The great journey to undo the Supreme Court’s Citizen United decision took another step today when Sen. Bernie Sanders filed the constitutional amendment that will give power back to the people.
The amendment contains three sections. Section I states, “Section I. Whereas the right to vote in public elections belongs only to natural persons as citizens of the United States, so shall the ability to make contributions and expenditures to influence the outcomes of public elections belong only to natural persons in accordance with this Article.”
In plain English, this section overturns Citizens United by barring any entity that doesn’t have the right to vote from donating to campaigns.
Section II states, “Section II.Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to restrict the power of Congress and the States to protect the integrity and fairness of the electoral process, limit the corrupting influence of private wealth in public elections, and guarantee the dependence of elected officials on the people alone by taking actions which may include the establishment of systems of public financing for elections, the imposition of requirements to ensure the disclosure of contributions and expenditures made to influence the outcome of a public election by candidates, individuals, and associations of individuals, and the imposition of content neutral limitations on all such contributions and expenditures.”
This section gives Congress and states the power set up a publicly funded electoral system. This section also undoes the Buckley v. Valeo (1976) decision that ruled money is speech, and gave individuals the right to spend unlimited sums of money independent of candidates.
The final section of the amendment makes ensures that nothing in the amendment infringes on the freedom of the press.
In a statement, Sen. Sanders said, “What the Supreme Court did in Citizens United is to tell billionaires like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson, ‘You own and control Wall Street. You own and control coal companies. You own and control oil companies. Now, for a very small percentage of your wealth, we’re going to give you the opportunity to own and control the United States government.’ That is the essence of what Citizens United is all about. That is why this disastrous decision must be reversed.”
The amendment requires a 2/3 majority in both the House and the Senate for passage. If it would pass both bodies with the required majority, it would then move on to the states, where a 3/4 majority is required for ratification.
There is absolutely zero chance that this amendment will make it out of Congress, but the importance of the gesture is that it brings attention to the Citizens United decision. While the media is obsessed with whatever partisan battle has distracted it like a jangling keys in front of a baby, our electoral process is still being hijacked.
The easiest way to get rid of Citizens United would be to replace one of the conservative justices with an Obama appointee, but that is not a certainty. People who care about the health of our representative democracy have to make their voices heard. If this issue gets pushed into the darkness the corporations, special interests, and billionaires win.
The billionaires have the money, but the people have the numbers. Money can never be allowed to purchase liberty. The people must stand tall, and speak loudly until Citizens United has been undone.





Mra Gunka
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 9:31 pm
That is the best news I’ve heard since President Obama won re-election! Thanks you Sen. Bernie Saunders!
Mrs Gunka
loading...
Julie Bucknam
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 9:36 pm
Senator Sanders should be cloned! Love that man. How refreshing to watch someone actually work FOR the people for a change.
loading...
PSzymeczek
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:27 am
I’d like a couple dozen Bernie Sanders, a couple dozen Elizabeth Warrens, a dozen Sherrod Browns, and a dozen Sheldon Whitehouses.
loading...
stitch
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Your mouth to god’s ear…though I would add a sprinkling of Barbara Boxers, Amy Klobuchars, and Barbara Mikulskis for balance.
loading...
NativeSonKY (@NativeSonKY)
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 9:52 pm
I’d vote for this! And this Man! Peace!
loading...
Russell Collins
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Bernie,
Please never give up. Our only hope lies with the likes of you and Elizabeth Warren.
Thank you.
loading...
Terry Derrick
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Thank heavens SOMEONE is stepping up.
loading...
Lila Wynne
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 11:09 pm
This is absolutely the best! How much of the millionaires money would trickle down and quickly to help save the middle class? Without a doubt it would help with the US and states budgets. Refusing to pay the same percentage of taxes that the middle class and the poor pay is evil.
loading...
Joanne Gordon
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 11:19 pm
Thank you! Keep up the great work you do.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 11:34 pm
I think the majority of people in this country understand that a corporation is not a person as it cannot have a hysterectomy or a vasectomy.
Money is influence and influence is power. I am a proponent of everyone being able to give a candidate a gift of $1000.00 period.
Public financing must be forced by the people.
Thanks Bermie. We know it wont pass but whoever says no, has to face those who know the truth.
loading...
Doraetta Hesse
Mar. 12th, 2013 at 11:44 pm
Thank You Senator Sanders, For this Amendment. And all you do for We The People.
loading...
Terry Click
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 6:50 am
He is the last American hero of politics!
loading...
Peter Barnett
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 7:41 am
He’s not as good as Paul Ryan.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 7:50 am
You’re right.Sanders states facts. Ryan states falsehoods and is a con man something you are familiar with.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 9:32 am
Ryan offers to take you for everything you have in order to feed the rich. and as we have read enough of your posts, we understand that you will bow down and give him the thank you sir may I have another routine. I find it hilarious that Republicans could fall for Ryan’s silliness. Robin Hood in reverse. Take from the poor to give to the rich. And Peter goes right along with it. Even though the rest of the world is proving that what Ryan proposes does not work the stupidity never ends
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 9:46 am
Makes you wonder what they’re teaching about catholicism these days?
As Jesus prepares the loaves of bread and wine the multitudes ask can I share?Jesus looks on them and say” I got mine fuck off”
loading...
Sherlock
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:37 am
Peter
You are baiting us.
Sherlock
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:45 am
He is not baiting us.He is an actual believer.
loading...
Lynda
Mar. 17th, 2013 at 3:53 pm
You can’t be serious! What have you been drinking to impair your thought process to that extent?
loading...
e roselene
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 7:42 am
the idea is great, but a constitutional amendment should be very short, max mo more than three sentences.
loading...
TJB
Mar. 14th, 2013 at 1:56 pm
Yes! That way it remains abstract enough for any judge to interpret it according to his/her own political beliefs!
loading...
anarchitek
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 9:41 am
Hail, the voice of reason and sanity! Those who wish to give voice” to corporations are those who STAND TO BENEFIT! The REST of us do not agree, but have been ignored and rendered MUTE, by the influence these scoundrels have over the Supreme Court, supposedly the PEOPLE’S court of appeals! This has been subverted, though, by the influence of MONEY, something the PEOPLE do not have in NEARLY the quantity those opposed to us do. It comes down to a difference of opinion between the INTERESTS of the PEOPLE, and those of SPECIAL interests!
loading...
michael howard
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 9:54 am
Thank you
loading...
Rich Riggs
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 10:08 am
This goes a long way toward restoring integrity to both the process of governance by affirming that bribery is not a preferred means of influence and to the rightful position of influence for the republic, i.e. with all three co-equal federal estates being less dominant than the States and local law…the power of the people to determine the outcome of actions based on the apportioned consequence on them.
I would add a fourth clause that declared: “The bribery of any public official before they take office, during their term or as a reward for service after leaving office, a crime of treason and subject to independent prosecution by the Justice department’s attorneys.
loading...
Anthony Browning
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 10:57 am
as to the fourth clause, I agree that bribery by a corporation should be considered treason…but how would the justice department handle the current supreme court justice which was paid for by Monsanto? I mean, since it is a lifetime appointment, is there a statute of limitations, or grandfather clause? no ex post facto laws can be made, so how do we clean the slate?
loading...
MeMcC
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:27 am
It takes an independent – a man with integrity! We need more like him: true public servants who have the interest of the PEOPLE and the REPUBLIC at heart. Not the interest of a political party or corporation/special interest.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:49 am
Actually Bernie is a socialist.
loading...
Randy Seck
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Perhaps but let’s be clear when tossing words around. He does not advocate for everyone making the same amount of money regardless of job skill and hours worked. Some people will read your statement which is a small admission of fact and go ballistic with ignorance. He is described as a democratic socialist and is constantly listed as an Independent in elections. I agree with many of his stances, however, I also see where he also wants more government control in certain areas that I do not necessarily agree with. Of course for me, I agree with people center left on most occasions, and Sanders is a little more North than I would rather him be.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 8:55 pm
I bet if you didn’t put democrat and/or socialist next to his name, and let people pick either for or against his positions, 75% would agree with what he stands for.
loading...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 9:22 pm
Personally he is the only one in Congress I would keep were I king.
loading...
Sherlock
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:30 am
OMG- a Senator actually doing something ! Where will it end? Action instead of motion. O Heart Be Still!!!
loading...
knight4444
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 1:11 pm
Bernie Sanders for PRESIDENT!!!
loading...
knight4444
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 1:16 pm
If I’m correct Bernie Sanders is a independent, with a socialist mindset!! I LOVE THAT MAN!!
loading...
Oosik
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 3:20 pm
Excellent. The forces opposed are aligning well-funded and coordinated. They won’t stop until their sated or again regulated.
loading...
Donna Rapich
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 5:10 pm
We need more representives like Bernie Sanders. He is a voice of reason. This Californian finds Vermont’s senator to be true to the spirit of public service. Thank you Senator.
loading...
phil pipieri
Mar. 13th, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Sanders is spot on on this one! But you’re wrong in your chopping of Ryan and equating him to Republicans. The liberal. Left and conservative Right have put us into the bindng mess that we’re in through greed, over-controlling government and slander of anyone who tells them to STOP. Your devisive remarks and unthinking remarks just take us further from unity and inclusion. Keep hating the way you’ve been taught, but don’t expect the world to change when you won’t change yourself!
loading...
berry lee
Mar. 14th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Thank you so much dear Senator Bernie Saunders !!! Best, berry (we will eventually get a new fair justice appointed into the Supreme Court)
loading...
Sam Udi
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 3:13 pm
That government of the money, by the money, and for the money must perish from the earth!
loading...
eric
Mar. 17th, 2013 at 1:32 pm
PASS IT NOW!!!!
loading...
Gayle
Mar. 17th, 2013 at 7:16 pm
It would seem that if corporations were considered “individuals” by the Supreme Court in terms of elections, voting priviledges, etc. that these groups of “businesses” would have to be breaking some laws that, in the past, could only be broken by “individuals.” I say, while the new law is in effect, we should have them busted, charged, prosecuted for fraud, bribery, grand larceny, etc. – there must be a list of things that shareholders, boards, and management can be charged with now that they are “perceived” as “individual entities.” It seems we are so scared and/or intimidated that we just try to change things that look pretty tied up instead of fighting fire with fire – even firemen know it, sometimes, means starting a fire in order to control one that’s gotten way out of hand!
loading...
G Dumbya
Mar. 17th, 2013 at 8:15 pm
What took so fkg long? now toss out the SOB roberts and scalia…
loading...