Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
A Close Listen Reveals Mitt Romney’s Religious Bigotry
Every human being possesses a guiding sense of the requirements and obligations of right conduct, and it is unfortunate, but what may be acceptable behavior to one person may repulse someone from a different culture or belief system. One of the values Americans hold dear is the fundamental right of free speech and it allows every American to express their ideas of what right conduct entails even when their ideas are steeped in religious bigotry. Over the past couple of days, Republican presidential candidate Willard Romney criticized President Obama and diplomats in Egypt and Libya for apologizing for American values and principles as if he is the arbiter of what is right and wrong, but if one listened carefully to the context of his statements, he exposed another personal character flaw that should be a warning to all Americans and the world.
When Willard told reporters that ”The Embassy of the United States issued what appeared to be an apology for American principles,” he was referring to the right of an Islamophobic film maker to impugn the Muslim prophet Mohammed. What embassy officials apologized for was the religious intolerance in the hate-filled video portraying Muslims and their prophet as violent monsters, and they specifically said that free speech was a “universal right,” but religious bigotry was not. Still, Romney continued on the same path accusing President Obama of making “an apology for America’s values,” and that “it’s a terrible course for America.”
Now, when Romney opened his mouth to reporters, he knew the embassies defended the “universal right of free speech,” and that the only American offense they criticized was the movie’s “efforts to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims” and it begs the question; does he consider condemning religious bigotry an ”apology for American values?” Seriously, does Willard Romney regard religious bigotry an American value, or does he think it is un-American to condemn sleights against Muslims? It is unfortunate, but that is precisely the point Romney made, and it was either a subconscious nod to his church, or deliberate signal to neo-conservatives from the Bush administration.
It is well-known the Mormons believed African-Americans were cursed by god until 1978, but it is not common knowledge that the Book of Mormon teaches there are only two churches; of god or of the devil. Obviously, only the Mormon cult is of god, and every other faith is “of the devil” and “whores of the Earth.” The founder of the Mormon cult, Joseph Smith wrote in his First Vision that when he asked the Lord “which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)and which I should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt.”
A stake president explained that Mormons hate Jews because they killed Jesus, they hate Catholics, evangelicals, and Protestants because they refuse to acknowledge Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon, and they hate Muslims for following Mohammed and not acknowledging the Book of Mormon. It is noteworthy that Romney criticized the Obama administration’s condemnation of those who created an anti-Islam movie that sparked violence in Egypt and Libya, but in 2010 he said “burning the Quran is wrong on every level. It puts troops in danger” in response to Pastor Terry Jones plans to burn a Quran as a means of condemning Islam; an act that resulted in the death of 15 people in Afghanistan. Pastor Terry Jones began promoting the anti-Islam video with a proclamation of Sept. 11 as International Judge Muhammad Day, and there was no criticism from Romney except to condemn President Obama for “an apology for America’s values.”
The Obama Administration’s official statement said the U.S. “rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others” but defended the Islamophobic filmmaker’s right to free expression, and condemned violence as a response to offensive provocation. So the White House defended a real American value (free speech), and condemned demeaning others’ religious beliefs, and Romney’s response was, “It’s a terrible course for America to stand in apology for our values” that in Romney’s eyes includes religious bigotry.
Throughout the campaign Romney has shown a predilection for racism from the earliest days of the Republican primary and he has continued by assailing the president for giving out welfare without a work requirement, using a KKK slogan, “Keep America American,” and scolding the NAACP “for wanting free stuff from the government.” It is obvious that after living, breathing, and eating Mormon racism until he was 31 years old had the desired effect of inculcating in Romney that African Americans are cursed by god, and he has taken it to heart and made it a staple of his presidential campaign; now he signals that his bigotry is not limited to African Americans.
When Romney first heard about the Cairo embassy’s statement, he heard them support “universal freedom of speech” and condemned the video that “hurt the religious feelings of Muslims,” but he still decried the Obama Administration for making “an apology for America’s values.” What Romney obviously cannot fathom is that religious tolerance, as much as freedom of speech, is a core American value that our embassies in Cairo and Libya, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the Obama Administration all acknowledged in their official statements.
Romney’s message to the Muslim world that religious bigotry is an American value informs that he is not, and never will be, ready to be on the world stage in any capacity. He insulted Palestinians who are predominately (93%) Muslims when he visited Israel on his world fundraising tour, and has been extremely provocative towards the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is entirely plausible that the reason Romney continues claiming the Obama Administration issued an “apology for America’s values,” is because his American values include religious bigotry that Quran-burning extremist Pastor Terry Jones espouses.
Religious bigotry is not an American value going back to the founding of this country where the First Amendment guarantees freedom of all religion. Founding Father John Adams said the “United States of America has no character of enmity against the religion of Muslims” and yet, Romney continued to imply that religious bigotry towards Islam is an “American value.” Willard Romney’s problem is that he has no concept of what American values are, and possibly lacks any real values of his own that are not steeped in greed, racism, and religious bigotry.
The wimp from Bloomfield Hills has done it again. This morning, Mitt Romney doubled down on his embarras ...
I blame the First Amendment. Don't get me wrong: I'm not making excuses for bad behavior by Islamic fundamen ...
On the day Australia's deputy prime minister warned the world that the biggest threat to the US economy ...
The storybook version of America as a shiny “city upon a hill” where religious tolerance attracted Europ ...
Mitt Romney continued his 2012 presidential campaign launch disguised as book tour today on Fox News Sunday, ...
JJM
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 6:42 pm
“When Willard told reporters that ”The Embassy of the United States issued what appeared to be an apology for American principles,” he was referring to the right of an Islamophobic film maker to impugn the Muslim prophet Mohammed. What embassy officials apologized for was the religious intolerance in the hate-filled video portraying Muslims and their prophet as violent monsters, and they specifically said that free speech was a “universal right,” but religious bigotry was not. Still, Romney continued on the same path accusing President Obama of making “an apology for America’s values,” and that “it’s a terrible course for America.”
PRECISELY! This guy never spoke out against the Mormon Church’s refusal of blacks until 1978!!
Apul Madeek Auod
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:06 am
You folks have got a few screws loose. Bigotry? Intolerance? So he should have said, sorry guys, thanks for taking down our flag and raising Al Quaedas. Burning the embassy, killing those nasty infidels, I understand you got pissed off, so we will hunt down the American and put him in jail or behead him for interpreting the Koran to the screen.
Are you nuts? Obama is the apologist, look at what we got. You do not apologize to murderous nuts who believe they will go to paradise if they kill you and maim you. What in the world has happened to the liberal party, it’s become a cult of insane people incapable of handling reality and relying on finding “ism’s and racism and all other nonsense.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:13 am
Except that no one apologized.
And Obama said he would get the people that attacked the Libyan embassy.
Let me guess, you listen to Fox News right? You certainly do have everything backwards.
But then again, its far to far past you to ask if some of the rioting would have happened had the guy not made the extreme racist film. DOnt ask, Fox might disown you
Johnee
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 2:01 pm
Now THAT is the putting things into perspective.
To point out that the makers of the film bear responsibility does not, in any way, let the idiots that are rioting and killing people off the hook.
Qualitycontroll
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 7:23 pm
TRoll (Borrowed) News…
We can dance if we want to
We can leave your friends behind
‘Cause your friends don’t dance and if they don’t dance
Well they’re, no friends of mine…….
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 7:52 pm
Its clear Romney thinks the troops are meaningless fodder
Its also clear he has no truck with other relgions. An article written by an ancestor of Joe Smiths detailed what Romney was in the Mormon church and what he is doing is explained in that article. He is a liar and a hater. A bigot and someone who is above other relgions.
And he sucks too
Johnee
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 9:02 pm
True that!
Johnee
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 9:30 pm
“What I am not about is the denegrating of other religions bit”. This sentence didn’t apply to Romney. I completely agree that Romney is a bigot.
Johnee
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 8:17 pm
I agree with your general argument that This has nothing to do with apologizing for “American values”. What I am not sure about is the denegrating of other religions bit.
Was the the maker of the film an Islamophobe? Oh yes. However this opens up another can of worms. What if a film was made that portrayed the prophet Mohammed in a negative light because it was extremely critical of religious leaders and their cult like beginnings? I could make a film that was very negative about Joseph Smith and it would be historically accurate.
The point that I am trying to make is that Muslim fundmentalists don’t care about the motive behind any portrayal of the prophet. In their eyes no one is allowed to criticize or portray Mohammed in a negative light or they will take to the streets and riot. And that is COMPLETE BS.
I reserve the right to criticize ANY religious leader, politician, or media personality if I see fit. Any one familiar with my posts about our Christian dominionist/fundies in this country knows what I think about them. And I am certainly not going to lighten up on them just because some maniacs are working themselves up into a lather if Obama wins the election.
Reynardine
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 9:22 pm
There is a difference, Johnee, between serious criticism and deliberate provocation. This was deliberately designed as a provocation, as demonstrated by the actors being elaborately deceived as to what they were showing, by the manner in which, after one sham screening, it was cut and dubbed to make an entirely different “trailer” for a movie that did not exist; by the fact that it was dubbed into Egyptian Arabic and circulated where it was calculated to provoke; and by the statement of intent of the known makers.
Islam does not allow any pictorialization of the Prophet, not even a laudatory one, and this is so his image does not become an object of idolatry. I was among Muslim associates when a serious film of the Prophet’s life was circulated. Their objection was that he was depicted at all. The worst thing they contemplated doing was picketing the movie theater. They thought the better of it when they realized it would attract crowds to what most Americans would otherwise consider a boring subject.
This is not any kind of serious artistic, historical, or religious work. Its stated purpose was to incite violence and disrupt diplomatic relations. Its creators, though they had the right to screen it without prior suppression, do not get to escape responsibility for consequences they admitted they not only foresaw, but intended.
Johnee
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 9:57 pm
Rey, we have absolutely no disagreement that this film was to provoke, agitate, incite, and stir up.
Yes, you are correct that the creators bear a huge responsibility for this. Believe me I get it.
My point is however that if I was to release a film that was extremely critical of the prophet, the effect would be the same. I am an artist…what if I wanted to lampoon or satirize ( like the infamous cartoon)to get a certain point across? Once again,the effect would be the same.
Rey, you saw that film with tolerant American Muslims. This is different. My family comes from a small town outside of Damascus Syria. I’ve seen too much of this intolerant religious garbage in my life. Certain parts of the middle east need to get a grip and deal with it.
A Walkaway
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 11:52 pm
(Laugh!) Johnee, that area sounds a little like around here!
I feel the same way too about a lot of my neighbors and most of the people in this area. Shoot- even if the cultures are opposite, you can still learn from each other AND even enjoy the differences!
IMO, religion should enhance life – for EVERYONE. The thing is, it CAN.
Normand
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 10:23 pm
The important thing is who funded this movie?Follow the money trail because the people involved that we know of so far could not have done this alone.Who did it then charge them with a hate crime!
Diana
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 11:05 pm
I have a strong feeling Mitt camp had something to do with this film.. Strong feeling..
Johnee
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 11:17 pm
More than likely.
A Walkaway
Sep. 14th, 2012 at 11:26 pm
I’m not so sure about Romney’s camp. I’ve heard that Terry of Florida (the jackass and triple-uggh ugly dominionist preacher) has his fingers all over this one, and since a lot of the dominionists think we have to go through WWIII (many believe with nuclear weapons used) in order to make Jesus return, IMO it’s MORE likely that the money will be traced back to them.
Reynardine
Sep. 16th, 2012 at 6:31 am
And where did HE get the money? Or the network? And why that SMIRK? Something came off the way somebody thought it would.
AcidQueen
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:19 am
There is still question about whether or not Romney actually used the phrase “Keep America American”.
Please, let the Trollpublicans do all the lying–don’t sink to their level, and FFS please don’t become politicusUSA’s version of Bill O’Reilly.
caractacus
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 5:58 am
The maker of the film about the Prophet is as much a religious “nutter” as the Muslim rioters, but what does the willingness of so many Muslims to approve or participate in riots and the killing people totally unconnected with the film just because they are perceived to be Christians / Americans etc, say about their mentality and the core values of their faith?
Western politicians clearly feel the need to avoid making inflammatory statements, but Western Governments should recognise that the vast majority of their non Muslim citizens regard the followers of Islam to be ignorant, arrogant, intolerant, fanatical bigots.
A Walkaway
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 12:40 pm
That attitude is also a constructed one. The people are taught to think that way.
And when you have a few extremists in each country committing violence (there are probably more militant “Good Christians” in this country who are willing to commit violence than there are in Islamic countries – at least no less), the violence keeps going.
What troubles me is that it’s obvious that this was deliberate and planned provocation. It may be horrible and wrong to the rest of us, but the dominionists (the “Good Christians”, along with everyone that sides with them) don’t care.
I remind everyone that a good chunk of Dominionist “Christianity” believes we have to have a nuclear WWIII in order to force Jesus to return (or in their words, Jesus will return). Some of their leaders have said so in public, and it’s common belief and doctrine in private (or they think it’s private).
NativeSonKY
Sep. 15th, 2012 at 7:45 am
I am going to the LDS temple up the street from me today and asking them for a Book of Mormon just so I can burn it. I’m just that tired of Romney and his cult. Two can play at this charlatan’s game.
JOHNNY BOONE
Sep. 25th, 2012 at 5:32 am
its obvious that willard has some. serious issues pertaining to being righteous considering the length of lies he’s telling to try to obtain the white house. he can’t be trusted & if he’s voted into office i guess that would make everything all white.