Something is rotten in the Department of Homeland Security, and it’s not just its name. Having bowed down to political pressure from conservatives after releasing a report (ordered by the Bush administration) that indicated our biggest threat was right wing extremists, the department reportedly has only one to two people handling domestic terrorism.
Daryl Johnson, who headed the DHS unit responsible for analyzing security threats from non-Islamic domestic extremists, wrote a report on the resurgence of right wing extremists in April in 2009, which was leaked by someone with a “political agenda” within days to right wing press, and immediately attacked. The right inaccurately claimed that the report made every conservative into Timothy McVeigh.
In 2011, Johnson, who has since left the department, told the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), “DHS stopped all of our work and instituted restrictive policies. Eventually, they ended up gutting my unit. All of this happened within six to nine months after the furor over the report. Since our report was leaked, DHS has not released a single report of its own on this topic. Not anything dealing with non-Islamic domestic extremism – whether it’s anti-abortion extremists, white supremacists, ‘sovereign citizens,’ eco-terrorists, the whole gamut.”
Johnson added in that 2011 SPLC interview, “What worries me is the fact that our country is under attack from within, from our own radical citizenry. My greatest fear is that domestic extremists in this country will somehow become emboldened to the point of carrying out a mass-casualty attack, because they perceive that no one is being vigilant about the threat from within. That is what keeps me up at night.”
Feeling safer yet? Mark Potok of the SPLC, one of the country’s leading experts on the world of extremism, clarified to PoliticusUSA on Tuesday that they are not suggesting the DHS not focus on Islamic extremists, but rather that DHS also keep their eye on other threats of domestic terrorism, “It’s not that they are paying too much attention to jihadists, but that DHS has taken their eye off of the ball of other domestic terrorist threats.”
Potok also noted that the 2009 DHS report was a prescient document, “It was a sober and prescient document, that noted same thing we had noted; there was a dramatic right wing insurgency. Secretary Napolitano caved in and withdrew the report. In my opinion, it was an act of political cowardice. It allowed Daryl’s unit to collapse. He was pilloried. Daryl left a year later, and most of the team followed him out. There are very few left in DHS, one or two, of what used to be a team of 6-7.”
The administration countered that the DHS unit isn’t gone, but by many accounts, all of the expertise is gone, after they were undermined by leadership. The Washington Post reported in 2011, “Multiple current and former law enforcement officials who have regularly viewed DHS analyses said the department had not reported in depth on any domestic extremist groups since 2009.”
At that time, the Washingon Post also reported that a study conducted for the DHS had concluded that a majority of foiled and executed terrorist plots were unrelated to Islamic extremists, “(A) majority of the 86 major foiled and executed terrorist plots in the United States from 1999 to 2009 were unrelated to al-Qaeda and allied movements.”
A 2012 Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security study confirms that assessment, “Since 9/11, Muslim-American terrorism has claimed 33 lives in the United States, out of more than 180,000 murders committed in the United States during this period. Over the same period, more than 200 Americans have been killed in political violence by white supremacists and other groups on the far right, according to a recent study published by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy. Sixty-six Americans were killed in mass shootings by non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.”
In March of 2013, the SPLC sent a letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and AG Eric Holder, urging them to address the disparity of resources going to domestic terrorism, “In the last four years, we have seen a tremendous increase in the number of conspiracy-minded, antigovernment groups as well as in the number of domestic terrorist plots. As in the period before the Oklahoma City bombing, we now also are seeing ominous threats from those who believe that the government is poised to take their guns. Because of the looming dangers, we urge you to establish an interagency task force to assess the adequacy of the resources devoted to responding to the growing threat of non-Islamic domestic terrorism.”
The SPLC’s 2012 report “documents that the number of militias and radical antigovernment groups grew from 149 in 2008 to 1,360 in 2012… Now that gun control is again being hotly debated, we are seeing a repeat of that anger, and it is likely to continue to swell the ranks of antigovernment groups.”
As of April 2012, Think Progress determined that 56% percent of domestic terrorist plots were perpetrated by right wing extremists.
Think Progress, writing on April 19, 2012, determined, “Fifty-six percent of domestic terrorist attacks and plots in the U.S. since 1995 have been perpetrated by right-wing extremists, as compared to 30 percent by ecoterrorists and 12 percent by Islamic extremists. Right-wing extremism has been responsible for the greatest number of terrorist incidents in the U.S. in 13 of the 17 years since the Oklahoma City bombing.”
You wouldn’t know these facts judging by the bias evident in our culture, assisted if not incited by right wing politicians and pundits in recent years. According to the SPLC, “the number of anti-Muslim groups tripled in 2011, jumping from 10 groups in 2010 to 30 last year. That rapid growth in Islamophobia, marked by the vilification of Muslims by opportunistic politicians and anti-Muslim activists, began in August 2010, when controversy over a planned Islamic cultural center in lower Manhattan reached a fever pitch.”
It’s really very simple. The Right wants to profile extremists in order to prevent terrorism, claiming that “political correctness” is stopping the facts from surfacing. I would agree. Let’s look at the facts and act accordingly. The facts are that as of April 2012, our number one threat was right wing extremists (56%), while just 12% came from Islamic extremists. The majority of foiled and executed domestic terrorist plots were unrelated to Islamic extremism.
Our resources should be distributed according to the math, not according to right or left wing outrage or political correctness. Let the facts dictate the allocation of resources.
Image: Southern Poverty Law Center



Reynardine
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 8:11 am
That graph is telling. In all the Bush years, they didn’t even squeak.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 8:34 am
They want surveillance of places of worship.Then start placing agents in right wing baptist churches,The bed wetters want racial profiling?Then lets start profiling right wing Christians.You can knock out two birds with one rock.One the real threats will be under surveillance and the unemployment rate would go down because its going to take a whole lot of agents to keep up.
loading...
Shiva
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 8:34 am
I don’t think any of us really stopped to add all of this up. but now that you read it, it’s apparent that the right wing extremist groups do not want you watching them. And this is with full support of people who call themselves GOP voters. Not the sane ones mind you, but the ones who fall for the garbage that they are fed.
I think it’s time that the government revisits that report. I also think it’s time to write our congressmen about this and reference that report
On the side, I was watching morning Joe this morning and Tom Brokaw happened to mention that in Birmingham Alabama during one summer there were 50 bombings during the civil rights movement. I think you would not be far off to say these were right wing groups
loading...
jeff
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 9:40 am
the gop is right to suggest that political correctness is hampering homeland security. but it’s THEIR political correctness that’s causing the damage.
on an unrelated note: it’s now Wednesday. wasn’t glenn beck going to out the Obama administration on Monday? strange, I haven’t heard a peep about an Obama scandal……
loading...
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 9:41 am
And I swear to all the gods, if have to hear one more time how Bush kept us safe from terrorist attacks…
loading...
jeff
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 10:12 am
bush kept us safe from logic & sanity.
loading...
Reynardine
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 9:41 am
I’m electronically limited, myself, but if someone starts a petition and circulates it, I’ll sign it and send it on.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 9:50 am
Well,well, well.Remember that big dust up about Rand Paul filibuster about the killing of American citizens by drones.And how the paulites was jumping for joy and crowing about “Now there’s a man who is looking out for our rights”?Well there seems to be slight change of position.Take it away Randbo
“Here’s the distinction — I have never argued against any technology being used against having an imminent threat an act of crime going on,” Paul said. “If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him, but it’s different if they want to come fly over your hot tub, or your yard just because they want to do surveillance on everyone, and they want to watch your activities.”
Who says the American Taliban don’t do nuance or whatever people are calling it these days.Me? I say he is full of bovine excrement.
loading...
befunknote
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 10:31 am
So not only do right wing extremists plot more terrorist attacks but they are obviously dumb and have them foiled more often as well. Lol, the Muslims are smarter than the right wing nut jobs. Why is that not surprising?
Also, this information really needs to get out there! It is disgusting that anyone let this get swept understand the rug for their own evil agenda.
loading...
elijah murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 1:04 pm
As a counter terror and unconventional warfare specialist, I am amazed at the ignorance and defamation on both sides. In my analysis of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) it is as far “left” as the NRA is “right”. The SPLC demonizes those who are for gun rights and a free America just as badly as those on the “right” demonize homosexuality and abortion. If you examine the increase in these “right” groups it is justified in the dismantling of the constitutional protections we are supposed to enjoy. If you examine the “left” these groups are growing and spitting venom to achieve their ends. In the end their is no left and right, those terms are poorly defined. Using SPLC’s own standard would make them a hate group just as the SPLC standard makes Catholics a hate group. Political correctness veils the truth and confuses the issue. We must ask why or how the the current laws didn’t stop Adam Lanza, the denver shooter, or the columbine shooters, who were all “liberals” by…
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 1:11 pm
I was going to trash this but I’m curious.What make you a counter terror and unconventional warfare specialist? Show me where is this proof that Adam Lanza, the denver shooter, or the columbine shooters were liberals?Where is it that SLPC made catholics a hate group.And what groups that are for gun rights has been listed as a hate group/
loading...
Elijah Murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:01 pm
Uhm, twenty years in the US Army, sixteen spent with US Army Special Forces (the green berets, whose primary mission is unconventional/guerilla/asymetric warfare), Attendance to numerous anti-terror courses, a door kicker for a counter terrorism force for four years, having been the counter terrorism intelligence analyst plans and exercises director for a special forces battalion, let that suffice I could go on ad nauseum….but I won’t.
Briefing to Colorado Law Enforcement Personnel:
http://poundoflesh.newsvine.com/_news/2013/04/09/17674243-us-government-evangelicals-catholics-ultra-orthodox-jews-are-serious-threats-to-national-security
Southern Poverty Law Center Ties to DHS
http://americanpolicy.org/2011/03/16/the-threat-to-freedom-the-southern-poverty-law-center-and-the-department-of-homeland-security/
Giffords Shooter
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/01/09/abc-interviews-friend-giffords-shooter-ignores-her-claim-hes-liberal
Much propaganda who…
loading...
Reynardine
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:31 pm
And you work for Blackwater (whoops) Xe.
loading...
Elijah Murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:13 pm
US Army on christian groups:
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/army-email-labels-christian-ministries-as-domestic-hate-groups.html
World News Daily
http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/04/bombing-used-to-slam-patriots-as-hate-group/
Columbine?
http://tfninsider.org/2013/04/22/rick-green-wonders-are-mass-murderers-all-democrats/
Demonization is the act of belittling and or ridiculing any group for the actions of a few. George Bush Jr started down the path to oppression with the Patriot Act, Obama is continuing the process. Think the New World Order is a conspiracy theory….Look at what George Bush Sr has to say about it on YouTube. A lot of people came out hoping that the Boston Bombing was right wing extremists….why? To create friction.
I recommend watching Naomi Wolf’s Goodbye to America, A letter of Warning to a Young Patriot on YouTube
Watch G Edward Gordon The Creature From Jekyll Island
There is much to learn..Our country is on a slippery slope because of…
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:31 pm
As a disabled veteran I thank you for your service but lets keep the conspiracy theories to ourselves we dont do them.A word of advise , the links you provide are not trustworthy to say the least if you want a honest discussion you have to do better.
loading...
Elijah Murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:32 pm
What folks write, opine, and speculate doesn’t always make their work true. You really must research, look for the connections between organizations, writings, background of the writer, and leanings of the writer. SPLC is not my idea of a bunch of stand up folks, any more than DHS, BO or Bush.
You can take my guns away, I could create havoc, no guns necessary, but only because I know that my mind is the weapon. I also understand that any person, left right republican democrat, whatever you label them, are all capable of violence. Even cops. Normal is a bell curve, everyone is on it, even Chris Dorner. Under color of law government maintains that monopoly on violence. Oppressive government murdered over 200 million people in the last century under color of law, Mao, Hitler, Stalin, to name a few. But at the same time Obama labels Army psychiatrist Nidal M. Hasans actions workplace violence even though Nidal was screaming Allahu Akhbar while murdering his fellow soldiers.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:39 pm
So are you a sovereign citizen or have some common beliefs with them?
loading...
Elijah Murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:41 pm
No I don’t work for Blackwater. I am a writer and research analyst. My point exactly, conspiracy theories abound. It is theory that a conspiracy exists until the plot is executed. So if a person plans to do a heinous act and never executes the act, of what are they guilty? Can only answer, conspiracy is a pre-crime.
So how is a police officer being given a DHS briefing that religious groups are terrorist groups unworthy. Maybe you should expand your horizons yourself. Like I said, my training in propaganda and the effects created by socio-political friction give me an advantage….but it’s your blog. What some today would consider conspiracy theories, I lived through, helped execute and observed the effects. Remember, most people think an ostrich is hiding when he sticks his head in the sand….when he is in fact looking for water.
loading...
djchefron(Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 5:17 pm
So I take it you dont beleive this study by West Point or to your way of thinking Counter intelligence
Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right
www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/ch…
loading...
Elijah Murphy
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 4:54 pm
Constitutional Libertarian I guess would best describe my political beliefs…..but if you wanna know, I trust no man who seeks power, I believe that the power rests in the people. After all, governments ultimately fail, time and again and again. I trust in me and the creator….all others pay cash please. If you wanna see what I think government should be watch “The American Form of Government” on YouTube. Then read the constitution, the federalist papers and the anti federalist papers. You can get an idea from there.
I was pushing for an investigation of my brothers murder. He lived in Southwest Missouri. I contacted the federal prosecutor in Kansas City, who turned my name over to the cops judges and lawyers who were supposed to serve and protect….but who were instead controlling the meth trade in the region. I stopped pushing the issue after I was told a cop would pull me over and put a bullet in my head if I didn’t. The outcome, changed my attitude big time about big brother.
loading...
Shiva
Apr. 24th, 2013 at 5:14 pm
This is most certainly a corporate government you regardless of party. Guns, oil, plastics, you name the commodity and it owns someone in Congress.
While I agree with you that this is a government of the people, and we can quote the Constitution all day long, but this is 2013 and none of the above applies. Even the Supreme Court has turned towards the corporations. The Chamber of Commerce that used to be an organization for the people and for the betterment of the people is nothing more than a corporate right wing entity.
I find it hilarious that people go on about their right to own guns and let everything else slide.
This hasn’t been a government for the people and by the people for a long time. But we do get to play tiddlywinks on election day
loading...