Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
25 Americans Are Dead Because Romney Believes Government Oversight Restricts Profits
In the criminal justice system, an accomplice in a crime is just as culpable for a homicide as the person who pulls the trigger, and it is not uncommon for the driver of a getaway car to face murder charges regardless if they left the car during the commission of a crime. It is the same with malpractice claims. If there was negligence on the part of a surgical equipment manufacturer and the surgeon knew a device was defective, then the surgeon and manufacturer are both legally responsible for the death of a patient, and culpability can reach all the way to regulators and inspectors tasked with ensuring a device’s safety. It is government’s responsibility to provide inspectors and regulators to guarantee consumer products are safe, but because Republicans believe regulations hinder profits, they believe businesses deserve free rein to ignore rules protecting consumers. In fact, there are instances in the past few years that resulted in tragic consequences for workers, and in each circumstance, it was the failure of self-regulation that caused accidents that killed American workers.
Willard Romney promises to “get government out of the way” of corporations he claims suffer from regulations that prevent them from increasing their already record profits. When Romney was governor of Massachusetts, he was instrumental in protecting a corporation by failing to adequately regulate a company and Americans are dying.
The fatal meningitis epidemic spreading across the country is directly attributable to then-governor Willard Romney’s failure to adequately regulate the New England Compounding Co. (NECC), the Massachusetts pharmaceutical company responsible for the public health crisis that has infected 344 people in 18 states, and killed 25 so far. According to Massachusetts state records, it is now confirmed that a Massachusetts regulatory agency found that in 2004 the pharmaceutical corporation repeatedly failed to meet accepted standards, and instead of holding the company responsible and protecting consumers across the nation, Romney’s administration withdrew a reprimand out of deference to the corporation’s business interests. For the record, owners of the New England Compounding Co have made campaign donations to Romney and Massachusetts senatorial candidate Scott Brown.
Records show that on at least six occasions, authorities cited NECC for failure to meet regulatory standards, and at least one complaint alleged that NECC’s methylprednisolone acetate failed to comply with pharmaceutical standards. It is the same drug involved in the current epidemic that has killed 25 Americans. In 2004, The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy, a state regulatory agency reporting directly to Romney, offered NECC a consent agreement that acknowledged professional misconduct warranting disciplinary action, a public reprimand, and three years’ probation. In November 2004, an NECC letter argued that such disciplinary action would be “potentially fatal” to NECC’s business, and asserted “Once disclosed, the reprimand will surely result in investigations and inquiries in other jurisdictions, and regardless of the derivative actions taken, the attendant legal and administrative costs will be devastating.” NECC decided that instead of the state monitoring the company, NECC would “bear the burden of cost and monitoring and reporting compliance” if they were given a non-disciplinary resolution. Translation; if the state does not discipline our company, we will regulate ourselves.
Massachusetts Board of Registration (BOR) subsequently dropped the reprimand, but in 2005, NECC faced another complaint and BOR went forward with a Consent Agreement that was “more advantageous to the company than was requested by NECC.” Instead of three years’ probation, NECC received one year and a non-disciplinary agreement to prevent reporting to the National Association of State Boards of Pharmacy or other outside agencies. Subsequently, by 2006 NECC was permitted to monitor itself and in May 2006, co-owner Barry Cadden wrote regarding several safety precautions that he was “pleased to report that the following actions have been completed.”
According to Massachusetts’ General Laws, Chapter 13, Section 22, members of BOR in Pharmacy are appointed by the governor, and since they reported to Romney, he “was responsible for these agencies.” A former Massachusetts’ secretary of health and human services said “It speaks volumes about the tragic outcome of Romney’s view on regulatory issues. There are two dozen people who died needlessly. It was clearly the responsibility of the company to protect them, but it was also the responsibility of the government at various levels and they failed.” This month, NECC issued a statement saying, “We have voluntarily suspended operations while we assist authorities in this investigation. The fatalities and illnesses confirmed today by the CDC and FDA are tragic.” Regardless NECC’s voluntary suspension, three of its facilities have been shut down by authorities after 25 people died as a result of Romney’s views on regulations. In a related matter, Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) signed a letter to the Drug Enforcement Agency arguing that regulations on the compounding industry should be loosened. Brown, like Willard Romney, received campaign contributions from NECC’s co-owners for being allowed to monitor their corporation for compliance with state laws.
Romney cannot feign ignorance as governor, because after the attack that killed four diplomats in Libya, he asserted that remarks from embassy officials in Cairo represented the Obama Administration, and that any subordinate’s action is the administration’s action. Since Romney appointed members to BOR and they answered to him, their inaction in prosecuting regulations and compliance falls on him and subsequently, his position on lax or self-regulation contributed to the deaths of 25 Americans and infection of 344 other patients. According to federal authorities, the fungus responsible for the meningitis epidemic matched over 50 unopened drug vials sent out by NECC, the source of contaminated drugs, and over 17,000 vials of the tainted drug was shipped to 76 different facilities around the country; the epidemic is not over.
Government, state and federal, is responsible for protecting consumers from corporate negligence, and yet Romney campaigns on eliminating regulations that prevent corporations from earning greater profits. In West Virginia in 2010, a coal mine explosion that killed several miners was the result of criminal disregard of safety regulations, and the TransOcean oil platform explosion occurred because regulations were ignored by company officials monitoring their own operations. Romney’s remedy to regulations is allowing companies to self-regulate, and there is no greater danger to consumers than leaders in “charge of oversight who believe oversight is unnecessary.”
There are 25 dead Americans because Romney believes government oversight restricts corporate profits, and that a company with a poor safety record should be allowed to regulate themselves. He has promised to eliminate regulations under the guise of getting government out of the way of corporate profits, and if his record as governor of Massachusetts is any indication, his policy of little or no oversight will cause more American deaths than the 25 that were on his watch. Romney’s running mate, Paul Ryan, and Republicans sought to cut funding for the CDC, FDA, FAA, and EPA and if they are successful; how long before they allow airlines, food processing plants, and more pharmaceutical companies to regulate themselves to protect their profits? The Federal government has a responsibility to protect consumers from unscrupulous corporations, and if Romney allowed 25 Americans to perish as a result of one state’s self-regulatory policy, one can only imagine the death toll if he allows all industries to monitor themselves. However, if Willard can sleep knowing he facilitated the deaths of 25 Americans, he will not lose on minute of slumber when the numbers are in the thousands, so long as corporate profits continue to rise.
Mitt Romney and other Republicans love to talk about the profits that deregulation builds. As they wag th ...
Americans are fortunate to have regulatory agencies that protect our food, medicine, and air and water q ...
Government is one of mankind's oldest institutions that, in the modern era, affects every human activity ...
One of the tools the federal government uses to carry out public policy is regulatory agencies that crea ...
The devastating earthquake that rocked Japan on Friday was one of the most powerful in recorded history, ...
joey
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 4:49 pm
the place is still in business? how many people die when it goes under? romney:1 creeps:0 put the government to sleep for good!
A Walkaway
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 7:33 pm
Some of the Republicans are fussing about “Obama killed those 4 people”, yet it was the jackass who made that movie, the preacher who helped to bring it about and has connections to the funding, and the militants who reacted who killed them.
Romney opposed regulation, and we’ve lost 25 people and counting.
The company is responsible, of course. It shows how badly regulation of business is needed – STRICT regulation.
The regulators are responsible. They should have gone ahead.
Romney as governor was responsible for policy. A de facto anti-regulation policy is just as powerful as a de jure policy (at times – and even when not as powerful it’s still pretty potent. Sometimes they can be more potent.).
The people screaming at our president don’t seem to know how the government could have prevented the atrocity, except that “Obama is guilty!” (NOT!) They don’t have a change in policy or practice that respected the rights of other countries and people.
At the same time, it’s painfully clear that if the law had been obeyed and the company regulated, people would be alive right now. Clear course of action, clear solution, the only thing is the rich get less profit. The law was clear. Policy blocked the law.
To hell with their damned profit.
To hell with Romney.
doug
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 8:40 pm
But this is a perfect demonstration of how well Libertarian principles work. In the absence of regulation any business is perfectly self-regulating.
If enough people get sick and die using a company’s product the public will eventually stop buying that product.
A Walkaway
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 9:11 pm
(Laugh) It’s a bit bad for the people who bought the product, though and I wouldn’t want to be one of them. Not only that, but if enough people die, there won’t be any customers… or people.
Seriously, that’s the best argument I’ve seen in a while against Libertarianism.
Of course, if you know a tad of history and the mindset of the rich, they’ll just ship their products to a new area and kill more people.
robyn ryan
Nov. 1st, 2012 at 12:39 pm
American independence was a direct result of colonists refusing to allow British companies to profit off human suffering.
The War for Independence was fought to reject the idea that corporate profits trump the rights of real people not to be slaves to commerce.
The Civil War was a religious war, but had the same underpinnings. You cannot make money off exploiting people, no matter what the Xtian Bible says.
This is another iteration. How we answer will determine whether we are a free country or a corporate tyranny.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 1st, 2012 at 12:54 pm
you are absolutely right, there were many people in the American government who did not want to separate from the British.
The pilgrims may have come here Because of religious persecution but they did not start this government or this country. there were plenty of people who had come here before them.
This country was founded as you say on profits and the rights of people. And those rights are given by the government of the people to the people not from some religious entity
RioSam
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 8:41 pm
I thought the FDA was supposed to regulate drug companies and manufactures…and if it was up to the state then why wasn’t there some regulations imposed after Romney left office in 2007? 5 yrs ago! Not like they didn’t have plenty of time and a Democrat Gov to boot!! This whole argument has as many holes in it as a colander!
A Walkaway
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 9:17 pm
You HAVE heard of Corporate and Government inertia, haven’t you?
I don’t know how many of the lower-level people were retained, but unless they’re made to change the way things are done (policy directive from on high), they’re too likely to keep things the same.
Romney made it completely clear that regulation was bad. Now those victims are paying the price.
robyn ryan
Nov. 1st, 2012 at 12:44 pm
That still begs the question of why Romney didn’t protect the people he governed for. He had the power – he did nothing.
What someone else did or did not do is not the issue.
Anne
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 8:52 pm
This is yet another example of Romney’s concern for profits over people. Since it involved the needless loss of life, it is a more egregious example than even Bainport or Bain Capital. Willard Romney is one of the most intellectually bankrupt, unempathetic politicians in American politics, and there aren’t enough words in the English language to convey what a loathsome excuse for a human being he is.
Pittens
Oct. 31st, 2012 at 9:41 pm
e Tu’ Rmuse Brute’?