Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Congressional Progressive Caucus: We’re All Trapped In The Tea Party Agenda
Today the Congressional Progressive Caucus warned America that the debt deal has trapped us all in the tea party agenda.
In a statement Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva and Rep. Keith Ellison said,
While voting to increase the debt ceiling is a necessary step, the deficit-reduction measures included in this deal will further harm our economy and hurt working Americans. With unemployment still above 9% and stagnating economic growth, taking money out of the economy will only place a heavier burden on working families.
This is the wrong approach for our economy at the wrong time, and it goes against our basic values. For that reason, we and many of our members will be voting no.
Progressives are committed to prosperity for the middle class, and we believe that reasonable deficit reduction can be achieved while advancing our values. But today’s deficit-reduction deal falls short. Republicans have sought to dismantle basic services for average Americans while spending more to support millionaires and corporations.
Tea Party Republicans have held our economy hostage to those demands, but deficit reduction should not be enacted in a hostage situation. We have long said default on the full faith and credit of the United States is unacceptable. If this bill is defeated, we urge the President to use his 14th amendment powers to raise the debt ceiling and avoid default.
We will continue to fight for programs that help working families. During recent weeks the Congressional Progressive Caucus stood with millions of people across the country to protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid from being cut in the deal being voted on today.
But preventing the worst from happening is not enough. Americans will not stand by while their livelihood comes under attack. We can structure our economy in a way that benefits everybody—not just special interests, and not just the extremely wealthy. We can articulate a vision for the country not based on what America can’t achieve—but what it can. That is the type of leadership Americans expect.
At a press conference Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva expressed the progressive frustration over the deal and said that if the president won’t use his 14th Amendment power, “If the president has to use his unilateral authority given to him in the Constitution he should, and then we can proceed in a calm rational way to look at spending and to look at revenue generation. Absent that, we’re trapped in this tea party agenda. They won, and they should be able to deliver the votes to pass what is essentially their package.”
Rep. Ellison wouldn’t blast President Obama and said the caucus’ dispute with the president is tactical, “President Obama has been given a hand to fight from. He was the president at the time that these people made these unreasonable demands to undermine and basic social services, and actually had Social Security and Medicare in their sights. If we have any dispute, it’s tactical. In principle we know that these are core Democratic values, actually core American values to stand up for basic programs to help America be better off. Let me say finally, we do support the president in using his constitutional executive authority to protect the full faith and credit of the United States.”
The Progressive Caucus is correct on this one. They seem to be the only people on either side who are discussing the damage that this agreement is going to do to our economy, but unlike some on the far left they aren’t willing to place all the blame on Obama. I agree with them completely that the disagreement with Obama is a tactical one. The White House should not have been so eager to get a deal done.
I think that they could have gotten a better deal by waiting the Republicans out, letting the deadline pass, and then threatening to invoke the president’s 14th Amendment powers. It would have been a win-win for Obama. He could have used his executive power as a fail safe against a default, and he could have pressed Republicans for a better deal. As it stands, all sides were too afraid of the consequences of a default to take that risk, so what we ended up with is a bad deal that is going to hurt the economy.
Sometimes no deal, really is better than accepting the lousy deal that is on the table.
House Democrats are urging President Obama to keep his pen handy in case he has to invoke some 14th Amen ...
By using the fiscal cliff as the first stage of his political strategy, President Obama is already two s ...
While Republicans are maintaining a hardline stance of no tax increases in the debt ceiling negotiations ...
A new Quinnipiac poll released today found that 67% of those surveyed felt that any deal to raise the de ...
President Barack Obama used Ronald Reagan as a weapon tonight against the House GOP and their tactic of ...
Mark Bousquet
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 6:23 pm
It appears to me that Obama is ALWAYS eager to compromise with fascists! I’m starting to think he is one himself.
Jason Easley
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 6:37 pm
I would not call the president eager, and he certainly isn’t a fascist. It amazes me that some people continue to blame only Obama when this agreement would have never happened if Congressional Democrats if Congressional Democrats didn’t sign off on it.
Congressional Dems killed one potential deal, and they could have scuttled this one too. Those who just blame Obama are politically naive. If Pelosi hates the bill as much as she claims to, she could vote no. Blaming Obama alone is missing the point. The entire Democratic Party and the progressive activists who pat themselves on the back for what they believe is holding the Democratic Party accountable completely blew this one.
Ingarose
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 8:42 pm
You are right, we should not blame the President alone. At this point I am totally disgusted with most democrats. I am definitely not an Obamabot (as some might have realized here), yet to blame most of this mess on Obama is nuts.
Yes, the tea party has won. Even Boehner said that they won 98% of what they wanted. Most democrats are totally spineless and have been since Obama was elected. I am so mad that it might save them right if they get voted out again in 2012 and let the idiots of Bachman, Palin and other tea party nuts run the country for a while. Then, and only then will people really wake up.
Sally
Aug. 2nd, 2011 at 3:53 am
People may wake up at that point, but at what cost? The Tea Party has no intention of making this country stronger or better. They are self-serving fools…and the Kochs sit back and reap the profits. If we allow them more power, they will soon be putting the dominionist dream of a theocracy into place, and this country will never recover. Once you lose the middle class, it will not come back. What they do not seem to see is that THEY are the middle class, and THEY are among those of us who will be irrelevant. I am not willing to watch that happen.
Cassandra Vert
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 6:46 pm
I disagree. Getting a deal done before the deadline is important, and a deal without a balanced budget provision shuts out the Tea Party. They didn’t get other things they wanted, too.
But what everyone will remember is that this whole unnecessary debt ceiling debacle was caused by “those crazy Tea Party people,” and that will come back to bite them. I don’t want to see the Progressive caucus try to prove that it can be just as crazy and ideological as the Tea Party caucus.
buckeyewill
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 7:01 pm
There is plenty of blame to go around….
buckeyewill
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 7:12 pm
Tea Party activist : a person hooked on Koch
Reynardine
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 8:58 pm
No, this bill is only half- Koched. I have a delightful picture I wish I could post with this comment.
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 11:14 pm
I am not sure he would have gotten a better deal. The tea bags wanted the default and would have set back. Lost their next elections but they would have been happy
That said the president should have said a long time ago, hold us hostage and we will do what we have to do at the right time. No negotiation.
Bright side, we didnt default
rm
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 11:24 pm
This nut will not run for any office, ever again.
www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah...
Shiva (Moderator)
Aug. 1st, 2011 at 11:38 pm
Love how she calls herself the tea party with “we”. Wonder how Bachmann took that
She was reading her answers, Im sure Sarah J could prove that
Sarah Jones
Aug. 2nd, 2011 at 12:39 am
Teleprompter looks like it jumped ahead of her and she lost her place at one point, but even with the teleprompter, she couldn’t come up with one thing to say of any interest at all. Looked like she was on the down cycle. Wonder how she can be outraged over Biden’s comment when she introduced “Obama palling around with terrorists”. She has nothing to fear but herself and her mouth.
Sally
Aug. 2nd, 2011 at 3:56 am
No,it was the same old sound bites she’s been regurgitating for months. I figured she would at least appear angry when Greta baited her with Biden’s comment, but she just smiled when she was done. And what was with that wig? You;d think she could afford decent wigs with her income. She was drugged up….no life in her eyes, and she never even used her hands or stuck out that tongue last night.