Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Blood Libel Sends Sarah Palin into Freefall
By: Sarah JonesJan. 18th, 2011more from Sarah Jones
Sarah Palin Thought Blood Libel was apporpriate
Blood Libel Sends Sarah Palin into Freefall
Although Sarah Palin told Sean Hannity last night that she was not ready to make an announcement regarding her political future, America is ready to make it for her. According to a Gallup poll released today, Palin has plunged in the polls again, hitting a new low. This poll comes on the heels of the Arizona massacre that many associated with Palin’s crosshairs map as well as her “Blood Libel” video that she put out on the day of the memorial. Palin’s approval ratings have plunged by six percent since last July.
A new Gallup poll commissioned by USA Today after the Tucson massacre found that Palin’s rating is at its lowest level since she burst onto the national political scene in September 2008. She is now seen in a favorable light by only 38 percent of US voters, while an astonishing 53 percent have an unfavorable view. Last July, 44 percent of Americans viewed her favorably while 47 percent viewed her negatively, so Palin has plunged 6 percent in approval ratings while her negatives have also risen by 6 percent. And in a new Washington Post poll, nearly half disapproved of her conduct after the shootings, with approval ratings even among Republicans of under 50 percent.
This tells us that the politics of division and violent rhetoric may appeal to the Tea Party faction of the GOP, but they do not appeal to most Americans. Americans want a leader they can trust, someone they feel is being honest with them while fair with the other side and Sarah Palin simply doesn’t evoke that. Her “Blood Libel” video brought the confidence in her to a new low, as she chose the day of the memorial to invoke the controversial term “blood libel” to describe the reactions of the American people against her, showing that she saw herself as a victim of the press and the American people at a time when the people needed a leader.
Americans want their president to be someone who not only leads them but also guides them and even offers them solace in times of deep crisis and pain. And we see this in the President’s surge in a new CNN poll. According to the new CNN poll released today, President Barack Obama’s star is on the rise. The poll was taken on taken Jan. 14-16 and reflects the President’s handling of the Arizona shooting tragedy as well as the productivity of the lame duck session.
59 percent of Americans now believe President Obama is strong and tough enough to handle a crisis. In fact, his approval rating is up six points since December. The best news for the President is that this jump comes from independent voters, whose support has risen from 41 percent in December to 56 percent now. And overall, 57 percent of Americans now consider him a strong and decisive leader.
The public also rallied behind the President for his call to more civil politics, with nearly 9 out of 10 Americans considering him to be a good communicator, which puts the President on par with Ronald Reagan in 1984. CNN Polling Director Keating Holland explained, “The poll tested Obama on a variety of personal characteristics, and he gets high marks for honesty, sincerity, leadership skills and compassion.”
When we contrast the styles of President Obama and Sarah Palin, we find a President who lead the entire nation through a crisis and called for a more civil political discourse. The President’s speech was empathetic, uplifting, and introspective, whereas Sarah Palin’s Blood Libel video was all about Sarah Palin and her image.
Palin’s deeply paranoid nature makes it impossible for her to rise to an occasion and put aside pettiness. She has spent all of her media time since the shootings defending her image, when she should have been offering introspection and leadership, as well as displaying empathy for the victims. Palin also made it clear that she views many American citizens as enemies rather than potential constituents in her relentless reference to her “opposition”.
The American people have rejected Palin’s divisive approach to politics once again, and this may be too deep a hole for even someone with Palin’s charm to overcome.
A new ABC News/Washington Post poll has found that while President Obama’s message of healing and changi ...
A new Pew survey has found that Mitt Romney is so unpopular that he has now replaced Sarah Palin as Amer ...
After John McCain claimed on Fox News Sunday that Sarah Palin can beat Obama, here is a little reality b ...
The new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has some bad news for Sarah Palin. Thanks to Paul Revere, her ...
Two polls, one of uncommitted voters done by CBS, and one of debate watchers done by CNN say that Joe Biden ...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 7:48 pm
She never should have said a word after the shootings. None of the major republicans did as well as the major Dems(except for congress). There was no reason for her to say anything. But she had to bury herself and show her tealings that she was on the job. How utterly sad.
She has sunk herself every time she opens her mouth. Every time she proves she has a horrendous lack of knowledge her favorability ratings go down. She either doesnt understand what effect her mouth has or she willfully ignores her own demise.
But why? And why do her followers still follow?
But I am happy for Obama. Possibly people are finding out that it takes more than a president to ruin the economy and more to bring it back
Sarah Jones
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 8:23 pm
so true. she just can’t be quiet.
Reynardine
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 8:56 pm
There is a plant in Florida called dumbcane, and if Ms. Palin’s handlers know their business, they will make her a nice little salad.
NadePaulKuciGravMcKi
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 10:24 pm
crucifixion
glenn beck
sarah palin
the passion
passion play
Ennealogic
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 10:26 pm
Ever since the Couric interviews, we suspected that Mrs. Palin might be a little ignorant of history. I think she confirmed that for us by trying to take the term ‘blood libel’ and reduce it, redefine it, make it generic enough so she could excuse that she used it to describe her own persecution by the nasty media and evil liberals thanks to her purposefully provocative imagery and rhetoric.
She must not have realized that you can’t just take a very charged pair of words, imbued with centuries of horrific brutality, and by using those words, conflate what you’ve been through with those who suffered real persecution. But Mrs. Palin and her ghostwriters failed to comprehend how false was the equation they tried to make. How could they be so ignorant of history, and especially Jewish history when the ex-halfterm-governor claims such a kinship with Israel?
We also suspected that Mrs. Palin was somewhat deficient in the compassion department. Now we can be assured of it, for, even when confronted by how thoroughly inappropriate her metaphor was, she could find no words of regret. Instead she acted like a pigheaded and rebellious teen by swearing that nobody would ever make her sit down and shut up. She may as well have plugged her ears, shut her eyes, and shouted, “Na na na na na I can’t hear you!”
pacos_gal
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 10:36 pm
After having spoken with some friends and family on the conservative side, she lost some, not all, but some at least, evangelical conservatives with the blood libel remark and her general attitude after the shooting in Arizona that they found to be horrible incident.
Spin is one thing, but almost everyone in America understands exactly who the victims were on that Saturday and it wasn’t Palin. She had probably the most perfect golden opportunity that she’ll ever have to prove herself as a real leader and she was not incapable of showing even the minimum of human decency.
If not for the major bucks behind her in this “game” of politics that the Republicans play, she’d probably still have left public office, being entirely ineffectual as a Governor and end up as just another Wasilla housewife with a bunch of screwed up kids. Take away the support of the money behind her and she is nothing and has proved that beyond a shadow of doubt this past week.
(too bad I don’t believe they Are done with her yet) :(
pacos_gal
Jan. 18th, 2011 at 10:38 pm
oops meant not capable or incapable of showing even the minimum of human decency
omomma
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 1:12 am
But the only way for her to “show” anything would have been to remain silent.
charlottesweb
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 12:44 am
OOOOOPPPPPSSSS – SHE DID IT AGAIN! God, Please talk to her-It seems
like You are the ONLY person she seems to TRY to listen to. Please!!!!
Lisa
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 12:37 pm
and she doesn’t listen to God either!!!
dan skinner
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 5:50 am
No better way to say it , but the analogy is spot on: Sarah Palin is the only person in the political spotlight who can take a public dump, step in it, then look around for someone to blame for the crap on her shoes.
craigtamy
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 3:12 pm
Hahaha. I totally agree!
Scarsdale
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 8:31 am
The fact that this woman was EVER taken seriously as a contender for the WH has amazed and disgusted me since she first came on the scene. Can anyone name one single occasion when she has tried to “bring people together” I mean apart from the Obama haters at her rallys? No ideas, just rhetoric most of which is unintelligble. Fortunately for her, she chose to be a republican candidate. The democratic party would have rejected her long ago as insignificant. I hope Murdoch is regretting ever sponsoring this inept woman and will let her contract expire.
darnay
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 9:59 am
Yet, if she runs for President she would still win at least 30 percent of the votes. Racism and ignorance is alive in America.
JewGottaBeKiddin
Jan. 31st, 2011 at 11:52 am
First of all, to the person that ‘published’ the horrific picture of Sarah…please learn to spell. It’s appropriate, not ‘apporpriate’. It makes me laugh everytime I hear liberals attack conservatives intelligence. For one, having a view opposite of your own does not show lack of intelligence. However, it could be argued that following what the mainstream media wants you to believe (such as “hate that horrible Palin lady”) DOES question your intelligence.
Think back to the elections…what is it that made you ‘hate’ her so bad? Most liberals I ask this question cannot answer without Google. Shows me the power of MSNBC, quite honestly. There is a reason that Fox is the most watched news station right now…because they are the only one looking at both sides. Disagree? When is the last time you actually “watched” Fox News? Negative press against a liberal candidate is unheard of in MSNBC land, but when conservative candidates screw up, you WILL actually hear about it on Fox. Liberals only seem to want to watch news that bashes conservatives. Does that seem intelligent to you?
'JustSayin'
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 5:24 pm
Clearly her handlers are as ignorant as she is. Oh, Sorry I can’t come up with a Bible verse to bolster my assumption.
gsb
Jan. 19th, 2011 at 5:45 pm
there she is with her tongue sticking out again….