Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
An Easter Lesson From A Small Church That Defied The Agenda Of Hate
On this day, one of the most holy of days in Christendom, millions celebrate the resurrection of their icon of salvation to renew their hope of everlasting life. Although millions of “followers of Christ” portray themselves as representations of his love, it is difficult to distinguish between Christ’s true followers and closed-minded people who reject his teachings in favor of repression and discrimination of non-believers. There are myriad opportunities for critics of Christianity to point out the fallacious mindset and contradictory actions of many 21st century Christians, and indeed, some critics have called for religious organizations to speak out against injustice in the name of religion. There are isolated examples of congregations who stand in opposition to the fanaticism rampant in the Christian community, and their goodness is beginning to catch on.
There is one such group that has spoken out and made a stand that is representative of Christ’s teachings, and they are a model for followers of Christ to emulate if they have the courage and conviction to reject the hate and vitriol that exemplifies American Christianity. Members of a Kentucky church have unanimously voted to cease signing official marriage licenses until same-sex marriage is legalized. Their bold decision came before a recent CNN poll that shows a majority of Americans now support same-sex marriage, and it is a cause for celebration and recognition that at long last, discrimination and inequity in the name of religion may be on the way out.
The Douglass Boulevard Christian Church (DBCC) declared itself to be an open and affirming community of faith in 2008 with a “commitment to full acceptance of all people, regardless of race, gender, age, or sexual orientation,” and church leaders said their decision represents those values. It is interesting that the church’s commitment is more in line with the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment than the discriminatory practices of many fanatical evangelical organizations. The Kentucky church’s members embrace Christ’s admonition to accept all people and to treat them with fairness instead of castigating them, and in many cases, openly condemning them as criminals because of whom they choose to love. A church associate minister, Reverend Ryan Kemp-Pappan said, “Our membership is committed to treating homosexuals and heterosexuals equally. Our congregation believes it is unfair to provide different services and benefits to heterosexual couples than we can provide to gay and lesbian couples.”
Fairness is a word that Jesus didn’t utter in his sermons because he assumed his followers would understand that when he said to love all people, they took him at his word. If his believers then, as well as now, did not understand his words, they surely saw first-hand that Jesus treated non-believers, sinners, and foreigners with love and affection equally, and he didn’t do it for donations, popularity, and notoriety; or to influence legislation. He did it because he represented perfection and was the example for all humanity to follow if they were true, loving human beings, and Christians.
The bold move by the Kentucky church is in stark contrast to voter’s intentions in 2004 when they overwhelmingly passed a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage with the backing of the state’s three largest religious organizations: the Kentucky Baptist Convention, Catholic Conference of Kentucky, and the Southeast Christian Church; the state’s largest congregation. The amendment passed with 74% approval in a statewide vote that makes the DBCC’s decision and pronouncement all the more significant. It is also noteworthy that church leaders didn’t appeal to the religiosity in their decision, but commented that there is inequity that they cannot endorse or perpetuate; the decision is remarkable nonetheless. Kemp-Pappan said the decision allowed members to “live out their faith as to what we believe,” and that it will “expand our outreach to a community that is being marginalized.” The church has a small congregation and performs 8 to 10 weddings per year, but is part of a larger organization and their hope is that their decision will start a dialogue with Christians who oppose homosexuality.
This column has been brutal in its attacks on the hate and hurtful practices of Christians and churches that promote discrimination by advocating legislation that oppresses non-compliant Americans; especially gays and women. However, there have also been calls for Christians to speak out against abhorrent bible-based legislation as well as oppression of the poor, women, and homosexuals because not all Christians support exclusionary practices of the evangelical community. There is overwhelming evidence that appears to portray all Christians as practitioners of hate, but the evidence is borne of organizations bent on controlling the government to reflect their own vision of theocracy and control of the populace.
The Kentucky church’s decision comes at a time when Republicans, at the urging of the evangelical lobby, are preparing to defend the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). DOMA punishes same-sex couples in many ways other than not allowing them to marry. Same-sex couples do not have the same rights as heterosexual couples in matters of adoption, health decisions, and income tax status and it is patently unfair according to the 14th Amendment. The oppression and discrimination that conservative-Christian legislators practice has as its basis a few lines from the Hebrew scriptures in the Christian bible and do not represent the teachings of Jesus; or the Constitution. Nonetheless, Republicans, led by Speaker John Boehner are going to spend taxpayer money to defend DOMA for their evangelical supporters instead of fixing the economy or creating jobs for all Americans.
Although the DBCC is a small congregation, they have spoken with the voice of fairness and acceptance that Jesus would recognize and endorse. Their decision will certainly elicit hostility and outrage from hate-groups with money and influence in Congress, but it also makes a statement that not all Christians subscribe to the Christofacist’s (HH) agenda of suppression and discrimination. There are good Christians willing to speak out for acceptance and decency that Jesus preached, but they have been shouted down by tyrants and Dominionists whose sole purpose is theocracy with assistance from conservative Christian legislators.
On this day of renewal and hope there is reason to celebrate that there are Christians speaking out and making a stand for the voiceless. Earlier this year when Republicans proposed spending cuts targeting the poor and women, another Christian group spoke out in opposition and based their objections on Christ’s command to feed and clothe the poor. That group, along with DBCC’s decision to stop discriminating against gays resurrects the true meaning of Christ’s teachings, and although they are not mega-churches, their courage and opposition to hate speaks volumes. Many people wondered why millions of Christian voices were not speaking out against hate in America because there is always silence. DBCC is a small in numbers, but they speak with their savior’s authority and it represents millions of voices. Whether or not one subscribes to Christianity, due respect, admiration, and gratitude are owed to any group opposed to hate and discrimination at the hands of alleged Christians. Hopefully, conservative Christian legislators are listening; although highly unlikely, one can always hope.
During the fear mongering and hate being spread by conservatives and Republicans, there is an incredible ...
Today tens-of-millions of Americans will tune in and watch the Super Bowl, and it is certain that most o ...
All around the world today, multitudes of Christians are celebrating their opportunity for salvation and ...
It's a little over two years since Proposition 8 in California passed and denied same-sex couples the ri ...
Around the world there are only a handful of countries that self-identify strongly with a religion as th ...
paulabflat
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 10:08 am
the southeast christian church isn’t a church. it’s a business that relies on keeping it’s customers ignorant and hostile.
Reynardine
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 10:12 am
For this congregation to make such a resolution in such a time and such a place requires more grit than they can mill at Quaker Oats and Dixie Lily combined, and those who take issue with them can kiss their grits.
janine
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 11:14 am
this is a very uplifting piece
Anne
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 11:22 am
The article would be uplifting on any day of the year, but the fact that you published in on Easter, RMuse, makes it even more timely and appropriate.
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 11:42 am
When I was quite young, my brother and I would set in the rabbit pen and sing jesus loves the little children to the rabbits we raised to buy a horse. Today that song still goes through my head at inappropriate times, but I can find little reason to assign it to todays Jesus as depicted by some (certainly not all)of todays christians.
Todays churches are far too big as organizations and lean on their powers of political persuasion to heavily. My guess is though, that if you went church by church in any area except the south you would find the major parts of the congregations would think just like this little church does.
People for the most part, religious or not, have tolerant hearts. Thats how civilization has increased its numbers from small bands of hairy woolly wrapped in skins hunter gatherers to what we are today. We must prevail
archie magoulas
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 11:44 am
Doesn’t it say in the Acts 94:32) that… “All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had.”
If one is to be considered a ‘Christian’ shouldn’t this be a high priority somewhere, or at least to be mindful of, or at possibly even..a goal ?
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 11:52 am
OMG they were socialists!
You may have hit on something. Our conservatives claim to be religious yet ignore the teachings because they would have to share life and limb with others. Thats just wrong to a republican.
Vixen
Apr. 25th, 2011 at 10:20 am
There are also passages saying those who don’t work shouldn’t eat. Being a carpenter by trade originally, I don’t think Jesus and Joseph worked for free. They expected to be paid for their craft. I have watched with interest how people have tried to paint Jesus’s teachings in socialist colors under the banner of social justice. Even a rudimentary education in theology would show you that we should be generous in charity, but that same charity should be freely given, not dictated by a governmental institution. Otherwise it wouldn’t be charity anymore; no, it would be redistribution of wealth.
I think a person’s sexual orientation is personal, but when it comes to the point of gays defining what marriage should be for an established church or synagogue, I draw a line. Civil unions gave homosexual couples all the rights they said they wanted. Marriage is a religious institution reinforced by the same legal binding of a civil union. Having a relative who is gay, one who said civil union was enough her and her partner, I believe her. She was very clear about civil unions being about law, and marriage being about religion.
If a church teaches that homosexuality, or rather acting on homosexual orientation, is sinful, why would gays want to be members of that church in the first place? It is not the business of gays to change their doctrine either. This isn’t some obscure teaching we’re talking about. There are several biblical references to homosexuality being abnormal or wrong, certainly not mainstream behavior.
No church should be forced to perform same-sex marriages. Any law enforced by the government that would make them do such a thing would be a real interference of church and state. The state can’t dictate a church’s fundamental teaching.
At the same time, hateful behavior is always wrong. You don’t see many groups walking into gay bars telling the people inside they have to change their ways. If you ask the average church-going Christian their thoughts about redefining marriage, contrary to CNN’s poll, I’d bet the majority would say civil union is enough, but they aren’t going to take to the streets to blast that thought all over the place. And yes, there are extremists who would, but there are extremists on both sides of this issue. Still, if a church’s teachings define marriage to be between men and women, people shouldn’t be judgmental and start protesting their services.
For the life of me, I don’t know what advantage marriage has over civil unions for gays. Unless it is meant to be a gateway move that fundamentally changes church doctrine to something that is dictated by the state and public opinion rather than biblical teaching. Or threatening the tax exempt status of churches that don’t go along with public opinion no matter how much it may disagree with church doctrine.
These days, just about anyone can call themselves a minister or pastor. Perhaps gays and lesbians can have their own church with their own doctrines, maybe even rewrite the bible to suit their desires, or even redefine God Himself. But don’t walk into an established mainstream church and try change something that has been in place since Jesus walked the earth. At no time in his ministry did he say he came to abolish the old laws, no, he came to add to them. He said to love one another as I have loved you. He wasn’t talking to a gay crowd when he said that, though there might have been gays among them. I sincerely believe he meant that we do just what he said… love the sinners, not what they do. He forgave people and then said to go forth, sin no more. I honestly don’t think He would sanction same-sex marriage, but at the same time, I don’t think he would be happy about violence toward gays or toward straight people either. His commandments were to love one another.
And those who don’t believe in the bible or that it was divinely inspired… well, then why the push to tell churches what to do?
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 25th, 2011 at 10:44 am
I agree with most everything you say about gays being married. But I also must draw a line under Jesus part. Certainly Jesus expected to get paid, but his teachings were very much involved in social justice and equality. You throw out the words redistribution of wealth, when the United States was successfully prosperous the distribution of wealth was totally different than it is now. In round numbers each class held about 20% of the wealth. Today, we have 80% of the wealth in 20% of the people. this country cannot survive in this manner. Also, I would not depend on anyone for charity or to use charity to replace a program that the country has in place.that would not last and all, that is the same as redistribution of wealth.
we will never survive with the wealth of this country being distributed as it is today. Nor will we survive depending on the goodness of people’s hearts
Melly
Apr. 26th, 2011 at 6:24 pm
It’s acts 4:32 ;) And the apostles and original Christians were indeed socialists. Check out the following verses of acts 4:34-35.
34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
So people sold their houses and REDISTRIBUTED the wealth according to need. Wow imagine that!
David Ashton
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:00 pm
Whilst homosexuality is not a reason to villify or hate, it is still sin.Both those churches that spew bile and those who endorse same-sex relationships are denying God’s word.
I want in despair the christians there who seem to think that holiness equals hatred, and I feel despair also when otehrs promote man’s will over God’s.
Sarah Jones
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:45 pm
David,
Have you considered that you are promoting man’s will over God’s when you suggest that you know his will?
You were obviously taught that this was a sin, but did you hear this from God’s mouth or did man teach it to you from a version of the bible they chose to cherry pick? When you think of how Jesus behaved, where did he call out the sin of others and demand that we exclude so called sinners from love and acceptance?
A church that opens its doors to all people without hate or judgment is a church that is following the example of Jesus Christ. Don’t worry so much about other people’s sins. All you are going to be held accountable for is your own.
Scott Rose
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:48 pm
What is the scientific evidence that “God” ever said anything, as an expression of his “will,” or even as an expression of his desire to spend a night out on the town dancing? People long ago wrote a fiction we know as the “Bible;” that text is no more “the word of God” than is the ingredients list on the side of a box of Lucky Charms. It can be documented with certainty that Scott Rose wrote the novel Mr. David Cooper’s Happy Suicide, but the only evidence that the Bible . . or anything else . . is “God’s word” is that the brainwashed faithful say it is. Hearsay! Wouldn’t stand up in a court of law, or in a university seminar. That is to say, it’s anti-intellectual and false. Take your “word and will of God” by which homosexuality is a “sin,” and jump in a lake.
Diane
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 2:08 pm
David,
Did Jesus condemn homosexuals?
Did he ridicule them, single them out or say that they need to be treated differently?
There are a lot of things in the OT that today we believe are wrong, including animal sacrifices, slavery,women being subservient to men,stoning people to death,an eye for an eye and the list goes on.
Do you really think, that if Jesus appeared today, given his actions over 2,000 years ago, he would condemn gay and lesbian men and women?
The Man who challenged money lenders in the temple, and said to us all,love one another as I have loved you.
Sarah Jones
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 3:49 pm
That was beautiful, Diane.
Jennifer
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Homosexuality is all throughout the natural world and pre-dates the bible in nature. Owning slaves was, even by Jesus, acceptable and a part of everyday life. Now, we consider it to be illegal and immoral.
Just because something is written in the bible, doesn’t necessarily mean it is a sin or mean it is acceptable. It is just a biblical philosophy.
I think this little church has it right. Everything I’ve read in the Canon bible and the Gnostic bible stories state that Jesus believed in love.
Ahab
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:12 pm
Beautiful and moving. Thank you for posting this.
Sarah Jones
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
This is so wonderful and perfect for this day. Thank you, Rmuse.
cathy
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:49 pm
God bless these beautiful people!
Oldsun
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 12:56 pm
There is no god get over yourselves! Only man speaks of a god not a horse, not a dog, not a donkey my, what egos hath man to believe that a magical being with powers beyond man’s comprehension would care for such an insect as man.
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 1:09 pm
Here is more explanation from the Pastor of that church
douglassblvdcc.com/blog/
“When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest. You shall not strip your vineyards bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am the Lord your God” (Leviticus19:9-10).
Reynardine
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 1:49 pm
I can recall when the law in Florida was that grove windfall or the produce left in a field after a commercial picking was free to all takers. Of course, the current wave of right-thinking patriotic Republican “christians” doubtless abolished that long ago (you can still use a cane pole or dropline in your county of residence without a license, though.
Bob Warfield
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 4:08 pm
My wife & I go to an open and affirming church in Bloomington, Illinois. All are welcome.
Shiva (Moderator)
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 7:55 pm
Thats quite a difference from down here where a woman can get sent home for wearing slacks to church
janine
Apr. 24th, 2011 at 8:37 pm
Leviticus 11:7 says that if you touch the dead skin of a pig you are unclean. What will we do with all the football players then? put them to death?
or perhaps you’ll help me stone my brother for planting crops side by side.
Tell me, does your mother wear garments made from two different threads? if so that is an abomination
Exodus 21:7 allows me sell my child into slavery
Exodus 35:2 says I cannot work on the Sabbath. What about all those people who work on the Sabbath? are they condemned? oh no, actually I believe the punishment is death. Shall we kill everyone who works on the Sabbath?
so you see, Jimbob, the Bible is quite clear on a lot of things but what I don’t see is the wholesale burning of Mothers because they wear garments made of two different threads. Nor do I see the wholesale murder of farmers who plant crops side by side.
What I do see is the continued hatespeak and bigotry about homosexuality