Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Calling Carl Sagan
By: Hrafnkell HaraldssonMay. 18th, 2011more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson

The universe opened up by Sagan in his thirteen part series was a place many people had never seen, had never given much thought to, a journey not only through our solar system but out beyond the stars to other worlds, to wonders inconceivable to the Medieval, Bible-centered mindset. As historian William Manchester wrote,
“The church was indivisible, the afterlife a certainty; all knowledge was already known. And nothing would ever change.”
Because the earth, and the universe itself, were eternal and unchanging. With this mindset in place, there could be no wonder, only fear. There could have been no Carl Sagan, and even if a mindset that could produce only the waterwheel and the windmill as innovations could have risen to the required level of technology, Cosmos would never have been made – or watched.
Cosmos, broadcast by the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in 1980, was the most widely watched series in the history of American public television until Ken Burns’ The Civil War (1990). It won an Emmy and a Peabody Award and has since been broadcast in more than 60 countries and seen by over 500 million people.
In 1980 the Religious Right had not yet declared war on science. The open war declared under President George W. Bush had not been initiated. Carl Sagan died shortly before that first salvo, before the Republican Party took the side of religious bigots determined to impose that medieval mindset described above by William Manchester on twentieth century America.
In 1996, Carl Sagan published The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, a book that was at the time heralded as “Wonder-saturated” (The Washington Post) and “a manifesto for clear thought” (Los Angeles Times). Here Carl Sagan argued that “Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking.” The Religious Right, our Christofascists, realize this, and they see it as a way of thinking inimical to their dogmatic assertions, assertions drawn on a Bronze Age religion codified in a document put to paper in the first millennium B.C.E.
Ironically enough, as Sagan points out, “A Candle in the Dark“ was a Biblically-based book published in London in 1656 on the cusp of the Enlightenment, a book whose author, Thomas Ady, attacked the witch hunts of his time “as a scam ‘to delude the people’.” The arguments he raised will be familiar to us today: “Any illness or storm, anything out of the ordinary, was popularly attributed to witchcraft.”
Thomas Ady saw the absurdity of this reasoning 350 years ago. He saw that it was time to move past such primitive and superstitious thinking. I wonder what he would say today, hearing these arguments still uttered.
Sagan wrote,
“For much of our history, we were so fearful of the outside world, with its unpredictable dangers, that we gladly embraced anything that promised to soften or explain away the terror. Science is an attempt, largely successful, to understand the world, to get a grip on things, to get hold of ourselves, to steer a safe course. Microbiology and meteorology now explain what only a few centuries ago was considered sufficient cause to burn women to death.”
Ady, writing more than three centuries ago, foresaw that nations “[will] perish for lack of knowledge.” Yet lack of knowledge is being codified and legislated today by the likes of David Barton and Republican-controlled governors and legislatures.
Carl Sagan foresaw this:
“I worry that, especially as the Millennium edges nearer, pseudoscience and superstition will seem year by year more tempting, the siren song of unreason more sonorous and attractive. Where have we heard it before? Whenever our ethnic or national prejudices are aroused, in times of scarcity, during challenges to national self-esteem or nerve, when we agonize about our diminished cosmic place and purpose, or when fanaticism is bubbling up around us – then, habits of thought familiar from ages past reach for the controls.”
The results, as he says, are terrifying:
“The candle flame gutters. Its little pool of light trembles. Darkness gathers. The demons begin to stir.”
And so they have. The demons have stirred. And they are among us.
We can blame a once obscure NW Arabian god for earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis; we can blame witches for disease – or we can turn to science to try to understand these things. The Bible doesn’t explain the ocean’s growing dead zones; it doesn’t explain our planet, which the Bible would have us believe to be permanent and unchanging, but which science shows to be in constant flux, a living, breathing organism. The challenges faced by our modern world cannot be met by a book written by men with a Bronze Age knowledge base.
We could use Carl Sagan now, we could use his voice, his wit, his ability to make science comprehensible to people. We could use him as a voice against the imposition of dead-end religious doctrines and dogmas that make of science a heresy, we could use him to re-light the candle that holds back the demons in the darkness.
Carl Sagan died of pneumonia on December 20, 1996 at the age of 62.
Late Night Snack: Carl Sagan and his cosmologist companion Stephen Hawking present: A Glorious Dawn - C ...
In a column this past week, James Robison lamented what he saw as the “flickering light of America.” There i ...
You too could be a witch. All it takes is an accusation. Why is it as the year 2010 draws to a close ...
One thing Republicans still do have in common with Ronald Reagan: creationism. It looks like we are going to ...
"The supreme mystery of despotism, its prop and stay, is to keep men in a state of deception, and with t ...
Reynardine
May. 18th, 2011 at 8:14 am
I do not believe Carl Sagan could make himself heard now. The whackwingers would make certain that anyone who truly needed to hear him – schoolkids, housewives, people without college degrees, the very ones who need channels of learning they don’t have to pay a fortune for – would never get a chance. That is why they are trying to defund PBS; that is why they are trying to co-opt or destroy public schools; that is why their rabid howls go up every time ordinary MSM news or entertainment becomes too informative. I get most of my “real” news from PBS or the Megaherz foreign newscasts carried on the PBS split channel, because I am tired of Charlie Sheen, Lindsey Lohan, and fillers about cute little ducklings. It’s not vulgarity the whackwingers are objecting to when they howl something like “The Book of Daniel” off the air – it’s thought. Crude reality TV goes unremarked. Intellectual inquiry- that’s dangerous.
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 18th, 2011 at 9:49 am
Carl Sagan’s Cosmos gives me much of what I believe now. In fact he was the crowning achievement in my falling away from religion and opened my mind to the fact that the universe we live is beyond our imaginations. That there was no knowledge that we shouldnt strive to learn and not be held back by fear mongering
The earth travel 2.5 million kilometers a day around the sun. Our galaxy rotates at a quarter a million miles per hour. We are going twice that speed as we fall towards the Virgo cluster of galaxies.
How can right and left be meaningful beside those facts? How can we allow religion to hold us with fear of an afterlife that is withheld from us if we dont toe the line? Fear is what keeps political party’s in power, religions in hold over lives
After a long and difficult fight with myelodysplasia, which included three bone marrow transplants, Sagan died of pneumonia at the age of 62 at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, on December 20, 1996.
And quite frankly I miss him
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 18th, 2011 at 10:23 am
BTW, thanks for writing about one of my favorite people
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
May. 18th, 2011 at 10:54 am
You’re welcome, Shiva. I miss him too. I miss what he taught me through his series and his books, the wonder of our universe he inspired in me. There are many science shows out there in cable-land but there was only one Carl Sagan.
Elizabeth
May. 18th, 2011 at 9:31 pm
He was a truly gifted man who could make Science available to those without a science education. As you said, it opened up the awe, wonder, and excitement of the Cosmos. I wonder if it could be rebroadcast.
Nasty Liberal
May. 18th, 2011 at 2:06 pm
In lieu of Carl Sagan, there is philhellenes via YouTube: This Remarkable Thing
Sarah Jones
May. 18th, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Thanks for that:-) Great article, Hraf. It makes me sad that we’ve turned inward on fear instead of exploring the vast wonders of reality.
Nasty Liberal
May. 18th, 2011 at 4:02 pm
Recommend this as well, with footage of Dick Feynman playing the bongos! Science Saved My Soul
omomma
May. 18th, 2011 at 6:19 pm
Great article about a person who had the true gift of communication. He delivered the sense of awe and wonder that natural events used to inspire in people not driven to distraction by religious “rules.”
He wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of being heard today, over the din of radio and tv bloviating demagogues and their idiot “activists.”
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
May. 19th, 2011 at 6:16 am
Yet, I wonder if he would have survived through the Bush administration that the war on science would have been as effective as it became.
omomma
May. 18th, 2011 at 6:20 pm
I forgot to say THANK YOU!!
normand
May. 18th, 2011 at 6:59 pm
Now over 60 myself i am glad that he taught me to look at the world differently.Miss you Carl
majii
May. 18th, 2011 at 10:22 pm
Carl Sagan was one of my most admired people and scientists. I was saddened that he had to leave as soon as he did. His work was truly awe inspiring, and as one of the world’s premier scientists, his work was very down to earth, interesting, and easy for non-scientists like myself to understand.