Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Bryan Fischer Blames Islam for the Christian Addiction to Slavery
more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson
We’ve watched Republicans step in the mire of the slavery issue again and again. You’d think they’d have learned a thing or two in the process but learning does not seem to be in the cards. Bryan Fischer is the latest offender but most certainly will not be the last. What, you ask, has Bryan Fischer said this time? Well, he says African slavery is the fault of Muslims.
In an article titled, “Our First Concession to Sharia Law: Slavery” noted bigot and hate-monger Bryan Fischer advances the claim that Islam is to blame for America’s – and Christianity’s – addiction to slavery. Never mind that Christians had been owning slaves – and endorsing the institution of slavery –for many centuries before Mohammed was born, or that appeal to the Bible – not submission to the Qur’an – was slavery’s first line of defense in America.
Fischer says,
[M]aking concessions to Sharia law over against the moral code of the Judeo-Christian tradition is nothing new for America. We started doing it in 1619 when we began to tolerate the slave trade, as the first shipment of 30 African slaves arrived on the shores of Virginia.
That’s an interesting claim. Perhaps Bryan Fischer should look beyond the David Barton School of Disinformation and even take a glance at his own Bible.
We hear often that Christianity improved the lot of the slave, though the implication is that it did away with the institution altogether, along with its many other alleged social reforms. Jean-Pierre Devroey asserts that “The triumph of Christianity constituted a major challenge to the ideology of slavery.”[1] But did it? Even noted ecclesiastical historian W.H.C. Frend is forced to admit that there was no Christian drive to abolish slavery.[2]
Classical historian Ramsay MacMullen challenges the standard model of Christian social egalitarianism: “Christian leaders once they emerged anywhere at or near the top of the social pyramid looked down on those beneath them with just the same hauteur as their non-Christian equivalents”[3]
The early Christians, it may surprise some, showed remarkably little concern for slaves or opposition to the institution of slavery. Paul for instance, while urging slave masters to be just and fair to their slaves (Col. 4.1), Ephesians has him saying (Eph. 6.5-8):
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, single-mindedly, as serving Christ. Do not offer merely the outward show of service, to curry favor with men, but as slaves of Christ, do whole-heartedly the will of God. Give the cheerful service of those who serve the Lord, not men. For you know that whatever good each man may do, slave or free, will be repaid by the Lord.
This admonition is repeated in Colossians 3.22-24. 1 Timothy, one of the epistles written later and not by Paul himself says that “All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God’s name and our teaching may not be slandered” and further reminds slaves that those whose masters are like them, Christian are no less deserving of respect because they are brothers. In other words, don’t take advantage or expect special privilege. You’re still a slave. Act like it (1 Tim. 6.1-2). Titus echoes these sentiments:
Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them, and not to steal from them, but to show that they can be fully trusted, so that in every way they will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive (Titus 2.9-10).
Here it is all about making a good impression on the Pagans. After all, who is likely to convert if they see that slaves behave like rascals and without respect towards their masters who share the same faith? Practical, but hardly the stuff of social egalitarianism! This is the end justifying the means. Rhetoric aside, the bottom line was as important to Christians as to Pagans.
Fischer advances this interesting claim:
Now, in contrast to Islam and Sharia, the Judeo-Christian tradition from day one has been adamantly opposed to the slave trade … Moses flatly prohibited the slave trade under penalty of death. “Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death” (Exodus 21:16). In other words, if a strictly biblical code had been followed in 1619, the slave trader who brought that ship to Virginia would have been arrested the moment he landed, prosecuted and hung by the neck until dead. The slaves on board would have been returned to their families and their homelands, and slavery would never have gained a foothold in the United States.
But despite Christianity’s much vaunted claim to moral superiority over other religions (which Fischer appeals to here), the Essenes, according to the first century Jewish historian Josephus,[4] kept no slaves while Gentile Christians did. This is just one of the many ways in which Christianity has tried to ride the coattails of Judaism through the manufactured and very false category of “Judeo-Christian”.
As it turns out, Christians were very much in support of slavery and the slave trade. Even Devroey admits that there were some instances in which Pagan practice was superior to what came after. A first century Roman master who killed a slave without just cause might find himself punished, and ill treatment might result in his being required to sell the slave, while the Lex Burgundionem of the Christian post-Roman era does not recognize the death of a servus (male slave) to be homicide until Chindasvinth’s reform (642-653).[5]
What we find when we examine the relationship of Christianity to slavery is that Paul’s view is not unique: A reading of Polycarp or Ignatius shows that slavery was not, as Christians would make it, a Pagan vice. Ignatius goes so far as to say that slaves should not be “puffed up” and not desire their freedom “at the Church’s expense…” (Ign. Pol. 4.3) and Ignatius’ letters to Christian households, such as Tavia’s with slaves. John Chrysostom argued that Christianity did not enter the world to overturn everything and require masters to free their slaves (Argumentum ad Philemon PG 62). Tertullian (Apology 27.5) said “rascal slaves…mingle insolence with fear.” He believed “resisting or rebelling slaves” were to be equated with demons and believed they should be confined to work houses or sent to the mines.
Under Christianity slaves were forbidden to be priests “not out of fear of complications with a runaway, but because of such candidates’ sheer vileness, by which ecclesiastical office would be ‘polluted.’ This amounted to a serious devaluation in comparison to Paganism’s auspices: “Slaves under paganism had free access to almost all cults and temples, they mixed promiscuously among most cult groups, and commonly formed their own cult groups with their own priests and officials.”[6]
Slavery continued in Western Europe as well, and it continued for a long time. Susan Mosher Stuard draws our attention to the fact that even the Latin terms, ancilla for females, servus for males, were retained, and that “medieval custom never jettisoned the Roman notion that women passed on their servile condition to the heirs of their body.”[7]
Rouen in Duke William’s day (the eleventh century) was a flourishing trade center, including among its other goods slaves from Ireland.[8] Slaves were bought and sold openly in many cities, including Dublin (the other end of the Rouen axis), but also in Marseille and Prague. Many slaves came from Russia and Kaffa on the Black Sea, an old Greek colony and alternately Genoan and Venetian outpost during the 13th century was a huge emporium in the trade – Europe’s largest, in fact. Many among this human cargo were Pagan Slavs from the interior, captured and sold by the nomadic peoples who dominated the Ukrainian steppes.[9] But it doesn’t matter who is capturing and selling them if it is Christians who are buying them, breeding them, and inevitably, re-selling them.
Christianity can claim that it was under their auspices that European slavery finally disappeared but slaves were not really all that critical to the economy when one of the fruits of feudalism was an every growing body of cheap labor – Medieval Europe’s disenfranchised rustics – the serfs, to do all the hard work. Though serfs could not be bought or sold, their condition was not much better. It is true that over time, conditions for slaves improved but conditions varied widely.
Marc Bloch asserts that slavery disappeared from France in the 11th century,[10] but Ruth Karras argues that slavery did not disappear from Sweden until the 14th century.[11] Stuard notes that “In Scandinavia, as in England and France, the domiciled slave remained a feature of rural life even after the disappearance of the unfree agricultural worker,” and furthermore points out that, “As for the Balkans and the Adriatic region, there appears never to have been a time when the slave-trade died down or slavery fell into disuse.” And much of this human traffic was in children, especially young females, who formed a special market niche. Female slaves had certain advantages over male; they were considered “more tractable” than males, who tended to run away more often.[12]
And even when slavery itself had been left aside in Europe, Europeans continued to traffic them to the Islamic powers on the Mediterranean’s periphery.
These facts aside, Fischer goes on to argue:
The slaves who were brought here in chains in 1619 were Africans who had been kidnapped by other Africans and sold to slave traders who in turn brought them to America. The kidnappers, the ones who went into the interior of Africa to capture their fellow Africans to sell them into bondage, were predominantly Muslims.
Au contraire…As we have just seen, Christians sold slaves from Northern and Eastern Europe to Muslims. And it gets worse.
Slavery lasted much longer in the Iberian Peninsula with its long history of warfare against the Islamic powers controlling the south. Muslim prisoners were regularly enslaved and this activity continued as Portugal began to operate militarily on the African continent (for example, Cueta in 1415 and Tangier in 1437). And of course, in the 15th century, not much later, began the African slave trade, in 1441 to be precise, when two Portuguese captains, Antão Gonçalves and Nuno Tristão, captured a dozen unfortunate Mauretanians and returned home with the new slaves.
Yes, European Christians not only sold other Europeans to Muslims as slaves, but went out on their own and captured them. Let me emphasize:
Black slavery caught on quickly – black slavery by and for Europeans. On August 8, 1444, six caravels sent to capture “black Moors” unloaded 235 slaves at Portuguese-controlled Lagos. Castile and Genoa were also early participants in this lucrative enterprise.It cannot be argued that this was simply a bit of secular economics.
Did I say it gets worse? On18 June 1452 Pope Nicholas V issues a Papal bull, the infamous Dum Diversas, which authorized the Portuguese to reduce “Saracens [Muslims] and pagans and any other unbelievers.”
Much is made of the numbers of slaves in Roman cities and as a percentage of the empire’s population as a whole, but there were so many slaves in Spain that by 1565 one tenth of the population of Seville – six thousand people – were slaves. The same figure holds true for Portugal’s capital, Lisbon in 1527 – some five to six thousand all told – and by 1573 there were some forty thousand slaves in Portugal. [13]
It was from this beginning that America was populated with black slaves, and it is to Christian thought, to attitudes established before the first European settled in North America, that racism owes its origins – not, as should be obvious – to Islam, Paganism, or any other cause.[14]
[1] Jean-Pierre Devroey, “Men and Women in Early Medieval Serfdom: The Ninth Century North Frankish Evidence,” Past and Present 66 (2000), 7.
[2] W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity (Philadelphia, 1984), 133.
[3] MacMullen, Christianity & Paganism, 7 cf. MacMullen (1990), 264 f. and n. 29
[4] Josephus, Ant. 18.1.5, the reason given being that “the latter tempts men to be unjust.”
[5] Devroey, 7, n. 13. For slavery in the ancient world see Moses Finley, Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (NY, 1980), 93-122 and Keith Hopkins, Conquerors and Slaves (Cambridge, 1978). Also A.H.M. Jones, “Slavery in the Ancient World,” The Economic History Review 9 (1956), 185-199.
[6] MacMullen (1997), 7.
[7] Susan Mosher Stuard, “Ancillary Evidence for the Decline of Medieval Slavery,” Past and Present 149 (1995), 7.
[8] McLynn (1999), 94.
[9] Perhaps, appropriately, given its reputation, Kaffa is believed to have been the city from which the Black Death spread to Europe in the 14th century.
[10] Marc Bloch, “Personal Liberty and Servitude,” in Slavery and Serfdom in the Middle Ages: Selected Essays (University of California Press, 1975), 33-92.
[11] Ruth Mazo Karras, Slavery and Society in Medieval Scandinavia (New Haven, 1988), 138-140.
[12] Stuard, 16-20.
[13] A.J.R. Russell-Wood, “Iberian Expansion and the Issue of Black Slavery: Changing Portuguese Attitudes, 1440-1770,” The American Historical Review 83 (1978), 16-27.
[14] James H. Sweet, “The Iberian Roots of American Racist Thought,” The William and Mary Quarterly 54 (1997), 143-166.
I talked the other day about David Barton’s plan for an American theocracy. The next day, I ...
Here is a question: how is it in a country where equality before the law is guaranteed by the Constitution t ...
Gov. Bobby Jindal's voucher schools are teaching Louisiana kids that most slave owners were kind to thei ...
I wrote yesterday about David Barton's plan for an American theocracy. Most people recognize Barton from ...
America is more than familiar by now with the infamous “Marriage Vow” - “The Marriage Vow – “A Declaration ...
Reynardine
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 8:29 pm
Vlad the Impaler was, as a child, surrendered into Turkish bondage by his Christian father in return for a military alliance, and his treatment there, coupled with an understandable sense of betrayal, seems to have been a factor in his… interesting pathologies.
Mr. Peabody
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 8:46 pm
You have to admit that Slavery was not created by White Europeans, but the idea that it was an immoral activity, and ended, was put forth by White Christians.
Reynardine
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 9:27 pm
Oh, come on, now, Mr. Peabrain, we don’t know who invented slavery, and though white Christians were a dominant force in the nineteenth -century Abolitionist movement (many of whom were women), they weren’t the only game in town. In Russia, both serf owners, serfs, and abolitionists tended to be white (or at least Eurasian) Orthodox Christians, because that was the population that existed west of the Urals and east of the Carpathians. Alexander II sent Russian vessels to aid the Union in intercepting British and French blockade runners after he was shamed into abolishing serfdom by the writer Turgenev, who never vaunted Christianity. The Haitians freed themselves, at great cost, in 1804, and the Mexican leader, Santa Ana, abolished slavery long before we did. I could go on, but have some real writing to get back to…
Mr. Peabody
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 10:06 pm
Get a grip. Slavery was simply a fact of the brutal life of the times. I mean, weren’t the Pyramids of Egypt built by Jewish slaves for their Black masters? Yes, you’re right, it wasn’t ONLY the White Christians who saw the immorality of slavery, but, I ask: who has more righteousness in the opposition; those that suffer under it, or those that can profit yet call for an end to the thing they regard as abominable. (feel free to continue to indulge in name-calling; I expect it from your kind)
Reynardine
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 10:14 pm
You don’t know my kind.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 10:29 pm
No. Recent evidence shows that slaves were not used to build the pyramids. The Eqyptians were paid labor as was anyone else in the area working there. Further there is evidence being uncovered that the “exodus” was the Israelis leaving Egypt because there was no more work. There is no evidence the pyramids were built by jewish slaves.
Ingarose
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 12:03 am
No one really knows 100% how the pyramids were built. There are many, many theories, only a few of which are mentioned here.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 12:22 am
As far as labor, there is lots of graffiti in the lower regions put there by labor gangs. There is no evidence that the Jews were made into slaves
A Walkaway
Oct. 16th, 2011 at 7:09 pm
Uh, Ingarose, that’s wrong.
We may not know the details or the exact process, but (1) we know it was Egyptians (and not slaves) who built them, and (2) we do have good ideas of much of the process.
We know how the blocks were carved, were finished, and have some idea of how they were moved.
Not only do we have the graffiti (showing that the working people were more educated than previously thought), but we also know the general diet and care of the people who built the pyramids, and it was good. We also have the tombs and even the writings (more than just graffiti) of the people involved in the construction.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 16th, 2011 at 7:26 pm
There is an entire city right next to the Pyramids mostly covered in sand where many people lived who worked on the pyramids. They know much about the people and they were not slaves. I watched a documentary on that subject today. Modern Archeology is finding out so many things
Another thing that has been found that you wont hear about is the fact that the Psalms of David were not written by David, but written about him. Its in the very first part of the texts of the psalms
DannyEastVillage
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 7:25 am
Black masters? In Egypt?
Mr Peabody, are you one of those conservative Jewish folks who subscribe to the odd “theory” that Black people are the sons of Noah’s son, Ham? And, therefore, since the psalms refer to the Egyptians as the people of Ham, the Egyptians were, therefore, Black?
Sir, the people of Egypt are Semitic people like most of the people of the Levant.
DannyEastVillage
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 7:29 am
and, btw, no segment of the Hebrew people at the time of the Exodus were known as “Jews.” The term “Jew” refers to the religious-political perspective that arose in post-Exilic Israel, i.e., 6th Century, BCE.
Md
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 12:45 pm
No one knows when slavery started. Most cultures had slaves to fulfil some purpose (sacrifice, servitude, cementing an alliance) so to declare that white europeans didn’t “create” slavery is intellectually dishonest. No one can claim credit for “inventing” slavery. Who do you think white europeans enslaved if not each other? As to the Egyptians…there is a competing (and compelling) theory that states that the pyramid workers were just that: workers. Conscripted, yes. But still paid and taken care of. Also…not every African is black. Just go on google images and search for Ancient Egyptians. And yes, some pharoes were black…because Nubia invaded Egypt and ruled for some time before native Egyptians expeled them.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 1:35 pm
Paying the workers was how they got the people to build such large tombs for the Pharaohs. If they used slaves they would have needed an army just to keep them inline and working as well as recruiting new ones over the years it took to build. I have read many times that a couple Pharaohs when broke building such places
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 9:33 pm
The christians of the 11th – 15th centurys were very rough. I would bet that it was no longer economical to keep slaves as they were another mouth to feed and clothe. I doubt the religion had much to do with the death of slavery especially during those times.
Reynardine
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 10:12 pm
Slavery at that time, in northern Europe, began to be replaced by serfdom. The difference was that while the slave belonged directly to his owner, the serf belonged to the land which belonged to its owner, and changed hands only with the land. Other than that, his condition was equally servile, and equally at the mercy of his overlords. Towards the end of this system, which outside of Great Britain actually became more burdensome before it was abolished, serfs were often sold just like slaves, as Radishchev reports. William the Conqueror enserfed the entire Anglo-Saxon population upon achieving victory, but most peasants were enserfed by their “betters” via a slow encroachment on their liberty via impoverishment and disenfranchisement. Let this be a lesson to us!
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 9:25 pm
The Dutch were xtians and they wasted no time facilitating the sale of black slaves to the US. Many of the founding fathers approved of slavery(the great compromise).
But whats the point of Fischer bringing slavery up? Discussing Sharia Law is about as silly as one can get. Its like the muslims saying christianity is taking over! Oh wait, they probably do.
I think Fischer is an idiot.
Zookeeper
Oct. 14th, 2011 at 10:54 pm
Bryan Fischer blames the Muslims for his painful hangnail, balding, premature ejaculation, cavities, cloudy days, sniffles, skeeter bites, etc.
Why not slavery?
At least he’s consistent in his monkeyfuck insanity.
Anne
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 1:59 am
This is another transparent attempt to demonize Islam by blaming it for something that only involved Christofascistis like Fischer. It’s sad because for so many, narrow-minded bigots like him have become the face of Christianity. It’s worth noting that people like him are only self-described “Christians,” because there’s nothing about them that Christ would have condoned.
Reynardine
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 9:13 am
Some people have asserted that the word “slave” came from “Slav” because so many of the latter were trafficked to and through city- states like Venice and Genoa, but such human chattels, were, before the Slavic tribes ever met Western “civilization”, designated as “exclavus” – the locked-out and locked-up.
Proud Kafir
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 10:36 am
Considering MOSLEMS still own slaves today..the original slaves were sold to AMERICA from MOSLEMS….and Christians TODAY do not own slaves no one alive today owned a slave….and ISLAM still has slaves..you should be exposing slavery in 2011 by moslems but that would mean being politically incorrect and you could not dare do that humm…easier to try to bash CHRISTIANS who are not going around the globe in JIHAD Mode killing off non believers in ALLAH…..
Why won’t islamic countries reject slavery in 2011? Why do they refuse to sign Human Rights documents to abolish slavery?
www.liveleak.com/view?i=9...
Slaves come from two sources at the time of Prophet Muhammad and In today’s world both cases are still available.
www.islam-watch.org/Other...
You can try to slam CHRISTIANS all day long but I have never had a CHRISTIAN say they want to cut my head off and try to kill me in AMERICA..I did have that happen when I divorced my moslem husband…..YOU ARE TRYING TIO VILIFY THE WRONG “RELIGION”….one day you will regret not exposing ISLAM because when moslems get their numbers up..AMERICA will be suffering dreadfully….here is their intentions written out for you drones….www.shariah4America.com
Reynardine
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 12:17 pm
We’ve heard it all before. Shut up and eat your bacon.
Shiva (Moderator)
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 12:23 pm
“Considering MOSLEMS still own slaves today..the original slaves were sold to AMERICA from MOSLEMS”
Wrong. The Dutch started the slave trade in the US. Muslims had nothing to do with it.
And once again, if you read the article this does not apply to everyday christians, but a segment of christians known as dominionists
The dominionists are trying to blame slavery on Islam, but slavery existed well be fore Islam and well after by any religion of except Buddhism
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Oct. 15th, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Thank you for emphasizing that this has nothing to do with your average, everyday Christian. I should have made that more clear in the article – unfortunately, there was not enough space to be more specific in the title
A Walkaway
Oct. 16th, 2011 at 7:48 pm
Maybe you haven’t had a “Christian” threaten you with death, but I have. More than once.
The funny thing is, in spite of what I’ve been put through for the past 45 years or so by “Good Christians” (including the time before I made the mistake of getting involved with the Assemblies of God… when the worst bullies in the school were from the church I attended), I am still Christian. A type not accepted and even vilified by “Good Christians”.
I’d rather be around non-Christians… certainly the Muslims I’ve known, than being around “Good Christians”. It’s been my experience that everything bad said about non-”Good Christians” irregardless of the belief system, is projection. I had to leave the churches to find that everything that “Good Christians” said about themselves actually better fit the behavior of those they vilified.
It’s my guess that the very things you say about the Muslims, is true about YOU. That would fit my observations over all those years.