 pm
I will say it again Fannie mae ,Freddie mac, Big mac, elly mae from the clampetts had nothing to do with the housing crisis much less the Financial meltdown
Bloomberg’s Awful Comment; What Can We Say For Certain Regarding the GSEs?
http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/bloombergs-awful-comment-what-can-we-say-for-certain-regarding-the-gses/
loading...
No_Tread_Zone
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:21 pm
Sorry, I don’t agree. Fannie and Freddie both had a hand in it. Try reading The Fateful History of Fannie Mae: New Deal Birth to Mortgage Crisis Fall by James R. Hagerty.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:36 pm
Fannie and freddie had far less to do with it then the banks(#1), the Bush home ownership program and the ratings entity’s. Standard & Poor etc. Fannie/freddie were caught up in it as much as everyone else was. Lets remember that when fannie / freddie went down they were under Bush administration hands. They were taken from congress
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:38 pm
A hand, excuse me but being only 14% of the problem while the right try to blame them for 100% seems a little far fetch.See thats what I dont like about conservatives.You present them with facts and to their dying breath what they believe shall not be debunked.
I havent read Mr.Hagerty other than he works for the Wall Street Journal who has a history of disliking the New Deal,the paper that is.,so I cant comment one way or another.
loading...
Nefer
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Bite me, Bad Lovey.
loading...
Allison
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:53 pm
Oh these two continue to be delusional. Ann assumes that Democrats in Congress would just bend to her and Mittens and their every wish would be the Dems command so sequestration with cuts to social programs and without revenue would happen.Are you kidding me. This woman Ann Romney is bitter and still feels entitled. She is upset as she was not given the chance to be First Lady baking cookies in the White House. The world has moved on from the 50′s. There is a First Lady who is aware of real issues while encouraging kids to exercise and stay healthy.
Ann and Mittens can easily afford Healthcare so cost is not important.Those who can’t will follow First Lady Michelle Obama and move instead of pigging out on cookies
The Romney’s would be better served if they take a step back and realise that the American people were just not that into them
loading...
Kathleen Kinkel
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 4:55 pm
I happen to know people who blame everything negative or bad that happens to them as the other people’s fault. Then , when the are winning, they take All the credit, even if it is attached to immoral practices. Mitt lost all by himself by changing his story every other day, according to what ‘the party regime’ prompted him to say. $$$ It is Mitt’s fault and it is Ann’s fault, maybe the son. when he wanted to immaturely punch Pres. Obama during a Presidental election. for God’s sake. If they cannot be happy with the money they immorally got by sending job’s overseas. for many years, and then, plant closed while Mitt is campaigning down the street. Then, with all that money, you have, but you do not have Power over the good citizens of the USA,they will never be happy. I pity them, because Mitt will never be Pres. Nor Ann will ever be in the White house.It was NOT the media. WE HEARD HIM, HIS WORDS
loading...
Michelle
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:25 am
You got it right!
loading...
Sugapea
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Jason, Great interview, thanks so much for bringing it to us!
On Pub websites, I see comments saying: “Where’s Romney now? Why doesn’t he step forward with his experience/insight to help solve our financial problems”?
Obviously, he’s done with the roller coaster ride and has nothing further to contribute.
loading...
Inez
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:13 pm
He’s got millions with no place to go. How about opening a manufacturing plant, put thousands to work with Union wages and all benefits to atone for his loss.
loading...
Reynardine
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:01 pm
What an interview! I feel like I just ate a dry quart of stale, sticky Easter candy.
loading...
Reynardine
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:07 pm
Ann is an example of when you get old, you get the face you deserve… unless you can afford to buy a better one.
loading...
Reynardine
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:18 pm
I’ll admit, though, the one she has is an admirably crafted prosthesis. You’d almost think it was alive.
loading...
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:42 pm
HAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!! Brava! Best quote of the month!
loading...
dawgsrbtr
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:27 pm
Of course they were delusional. They listened to all the right wing polls and thought they were going to win.
loading...
PC
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:39 pm
Bitter, party of two, your table is ready.
loading...
Michelle
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:26 am
LOL
loading...
PSzymeczek
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:51 am
Perfect!
loading...
Sandra
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:41 pm
Like McCain and Palin, these two bitter, angry people will go to their graves still bitter and angry that intelligent, ‘real’ Americans who care about each other and the survivial of their country, voted against them. They can blame the poor, the media, the minorities all they want, the fact is they were their worst enemies. They had nothing to offer the American people, they demostrated time and again during the campaign, they had no policies and they couldn’t relate to ordinary Americans because they live in a different world from removed from the real America. Romney had no real agenda or policies, he campaigned on the fly, saying one thing then changig or denying it the next. They were a complete disaster. Ann’s constant refrain ‘let Mitt be Mitt’, well America and the world did see ‘let Mitt be Mitt’ and rejected him. Enough about these two arrogant, selfish, entitled critters.
loading...
Mcflyer
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:43 pm
The Republican party didn’t want Mitt, didn’t like Mitt and failed to support Mitt so he lost. Plain and simple. Once again the Romney’s are blaming everyone (and everything) but themselves. And to suggest that Obama ran an ugly campaign after the brutally destructive demonizing the Romney camp did to his primary opponents is beyond ridiculous. Even Tagg admitted that his father didn’t want to be President – it showed and people gladly accomidated him by rejecting him. Mitt and Ann, please get over it and drive one of your Cadillacs but to one of your many homes.
loading...
LVNytowl
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:43 pm
Why don’t they just blame who is really responsible for her not being the First Lady and Mitt not being the President…The American People!
loading...
musicdinosaur
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:46 pm
With this kind of attitude, the Republicans will never regain the White House. It’s like the blind are still leading the blind. This entitled, obstructionist attitude literally makes me sick..enough already.
loading...
JF
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 6:52 pm
Uh it wasn’t a landslide and I think we can safely say that given the current climate with the Non-Leader in Chief playing the blame game himself that we re-elected someone who is the poster boy for being in over your head. This is what happens when you elect someone purely on race and don’t even have the most nominal understanding of where he’s coming from in regards to what he’d like to do to this country; not that that would matter to the true acolytes out there. This is only the beginning and for all of you out there vilifying the Romney family I pity you. You are willing pawns of an administration that has brought more division and anger to this nation than any other administration in history. We are allowing this man to spend us into a debt that will eventually cripple this nation and we do so without care as to what this will mean for the future of generations to come. I am sickened by some of the comments I’ve read on this page, not to mention the “article” by Mr. Easley. We have lost our way as a nation.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:05 pm
The stupidity never ends.
Rove called it a landslide when he predeicted Romney winning by a lesser amount. How many people have won in the last 50 years with over 50% of the vote? You dont know? Look it up.
The president spends nothing without Congress. Not to mention spending is down, the defict is being paid down and you dont even know it.
You are a fraud
And so was Romney. Wernt you smart enough to listen to what he said about people that are not rich like him? or his wife who looks down on you?
loading...
Alice
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 8:16 pm
Where can I find the information you are talking about. I am interested in looking up your facts you are talking about. Let me know. Thanks.
loading...
Alice
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 8:57 pm
I wasn’t sure how long it takes for you to respond or if I wasn’t looking in the right place. I am hoping to get some information because I am not really sure where you can get real factual information. I am assuming since you have this page, you might be able to point me in the right direction. Thanks so much and sorry if I just didn’t give you enough time to respond the first time. Have a great night.
loading...
paulabflat
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:03 pm
google is your friend.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:05 pm
Karl Rove: 279 electoral votes for Mitt Romney
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83150.html#ixzz2MX4SuIrm
Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 8 – Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html
10 Presidents Who Won with Less Than 50% of the Vote
Read more: http://www.toptenz.net/10-presidents-who-won-with-less-than-50-of-the-vote.php#ixzz2MX5PL0X8
loading...
Sammy
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:14 pm
Miss Alice, use the d*** google. Ignorance is not attractive.
Where do you live? In Fox or Beck land?
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:09 pm
The 47% vid and a video of his wife talking to other rich people.
Mpost of the info is here onsite. The 51% landslide and rove etc. try searching for it here.
Sorry, my next door god daughters came over and needed hugs
loading...
Alice
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:45 pm
Sammy – what’s up with that comment? I don’t really understand what your point was for that. If I knew all the answers like you (or at least thought I did like you do), I wouldn’t be asking the questions. At least I have the courage to admit I don’t have the answers. I can google as well as the next guy. I guess I was trying to find non bias information. It is hard to tell these days. For you to refer to me as “living” at Fox or whatever the other place was, annoys me. Unfortunately, your response does paint the picture of being very defensive (like a sterotyped liberal) so I guess my question now is, how can you expect people to respect your point of view when you are unwilling to even give out information without being a jerk AND sounding stupid. DJCHEFRON – thanks for your help, but Political is (unfortunately) not that trustworthy – that I do know. I look forward to looking into the other sites though. Thanks.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Since politico being the gop hacks that they are would do.Sometimes when people doubt what the rethugs do I try to point them to their propaganda outlets so there is no “liberal bias.”
loading...
Alice
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:18 pm
Thanks for your help. I appreciate it. Glad I found your site and look forward to your articles. Have a great night.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:23 pm
Good luck, I havent updated it in over 6 months lol :)
loading...
Reynardine
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:18 am
With “stereotyped liberal”, you just flushed your cover down the trolette .
loading...
dug
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:54 am
On the subject of popular vote ‘landslides’ Obama’s 2012 popular vote margin was the 35th largest, with warren Harding, calvin coolige and FDR being 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Ike, Nixon, Clinton and Reagan had much greater margins in the popular vote, and no, I didn’t support Mitt.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:58 am
it doesn’t matter what it was in history. What really matters is the two combatants. President Obama won with 50.3% of the vote. Met Romney at 48.1%. That’s a decisive margin
Obama also one with 332 electoral votes to 206 for Romney. That’s a very decisive vote
loading...
michael
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:03 pm
JF …. how ridiculous…. the popular vote WAS a landslide……. Ann Romney needs to go home and bake some cookies (given that she has ever been in her kitchen) ….. . in any event, the American people spoke with the votes….. and THANK GOD for four more years of President Obama….. one of the greatest President’s in my 60+ year lifetime!!!!
loading...
rvn_sgt6768
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:18 am
You are as delusional as the mitt and misses and yes it was a LANDSLIDE. Now grow up get over it and move on.
loading...
Ilelsvm
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:03 pm
Give them a break! Entitlement?? Anyone that runs for a postition believes they are the best to do it and Romney was no different and that was all they were saying.Can anyone really say they think Romney has a bigger ego or sense of entitlement than Obama?? These are good people that wanted to help this country out of a terrible state which is getting worse by the day. As for media-they are right! It’s still going on today-look at the sequester- I see Obama blaming Republicans all over the media where are the Republicans stating their side? People wake up!Romney was right-entitlements aren’t worth it if it means going into more debt with China. And where is this money coming from for Syria?? There has to be spending cuts. Money problems are never solved with more money-it’s a spending problem in this country.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:12 pm
Boehner states his side daily. By lying.
Romney according to his son didnt want to run. And according to Romney you are looked down on mr 47%.
loading...
Sandra
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 5:54 pm
Romney not wanting to be POTUS is a big lie and a joke on his son’s part. The man spent the previous 6 years running for POTUS. This was actually his second run, he first loss to McCain in 2008 during the Rep. primary. Lets put that bs statement to rest already. Romney had nothing to offer the country, he was only interested in getting the title, POTUS on his resume. He had no clear vision, no principles, no agenda, no policies, no true belief system and certainly no moral core. His business history should have disqualifed him considering how he made his millions and how he treated hard working Americans by outsourcing their jobs to Communist China. He’s no true American.
loading...
FLFarmer
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:21 am
Sigh. What *is* it with people who constantly whine about the massive spending issue we supposedly have? We DO NOT have a spending problem. Let me repeat that, for the hard of learning: WE DO NOT have a spending problem. Spending is at the lowest its been in decades. What we have is a revenue problem, thanks to the neverending parade of Republicans/teabaggers insisting taxes are too high (they aren’t: lowest they’ve been in 30 years), corporations that pay nothing in taxes or receive credits, and the ultra wealthy benefiting from loopholes. I will never, for the life of me, understand why simple facts are so very difficult to grasp for a certain segment of our society, or why they insist on fighting so hard for the top 2% of wealth holders in this country and against their own best interests.
loading...
Ron
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:43 am
“Amen” people need to pull their heads out of the ground and stop, look and listen. The fact are their
loading...
Rod Boggs
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:09 pm
Ann has forgotten more than you know about business and politics… fact.. media does not want a smooth, successful govt.. It would not be newsworthy and sell their product. Remain duped and in the dark, why not? It’s just your life and your kids future.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:14 pm
Really? She has a business degree? Politics? She knows nothing of politics. But you should remember her words on the 47% tape. You are no one.
Dont talk about the kids when you are willing to allow them to starve and kill off the environment
loading...
Yeah,Right
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:01 am
There is always an oblivious &$#&%^ who sees it exactly the reverse as the ..99.99999% of people! Congratulations, in this case, its you! Hey,’genius’, ANN,smart businesswoman or not, didnt run for president,her lying,flip-flopping, phony,greedy,corrupt,nervous husband did! Go back under your little oblivious rock!
loading...
Roger Geltung
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:18 pm
Blame it on people like me who refused to vote for him because we knew he was full of it. We’re the ones responsible for Romney losing, so blame it on us.
loading...
Reynardine
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:22 pm
Only a matter of time til the Rombots were rolled out of their closet and plugged in, wasn’t it? Merrily we troll along..
loading...
D. Lowrey
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:30 pm
Flash…Ann Romney finds stick up a$$. Can’t figure out how to pull it out.
loading...
Paws
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 7:56 pm
Mitt Romney was an incredibly flawed candidate. He put down one segment of the population one day, and another segment the next. His flip-flopping was so bad that we didn’t have to wait a full 24-hours for the flip-flop to occur; toward the end of the campaign, his flip-flop could be measured in minutes. He’d say one thing at a rally and before he was on to the next, his spokespeople were contacting media to “clarify” and “explain.” Even an actual Etch-a-Sketch couldn’t have kept up with him.
All the media did was report HIS words. You cannot piss off half the population and expect them to vote for you. It doesn’t work like that.
loading...
phooeyrat
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 8:02 pm
Beware people; should you ever be out traveling at Xmas time near one of the Romney’s many “royal-palaces” and are in need of shelter; do not attempt to find it inside of their palace as I have a very strong feeling (my opinion of course) that you will be refused access there. And since their stables are always filled up with dancing-horses; I would say that you would be out of luck and totally on your own. That would also go for any pregnant women traveling with you and the donkey she rides. In my opinion
loading...
mary
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:07 pm
we are sooo lucky that they din’t win ,god help us. its bad anough what george did
loading...
neal
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:41 pm
yeah,it’s the media’s fault that they were there when stupid sh it came out of your mouth
loading...
Gary Seavers
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:49 pm
What most people remember about Mitt Romney are the remarks ragarding the “47%,” his comment about not concerning himself with the very poor and how he acquired his wealth…in the end Ann Romney is correct. The vast majority of Americans based their decision for the presidency on very narrow, distorted and prejudicial views of him and the Republican party. But…no one said the American electorate were intelligent…the Romneys overestimated Americans ability to grasp the importance of issues and their consequences…
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:57 pm
You right about the intelligence of the American electorate.Who knew there was 47% of the citizens are actual dimwits.
loading...
Anne
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Then how do you rationalize the fact that when Willard went overseas, especially to Great Britain, he made a fool of himself? The media accurately reported the extremely poor impression he made, especially in Great Britain, where they called him Mitt the Twit and said he was worse than Palin. Then there were his numerous lies, which he doubled down on even after having it pointed out when he was lying (Chrysler and Jeep). He was an unethical shape-shifter who told people only what he thought they wanted to hear, and the 47% remarks only confirmed what most of us already suspected about him. As for his wife, she was a world class whiner who apparently failed to realize that they actually had to have something to offer Americans.
loading...
dbo
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:19 pm
I have an urge to read The Taming Of The Shrew.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:41 pm
The perfect song for rmoney and queen ann delusions
Jefferson Airplane -White Rabbit-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WANNqr-vcx0&feature=player_embedded#!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 10:47 pm
I have seen airplane 3 times and starship at least 5 times. Good choice!
loading...
Olivia Coles
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:00 pm
It’s too bad Mitt is having a hard time adjusting to his loss to President Obama. For once he did not get what he wanted most the Presidency of the United States. He could not buy it, even though he tried, the American people saw through his lies and rejected he and the misses. Go away already, enough of the two of them.
loading...
Yeah,Right
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 11:10 pm
Hey, you snob, Media just showed videos of your husband..opening his mouth! Enough said!
loading...
malibujimbo
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:36 am
“The media didn’t show Mitt’s compassionate side.” Yes they did, they showed it with the help of a hidden camera at a fund raiser. He was compassionate!
loading...
Eve White
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:01 am
Nastiest group of haters…..glad I am not any of you!
You call name calling making comments. Jealous cowards.
loading...
Anne
Mar. 6th, 2013 at 7:07 am
Do you seriously believe anyone who voted against the Romneys, especially those of us on this forum, are “jealous” of their wealth? When we think of how he bankrupted companies, throwing countless Americans under the bus by firing them and outsourcing their jobs to other countries for cheaper labor, contempt is the overriding sentiment. There are people who have acquired their wealth by helping others and actually making positive contributions. Romney is not one of them. We are contemptuous of his arrogance, his ignorance, and his dismissiveness of all the Americans he planned to serve except for the wealthy. One problem with so many on the far right is that they have an inexplicable reverence for the wealthy, regardless of how they got their wealth.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 6th, 2013 at 8:59 am
I am more jealous of the fact he got out of paying any taxes for years and years. And worse, would not admit it to the people of the country.
loading...
D. W. Skinner
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:26 am
all those pretty horses and one of them hasn’t kicked her in the head yet?
loading...
x_infamous
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:22 am
What a contrast! The elite clothes cow Ann versus the thoroughly likable down-to-earth Michelle. Michelle is physically involved in promoting healthy food and exercise while Ann would have possibly promoted the Marie Antoinette attitude of ‘let them eat cake’.
loading...
Gail
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:12 am
From a previous post: “What a contrast! The elite clothes cow Ann versus the thoroughly likable down-to-earth Michelle. Michelle is physically involved in promoting healthy food and exercise while Ann would have possibly promoted the Marie Antoinette attitude of ‘let them eat cake’.”
… Yes, and perhaps it would have continued to “off with their heads” if Mitt & Ann had won. They were so casual with blaming the 47% … and so callous toward people who cannot afford health care (let them go to the emergency room, they are already covered!). Michelle and Barach are not perfect, but at least the republicans did not end up with a majority in the white house.
loading...
JorgeH
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:30 am
ALL OF THE ABOVE! or BELOW
depending where you locate this comment!
loading...
John
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:32 am
Just by reading all these hateful comments, it is easy to see the media created bias against the Romney family
loading...
dan doggett
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:32 am
how typically republican of her. “its’ not our fault-it was the liberal media” should become the new gop motto (you can substitute “lamestream media” for “liberal media” if you are of the “caribou barbie” faction of the gop….just a suggestion.
loading...
Mr. G
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 6:48 am
I’m not sure that I’d agree with Ms. Romney as to whose fault her husband’s loss was, but the lack of objectivity in this piece doesn’t do anything to disprove her contention.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 7:12 am
You know I am sick and tired of this whoa is us and people who fall for it.It was that bad liberal media.It was low information voters blah blah blah.He and his wife are hypocrites for one.They derided people who want stuff from the government.Really mittens?
The Federal Bailout That Saved Mitt Romney
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-federal-bailout-that-saved-mitt-romney-20120829
Romney Didn’t Build That: His Olympics Were Bailed Out By Taxpayers
http://www.wbur.org/2012/10/19/romney-olympic-bailout
We were tired of his lies of his super duper powers of bi-partisanship
Thomas J. Curry: Romney as governor: a very practiced liar
http://blogs.providencejournal.com/ri-talks/this-new-england/2012/10/thomas-j-curry-romney-as-governor-liar-and-a-phony.html
You Don’t Know Mitt: 99 Facts About Mitt Romney
http://thinkprogress.org/romney-facts/
No it wasnt the media,hell if anything they gave his lying ass a pass so they could have their horse race.His pompous patootie should thank his handlers on the planet Kolub that there was 47% low information voters that spared him total humiliation.
This shyster if you remember was not even the choice of republican voters.Every one of those clowns and one point was the favorite in the republican primaries.I guess that was the media fault too.Just go ride your horse.bleach those magic underwear.Just do something other than blaming others for your defeat.
loading...
Karen
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 7:24 am
Just face it Ann you married a loser. He and you both thumb your nose at the working class. Not everyone is born with a silver spoon, and not everyone can borrow money off their daddy.
loading...
jscottu
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 7:41 am
For all his faults, Romney was the better choice. Too bad Obama was re elected.
loading...
ethridge wells
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:17 am
if this article is not evidence of media bias then nothing is . yahoo is worse than the ap and msnbc. you have to be a total idiot to not see the media bias. the media has been in the tank for obama from the start and partly to blame for the mess we are in.
loading...
S. F.
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:30 am
She is absolutely right! I know Mitt and I am an everday Joe. He is a very altruistic man. He was not even going to take a presidential salary, it was going to be given to charity. Most the people making comments on here bought into the Chicago Thug/smear your opponent message that our media broadcast.
The man Mitt is very different from what was portrayed by the media. Romney would have LED the nation instead of being a celebrity who cares nothing for the people he is supposed to serve.
loading...
knight4444
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Here we go!!! the club for neanderthals are churping in with their idiot flat earth world views! @SF I’m surprised at how a human being that has the ability to find you’re way to a computer “A” -”B” type out that insane rant about Willard Rommey being a real ”normal” guy!! Dude I truly see why your party is in the crapper!!!
loading...
Beaglemom
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:44 am
It is interesting that this interview with the Romneys has inspired such support for them from people who otherwise never comment on Politicususa.
Mitt Romney lost because he is not worthy of being president of the United States. He considers himself above everyone else and that showed every second of the campaign. Even I had forgotten many of the instances – thankfully – but they are coming back. Remember when he mocked the homemade cookies served to him in a park in Pennsylvania? Remember Ann’s disdainful references to “them” when a regular person would have said “us”? And, yes, the 47% speech. We should never forget that because it showed much of the essential Mitt Romney. Add that to the company he ran, to his sorry excuse for governorship in Massachusetts, to his mishandling of any contact with minorities in this country, to his obvious inability to even pretend to relax among foreigners in Europe. This interview brings it all back.
I am so glad that we, the people, re-elected President Obama and Vice President Biden. Now I hope that the Romneys will go back to wherever the rock is that they have been hiding under and stay there.
loading...
howmuchwasthat
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:49 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REn1BnJE3do
loading...
Rocky Harris
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:50 am
Wake up people! We the people are going down quickly. This country is going broke. Until people get off of the Republican or Democrat bus. It will never work together. Too many old ways , not enough give and take. Until we work together again, nothing is going to change. The country will not come back until we get God and morality be in practice, the way it was when this country was founded. Most of the people in washington today are no longer working for the people as were originally elected. So if you want to keep going down the road blindly, keep voting the same people back in. I do not claim to be Republican or democrat. I try to vote for whomever seems the best candidate. America needs us to pull together for the better of this country. Throw partisan politics out and work together. It seems we only depend on GOD when there is a major loss of life, tehn we start kicking him out again.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:58 am
You mean when we believed in god to justify genocide against Native Americans,enslavement of the blahs and then after that,apartheid to further keep them from acquiring wealth and basic human rights?Was it morally right to disenfranchised everyone who was not a white male landowner? Thats what you miss in the name of your god?
loading...
Sherlock
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 3:59 pm
Mitt and his NitWit wife are 100% correct to blame the media for Obama’s victory.
Mitt said and did some real dumb things that the MEDIA reported. The grungy 47% I mean 53% heard or saw these real dumb things courtesy of the MEDIA.
They voted accordingly— yep the MEDIA certainly played a significant role.
The Romneys are EVIL Republicans.
loading...
John
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:58 am
romney was just a rep puppet is all … all he cared about was tax breaks for the ultra wealthy like himself.. i cant blame him , in the USA people are very selfish and only think of themselves… he lost the election when he showed how out of touch he was with the middle class by saying that middle class folks make 250k a year lmao that was his end right there… when 5000 a week is a middle class salary this would be by far the richest country in the world ..and what does the lower middleclass make? 150k? what about the working poor 75k.. this silver spoon guy has no clue of what really goes on in the middleclass or anything else in real life…the man has 17 mansions.. all his staff are illegals… more for the rich and F everyone else… thats why i dont understand why reg folk wanted to vote for him WAKE UP AMERICANS america is about the middle not the top
loading...
jeff earl
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:22 am
why are the romney’s allowed to speak about americans or even humans?!!? they are neither!!!!
loading...
Elvis
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:29 am
Google Narcissistic Personality Disorder and it will all make sense; entitled, can’t take responsibility and blames others for own shortcomings, failures and mistakes.
loading...
diane
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:39 am
We dodged a bullet with the Romney’s.
We elected the right man.
loading...
Janet Dial
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 9:45 am
Still not a clue, Ann. Still not a clue.
Blame ME. I am 61-year-old, white woman. My husband and I have worked hard all our lives. We are deeply Christian, active in our church and community and have raised two fine sons with good families. Dear Ann, WE voted for President Obama, who more clearly understands the economic and social problems facing this country. Blame ME. And blame yourself for not understanding that well-educated, well-informed voters could think for themselves.
loading...
Rocky Harris
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:00 pm
How can a christian vote for a person that promotes same sex marriage & abortions, both which are considered an abomination in the bible? Just asking.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:05 pm
how can a Christian vote for a man who had a different platform on every issue depending on what crowding was talking to? How can they Christian vote for a person like Romney and Ryan who put forth personhood bills that would’ve taken birth control away from women and taken the rights away from women?
How can anyone believe in a religion to start with?
loading...
knight4444
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 3:52 pm
@rocky you’re just one of the many people don’t want anything to do with christianity!!! it’s pathetic low life bible thumping uneducated idiots like you and that joke of a party of typically RACIST- OLD- WHITE- MALES!!! you and your ilk fortunately are a dying breed!!!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:47 pm
I think the problem here is is that people think that Obama is out supporting abortion. But I think he is doing is saying people have the right to do this and the right to make the choice.
As far as gay marriage goes, I don’t see anything in the Constitution that would prevent this from happening. I’m sure the tea parties with me on this one
loading...
Paws
Mar. 6th, 2013 at 8:41 pm
“How can a christian vote for a person that promotes same sex marriage & abortions, both which are considered an abomination in the bible? Just asking.”
First, the President does not promote same sex marriage or abortions – he promotes equality.
And what could be more Christian than making sure all citizens are treated equally? Either we are all equal under the law or we are not. Are you prepared to say that homosexuals are not equal, that they should be treated differently than heterosexuals? They cannot marry in all states and even if they can, DOMA prevents them from enjoying the same rights and legal status as other couples.
As for abortion, what the President supports is choice – the right of women to determine their own reproductive destiny. Certainly men are not prohibited or restricted as it concerns their health care; why should women be? I don’t have the right to tell a man he can’t have a certain health procedure, so why should that man have the right to tell me what health procedures I can have just because I’m female? Women are equal with men whether some in society want to recognize that.
The quarrel over same sex marriage and reproductive choice is nothing but “separate but equal” all over again only with two different groups of people – women and homosexuals.
If you don’t agree with same sex marriage, then fine you don’t have to marry someone of the same sex. If you don’t believe in abortion, then don’t have one.
Individuals can live under scriptures in their private lives if they wish, but they don’t have the right to deem what all of society can and cannot do. Society lives under the rule of law.
Having said all of that, you will never find a candidate you agree with 100% unless you are the candidate. I don’t agree with everything the President has said and done, but I do agree with his overall philosophy about governing and the role of government in our lives. I would certainly not vote for a person like Mitt Romney because his overall philosophy is not one I agree with. Certainly his views about the poor, aid to needy families, taxes, etc., are unchristian and are not in keeping with the teachings of Jesus Christ. So I have to wonder why a Christian would vote for Romney or others like him.
loading...
Brian Loudermilch
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:15 am
Was there a Ventriloquist forcing those
words Out of Mitty’s Mouth when that
“47 Percent” Video was RECORDED?
Could Ann Romney Possibly come up with
something More Condescending than
“You People”?
That Damned “Liberal Media” showed the
World what Mitt and Ann Really are.
loading...
dawn
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:24 am
Wow, that is the most left leaning article ever written! Scary thing is all of your readers believe it. If you watched the actual full video people would see what they actually said. This country is falling apart because somehow being successful is a bad thing. It used to be something people worked for and strived for, now it’s not. The bottom line is that we have a HUGE debt crisis on our hands. The republicans agreed to big tax hikes several weeks ago with the agreement that Obama would come back with some kind of spending reform. Now he won’t give a penny. Do you realize that the sequester is 2% of the federal government’s budget? Each and every working American took a 2% pay-cut with the repeal of the payroll tax. If we can all do it why can’t our government? Are you really telling me Mr. Obama that there is no waste in our government? You can’t find 2% to cut? This sequester was his idea, he should own it, but he doesn’t own anything. It is always everyone else’s fault. If we don’t seriously get our spending under control we will become like Greece, it will happen. President Obama needs to stop compaining and start working. Enough with the politics, let get our country back under control.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:49 am
number one, they were not big tax hikes. They were just a few percent on the very rich. And no one even affect the very rich simply because they don’t even come close to paying the percentage that you do anyways.
Obama has put forth many cuts. The house has put forward a very narrow focused cuts and all of them on you. And you stand your cheerleading for them. Obama wants to drop all of the deductions for the rich so they can pay the same or a higher percentage than you do. You are against that.
As far as your moronic pandering about being successful as a bad thing, that’s not even hilarious anymore it’s just plain stupid.
Greece is in the position it’s in now because of the austerity programs that were forced upon it. And that is exactly what the Republicans are trying to force on you.
The sequester came out of the White House. The Republicans voted as a bloc for it. All of them need to take credit or responsibility for it.
I also find it hilarious that people say the country is broke yet are totally against any type of revenues such as plugging tax loopholes. Boy does that ever makes sense
loading...
Babs
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:28 am
It was Ann Romney that made me vote against her husband. She always referred to “those people.” Well Ann “those people” are Americans too.
loading...
Steven
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:37 am
Speaking of media bias: Read your own headline. It was not a landslide but actually a very close loss according to the popular vote. It just looks more lopsided because of the way the archaic electoral college works.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:44 am
I find it extremely funny that Karl Rove on election night was predicting a landslide victory for Mr. Romney while picking less electoral votes and less popular vote that Obama won. I wonder how it would’ve been if Romney would’ve won with the numbers that Karl Rove gave it would have been considered a landslide victory. Obama wins far more popular vote and quite a few more electoral votes than Romney and it’s not a landslide. Can you explain that?
The electoral college has worked for a very long time. And now you want to change it just so Republicans can win? Isn’t that like gerrymandering?
loading...
PSzymeczek
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:08 am
I’d call a five million-vote difference in the popular vote a landslide.
loading...
Lynnda
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:42 am
Hey Mitt and Ann remember this? Tagg Romney said his father “wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life,”
loading...
Ksavage
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:50 am
I love the title of this article for “landslide loss” Last I recall it was not a “landslide” if you are talking popular vote. I don’t know what results showed a landslide loss. The media is biased I don’t care how you spin it.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:51 am
I find it extremely funny that Karl Rove on election night was predicting a landslide victory for Mr. Romney while picking less electoral votes and less popular vote that Obama won. I wonder how it would’ve been if Romney would’ve won with the numbers that Karl Rove gave it would have been considered a landslide victory. Obama wins far more popular vote and quite a few more electoral votes than Romney and it’s not a landslide. Can you explain that? The electoral college has worked for a very long time. And now you want to change it just so Republicans can win? Isn’t that like gerrymandering?
I can wait
loading...
knight4444
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:05 pm
You’re joking right???????? seriously? you’re just kidding around right??????? for the love of GOD! how stupid can a human being get?????!! losing by over 5MILLION votes isn’t a landslide?????????? damn @Ksavage!!! what’s you’re definition of a LANDSLIDE??? with brilliant thinkers like you I see why the GOP is a complete JOKE!!!!
loading...
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:20 am
That might have been referring to the lips downstairs.
loading...
Steph & Mike
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:34 am
Ann Romney is right on. The media portrayed Mitt, just as Obama’s campaign did as someone he wasn’t, that was Obama’s only chance of winning since he had no positive record to run on. Mitt Romney is the man who would be steering this country in the right direction. It’s our loss that he’s not in office. And btw, Obama’s win was hardly a landslide, get real!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:45 am
it didn’t hurt that Mr. Romney had a different position every day of the week for every single issue. That wasn’t the media. All Romney wanted to do was give the rich more tax cuts and make you pay for them. which Romney did you like? The one who lied through 18 months of campaign are the one who showed up at the first debate?
As for the land side part it’s already been explained in this article. You might want to read it.
loading...
fedded-up
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:14 pm
OMG! The butthurt!! The media didn’t tank Mitt. MITT tanked Mitt, with a LOT of help from his faithful sidekick, Ann. Get over yourself, and your massive butthurt.
loading...
Ralph Williams
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:35 am
I don’t believe all of these people who continue to tell the big “Obama is running up the national debt”lie..Allow me to educate some of you..George W. Bush,had a 180 billion dollar SURPLUS passed to him and what did he do?…started TWO TRILLION DOLLAR WARS and didn’t pay for either..gave the top 2% a TRILLION DOLLAR TAX CUT..gave ‘Big Pharma’ 900 BILLION DOLLARS(Big Pharma,was a giant giveaway to large pharmaceutical companies)allowed WALL STREET firms,run amonk to create ‘TOO BIG TO FAIL’almost allowing the American economy to collapse.(Hank Paulson,Treasury Secretary under Bush,gave the 15 largest banks 250 Billion dollars,to supposely lend..the money was used to pay bonuses)..so for all of you Obama haters,George W. Bush ran this country into the ground and we will pay that price for years to come..Romney wanted to do the same..tax cuts for the rich and to hell with everyone else..Romney’s 47%..wake up right wing,your lies have been uncovered.
loading...
Fil
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:39 am
I am amazed that at the total lack of common sense in most of these comments.
-We don’t have a spending problem.( 16 trillion debt and counting)
-The media isn’t bias (Both sides are bias)
-The rich don’t pay enough taxes (50% of the country doesn’t pay any)
-Greece is in this position because of austerity (No they were forced into this austerity program because they couldn’t meet their debt obligations)
-The country is becoming so divided that I don’t know if we will ever be able to fix it. The system is broken and until everyone has the courage to take responsibility for their own actions it will remain broken.
-We have drifted so far away from President Kennedy’s speech about ” ask not what your country can do for you” now it is all about what the government will do for me. No candidate has the courage to stand up and say my campaign won’t be about what I will give you but rather what I will do for this country.
-I am sick and tired of everyone promoting their agenda left and right at the expense of our children and grandchildren.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:44 am
as long as you’re okay with the rich paying a lower percentage than you that’s fine with me. Because the amount of money they have dwarfs you like a single pea million acres of peas.
Why doesn’t 50% of the country pay taxes? Because a great many of these people have been out of work for a long time, because a great many of these people have children and get to use them as deductions. They get money back.
Doesn’t it trouble you that 50% don’t pay taxes? Doesn’t it trouble you that 10% now own 80% of the wealth? doesn’t it trouble you that there is no purchasing power in the middle class because all of the money is at the top?
Doesn’t it bother you that you don’t understand that the deficit is coming down slowly but surely? Doesn’t it bother you that the austerity and Greece isn’t working and it’s the same thing that the Republicans want for us?
Well?
loading...
Mark
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:41 am
You know, I have read a lot about this..and quite frankly it all stinks. The media is a very biased organization..or as I will put it, a bunch of ass kissers. They will bend over for anyone that gives them whatever they want. CNN was recently exposed for being paid by the whitehouse to deliver what the whitehouse wanted..but you never hear about it. So were the Romney’s given a fair shake..no I don’t think they were. And for all of your relgion haters out there, you need to get your heads out of your asses and find out for yourself what the Mormon church is all about..and form your own opinions…oh wait..the feeble minded may not be capable of asking those question and seeking out their own truthful answers without turning to what OTHER people have to say. So sick and tired of it… If you think the Mormon church is soo wrong..prove it… Wait, I was born in the catholic church..let me take a stab at the biggest, phony religion out there…lets see..catholics pray to statues.., they have priests who defy the law of marriage, the cover up pediphiles (oh wow)..and yet they are considered the church of God. By the sweat of your brow you will work, but catholic priests dont have real jobs..they get everything handed to them..with the addition of a college degree..shall I continue.. Go ahead challenge me..I dare you..I have seen enough crap growing up in the catholilc church that if it were exposed everyone would probably leave…fakist church on earth.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:53 am
No we haven’t heard about CNN getting paid.A link would help.Oh,you didnt provide one.There goes what little credibility you have to begin with.What I think of the Mormon church in general/The same thing I think of all grifters.THERE IS A SUCKER BORN EVERY SECOND.Who gives a rat ass on what idols you pray to?I mean really,thats your argument.
Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you’d have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion. -Steven Weinberg
loading...
T.McGough
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 11:44 am
Loser’s Limp. Bad sports teams blame the referee, bad political campaigns blame the media. Have a positive attitude: Consider your interview a job audition ala Sarah Palin. Hannity, Limbaugh,Fox News will all give you glowing recommendations.
loading...
michael arthur
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:00 pm
To those who think President Obama is doing a great job, keep taking your meds. Mitt Romney offered real leadership and an ability to reach across the aisle to get real change accomplished and lower our paralyzing debt!!! To say that the media has not favored President Obama is to ignore he has taken no action in regards to Benghazi, that according to even Bob Woodward the Sequester was his idea, and that again in President Obama’s own words during the election the Sequester would never happen, because he wouldnt let it happen….so either he is a LIAR or incompetent…..or in my mind both!!!!
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:04 pm
met Romney offered one thing. More tax breaks for the rich and tax increases for you to make up for those tax breaks. He had a different platform on every issue depending on what day it was. He offered nothing but a rich man’s paradise.
What action would you like the president to take on Benghazi? do you think we should nuke the country?
loading...
fedded-up
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Did you miss any FOX talking points?
Go away, baby troll…
loading...
MelK
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:07 pm
@Shiva,@ No Tread Zone http://mediamatters.org/mobile/research/2012/09/14/krauthammer-whitewashes-bushs-history-to-bash-o/189890
loading...
Stephen
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:09 pm
It’s funny when I hear the Romney’s blaming the media. They really are out of touch. Fox, of course hated Obama and lets face it not because he was a democrat. The south hated him, not because he was a democrat. Media, even CNN were not favorable towards him because Fox created this story that every
network except them are fair and balanced and the rat of the media is liberal.
Wow, I am hearing more about Benghazi from the angry republicans then I ever heard when our country was attacked September 2, 2001. C. Rice is still held up on a pedestal. By the way, how many dies then? How much of a warning was given?
loading...
Frank
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:12 pm
The republicans have tried twice to beat a black man, they don’t understand what where the country is at.
The average American has been raped, beaten and trodden, by the very people the republicans are promoting (the very wealthy).
The wealthy have the money (bribery – lobbing) the average have the votes.
Until the republicans to unite the country instead of divided it, they are not going to win much, maybe loose more seats in congress.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:16 pm
you are right, the people that the Romney’s are supporting our the people in the cable companies that rape you on a daily basis. These people get rich off the fact that we pay far more than other countries for Internet access and get half the service they do. The oil companies, the utilities, the people who make their billions and millions off of people like us and who look down on us just like the Romney’s do
loading...
R E Lee
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:22 pm
Frankly, a politician or their wife looking for sympathy-from anybody-is about as pathetic as I have ever heard. Who cares that you lost? Politics has never been known to be a friendly sport? Of course, with America divided by imbeciles who cannot separate their “gods” from their political thinking, why should one be surprised at such commentary?
I am “the middle” in this once spiritual, great land…and I did not care for the glibness of Pres. Obama…but simple protocols were requested and ignored by the opposition…if you cannot release your tax returns (and most of us already presumed why), then don’t run for office. His father had no problem releasing his?
As for the religious defense, gimme a break…religion has caused more deaths than any other moral abyss mankind has created throughout his history. Just let it go. If the current state of “a faith” causes people to find their truer/better selves, why not just be grateful that said church/churches are their? History remains part illusion-written by the winners-or chiseled out of stone. In any case, absolute answers just aren’t so easily revealed. If it takes some sort of religious beliefs to bring mankind into a kinder, more compassionate place, I’m all for it…whatever name said religion claims for itself. And if a religion claims that others MUST DIE FOR IT, then I’ll be the first to join the army that wipes it out…RL
loading...
Ric
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:23 pm
Apparently FOX News was always fair and balanced.
The entire rest of the media was pro-Obama.
Apparently the Republicans will continue down this path and continue losing. As long as they hate women, hate science, hate smarts, hate gays, hate the poor, love assault weapons and think that all the money should go to the millionaires who are truly blessed by God who loves Republicans and Tim Tebow more, they have no chance.
loading...
Doc
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:35 pm
It’s not so much that the mainstream media are liberal: it’s the FACTS that are liberal.
This is what happens when one party decides to manufacture facts and repeal basic logic in order to try winning arguments where they dislike the facts: The MSM won’t defend them and so they create their own hostage “news” organizations. If you live in that echo chamber – as do the Romneys, Roves and all the other fools who couldn’t believe their inbred polling was wrong – you will end up looking foolish in the part of the world that works with facts.
Case in point… for all the hysterics who feel the most urgent thing we can do now is to cut the deficits, please go study some facts first, then come back and explain why you think classical Keynesian Economics is wrong. This is Econ 101, folks, and you failed. Holding an entire economy hostage does not make you right, just dangerous in your ignorance.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Its always the kids.We must save the children.Were you this upset when we had to endure this
10 Horrifying Racist Attacks on Obama
http://www.alternet.org/story/142747/10_horrifying_racist_attacks_on_obama
I guess kids of color dont count on what people sling their way.
As for the charges against us, I am unconcerned. I am beyond your timid lying morality, and so I am beyond caring.
loading...
notquit
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Sometimes, I feel that I am the only one who remembers Raider Romney of the corporate raiders of the 1980′s who made their 1% amount of money DIRECTLY off the backs of the 99% whose companies they cannibalized – (and that is a “nice word.”) Talk about a lack of “personal responsibility” – BLAME the companies, people, media, campaign, etc., but make sure you BLAME the other.
loading...
Michael J. Benardo
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:07 pm
Many so-called “conservatives” seem to wonder why most REGULAR people, (people who are not rich), dislike everything conservative. Here is why:
Conservatives want to destroy Social Security by privatizing it, thereby making it so disfunctional that people turn against it and repeal it.
Conservatives keep pushing government-mandated Open Shop, aka “Right-to-Work” laws.
Conservatives want a government that does little more than field a military and a Post Office, no social spending at all.
Conservatives think the government should not fight racism.
Conservatives like paying employers to off-shore our jobs WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS.
Conservatives’ Patron Saint, Ronald Wilson Reagan, caused mass homelessness by giving our industrial base to Japan. We never had mass homelessness in this country before.
Conservatives CLAIM to be Christians, but in reality are pagans, as they worship idols, ie money, power, fame, glory, material goods, riches, all things of this earth. REAL Christians worship GOD!
With that kind of record, how can we like ANYTHING conservative?
PS: Do not try to say Reagan didn’t do what I said he did. I am 57 and I lived it!
loading...
jsmu
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Simply astounding–this rich bitch cannot let it go that she and her corporate stooge of a husband just couldn’t quite BUY the White House.
loading...
david
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:35 pm
The media was in BED with Obama. They bashed his wealth, success and religion. I think the media was afraid to say anything bad about Obama because they would be called Racists.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:42 pm
Give us a link to where his church was bash my the MSM?I can give you hundreds bashing The President over Jeremiah Wright.Bash his wealth.If you mean telling how vulture capitalism work, well I am so sorry you didnt have a clue
Other than that ,the bubble you live in must be stinking to high heaven from all the flatulence the right produces on a daily basis
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 4:48 pm
I guess that’s why every Sunday television show had conservatives on on a ratio of 3 to 1 against Democrats. All during the campaign. Every day Romney had his face on TV and the media sucked up everything he said even though he was lying 90% of the time
loading...
Ellen
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:32 pm
I am really dismayed that even the moderators have chosen to name call and display THEIR intolerance in these comments. DJCHEFRON, you especially are out of line. You moderators should make your points with civility rather than personally attacking the commenter. I am reluctantly concluding that I need to stop visiting this website.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 8:36 pm
“The truth will set you free…but first it’ll piss you off.” – Gloria Steinem
loading...
James Threadgill
Mar. 5th, 2013 at 12:17 am
This narrow between the eyes bitch should shut her yap. The GOP wanted to get rid of entitlements, so what’s she whining about? Why she thinks she was entitled to the WH is just another indication of the fact these pukes view themselves as royalty.
loading...
Evermore Jones
Mar. 5th, 2013 at 3:20 am
I just finished reading this thread and I have to say, you people have way too much free time on your hands. Get a job ya hippies :) neener neener :)
loading...
Doris ~
Mar. 5th, 2013 at 2:02 pm
Mittsey & Queen Ann are very palinistic and four months after the election they are still licking their wounds…..GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!
loading...