Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
There Is No Greater Danger To Our Constitution Than Religious Frenzy
America’s experiment as a sort-of democratic republic has lasted for about 235 years, and for the most part, the system has worked relatively well. Since 1980 though, there has been a movement to change the nature of this country and the Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan, is responsible for unleashing the Religious Right on the nation and they are close to achieving their goals after the 2010 midterm elections that gave power to malignant teabaggers to collapse the government. Republicans are awash with funding from religious groups to enforce biblical laws against gays and women, but there is a bigger threat from Dominionists to form a theocratic government that is just now becoming evident to many Americans.
Two weeks ago this column addressed the Mississippi ballot initiative that replicates the personhood amendments many states have attempted to enact at the behest of fundamentalist Christian groups, the Catholic Church, and the American Family Association (AFA). The article pointed out that Mississippi’s ballot initiative 26 will most certainly pass and will withstand court challenges because the state supreme court’s bench is filled with 7 devout Christians reflecting Mississippi’s population that is fervently Christian (82%). The amendment is undoubtedly an attack on women’s right to choose their own reproductive health, but there is an insidious motive beyond just restricting contraceptives, stem cell research, in vitro fertilization, and abortion.
The personhood amendment’s author, Les Riley, said his amendment would have “international implications” and should be “the biggest news in the pro-life movement in 20 years,” and that it will engender a court challenge to overturn Roe v. Wade. As horrible as that sounds, it is not Riley’s only goal and his history informs the beginning of a movement to change America into a theocracy. In 2003, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down anti-sodomy laws because they were unconstitutional, Riley was part of a movement to remake South Carolina into an independent theocratic republic dedicated to forming a “free Southern Republic” based on biblical law. The neo-secessionist movement, Christian Exodus, had as its goal formation of “an independent Christian nation that will survive after the decline and fall of the financially and morally bankrupt American empire.”
Riley was leader of the Mississippi chapter of the League of the South whose neo-confederate theory was that the nation could be saved by breaking it apart. They called for a nation rooted on European principles and population (read White) based on Christian Reconstructionism, and believe America was founded on and needs to return to biblical law. Riley calls Washington D.C. “Sodom on the Potomac” and follows the teachings of Reconstructionist leader R.J. Rushdoony who says “all ideas are inherently religious.” One of the ideas of Riley’s personhood amendment are that rape or incest victims are not eligible for abortions or the morning after pill because they claim that although rape or incest are unfortunate, “you don’t execute the product of the crime,” because “that’s what abortion does.” They also say that after fertility procedures, unused embryos “can’t be destroyed if people want to adopt embryos just like they want to adopt children” and that instead of using them for research or throwing them out, they should be frozen. An opinion writer in Jackson suggested that freezing embryos may be classified as child abuse, and the Yes on 26 website said using embryonic stem cells for research is tantamount to “human cannibalism.”
Although men like Riley are the epitome of insanity, they are gaining momentum in their drive to change the government into a theocracy. Mississippi is the most religious state in the nation, but it is not alone in pursuing personhood for zygotes. PersonhoodUSA is a national movement that is active in all 50 states and they claim that their movement is the “most important civil rights struggle of our age.” Whether or not it is a civil rights movement is questionable at best, but it is telling that Christians in every state are supporting a radical notion, but zygotes as persons are the least of the country’s problems if the Dominionists are not stopped in their tracks. Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann, and Rick Santorum all signed an anti-gay pledge to appoint Christians for all federal courts as well as a presidential commission to investigate proponents of gay marriage for attacking Christians who support traditional marriage.
It may seem alarmist to give attention to these sinister personhood amendments, but they are precursors of Christian rule in America. The entire concept of a zygote as a person has as its basis the Christian bible and these extremists will not stop at punishing women; or gays. Riley’s history gives a hint that, in pursuing a European population model based on the bible for the new America, all ethnicities except Caucasian are in danger if the Christian Reconstructionists gain power. There have been arguments proffered that the Dominionists are not in power at the federal level, but they are entrenched in many states’ governments and that is where the danger really lies. The “tenther movement” is gaining momentum along with personhood movements and a Republican president and Congress could allow states to dictate their religious agenda to the entire country regardless the Constitution’s separation of church and state. However, as Republican Christian conservatives are infiltrating the government at every level, their goal of replacing the Constitution with biblical law is becoming more of a legitimate threat.
Most Americans are not aware of Christian Reconstructionists or Dominionism, but they should be. The problem is not necessarily all Christians, but given the choice of supporting the Constitution or the bible, there are few Christians who will opt for the Constitution. There is nothing as dangerous as religious frenzy and although the religious right has been involved in the government since Reagan gave them a voice, they are making progress towards establishing a theocracy. It is important to remember that not all Germans were anti-Semites, but as the movement gained momentum and nationalism became intertwined with Hitler’s final solution, it was not long before exterminating Jews became a national movement. The fanatics in the Dominionist movement are having success with the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation, and with support from groups like the tea party that dreams of collapsing the government to reshape it into a Christian, family-values theocracy, a religious takeover could happen before decent Americans knew what hit them.
The question still remains; where are the Christian voices who are not fanatical extremists? Apparently, they either condone a theocratic takeover by Dominionists or they are too frightened to speak out against the fundamentalist threat. Now that nearly all of the Republican presidential contenders are unapologetic Christians who tout their faith as a positive attribute, the threat is more credible than ever. However, there is a dysfunctional belief in this country among most of the population that Christians are basically good folk who can do no harm and it plays a role in helping Dominionists reach their goal. It is a goal of the bible as the rule of law and an Inquisition to root out non-believers for punitive regulation and the first victims will be those who are speaking out and attempting to warn Americans that democracy is finished unless the Dominionists are stopped. It may be unbelievable, but just ask people who face death threats from Christians every day.
There are myriad threats to any nation's existence that do not all issue forth from invading armies or t ...
In the world of politics, the last thing one expects to see are religious edicts as legislation unless o ...
There are distinct advantages to allowing the public to cast ballots on a variety of issues that impact ...
There is an attack on liberty in America from the corporate world, but there is a not-so-covert attack o ...
In 1797, one of America's Founding Fathers, John Adams, categorically stated "the Government of the Unit ...
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 29th, 2011 at 8:52 pm
This post ties many things together. I felt the GOP was doing the things they do for power yet 3 of the candidates are domionists themselves. I had not thought far enough ahead to the fact they need the collapse of the country. I thought all they needed was the gop to take over then throw them out.
And all the conservatives will be out of luck. But can this happen? They seem to be moving fast and it also seems that everything hinges on 2012. The dems better find abase in the christian community and fight back but I know they wont.
Serious post Rmuse, deadly serious
Watcher
Sep. 29th, 2011 at 9:25 pm
@Shiva, don’t worry. The Christian Left is standing up to the nuts. But we get little or no recognition of even our very existance.
The sick and twisted perversion of the bible by dominionists and fundamentalists, is something we of the Christian left are well aware of.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 29th, 2011 at 10:22 pm
Oh I am worried. If the leadership of the christian churches doesnt speak up, the people will just keep going to church and waiting their fate. Write letters to your leaders and hope to god they are not part of this
A Walkaway
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 12:16 am
I think it will take more than that.
We wrote a letter to the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal church about the shenanigans around here in the Episcopal churches (some that I’ve mentioned previously). The response was very discouraging – we were told to go back to the priests/bishop (the source of the problems we were writing about).
It takes power to get through to the people in power. If we (ordinary people) don’t get help from people with some clout, those at the top just don’t listen. It takes power to get past all of the barriers and to get people to listen.
I also suspect that the decent people at the top (at least in the Episcopal Church) don’t get half of the messages they should… because part of the way steeplejackers work is to get into “positions”, including those that control the flow of information. I’ve always wondered if the PB ever got the letter. The response from her office was so unlike the descriptions I’d heard about her that I’ve always had doubts.
Laura
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 11:54 am
Zabasearch for a home address and mail your letter there. It’s more likely to get to the intended addressee.
Ingarose
Sep. 29th, 2011 at 9:37 pm
Religious frenzy is very dangerous, just like any other frenzy. I do not think that it is very helpful by constantly comparing ‘religious frenzy’ having to do with abortion and gay marriage. A lot of Latinos are Catholics and both abortion and gay marriage are touchy subjects.
The religious nuts at the moment would like to take almost all freedoms away if they do not coinside with their believes.But by harping mostly on two things, we are actually helping them.It is for that reason that Republicans have used abortion to their advantage for ever.
It is time to point out many other dangerous things these religious nut groups believe.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 29th, 2011 at 10:33 pm
The comparison is aimed at the fundamentalists who are opposing abortions and gay people. The catholic church in its own way is part of this
A Walkaway
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 12:56 am
Rmuse, we’re here. The problem is, people don’t listen. They dismiss us or say we’re making things up (especially us walkaways) when we try to tell them the truth. Or the bullshit from the fundamentalists so invades their lives that they cannot hear anything else. It drives me crazy sometimes (with all we’ve gone through, I’m not sure I’m sane part of the time), because people will witness things and then refuse to believe what they saw… or hear things and then tell people that they were mistaken. They have the evidence right in their face and refuse to believe it (or at best try to say it was ‘nothing’).
I think the main reason is that dysfunctional belief you mentioned… that somehow Christian means ethical and good. Also, there is this idea that if a person isn’t an accepted authority, anything they might say has no value. For years, I’ve tried to direct people to sites that expose dominionism, and time after time been told it was all “conspiracy theory cr*p”. I’ve had a few people finally change their minds – after they heard about it on NPR or something else more authoritative. THEN they start reading and join the fight.
The point about being afraid, sadly, is also a valid one. They have been known to kill, but it is far more likely right now that they will commit acts of vile and cowardly terrorism… arson, poison, etc.. The future… if we don’t stop them, another story.
SinghX
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 8:14 am
Well, I could “wax eloquently” for hours on end about this issue sans a discussion of the personal is political an the political is personal…
But, there have been people who talk about this and have been at it for many years. And, Rmuse, I believe Nixon actually unleashed these people as his own religious frenzy was always under the surface boiling, yet suppressed. (I have anecdotal evidence from that era that I think I’ll blog over on at my “thang” forum today so it doesn’t get too long here…)
There used to be lots of books in my local public library on this topic (that was my first exposure; the public library). For example, there was a collection of well-known intellects from the late 70′s who discussed their views on this rise of fundamentalism, as in Gloria Steinem wrote a piece, but, that disappeared along with all the anti-cult literature when Bush came into office–systematically. Yes. I saved my library due date slips, asked the librarian where books were, and all I got was a look of fear. After persisting and insisting on an answer, I was finally told the “board changed” and a the head of a large corporation and cronies took over. I looked these people up and sur-prize, sur-prize, sur-prize! They just happened to be very devout Christians!
All, and I mean all the classic books that discussed destructive cults/ identified them such…all the books on how to leave a church-based cult…gone. But, in there place was two stacks that were devoted to “Hate Hillary” and lots of Christian apologist books (Melton, Hayden, etc.) and books by Christian preachers that told of the evils of Satanism invading the schools as well as Pagan rituals…
In other words, this has been a very covert operation that has gone on under the noses of people in this country for a long time; and yes “walkaway” you WOULD be called crazy, a conspiracy theory guy because you would have no book-learnin’ evidence to back up your claim. You would have to go deep into the literature of all kinds of thesis (if you knew were to look) and copy their book list…then, try to find the books via old book dealers…these fundamentalist have destroyed their history of mis-deeds behind themselves so it makes it very hard to grasp all that they’ve been doing…that is one reason the public is “unaware” and former members are all “crazy”; all the credible evidence has been “canceled”. Oh, I could go on as to how this campaign got started and who started it… but, that’s another bedtime story, kiddies, sleep tight!
SinghX
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 8:19 am
one more thing…I dare ya’ to try and find anything by Sara Diamond on the shelves! You will have to ask go through a university inter-library loan and they will find it…opps!
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 8:59 am
is that Neil diamond’s daughter?
SinghX
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 9:09 am
Good question.
Answer: if it makes you read her “oldies but goodies” then, yes…sure, it’s a tell all by a celebrity’s kid…yeah, that’s the ticket!
(I think she burned-out trying to do this work…we haven’t heard from her in quite a while. This kind of research is a exhaustive and fulfilling all at the same time, if you can stop yourself from banging your head against the wall trying to make difference, like Sara)
A Walkaway
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 10:50 am
Burned out is right. I’ve never met her or read anything by her, but friends of mine have and told me that was the case.
That’s funny about the book-learning. But that is exactly what I’ve encountered – people wanting me to provide documentation and references to peer-reviewed articles when I was talking about my own experiences or those of other people.
I’ve had people want me to do research on this (interviews, etc.) but I am very uncomfortable with the idea, plus I can’t work without an income. It would be a valuable undertaking to interview people who have gone through the dominionist ‘stuff’, in essence a ethnography of walkaways. At the same time, extraordinary measures would have to be taken to protect identities and the IRB requirements would be lengthy to get through. The dominionists ARE a major threat to walkaways, after all.
A Walkaway
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 11:12 am
BTW… if you do share that ‘anecdotal evidence’, I’d love to read it.
shadowspring
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 9:43 am
” Apparently, they either condone a theocratic takeover by Dominionists or they are too frightened to speak out against the fundamentalist threat. ”
Those are not the only options. The truth I see everywhere I try to talk about dominionism among Christians, is unbelief. They don’t believe that their co-religionists could be so horrifyingly dogmatic and politically ambitious. They assume all other Christians are like themselves- level-headed, live and let live sort of folk who go to work everyday, wash the car on Saturday and go to church on Sunday about half the time. If you try to tell them otherwise, they simply won’t believe you.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 9:48 am
and that is exactly what I’m afraid of. Christian apathy due to a lack of knowledge of the threat. Whenever there is an article here about fundamental Christians we always receive a goodly number o f”regular” Christians who bark out about they are being picked on. You have to try and convince them that they are not talking about the everyday Christian they are talking about fundamentalist. Many don’t seem to see the difference at all. In my opinion Christianity is not in question here, just the ones who are abusing it just like fundamentalist Muslims abuse Islam
A Walkaway
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 10:58 am
That’s why I suggest using “Christians” in quotes, and care to make it clear that it’s not a blanket condemnation – which I’ve seen here a few times, including a recent example. I understand people being angry at Christianity in general… it does seem that the religion as a whole is not like the way it’s portrayed (and I do know the history of the religion), but there ARE real Christians who do try their best to follow Jesus’ teachings (and not the seemingly harsher ones).
There are also a lot of people who think themselves Christian, but when you scratch them, they bleed dominionism. I think it’s because they’ve been steeped in the ideology and haven’t even started questioning it. I’ve seen incidences where the person didn’t even seem to think about what was being said, or how anti-Christian it was.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 6:57 pm
Speaking only for myself here, I am not aware of any blanket condemnations of Christianity from our writers, myself included. I may be wrong, of course, but I am not aware of any, and what the writer intended cam be quite different than how it was interpreted – and I can speak from experience here.
Definitions are a definite problem and not just in this context – what defines a Christian is a question I myself have asked here in the past. Many people consider themselves Christians, happily unaware that other Christians might disagree.
The history of Christianity is a bloody, unsavory one. Millions have died as a result of the Great Commission. This history does not mean every Christian is bad, but it Christianity nonetheless. The problem as I see it, and as I have argued here many times, is fundamentalism of any type, whatever the religion. And sadly, it is the fundamentalists who have directed the course of Christian history – it would be refreshing to see Christian moderates take charge for a change, but they seem reluctant to speak out.
Meanwhile, I see no substitute for Christian and as a writer I won’t use quotation marks around the word because in the end, whatever their goals, they do worship the Christian God, do claim Jesus Christ as their savior, making them, by most every definition I’ve seen, Christians.
Shawn
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 11:25 am
It’s not the religious fanatics that are the danger; it’s the authoritarians that use the fanatics to gain power. Religion is just one of their tools. Others are patriotism and fear of crime. But it’s not just the authoritarians. Authoritarian followers are mostly harmless. It’s their leaders that do the most damage. That’s because most are psychopaths and will do anything to gain and hold on to power. And when they get power, it always ends in war and financial disaster.
justyntoo
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 10:35 pm
yes
justyntoo
Sep. 30th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
there are alot of names being used to describe what are idea adherants . you are correct in the idea that radicals in any area of life make everyones life miserable what must be looked at is the idea that there are core values that are fundimental and if some one act in disregard to this fundimental then there are consequences . one , there is a god . proven by ancedotal occurances – there will always be those that will not believe because it interfers with what they want to do . since we are alive it might be concluded that there is a reason for our existance . the possibility that life was generated from essential atoms and molecules and amino acids from asteroids are profoundly lacking in reality .back in the sixties there was an experiment to produce life in the lab , to this day we still have not . nor shall we . ourefforts to remove the free will of god from our lifes will not end well . with out god , all hell breaks loose . we should not kill children in the womb not for birth control , not because they are one gender or another , not to test cosmetics , not to find the right sweetness for soft drinks , not to extend someones life through stemcell therapy , not to run cloning experiments , not at all. george washington in his farewell address stated that there is not to be a state religion but the state must recognize all religion because it is mans acceptance of a higher authority which keeps him humble , at this time we have many who are not humble . as with all bad things ,bad things will happen . all this destruction of religion by undermining , dimisishing , mis quoting , outright misleading has been the avenue used by those who hold religion in contempt . they are not above using people who hold anti religious feelings- because they are not able to do what they want- by giving them a forum to spout their dissent , while either not allowing a true rebuttle to be spoken on the same forum or choosing a good example of a bad example and allowing them to speak as if for all of that group . infact marx and engles in the communist manifesto state that religion is the panacia of the masses – it keeps them quiet so the leaders can do what they want . but this country is differant , we have an oppertunity to stop these meglomaniacs by the honest expression of what is right for all not just for some . there is no right from the constitution which says the government has the right to control who you have sex with. all those sodomy laws are unconstitutioal . but , it is known that some types of sex are more prone to disease which begs the question as to wether or not these forms are natural forms of pro-creation . so for the common good it can be argued that it would be best if the goverment did not promote these types by giving them the same status as is given to the natural relationship which has been proven to be the most advantagious to raising good citezens . there are always exceptions when someone rises above there environment and turns out ok but the vast majority if raise by abuseive (just an example , could also be alcohalic , ect) will grow up and not have the most compete idea as to what is best for society as is aposed to what is best for them , thus more undermining of fundimental truths . we face many half truths and outright lies in this religion subject . those who choose to reject a god are free to do so , but i reserve the right to place ( for example) a nativity scene on my front lawn thereby allowing those who share my ideas of thanksgiveing and joy the opertunity to see and to respond by perhaps stopping in and saying merry christmas , or god bless you merry gentlemen . i do not believe that being a man or women in the service should have any bearing on sex prefferance because you are not in the service to have sex – you are serving your country . in ancient israel it was common practice to not have sex while in the military . this might be a good way to defuse any antaganisms . as we have all seen the freedom of unmarried sex has truly been a divisive force in the large number of divorces . all who work in a mixed gender environment know the push and pull of chemistry , ego , authority and reward systems and the need for them by most . it might be a good idea for all to step back from our lives and see if there might be some areas that could use a little tweeking and or straitning .
Chris
Oct. 1st, 2011 at 12:34 pm
While I agree with your call for education and counter-action, your attempt to make all Christians culpable is logically flawed. They are culpable, you argue, because they do not counter what the extreme right among their co-religionists say, and you embody Godwin’s Law before even the comments section could. However, in the paragraph previous, you say that “[m]ost Americans are not aware of Christian Reconstructionists or Dominionism.” Being that the large majority of Americans are Christian, at least nominally, then that stands to reason that the most Christians also do not know about Dominionism. Those that do are most likely tied into the movement. This is a simple syllogism with a smidgeon of probabilistic reasoning. I ask you, how do you counter a movement within your own group (viz. religion) when you are unaware of its existence?