Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Homophobes and Neo Nazis: Behind The Conservative War on LGBT
Denial is a conservative’s friend. As it denies the war it is waging on women, the same is true about the GOP’s war on the LGBT Community. The war is on multiple fronts from spending millions to defend the so called Defense of Marriage act, to Mitt Romney’s promise to reinstate DADT and comparable policies at the state level. Most recently, right wing homophobes aligned with Neo Nazis to make Amendment 1 law in the state of North Carolina.
Amendment 1 was not merely a ban on same sex marriage, which was already outlawed in North Carolina. It is a amendment to North Carolina’s constitution which bans legal unions other than between one man and one woman. According to ballotpedia:
Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts.
In other words, under North Carolina’s constitution, same sex couples will not be recognized in any form. This is not for lack of trying by more enligtened North Carolinians.
For example, dailytarheel.com reports:
In Orange County, 79 percent of voters voted against the amendment. Orange county recorded a nearly 44 percent voter turnout rate in the primary.
Conservatives managed to garner enough support for this measure with a little help from the Neo Nazi group, World Wide White Pride which supported the measure in the name of preserving the caucasion race. That’s exactly the argument Jodie Brunstetter, wife of State Senator Peter Brunsletter used when justifying her support for the measure.
In fact, according to the Huffington Post, Mrs. Brunstetter said
The reason my husband wrote Amendment 1 was because the Caucasian race is diminishing and we need to uh, reproduce.
To be sure, Mrs. Brunstetter’s comment makes you want to take a shower. There are more comments and actions by conservatives that have a similar effect.
There was the time audience members booed a gay soldier during a candidates debate.
In response to a question about DADT (and waiting until the audience stopped booing the man who asked it) former Presidential candidate, Rick Santorum had this to say:
I would say, any type of sexual activity has absolutely no place in the military,” he said. “And the fact that they’re making a point to include it as a provision within the military that we are going to recognize a group of people and give them a special privilege to — to — and removing “don’t ask/don’t tell” I think tries to inject social policy into the military. And the military’s job is to do one thing, and that is to defend our country.
Then there’s pray the gay away Michelle Bachmann. She explains how same sex couples can get married. Courtesy of the Washington Post:
“They can get married,” Bachmann responded, “but they abide by the same law as everyone else. They can marry a man if they’re a woman. Or they can marry a woman if they’re a man.”
Then there is Dominic Dieter, the “screw your daughter straight guy” who later made one of those “if anyone was offended apologies.
Aside from the homophobic statements, Conservatives oppose anti bullying legislature because such laws would somehow impose the so called homosexual agenda in the schools. Seriously. Watch it explained in this video, courtesy of Think Progress.
So, aside from supporting a ban on same sex marriage; seeking to reinstate Don’t Ask Don’t tell to send gay members of the Military back to the closet; spending money we supposedly defending the Defense of Marriage act while cutting programs to feed and educate our children and giving a nod and a wink to bullying the gay away, the GOP doesn’t have any issues with the LGBT community at all.
On the positive side, the President announced that he supports same sex marriage. During an interview with ABC’s Robin Robert’s, President Obama said:
I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married.
See Jason Easley’s report for more details.
Conservatives say there is no war on the LGBT community, but there certainly is one. It’s proven in the policy, and backed up by ugly rhetoric from homophobes and Neo Nazis. In addition, Senator Peter Brunsletter’s wife’s comment lends credence to the theory that the passage of Amendment 1 in North Carolina is the Trojan Horse meant to clear the path for similar limitations of marriage rights.
Image from comingoutjournal
Barack Obama made history today by becoming the first president to come out in support of the legaliza ...
The more Republicans talk about transparency and rights the more they’re about secrecy and tyranny. The late ...
When President Obama said in an interview with ABC News: "At a certain point I've just conclude ...
Here is a puzzler of a position, one held by pretty much every Republican candidate and group, but I will le ...
If two forces were ever in conflict in America of 2011, the idea that states trump the federal governmen ...
Reynardine
May. 15th, 2012 at 12:53 pm
Ah…similar legislation…such as overturning Loving v. Virginia, I bet.
I will break Godwin’s Law. 1930′s Germany indicates how, once a formerly decent people accept the outcasteing of one group, the way is open for them to acquiesce to the outcasteing of another…and another…and another. Of course, those who are least popular and least important are outcasted first. In the Third Reich, first it was defective newborns, then hospitalized toddlers, then institutionalized adults (the T4 program). After that, it became “defectives” in the population at large, then homosexuals, and then practicing Jews and identified Gypsies. After that, the hunt for the “racially subversive” became open. Women had lost independent citizen status by 1935.
Our outcasteing program seems to be as follows: first “Mooslins” and “queers”. After that, blacks, liberals, and the poor. Meanwhile, the progressive disenfranchisement of women is likely to proceed along the lines of the legendary mice eating the moon, with the idea that by the time well-born white women realize their rights are being taken away, their allies will be gone.
Rmuse
May. 15th, 2012 at 12:58 pm
Christians procreating to “flood the electorate” with evangelical voters is a long-term goal of the evangelical, Catholic, and Mormon cults. None of these fanatics recognize the LGBT community as human beings and until that changes, there will be no change. This isn’t going away anytime soon.
SinghX
May. 15th, 2012 at 8:54 pm
Ummm…how do they think they’re going to “flood” the electorate when the kids the breed run away all the time…strange…
“…I don’t remember ordering the Christian sandwich” (David Cross)
JJM
May. 15th, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Driven mad by this mythical being called ‘race.’
robyn ryan
May. 15th, 2012 at 1:23 pm
Fortunately for humanity, the internet keeps throwing a spotlight on these people, who had managed to stay under rocks.
I’d like to invite all the neo Nazis to return to their Homeland in Europe, and leave Americans alone. Bulgaria is nice this time of year. And Romania.
Reynardine
May. 15th, 2012 at 4:04 pm
Absolutely not. Those are lovely little countries that have too many times been run over by other people’s Nazis and nasties. We clean up our messes and wash our shitty laundry at home.
ebonycapamerica
May. 15th, 2012 at 3:42 pm
There is a curious “ignoring” of a reality concerning the whole thing about combining Government / Religion..the obvious first, we are not a Theocracy! This is the agenda apparently of the Christian conservatives. The issue of same sex marriage is a teachable moment for the nation (at least the part that does not follow the ideology of the right ) …We are seeing a revival of the old Christian coalition ambition to implement policies for the entire nation,that follow the teachings of their version of Christianity.Secondly, the nation was founded with a REVERENCE for the God of the Bible , but plainly NOT as a reflection of HIS (GOD’S ) KINGDOM ON THE EARTH ! Yes, to anyone who is not a follower of the Christian faith from all the talk one would assume that all this AGENDA addressing RETURNING AMERICA to is’t CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONS is factually impossible and reflects a fanciful recollection of the past. This nation has built within the fabric of it’s statutes /principals a system of CHECKS / BALANCES ..the functional purpose of this was to PROHIBIT the creation of a DOMINANT IDEOLOGY born of either one of the levels of Government (judicial , legislative , executive ) this of course included laws that reflect any certain RELIGIOUS BELIEF we find this stated explicitly in the CONSTITUTION in the “no laws respecting the exercise of religion ” saying that no preference shall be given to any particular religious belief, this is not the idea that is given from the political Christians it seems they want to create a theocracy out of the model we have all sought so long to establish and are finally on the road to perfecting !
Shiva (Moderator)
May. 15th, 2012 at 3:52 pm
I’m not going to dispute what you said except for one thing. Reverence to the Bible or to God was not an issue here. If you read up on each one of the founding fathers, all 39 of them you would find a few religious, a few of them were absolute scoundrels, some of them could care less about religion. These were not a group of men who sat around praying over what they were doing. Also at the same time a Methodist or a Catholic could not hold public office, or be lawyers as well as other positions. Religion at that time was strictly one type. So whatever hype you hear about the Constitution was written based on the Bible or any other malarkey about religion and the Constitution, it’s just not true.
there are no Christian foundations. None that any Christian today would want to align Himself with
consider that there is a considerable amount of time between the time the Pilgrims landed in this country came into being. Religion was not a major part of anything anymore or any less than it is now. And I can guarantee you that you would not consider yourself religious if you belonged to the Puritans that landed on our shores. It was a religion that you would not even recognize and was the opposite of that Church of England.
SinghX
May. 15th, 2012 at 9:04 pm
frank.mtsu.edu/~baustin/h...
Above is a link to an article by Ben S. Austin,
Associate Professor of Sociology, Middle Tennessee State University
Teaches: Race and Ethnic Relations, Sociology of Genocide and the Holocaust, Hate Groups and Hate Crimes in the United States, Sociology of Street Gangs, Introductory Sociology. Serves on the Holocaust Education Committee at Middle Tennessee State University.
I think he qualifies, has the street creds as an “expert”…
Dan Skinner
May. 16th, 2012 at 10:14 am
actually there is very little difference between the Nazi’s and the Conservatives these days.
TheLoneRanger
May. 16th, 2012 at 2:59 pm
It should surprise no one that Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is tolerant of gays and even loving towards them. As a life long member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a retired bishop in that church, Romney has an innate love and compassion for all members of the human race. This of course includes those who engage in the psychological behavior known as homosexuality.
Those who dismiss the Mormons as they are some times known, because of their deeply held, orthodox Christian beliefs on morality, and say these beliefs are homophobic, are not willing to look at the Mormons as a people or as individuals.
There may be black churches and white churches and Chinese churches and other divisions of Christians in society. But where the general population of a geographical area is diverse, so are the congregations of The Church of Jesus of Latter-day Saints. Blacks, whites, Chinese, Filipinos, Bahamians, Colombians and others can be seen singing praises to their God together.
They also have church members who struggle with the temptation of homosexuality. In 1998 then president of Romney’s church, Gordon B. Hinkley said of gays and lesbians, “We love them as sons and daughters of God.” Members are counseled to treat those with same-sex attraction with compassion whether they are in the church or are their neighbors.
And they would say why not? For as it says in Romans 3:23, “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.”
Other scriptures that they would bring to mind are Matthew 22:35-40 and reads:
35 Then one of them, which was a layer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang the law and the prophets.
KatzKids
May. 17th, 2012 at 9:09 am
Ah yes, Mormons just LOVE the LGBT community. That’s why they poured more than $20 million of your tithes into CA to overturn Prop 8. That’s why Romney’s anti-gay policies as Governor of Mass. proved just “how much” he loves & honors Gays.
2012.talkingpointsmemo.co...
That’s why Romney, as an 18 yr old adult, Sr. in high school took great delight in leading a group of boys to attack a younger classmate, thought to be gay, pinned him down & physically attacked him by cutting his hair. He still thinks that and his other anti-gay bullying was funny & laughs when he talks about it. Calls an attack he should have been prosecuted for – just a prank.
www.alternet.org/election...
I understand that you want to defend your religion, but nothing you’ve said here comes close to the truth about what the Church’s attitude is toward the Gay community. Maybe you really don’t know about it, or maybe you’re practicing “Lying for the Lord” to attempt to white wash it.
www.mormonwiki.org/Lying_...
Dan
May. 16th, 2012 at 6:21 pm
“The reason my husband wrote Amendment 1 was because the Caucasian race is diminishing and we need to uh, reproduce.”
Hmmm… As much as one hesitates to attempt to inject logic into anything said by the other side… If this really were the reason for opposing gay marriage, shouldn’t the White Supremies be pushing for gay marriage among non-whites?
Just saying.
Ted
May. 17th, 2012 at 11:44 pm
“To be sure, Mrs. Brunstetter’s comment makes you want to take a shower.”
Oh I’m sure she’d love that, and even offer you use of her own special “shower.”