Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Conservatives Are Dreaming of a ‘White’ Christmas
By: Hrafnkell HaraldssonDec. 7th, 2012more from Hrafnkell Haraldsson

First of all, December 25 is not even Jesus’ birthday. The holiday known as Christmas is only the latest facade over holiness likely dating to the dawn of humankind. Just as Heathen Jól went away or morphed as Yule into Christmas as part of the endless process of syncretism, so too must Christmas give way to changing attitudes and beliefs.
And Christ. for the so-called defenders of Christmas, has himself become nothing but an excuse for racists and bigots, and a rallying cry for fleeting white privilege in a nation increasingly diverse in ethnicity and belief.
The much-touted War on Christmas has been exposed as a myth some would say is a celebration of another myth. Conservative Christians like Buster Miller of the American Family Association can say that opponents of Christmas “are using the court system of this country to force Christians to not be able to celebrate Christmas at Christmastime,” but in fact, most people still say “Merry Christmas” rather than “Happy Holidays” and most Americans are still Christians – at least nominally – of one stripe or another.
What have changed are the underlying assumptions: that we are a Christian nation of white people sharing a common heritage that is itself a myth. In fact, the definition of white people has changed many times over the centuries. In the 19th century, bigots in America insisted the Irish were not white, and the Germans, the Italians, and others.
Conservatives like to talk about a “white culture” or “white America” but there really is no such thing. Yet we can read about people like Matthew Heimbach, 21, a student at Towson University, who clearly managed not to learn anything during his first three years at the school, saying “White culture is dying,”
We can certainly talk in more general terms about European culture, but there is no such thing as “white” culture. Myopically, he says that ” “Every other single group has a union — Jewish, black. Why don’t white students get equal treatment?”
Yes. Somebody hasn’t been paying attention in class. Christians as oppressed. Whites as oppressed. The rallying cries of the obtuse and ignorant.
It would make more sense to form a Scandinavian student union, or a French student union, or a Slovakian student union, or one of any of a dozen other European ethnicities, where Old Country traditions and language could be celebrated.
But a white student union is representative of a group that exists only in the conservative imagination. My mother belonged to the Sons of Norway in order to celebrate our family’s heritage. She would never have dreamed of joining a group celebrating “white” culture, because my mother, did in fact, learn something in school.
And she had a better upbringing from a Norwegian mother and a Swedish father than to fall for such simplified world-views as that possessed by people like Heimbach.
The underlying assumption is that we are all, and have been, a nation of Cleavers. In the conservative narrative, minorities – those icky brown people who shouldn’t be allowed to vote – moved in a shadowy miasma to be best avoided by historians as unimportant (one of the reasons Republicans hate Susan Rice is because she dared, some years ago, to object to this bias).
Any mention of ethnic studies provokes a violently emotional response from conservatives as they cling, David Barton-like, to their fantasies of a white Christian America thinking the same thoughts they do; almost like a Nazi postcard from another era.
They do not realize, because they have no interest in history or facts, that most Americans for the past 200 years have not thought like they do, that their own religious proclivities and attitudes are a relatively new innovation.
Instead of recognizing this, they prefer the David Barton’s of the world to rewrite history to justify and match their own beliefs. This is what David Barton tried to do with Jefferson, turning him into a 21st century white Evangelical more congenial to their needs.
Thus Christmas becomes emblematic of the white Christian struggle for a reality that is in fact a fantasy. Barton says he is fighting against a liberal bias in history (as Stephen Colbert has pointed out, reality has a liberal bias) while Fox News and Bill Donohue and others are fighting against what they say is a liberal war against Christianity.
But if the white perspective has been ethno-centric, America itself has never been monolithically one thing or another. Remember the Irish who were once not white, and the Native Americans and the Africans, first slaves, then free but disenfranchised. Remember the Mexicans who occupied the Southwest before being absorbed into America, and the Chinese imported to build the railroads, and all the other ethnic groups so often lost in the static but as much a part of the fabric of America as any European.
But Republicans have become so obsessed with color (not ethnicity) that they insisted Obama only one in 2008 because of his color, and compounded this absurdity with the claim that he only won in 2012 because he was not of another color: white. But it is not Obama’s color that won or lost him either election, but the inability of Republicans to see any color other than their own; the same color Obama is not.
The sad fact of life in the early 21st century is that in American conservatism, Obama is not only not an American because of his color, because real Americans are white, but because of his religion; the dogged insistence of conservatives being that he is not, in fact, a Christian, but a secret Muslim. I won’t even get into the disqualifier of demonic possession or the equally bizarre determinant that all real Americans are colonialist and Obama is not.
But as Rick might have said to Ilsa, we’ll always have Christmas, that special day of the year when in good conscience all aberrochristians can foreswear their true belief; an act based on the premise that the birthday of a god that has otherwise become completely irrelevant to them is under attack, thus undermining an America that has never existed outside of their fantasies.
Christmas is no more about Jesus for conservative Christians than it is for Heathens like me. It is a colossal excuse. Retailers and manufacturers might mine it for its cash content, but conservatives stand to lose far more than money: they stand to lose a symbol.
After a bruising partisan presidential election, the White House has posted a video that everybody can e ...
To any Christians who ask why I do not wish them a “Merry Christmas” I can only say this: “Why should I? ...
The War on Christmas is back and Bill O'Reilly is here to tell America that the mixing of religion and s ...
During the fear mongering and hate being spread by conservatives and Republicans, there is an incredible ...
Every year, the President of the United States delivers a Christmas message. Some are good. Some are bad ...
Dan Slaby
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 3:40 pm
When climate change overwhelms our ability to recover and rebuild, when financial markets fail and governments serve the demands of the wealthy instead of the people, when the traditional values of self-reliance fail to keep us out of debt so we can survive famine, then we will realize that when we forfeit the responsibility of self-government to corporate control, we forfeit our freedom to live.
The rich own the boats that rise with the tide, the rest of us have to learn how to tread water or row their boats.
Reynardine
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 4:06 pm
I’ve often celebrated my *real* Yule on the Winter Solstice anyway. If you think about it, the agelong custom north of the Tropic of Cancer has been to celebrate these longest of nights with lights and feasting to ward off the specters of darkness and dearth.
Elizabeth 44
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 6:39 pm
As you say, “Christmas” is the just the latest incarnation of the northern hemisphere’s celebration of the winter solstice. Earliest Christianity didn’t even ask about when Jesus was born. Paul and Mark, the earliest gospel don’t even mention Jesus’ birth. It was only later that Christmas became an attractive alternative to whatever the local celebration of the Solstice was. Of course, many of the local traditions were just added to the Christmas mix. Besides, the Incarnation is not the premier celebration of the Christian church; the Resurrection is. As a white, American, Christian I choose to celebrate the Incarnation, but I even prefer to celebrate quietly. As a denizen of northern Washington State, I also celebrate the winter Solstice.
A Walkaway
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 12:47 pm
There is a National Geographic special “Rivals to Jesus” that bears watching and is worth checking out or renting, although it can be seen online. Among other things, December 25 is the recorded birth day for Mithra, who as far as we know, taught some of the same things that Jesus taught.
An early pope admitted that they adopted December 25 in order to make Christianity more palatable to the followers of Mithra (and it does coincide with many other pagan celebrations). It was a deliberate move for the purposes of proselytizing.
Personally, I have no problem with December 25 being celebrated as Jesus’ birthday, even though it was more likely to have been in the spring (as I remember). I love the season – or did, but the sort of abuse we’ve suffered at the hands of “Good Christians” has rather turned me off. It’s still the coolest and driest part of the year, and while they’ve largely spoiled something that I enjoyed, I still plan on celebrating it. (After all, I do agree with most of what Jesus taught – especially the parts we are sure He taught, and I do think he was more than a prophet.) I also think that we do need more of the positive things about Christmas… helping others, giving, etc..
SinghX
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 7:28 pm
“The underlying assumption is that we are all, and have been, a nation of Cleavers.”
The “Cleaver Syndrome”, a simple assumption based on a fictitious TV script written 50 some odd years ago, created in order to sell soap and laundry detergent to the masses…
Soap was a big advertisement product in 50′s Americana for some unknown or, perhaps unconscious reason…soap came in bars or powder and was almost always white (the people in the commercials white). “Snow White” “Ivory” was literally pushed in our faces as the ideal; scrubbed white faces were good and pure and the Cleavers personified the product. June must have said her lines, “wash up for dinner, boy” “I’m washing the dishes/laundry” at least 10 times in every show; she was a shallow, cartoonish,
pearl-wearing subversive that resembled no ones mother.
YES! Brainwashed “clean” by the Cleaver Syndrome, these monumental miscreants are STILL following a 50′s script hook line and sinker…of course, how can anyone possibly think of anything but a scrubbed version of “white” Christmas”?!!
Shiva (Moderator)
Dec. 7th, 2012 at 7:45 pm
I have said this before here I think, but I wonder if the white christians are ready for the multitude of Hindu gods. One with several arms and the trunk of an elephant
The only place the white xtians cant run their religion roughshod over everyone is on government property. They still have their churches, their homes, the holes covered in lights that are sometimes beautiful to see. But like Mitch McConnell they wont take yes for an answer.
How about it white christians? Ready to expose your kids to a huge multitude of holidays and 8 armed dancing gods with beautiful artwork? Ready for tommy to come home and say, gee mom, I like Ganesha, can I get an idol? Ready for Maya, Brahma, Shiva, Vishnu? And the resultant set of different incarnations of each plastered all over government property? They will make baby jesus look like a beginner.
I know the answer is no, so STFU
SinghX
Dec. 8th, 2012 at 6:45 am
The Hindu lighting displays are way much cooler, more colorful than the desert religions displays, plus fireworks are lite for Dwali and all the outrageous foods, sweets and festivals with parades and elephants…what American kid wouldn’t want to get out and kick it with their East Indian friends and family!
As I have said before and I’ll say it again; they are more afraid of “us”…and we shouldn’t be afraid of superstitious people like “them”; it’s silly.