Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Anderson Cooper Takes Down Mitt Romney’s Secret Tax Plan
The truth is catching up to Mitt Romney.
The night before the second presidential debate, Anderson Cooper took down Mitt Romney’s false claim that six studies show his $5 trillion in tax cuts for the rich can be paid for without raising middle class taxes or adding to the deficit as George W Bush’s tax cuts did.
Watch here:
TRANSCRIPT
COOPER: Good evening, everyone. Ahead of tomorrow’s big presidential debate we are taking a look at Mitt Romney’s tax plan and his claim it will cut rates without it ballooning the deficit. We are interested in it for two reasons tonight. It was a major subject on the Sunday shows where Romney advisors continued to defend it and no doubt it will continue to be a big topic tomorrow night. Keeping them honest though – a bipartisan study found the math doesn’t work and other studies which the Romney campaign counters with, well they’re coming under fire tonight as well. Take a look.
GILLESPIE: Six different studies have said this is very questionable.
WALLACE: Those studies are very questionable. Some of them are blogs, some from the AEI, which is hardly an independent group…
GILLESPIE: These are very credible sources.
WALLACE: One of them is from a guy who is a blog from a guy who was a top advisor to George W. Bush. These are hardly nonpartisan studies.
COOPER: Well that was top Romney advisor Ed Gillespie. More on that in a moment. First though, I just want to begin at the beginning. With what Mr. Romney has been promising.
ROMNEY: Under no circumstances will I raise taxes on the middle class of America. We are going to keep our taxes down.
RYAN: What Mitt and I are proposing is a five-point plan —
ROMNEY: There will be no tax cut that adds to the deficit but I do want to reduce the burden being paid by middle-income Americans.
ROMNEY: The combination of limiting deductions and credits and exemptions.
RYAN: You can cut tax rates by 20% and still preserve these important preferences for middle class taxpayers.
RYAN: It is mathematically possible.
COOPER: That’s the promise. Keeping them honest, though, neither he nor his running mate Paul Ryan have ever specified which tax deductions they will cap, which loopholes they will close or frankly give out many details at all. Their campaign advisors didn’t either this weekend. Despite that handicap, a bipartisan panel of three authors for the Tax Policy Center examined the plan and concluded that there’s really no way of making the numbers work, that is unless the middle class pays more. Thousands of dollars more per family, according to the authors. The Romney campaign called the study biased, and began saying that academic support of its own. Take a look.
ROMNEY: The good news is that five different economic studies, including one at Harvard and Princeton, at AEI and a couple at the Wall Street Journal all show that if we bring down our top rates and actually go across the board, bring do rates for everyone in America, you can remain revenue neutral.
ROMNEY: You cite a study. There’s six other studies that looked at the study you described and say it’s completely wrong.
GILLESPIE: Six different studies have said this is —
GREGORY: What gives if you’re not right about your projections?
ROMNEY: Because first of all, I’ve got Princeton, Harvard, Wall Street Journal and AEI all saying actually that we can bring down the rates.
RYAN: Six studies have guaranteed, six studies have verified that this math adds up.
COOPER: Keeping them honest, though, not quite. The suggestion is that these are full-blown academic studies. Actually, three are blog posts, one is a “wall street journal” op-ed. In the Wall Street Journal piece, Martin Feldstein, who’s also a campaign advisor, makes the math work but only by using a different definition of middle class than Mr. Romney uses in his own plan. In another study cited by Mr. Romney, Princeton economist Harvey Rosen assumes the tax cuts would generate enough economic growth to offset the cost but for many, that’s a rather large assumption. One that’s also by the way questioned by many conservative economists as well. Bottom line, though, that word ‘assume.’ Every one of these authors in each of these studies, or so-called studies is making assumptions. Some may be solid assumptions, others dubious, but they are all just assumptions because neither Mitt Romney nor Paul Ryan nor any of their surrogates have yet come forward with specifics. Instead, we asked the Romney campaign if they would like the opportunity to respond to the program. They declined for us tonight. Of course, the invitation stands.
END TRANSCRIPT
Mitt Romney’s gleefully claimed six “studies” that allegedly back up his deliberately vague promises actually come from conservative blog posts, Wall Street Journal op-eds, and analyses by Romney’s own advisers. Non partisan? Not so much. “Studies”? Not so much.
In the first debate, Romney just flat out denied the very existence of his $250,000 tax cuts for the rich, but unfortunately for Romney, the media is starting to catch up to Mitt Romney’s lies. To give you an idea how egregious Romney’s secret tax plan claims are, even Fox News is calling the campaign out for failure to disclose details.
I doubt that being called out over and over again will put a dent in Romney’s willingness to look Americans in the eye and lie to them tonight. After all, this is the same Mitt Romney who was called out yesterday by an aide to his father, who accused Romney of saying anything to anyone for the win.
Romney is so desperate to be liked and so willing to be used that he fools even himself in thinking that he can get away with lying on this level for an entire presidential campaign. In order to support Romney’s tax plan, you have to support Bush’s economic leadership and want to double down on a bigger deficit for more tax cuts for the rich. Any takers?
Fox News Sunday's Chris Wallace turned on the Romney campaign today, called out their bogus 6 studies st ...
Mitt Romney showed just how out of touch he is when he claimed today that people earning $200,000-$250,0 ...
President Clinton explains Mitt Romney's $5 trillion tax cut and how middle class families with children ...
Paul Ryan welcomed himself to the Romney campaign by claiming on 60 Minutes that he wants to eliminate t ...
Remember that study Romney cited in Denver's presidential debate, the one that backed his claim that Oba ...
LINDA BENTON
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:35 am
it does not made sense, romney will not answer a straight question. that why the”bush” family is for him. two of the same person
Sandra
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 1:51 pm
Romney/Ryan are masters of Gish Gallop which I must admit I had never heard of until this election cycle. I’m hoping with all the talk of this phrase now on the blogosphere, PO will accuse Romney of applying it to his campaign, then explain to the viewers what it means.
My2Cents
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 5:46 pm
Just to further explain the “Gish Gallop” it is an illegal move within debates circles and will get you disqualified. One opponent throws so many different false statements out at one time, basically drowning out their opponent and giving very little possibility to answer one of items, much less be able to refute all of them in an allotted time. The techniques was developed by Duane Gish.
RMuse
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 10:43 am
Perhaps if all main-stream media challenged Romney’s BS tax plan contention, he may back away, but not as long as he can cite one group that supports his math fail, or a “study” verifying his lies. It is encouraging MSM is starting to question him though, and if enough of them keep on him, maybe they’ll all start doing their jobs. Don’t hold your breath though.
Deanne
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:07 am
And the MSM wonders why ‘Main Street’ distrusts them as much as they distrust Romney.
It’s called they’re late to the game. They’ve played along and not done the work to expose this 5 point plan which has been laid before us for months. Only now when one questions it, they all feel they should pile on. Why weren’t they doing the investigating? They sure get paid enough and clearly are no different than Romney — the majority floating along filling the air with words — empty words. Cooper is one of them. He’s more obsessed with the Housewifes, Jersey Shore and Honey Boo Boo shows than he is doing the work that made him what he is. He’s an empty vessel. That ‘Keeping them Honest’ tag line — is BS in that you can count on one hand how many times he’s actually followed up on a story to truly keep anyone honest. Go pander your wears elsewhere Cooper.
Sandra
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Guess MSM got embarrassed by all the blogs and online news papers like NYT who have been challenging Romney and Ryan on their faulty arithmetic. Bill Clinton and Paul Krugman gave them the opening and they choose to ignore it. VP Joe Biden schooled Lying Ryan in the debate re. his and Romney’s tax plan and their questionable math, so now they are questioning it at this late date when so many people’s minds have already been made up regarding who they will be voting for. Collusion anyone?
Jonathan Burton
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
The MSM needs to be able to blow the whistle and declare shenanighans out of the obligation of informing the public.
carmelta olaes camol
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 12:43 pm
41 kisses st ph 2-e camella homes bacoor cavite
Liz
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 1:10 pm
@deanne. No one is forcing you to watch 360 or Anderson Cooper. He based his story on facts. Unlike Romney
Deanne
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 3:43 pm
Liz, your response is clearly simplistic.
I did not indicate whether I presently watch either of his shows. You’ve made an assumption.
You’ve neglected to think about how other shows may include clips of Cooper’s shows. There are videos of segments such as this blog post has included.
He’s been a guest or a co-host on shows other than his own.
His basing it on fact — after the fact of many others having exposed it. That’s why I say the ‘keeping them honest’ is a tag line and is total BS as he doesn’t do follow up or as in this case — he’s late to the game.
He was once a respected person in his field — now he’s no different than an entertainment mouthpiece who has a talkshow. That he needed to have a co-host on his 2nd season of his talk show, shows he didn’t have the strength to carry it himself. The network had advertised the crap out of it before the show aired and they didn’t want to admit failure.
Progressive Texas Democrat
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 1:12 pm
Waiting or the MSM to investigate anything that doesn’t involve a sex scandal is like waiting for John Travolta to come out, just ain’t going to happen.
Bea Kath
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 2:12 pm
Dr. Arthur Laffer, member of President Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board and founder of the “Laffer Curve” also tackled Romney’s tax plan and the myth of the “$5 trillion tax cut.”
He debunks myths about current tax proposals and explains why lowering tax rates and broadening the tax base are the key to any budget balancing strategy:
bit.ly/UV7NKb
terrik
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 2:18 pm
The MSM only wants to be on record as saying that they questioned Romney’s Tax Plan, and this is only for posterity sake. Their agenda is to be profitable and carry propaganda for the GOP. This is only a one day story. Why are they not asking relentlessly for his Tax returns, they should point out that he is the most unpatriotic presidential candidate in this country’s history due to the fact that he outsource jobs and hides his ill gotten millions in tax shelters worldwide, and pays less that 13% in US taxes on the money he keeps here.
Arlene Tucker
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 2:55 pm
My guess is according to Romney and his theory means: right their “MIDDLE INCOME is 250K and the target group he says he plan to represent! So he is planing to reduce their taxes! NOT “NOT” American making 50K !
MAGGIE ALSTON CLAUD
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 4:55 pm
mr. romney should first disclose his income for the last 8 years. it would help his credibility. i am willing to disclose my income for the last 8 years. at age 76 i cannot trust a candidate who does not want me to know what his income is. what else is he hiding?
Allen F.Perkins
Oct. 16th, 2012 at 11:51 pm
Correct me if I am wrong but,didn’t the vice president shoot this tax plan down during his debate against Ryan.He said,twice….”it has never been done.” Mitt Romney has been running for the WH for the last 20 years,probably longer…..He will do and say anything to be elected …..I want to repeat “ANYTHING”……He is a proven LIAR and not to beat a dead horse…..what about those tax returns? What he is hiding must be big indeed.Then theres that 47% film and yet the same people he called dead-beats seem ready to support him,against their self intrests. The ONLY conclusion I can arrive at is RACISM!! I will not visit their plans for medicare+social security.If he is elected,remember “People get the government they deserve” Allen Perkins Philadelphia,Pa.
Tim Henderson
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 9:26 am
So Romney said it last night. No taxes on dividends and capital gains for people who make less 200,000 dollars a year. So that means his buddies on Wall Street will be getting a LOT of tax free money. But here’s the kicker….they give stock bonuses now that are often times higher than their base pay…what’s to stop every large business in America from paying their employees ALL in stock?? We could be looking at nearly the entire working force of the S & P 500 no longer getting wages, but stocks, all tax free.
Gary Vaughn
Oct. 17th, 2012 at 9:30 am
Bea, just by you reading the article from Art Laffer (whose curve was disasterous) tells me you are ill and mis informed on politics. Have a nice day now, with the meds and all.