Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The Republican Austerity Bomb is the Real Threat to America
By: Deborah FosterDec. 2nd, 2012more from Deborah Foster
Hidden in the tedious language of “sequestration,” which is guaranteed to lull Americans into disinterest, is an epic battle between the interests of the rich and the poor. Since the rich tend to chronically have the upper hand, having the fiscal cliff conflict come out favorably for the poor seems improbable, though there’s always hope. When the poor come to the government for welfare, they are stigmatized and degraded. When the rich come to the government for welfare, they convince everyone they earned it.
Many of the same individuals who received billions of dollars from the government in the bank bailouts, such as Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon, are currently spearheading a campaign to demand billions of dollars in cuts to social programs while billions more are requested for corporate “incentives” like tax breaks. These men, and many other CEOs of companies ranging from TimeWarner and Honeywell to Boeing and General Electric, are all part of Campaign to Fix the Debt, a project of the Center for a Responsible Federal Budget. Fix the Debt is really just an advocacy organization for people who deeply believe in disaster capitalism and austerity measures. Their solutions for resolving the debt “crisis” always revolve around funneling more money toward the wealthy through tax breaks for both corporations and upper income people while making dramatic cuts to the social safety net.
Naomi Klein called the ideology practiced by Fix the Debt, “the shock doctrine,” albeit this time the disaster is being generated in the form of a “fiscal cliff.” Across the world, powerful financial interests like the World Bank or the IMF have declared countries, regions, or other localities “disaster zones” where they could go in and impose “restructuring.” This was always a conservative’s fantasy come true: 1) cut off government services, 2) sell off government assets 3) privatize remaining government services, and 4) focus the entire economy on paying off debt. If you follow up with the countries or other localities that endured disaster capitalism and its austerity measures, they are decimated societies that have fallen to the bottom on nearly every measure of well-being. Now, organizations like the Center for a Responsible Federal Budget want to impose the shock doctrine with the most ambitious target yet, the whole American government.
Corporate CEOs are pushing for austerity, knowing there is a payoff for them. Government services will become privatized, and the corporate class is ready to move in and provide these services at a profit. Tax rates will be kept low for corporations and individuals making millions of dollars. They may have lost some power, but Republicans still have the House, and right on cue, they have been representing their core constituency. They have been pushing austerity, and holding out for those with incomes over $250,000 to receive tax cuts.
On the other side, the Democratic Party, not always known for holding their ground in negotiations, is carrying the mandate of a solid electoral win, a strong endorsement of their policy to tax the rich. The most liberal wing of the Democratic Party and Bernie Sanders have been very vocal about protecting Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare, as well as trying to scale back on the cuts to other social and educational programs that already occurred with the Budget Control Act of 2011, but this is where everyone waits pensively to see what compromises Obama and the Democrats will make now that Boehner has exercised some political muscle by again holding the threat of the debt ceiling over Obama.
Progressive advocates for society’s most vulnerable populations have been getting time with President Obama and other White House officials. Unfortunately, at the same time, the Fix the Debt campaign has also had sit-down time with top officials in the White House. The next few weeks will include a great deal of political wrangling and it remains to be seen who will win the stand-offs between forces for and against austerity.
Nobel-prize award winning economist Paul Krugman has not been shy about his contempt for austerity policies or his belief that these policies were causing a recession in the European Union. He’s been using his New York Times column to track how their cutbacks in government spending have led to contracted economies with subsequent high unemployment. So, when Krugman saw that powerful allies were joining forces to bring austerity to the United States, using the upcoming “fiscal cliff” as an excuse, he decided it was time to go on the offensive. Picking up on a phrase by Brian Beutler at Talking Points Memo, Krugman is asking everyone to start calling the “fiscal cliff” what it actually is, “an austerity bomb.”
Conservatives have been allowed to get away with defining the conversation, which is something they frequently manage to do. They have been successfully manufacturing this “impending debt disaster,” pushing the language of a “fiscal cliff.” For a decade, Republicans oversaw government spending that reached hemorrhaging levels with wars that were not paid for and an unfunded prescription drug benefit. They saw no problem with running deficits as they watched tax revenues drop rapidly following the Bush tax cuts. Yet, according to Republicans, the nation must suddenly address the debt crisis that they created, despite the fact that doing so threatens to stall our economy. Even the conservative think tank, the American Enterprise Institute, agrees that austerity would harm the U.S. economy right now.
Come January, the austerity measures that congressional committees already negotiated will be enacted; we will have been handed an austerity bomb. In addition to the elimination of tax cuts, a significant portion of the $500 billion sequestration includes automatic cuts to spending. There will be across the board cuts to dozens of social programs for the elderly, disabled, and the poor while public education budgets will be similarly slashed. Head Start programs will soon begin shutting down, so low-income families will no longer have access to pre-school for their children. Many college students will not be getting Federal Work Study. Fewer people are going to be admitted to substance abuse treatment programs. Children are going to go without vaccinations.
Most of the money spent on government services goes to paying labor, so reductions in government spending will represent tens of thousands of public sector jobs eliminated. Obama’s first term already included major job losses in the public sector, which was unprecedented. During every other recession, the government has responded by hiring more people, but during the recovery from the Great Recession, the government actually shed jobs. In fact, just at the state and local level, 636,000 government jobs have been lost. Already under siege, public sector workers will face dire consequences as austerity pressures continue to sap their labor rights. Just ask the entire police force of Camden, NJ, which has been fired to be replaced by a cheaper, non-union force.
As it stands right now, there will be significant cuts to social programs no matter how fiscal cliff negotiations go. There is an austerity bomb going off in January. The question is only how big will it be and what it will hit hardest.
It is nearly impossible to understand what motivates human behavior, especially when the result is bound f ...
There are times when taking a new, untested approach to solve a problem after exhausting all other optio ...
Sen. Bernie Sanders told the Republican Party today that if they continue to push austerity, they will s ...
Last week, I wrote about a powerful lobbying group of the wealthy and their corporations, Campaign to th ...
On Bill Maher's Real Time Paul Krugman went head to head with Arthur Laffer, and destroyed every conserv ...
novenator
Dec. 2nd, 2012 at 9:37 pm
Well said Deborah.
aspromised
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 12:37 am
I really believe that states like Wisconsin with their union-busting efforts were the trial-run for the GOP version of shock doctrine, and said so at the time.
Brigita Petrutis
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 2:08 am
Excellent article. Thank you.
Paws
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 7:57 am
It is just insidious for the poor to be blamed for being poor and for unions to be denigrated regardless of the good work they have done for the benefit of ALL, regardless of whether you are in a union or not (work days, work hours, days off, etc. benefit everyone).
We must not let the poor get poorer here; they are already struggling and it breaks my heart to see them on the proverbial chopping block all because a few gazillionaires don’t want to pay a little more in taxes. We created a society early in our history because we know that we all do better when part of a community. We know that we must take care of the least among us as part of our social contract. We are not doing that. We are tearing our society apart because some are insisting that the poor are to blame for their lot in life and they deserve no help whatsoever.
This is not why we formed a society way back when, and it is not why we have fought to keep our society together over all of these years. We are supposed to care for our neighbor because doing so benefits society as a whole.
How and when did we lose our humanity?
K
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 5:07 pm
Paws,
You have a good heart. There is no humanity. Not as far as psychopaths go. We will be delivered an austerity bomb. A friend of mine lives in Ireland where austerity has crippled places like Dublin. Her descriptions of people literally on the street, going through garbage cans, sleeping near buildings on concrete with their children, no jobs..no housing..nothing. This is exactly what we’re looking at.
These corporate psychopaths could drive by what would look like third world countries in the United States, in their BMR’s and spit on these people while counting the money in their wallets and shopping at Macy’s.
They don’t care. The problem really isnt greed as much as it is about POWER. Psychopaths love power and control. They lack empathy, they exploit, they pathologically lie (lots of that), and they kiss the butts of corporate master’s who don’t create jobs, but destroy any ability to create them. How can they do this? It’s a question I see so often. Study psychopathy, Paws. Also, a great documentary called, “Fishead” about corporate psychopaths, is excellent and will give you a good idea as to why this is happening. You can access the documentary at the Fishead website online for free. Bless your heart. :)
Paws
Dec. 5th, 2012 at 7:14 am
Thanks, K. I will check out that documentary; I had not heard of it before.
edna
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 11:03 am
take it to the cliff. the hell, with all it. the tea-bagers allready done all of it . and were still here, so waiting for jan, whats to gain, more tax money from the rich.thats a bigger deal. and the country, has to put there asses out. we the people have nothing left . now.. whats left to chance. we the people have been living off the cliff for a decade. go after there asses.vote them all out.and dont ever lit the red necks back in office. they have been rageing war on the north long enough.
Maranon
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 11:41 am
The GOP and the big corporations, with the assistance of the churches have been running campaigns of fear, herding peopple into corners to their benefit.
By wanting to “recapture our country” like the tea partiers want, it creates fear and violence against all others, and it has become a campaign of persecution agains Latinos in the Southwest, because that has become a huge industry and has created PRIVATE JAILS and their budget continues to grow.
By claiming that the school system is broken, the charter schools are cucking the monies out of the system to benefit some other corporation.
The fear here is to protect the poor, and also to protect the disappearing middle class that will be extinct in the future as the resources continue to shrink and the monopolies continue to choke the smaller outfits that crop up.
Then, there is the global investor, who come from other countries and a mind set from other century, and may not be as community oriented, since they may not live anywhere this sector, they really do not care if it is polluted and poor or whatever, they just want higher return in their dollar.
These are the people we need to be afraid of, not the migrant workers to whom a “campaign of hunt and capture” has been directed for profit.
A Walkaway
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 12:33 pm
A few years ago, I heard a speaker say “The rich aren’t loosing unless they’re running for their lives.” I am starting to agree with the assessment.
We’re loosing, folks. President Obama needs to wake to the fact that we’re being pushed off a cliff to increase profits for the already FILTHY rich, and he needs to stop or destroy them.
I’d rather see socialism (the real thing) or even communism than the crap the Republicans are doing to everyone – and I’ve been opposed to those forms of government all of my life (and know – from a social science perspective – their weaknesses and failings).
The best solution, of course, would be tight and VERY strict regulation of corporations and the rich… no more shipping jobs overseas, no more cutting wages, no more denying benefits or any of the other greed-based tricks they’ve been slowly boiling us in.
The rich can start learning to live with more reasonable profit margins, and tough shit about their extravagant lifestyle. Someone needs to tell them the thing I’ve heard many a poor person and homeless person get in their faces: “Get a JOB!”
Victoria Lamb, MSHA
Dec. 10th, 2012 at 6:03 pm
This is an interesting comment. I think your insinuation that President Obama needs someone to tell him what he should do is pretty darned insulting, however. He’s the one who has to deal with the Republicans, and they are inclined to do the opposite of whatever he wants.
Alan Koeppen
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 5:01 pm
No wonder the united States government is becoming a huge joke to the rest of the world. The government is allowing itself to be bullied and misled by CEOs and powerful businessmen! “Give me more money (through incentives and bailouts) or I will take my company elsewhere!!!” Such bullshit.
Let the bad eggs leave then! This will give the smaller business who ARE still here, who ARE still making good products, who ARE still small enough to believe in the betterment of community and country to grow in size because of good business practices. NOT strong-arming bullshit!
A Walkaway
Dec. 3rd, 2012 at 5:12 pm
I’d add to that confiscate their resources if they decide they’d rather leave than treat people like human beings. Their ill-gotten gains can help people here rather than buy islands or nations elsewhere.
They can also find customers anywhere else but here.
Let the rich bastards chew on that.
We also need to bring back all of the anti-trust laws.
Jean Tome
Dec. 4th, 2012 at 12:26 pm
We have lost all of the word humanity. There was at one time the knowledge that if you lived in this country that there was a certain amount of compassion for the our children who have come from the poor.
It sickens me to think that here in this country so many little guys are going to bed at night without food and warm blankets. Now there healthcare may be lost give me a break heartless and inhuman that is what the greed for the rich and tax breaks and loop holes sending money to off shore accounts to avoid paying taxes. Leaving the middle class to pay off the debt. Really!!!!