Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Boxer Takes Aim at GOP Election Games: Introduces a Bill to Prevent a Waiting Time of More Than One Hour
By: Sarah JonesDec. 6th, 2012more from Sarah Jones
President Obama promised to address election standards in his acceptance speech, and Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is stepping up by introducing a bill called the LINE Act (Lines Interfere with National Elections Act). The LINE Act is election reform legislation to address national standards for waiting times at the polls. “The bill explicitly states that the goal of minimum standards is to prevent a waiting time of more than one hour at any polling place.”
Imagine that.
I’m sure the voters in Florida, Ohio, Michigan and Virginia would appreciate not having to camp out in order to exercise their franchise.
In a statement, Ms. Boxer said, “It is unacceptable that many Americans had to wait in line for five, six or seven hours to cast their ballots. The LINE Act will help ensure that every American has an equal chance to vote without enduring hours-long delays at their polling places.”
According to Senator Boxer’s statement, the bill would “require the Attorney General, in consultation with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), to issue new national standards by January 1, 2014 regarding the minimum number of voting machines, election workers, and other election resources that are necessary to conduct Federal elections on Election Day and during early voting periods. The bill explicitly states that the goal of minimum standards is to prevent a waiting time of more than one hour at any polling place.”
One hour. That’s almost sane. But it gets better. Those states where a “substantial number of voters” had to wait longer than 90 minutes to vote in the 2012 election would be required to comply with a “remedial plan” to ensure it wouldn’t happen again.
Since we have several Florida Republicans saying on the record that the long lines were intended to prohibit Democrats from voting, it’s fair to say that if the lines are cut and more people vote, it wouldn’t be good for the Republican Party. Not that we needed Republicans to admit this in order to realize the purpose of their largely imaginary “voter fraud” justification for laws that make it harder to vote, but having evidence of intent is different than surmising intent.
No matter- many things are not good for the Republican Party, precisely because they are good for the citizens of this country. In other words, just because the GOP doesn’t like it when more people vote is no reason to continue to tolerate their election games. Everyone qualified to vote should have the ability to vote, and they shouldn’t have to wait in seven hour lines or face caging or intimidation in order to do it.
Any guesses as to how the Republican Party will vote on a bill to make voting easier for Americans? Right. But you can’t get anywhere unless you take the first step, and getting them on record as being against making voting sane is a worthwhile venture for future attempts to address the issue.
Then again, Reid reiterated his promise to change the filibuster rules yesterday, saying, “We’re going to change the rules. We cannot continue in this way.” He would most likely do that on the first day of the new legislative session in January (on which day the Standing Rules of the Senate can be changed with a simple majority vote), so it’s possible that we might see some real action out of this Senate after historic high levels of filibusters by Republicans (not to mention the secret holds and refusal to confirm appointees).
During America's founding, the Constitution's framers did not believe in the one man, one vote concept u ...
Two suspicious packages caused authorities to shut down an early voting location in Winter Park, Florida f ...
For years, Republicans have connived to make sure that you couldn't vote. Today is the day when you marc ...
Although Republicans in some states continue to battle against voting rights, there is reason to believe ...
The early voting math is creating a problem for Mitt Romney. Obama is piling up such large margins that ...
Reynardine
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 9:34 am
Good idea! And, damn, it’s good to see you back again!
Sandra
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 1:25 pm
An excellent idea and I hope R’thugs who are honourable and respectful of the Constitution will get on board and pass this bill. I’m Canadian, and found the entire affair dispicable and dishonourable to American citizens. America is supposed to set the standards for other countries to emulate, yet these traitors hijack said standards of decency and democracy because they can’t win in a fair election when every citizen exercise their Constitutional and Civic right to vote.
Shame on them.
djchefron
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 9:35 am
Great idea but this aint going nowhere.That whining you will hear will be the wails of states rights.Now there is a contradiction because the Constitution gives the feds the power of election laws while the states set the qualifications as long as they dont infringe on the basic rights of the citizens.Maybe someone can educate me more on this subject
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 10:10 am
I am not sure why those inhibiting the vote are not being prosecuted. After all, arnt our rights god given? They are going against god!
The people need to take advantage of early voting. Early voting should be a law as well. No longer should any state have 1 day only to vote on. The people should have a full 7 days prior to the election to cast a ballot.
And lastly, take all election laws out of the hands of state and local electors. Federal laws apply. Remove the corruption of any party or individual.
Paws
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 11:02 am
I agree with taking the elections out of state and local hands. We have a constitutional right to vote and federal laws as you mentioned, so it makes sense the federal govt should make the rules. They should be uniform, too (to the extent possible).
robyn ryan
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 1:10 pm
The Fed is there to keep the States and corporations from denying citizens their rights. The 10th amendment is not an excuse for discrimination.
marehare
Dec. 6th, 2012 at 6:09 pm
Since the GOP tried to mess with voting rights in the last two elections, I would stongly suggest that everyone that doesn’t have a Drivers Lic. to get a state ID card pronto so you don’t have an issue next election. I think the GOP will continue to try to take away rights and also the Supreme Court will be considering killing the voting laws that some state have that could impact the rights of minority voters. Get that ID before the next election so anything the GOP does won’t impact you.
Terry E
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 2:01 pm
I live in a vote by mail state, and I really appreciate the service. I appreciate the Post Office, and the State Government for making this avialable to us. I’m sure we would have many people drowning while waiting in line seven hours here.
I applaud and salute those brave citizens who endured standing in line 5, 6 or 7 hours in order to vote their conscious in the last eletion. Bravo!!
Ingrid Buxton
Dec. 11th, 2012 at 12:38 am
It also helps support the post office.