Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
A Contingent of Gun Fanatics Make Their Intention to Initiate a Revolutionary War Known
NRA board member and spokesman Ted Nugent suggests Revolutionary War.
An individual who adheres to a political viewpoint which drives them to seek to return to a previous state in a society is a reactionary, and it is natural for a person who is divorced from reality of the present. Over the past four years there have been calls by conservatives to harken back to an historical era that either never really existed, or belonged to an epoch far removed from modern civilization. There are extremist Christians who yearn for a society governed by statutes found in the Law of Moses typical of Iron Age Judaism, and teabaggers who pant for conditions that drove the American colonies to declare their independence from the British in late 18th century colonial America. Where most Americans are reacting with utter shock and revulsion at the increasing gun violence plaguing America, there is a contingent of gun fanatics driven by racial prejudice and gun lobby fear mongering who desperately long to initiate a revolutionary war over attempts to stop the senseless gun violence that threatens civilized society and the domestic tranquility cited in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution.
Since the tragedy that claimed the lives of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut, calls for armed conflict against the government have been the purview of maniacal gun zealots and racists who conflate gun safety measures with gun confiscation orders at the behest of the Obama Administration. Despite reports that right-wing extremists in league with Republican ideologues pose a serious threat to the government, law enforcement, and the people, Republicans and the National Rifle Association have been remiss to condemn calls for a revolution to replicate sectarian street violence that ravaged post-invasion Iraq that this country is creeping toward. However, over the weekend, an NRA spokesman and board member joined the calls for revolution against the Obama Administration, and a leading Senate Republican struck fear in his constituents with a frantic warning the government is coming for their guns en route to shredding the Constitution.
In an urgent email from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, he warned fellow Kentuckians that “You and I are literally surrounded. The gun-grabbers in the Senate are about to launch an all-out-assault on your rights, on your freedom from those who want to shred our Constitution – they’re coming for your guns.” McConnell’s campaign manager, Jesse Benton, said “It is almost hard to believe the sheer breadth and brazenness of this attempt to gut our Constitution,” referring to gun control measures to reduce the proliferation of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines on American streets. McConnell’s use of battleground siege terminology such as “surrounded” and “about to launch an all-out assault” cannot be misconstrued as anything other than government declaring war on gun owners and the U.S. Constitution. McConnell even made a pre-recorded phone message telling Kentucky hunters and gun owners “Their efforts to restrict your rights, invading your personal privacy and overstepping their bounds with executive orders, is just plain wrong,” and he vowed to fight them “tooth and nail.” The only thing missing from McConnell’s clarion call to arms was the time and staging area to make a stand against tyrannical government reminiscent of colonial Americans facing British troops at Concord where the “shot heard round the world” signaled the beginning of America’s war of independence. An NRA spokesman and board member did make a direct reference to Concord in a warning to the Obama Administration.
The NRA board member, draft dodger Ted Nugent, made his comments during the Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show (SHOT Show) in Las Vegas over last weekend. Nugent said the “Barack Obama gang is actually attempting to re-implement the tyranny of King George that we escaped from in 1776, and if you want another Concord Bridge, I got some buddies.” Nugent summoned the Revolutionary milestone that pitted a group of colonists against British soldiers assembled at the North Bridge in Concord, Mass. in 1775, and broke a standoff when a soldier opened fire. Nugent went on a tirade claiming “The president of the United States goes to the Vietnam Memorial Wall and pretends to honor 58,000 American heroes who died fighting communism and he pretends to pay honor to men who died fighting communism, and then he hangs out with, hires and appoints communists. He is an evil, dangerous man who hates America and hates freedom. And we need to fix this as soon as possible.”
Nugent has an inordinate amount of gall citing the 58,000 American heroes who died fighting communism in Viet Nam, because to avoid serving his country, he defecated and urinated in his own pants and feigned insanity when he went before the draft board because as he said, “I did not want to get my ass blown off in Vietnam.” Apparently the NRA board member who was too much of a coward to fight for his country has no compunction fighting against his own country, or inciting his gun-fanatic buddies to “fix” the fact the American people re-elected President Obama; “as soon as possible.”
Since the Sandy Hook massacre took place prompting outrage and calls for stricter gun controls and safety measures to protect Americans from gun-crazed “law abiding citizens” and their assault weapons, so-called patriots who equate sane gun laws with “shredding the Constitution” have made overtures of revolution to protect their precious AR15s and high-capacity magazines. However, McConnell and Nugent represent the first official institutional forays into inciting gun advocates to fight tooth and nail against President Obama’s attempt to blunt the daily reports of gun atrocities McConnell and Nugent claim are “shredding the Constitution” that drives hate-filled gun-zealots into revolutionary war mode. It is noteworthy that neither the NRA, or the Republican Party, have distanced themselves from Nugent or McConnell’s fear mongering and blatant lies that serve one purpose and one purpose only; incite violence against the United States government and its Commander in Chief that regardless how one defines it, is sedition.
When a person holds another person responsible for actions that are socially or morally irresponsible, a ...
Representing the NRA and Senate Republican Opposition to Background Checks Nearly every organization has ...
Days after Ted Nugent threatened violence and launched a racist attack against the president, CNN reward ...
An error stemming from ignorance, misinformation, or sheer delusion is sometimes labeled a formal fall ...
It was a bonzo gonzo crazy fest on FNC's Hannity recently as Ted Nugent showed up and blasted the Obama ...
Mary
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mitch and the rest of the gun addicts need to start being held accountable for inciting revolutions by the nut jobs.
Mike
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:16 am
Fucking psychopaths. And im stuck here in Oklahoma, a state that will probably become one of the largest fucking military strongholds for southern insanity with fort sill and a nearby airbase. Makes me want to buy few bushmasters and ballistic vests in case these sick bastards start looting houses and raping women in roving gangs of bible thumping illiterate mongoloids. At this point, I put nothing past the teabaggers.
Banned Atheist
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:36 am
I really really don’t think you meant “mongoloid.” Look it up and tell me I’m wrong.
Mike
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:43 am
Meant in offensive adjective form, essentially calling them mentally retarded in a non literal non scientific manner.
“Ignorant automatons” may be better fitting though.
KellySpeaks
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 8:33 pm
diane
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:19 am
When is this treason?
When is enough enough?
Can you imagine a leader of another country saying some of the same things?
The republican would be calling for blood.
Banned Atheist
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:39 am
At what point does this type of speech qualify as “inciting violence”? When we’re already in the middle of Civil War 2.0?
dr. sparemachinery
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:58 am
interesting.
senator mcconnell is all worked up about those who ” . . . are about to launch an all-out-assault on your rights, on your freedom from those who want to shred our Constitution . . . . ” in regards to guns.
but he never seems to have had any compunction about “shredding the constitution” when it comes to his voting for laws authorizing warrent-less wiretaps and other intrusions into our individual rights.
perhaps he should refocus his enthusiasm for outrage about “Their efforts to restrict your rights, invading your personal privacy and overstepping their bounds with executive orders, is just plain wrong,” and do a better job protecting all of our rights.
sue
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:01 am
Since they want to use their weapons of mass destruction so badly….I suggest that our government send some well outfitted military types to meet them at their place of choice…the legal military can represent us (the law abiding citizens) and they Nugent types can represent themselves..and they can have their little war…wouldn’t take too long for our men to eliminate them….then the rest of us can go back to doing our thing….like living our lives without the loonies…How’s that sound…it’s a win-win…they get their little war…we get rid of them once and for all….personally I love this idea…
bill
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:41 am
I like it! A surrogate war! Hunger Games anyone?
mjh
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 3:07 pm
.I suggest that our government send some well outfitted military types to meet them at their place of choice…the legal military can represent us (the law abiding citizens) and they Nugent types can represent themselves..and they can have their little war…wouldn’t take too long for our men to eliminate them…
I’d go one better, Sue.
Since it’s the Revolutionary War that Teddy and his fellow nutcases want to recreate, it’s only appropriate that they be outfitted with the same weaponry — i.e., Charleville Muskets:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cha...
.
SinghX
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 7:19 pm
Great revenge fantasy!
Perhaps the concept could be sold as a pay-for-view reality show with “prize money” (if they live, that is)…Let’s see just how fast Nugent and his “militia” would sign on…
I say they wouldn’t think twice and would do it in a heart beat, especially if there was $$S involved. Maybe Mr “Shell’dun” Casino could put the money up for the fight, then bet against his revolutionary pals. Again, I believe “Shell’dun” wouldn’t think twice and would do it in a heart beat (I could juggle this all day)!
What a fantastic way to get rid of a bunch of rabid, sick puppies who want nothing more than to go down in blaze like John Wayne fantasy so they can become martyrs and fall on their own guns.
Reynardine
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:04 am
It strikes me they’re at least bordering on sedition and seditious conspiracy, and they have definitely crossed ober under 18USC§2385, Advocating Overthrow of Government. The NRA is also criminally liable under that section. If convicted, Mitch McConnell could not hold office; I believe the Senate could refuse to seat him now.
Reynardine
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:05 am
Over. Out of coffee.
Shiva(Moderator)
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:13 am
You didnt pour any in the android did you
Reynardine
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:46 am
Nope. That was way back four years ago, when I did it to my Nokia.
Mari
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 4:10 pm
I quite agree & then add to that the treasonous plotting done by Paul Ryan (who went on to campaign for V-POTUS), Eric Cantor, Newt Gingrich, etc, back on January 21, 2009, to plan the sabotage of the American economy just to try & bring down Obama.
trea·son
1.The crime of betraying one’s country, esp. by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
I’ve been so confounded by the lack of outrage to this. It just seems to me the republicans can enact the most criminal behavior & get away with it.
Just off the top of my head, Newt & his 84 unethical crimes (including stealing from a charity for his own personal political agenda) of which he received a slap on the wrist (we’d be in prison) & was allowed to stay in office & eventually run for POTUS.
Bush43 was convicted in absentia in Malaysia as a war criminal along with his administration & Tony Blair, yet Bush was not once investigated or tried in this country. Then again there’s Ryan, Cantor etc & their plotting against the economy that damn near brought this nation to its knees & now this GOP call for a revolution, which is blatant sedation in all its inglorious colors.
And yet look at how they treated Clinton when he was president, an oval office blowjob that received more critical attention that ended a very good presidency & tarnished a legacy than treasonous plotting against the United States govt received. Look at how the republicans are treating Hillary over Benghazi when Bush43 got away with his lies to this country about WMD so he could launch his Liar’s War, etc etc Git-Mo torture, etc. But is considered a war criminal in the rest of the world.
So, in spite of the fact that Nugent’s & McConnell’s public declarations to deliberately lead fanatics to a revolution against the United States government is blatant treason and sedation there is nothing to lean back on to make me believe anything will be done about it.
Like other GOP before them, they…
Mari
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 4:12 pm
… will get away with their crimes.
marc
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 9:39 pm
“Blatant sedation” puts me to sleep. Blatant s
edition, on the other hand, makes me angry.
Mari
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 10:53 pm
Ooops, you’re right… that slipped right by me… must have been sedated. *grins*
Grasshopper
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:17 am
I don’t think tough guy Ted was acting when he shit and crapped his pants at the draft board which may account for his constant foul odor. He was never really potty trained properly. That would account for all the newspapers on his floors and the cases of baby wipes and powder. Bring it teddy boy, you’ll have a lot of fun in prison, bitch.
PSzymeczek
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:25 am
The case of baby wipes may be for his “wife” – you know, the underage girl whose parents he paid to sign custody over to him so he could commit statutory rape.
Randall Lehmann
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:19 am
D. W. Skinner
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:24 am
My dog lays steaming, corn-flecked, brown curls on the morning fresh, dewy lawn that have more intellectual brilliance and a greater embodiment of significance to society than Ted Nugent.
Mutti
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 1:59 pm
You feed your dog corn? *whap* goes the yardstick across your knuckles! Now drop and give me 10 Hail Mary’s!
K from Bellingham
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 12:43 pm
I dunno…from an evolutionary view, it may be better to cull this herd. The I.Q.average goes up instantly…
1voice1vote
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 12:54 pm
NBC Sports – CEO Jeffery Immelt – was a sponsor of this event. NB-effingC – OUR media sponsoring the likes of domestic terror inciter Ted Nugent. Outrageous.
djchefron(Moderator)
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 1:29 pm
As much as I like MSNBC prime time lineup I wonder with their strong stance on gun control will they call him out?I will be watching
mjh
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 2:53 pm
NBC Sports – CEO Jeffery Immelt – was a sponsor of this event. NB-effingC – OUR media sponsoring the likes of domestic terror inciter Ted Nugent. Outrageous.
That’s our “librul media” at work.
.
samantha
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 3:04 pm
To call our patriatism racial prejudice is all but the same. People are so worried that standing up against the president is being racist is all but racist themselves. The president is all but announced his racism to this country and his ability to destroy it from the inside out. He has given people power to spend our money and pocket billions of our money and what ever is left over who really do not need that power. The secratary of human services has that ability. Dont believe me Read ObamaCare. He has given people the power to kill amarican citizens if they do not comply or if they disagree with him on anything at all. He is aiding anti american muslim terriosts with billions of our dollars but we are the terrorist. Even the people who agree with him he sees this way. Hard to beleive that your president can do this to you even after you announced your faith and abundance to him. He is after all americans not just some. He is the racist. He is using the deaths of innocent children( not the others who were killed just the kids)same as hitler in his reign. This is racist. He is racist. His administration is racist. Stop being blind sided by him and his evil tactics to destroy us and this country and stand up for yourself and others. We are doing the same for you even though you call us racist. We are still fighting for your rights and freedoms from this evil cult in the government. He is not good for us or our country. Removing guns from law abiding citizens is going to result in more criminals having them and using them to commit more murders, rapes and other crimes. More and more law abiding citizens will be murdered, raped and other crimes commited against them. More and more people are going to come up missing because of this and the unconstitutional evil dictatorship of obama and his administration.This is only a start of things to come if people don’t wake up, paying attention and fighting back for us to keep our country and our constitutional rights.
djchefron(Moderator)
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 3:39 pm
At first I deleted this drivel but I want to give you a chance.I find it hard to believe you read the affordable care act but I will give you the benefit of the doubt after re-reading this eloquent dissertation.BTW your use of the word evil was just words cant describe it on how many times it came up.Now being fair I want to ask you a question or two and in your own words please answer them because I am on pins and needles waiting for them
1.Who is the us that is fighting the evil dictatorship?
2.What do you mean by taking our country back?
3.Who do you define as our?
In the event you dont answer well……
fedded-up
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 7:29 pm
Good gawd, WTH is this? Pure paranoid illiterate drivel. I strongly recommend a thorough evaluation and treatment with Zyprexa or perhaps Zoloft. However, I am quite sure you would refuse it due to a ‘medication that starts with ‘Z” conspiracy….
mjh
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 4:26 pm
TL/DR
.
Shiva(Moderator)
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 4:41 pm
Wow, the insanity is strong with this one. She repeated every single talking point you can imagine.
Well done Sam.
BTW, what are you going to be doing in 4 years when everyone still has their guns? I know the answer, you will just move on to the next conspiracy
I bet the people who tell you what to say just love how easy you are
Nita
Feb. 1st, 2013 at 12:25 am
Samantha well represents the uneducated masses that believe everything they read or hear as long as a Republican said it. They don’t have a mind to think for themselves and are too young to really know who Hitler was and what he did, nor do they educate themselves about it. They are revisionists who vote against their own best interests and blame everyone else for their own short comings.
KellySpeaks
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 9:22 pm
SinghX
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 12:17 am
…”He has given people power to spend our money and pocket billions of our money and what ever is left over who really do not need that power.”
OK…so, you wanna’ tell me what this means “Samantha”?
Let me break down what I want you to answer. Or, are you afraid to tell us something, maybe name name’s give real dollar amount, etc., because were not, you know, BFF’s? If you are truly a patriot, don’t you think it is your duty to provide us with information, all the information you have on this hot topic?
Please answer the following and provide the source of your information:
1.Obama has give “who” what power to spend “what” money?
2.Who is the “Who” that is pocketing billions?
3. What the “what ever left over”; can you say how much you know about this left over stuff?
4. And “who” is the “who” in “who really do not need that power?”
As I said, if you were truly concerned for us as fellow Americans, you would comply by doing us the honor of providing information and answering out questions…unless of course you are afraid of us…
Mutti
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 2:02 pm
Unlike Sam, the book “Assassin’s Gate” by Packer does name names–the names of the people who really ARE behind the Iraq war. Who facilitated the loss of our money to the contractors, etc.
Ed Belanger
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 5:26 pm
Hey Samantha, so YOU think your BOY Nugent is a fucking PATRIOT? That fucking candy-assed COWARD who pissed and shit himself to avoid having to go and stand NEXT to REAL Patriots who actually ANSWERED the call of their country? He has NO legitimate right to call himself an American, let alone a Patriot. A Patriot is NOT some asshole who runs around shouting “My guns, My guns!” or wearing a red white and blue satin shirt or a fancy cowboy hat and carrying a freaking guitar! That chicken needs to get his ass back on stage and sing his freaking songs like the momma’s boy that he truly is. He can’t hold a candle against ANY of us who answered the call of duty and SHOWED up in Nam and followed our orders and stood our ground when the shit hit the fan. And if you think your so-called AR-15 armed “Patriots” can withstand just ONE battalion of modern Cavalry then go ahead and bring it on, we DARE you. Hell we DOUBLE dare you. Hell we’ll even set your AR-15′s up to full automatic FOR you, just bring it on you traitorous cowards. You turds are so set on rigging the NEXT election with your gerrymandering and changing the rules to suit YOU so that you don;’t HAVE to pay any attention to the wants of the MAJORITY of Americans. IF you want to WIN so damn bad then perhaps you need to re-think what it is that you stand for, because OBVIOUSLY it ISN’T the Constitution. If it WERE then you would recognize that you LOST a FAIR election to the BETTER Candidate. YOU just can’t stand the idea that the BETTER candidate was BLACK, that the BETTER candidate was from Illinois, that the BETTER candidate had MORE to offer than the spoiled little RICH boy and his narrow-minded bigotry had to offer. REAL Patriots accept defeat with grace and honor, YOU folks have NO honor whatsoever and you are following a bunch of Cowardly traitors who not ONLY refuse to serve the Nation in a time of WAR but also refuse to abide BY the supreme law of the land which insists upon equal rights for…
djchefron(Moderator)
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Ed I applaud your passion.I agree with everything you said times ten.This is where it gets tricky.I have known to use a colorful phrase or three and I am trying to express myself in other ways as not to offend the more sensitive among us.Keep your passion say it loud just try to tone down the colorful expressions just a little bit.Thank you and keep knocking some sense in them.
galactusX
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 3:18 pm
Who are these repukes going to shoot first? Should we shoot anyone with a Romney Sticker or NRA sticker first to get the drop on em’? These idiots deserve to be shot and their guns taken from their WARM dead hands.
Tap Duncan
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 3:48 pm
It’s always the people who never served, who are so ready to start a war. Nugent and his ilk are cowards of the first order, Nugent even admitted it in his book, but our MSM won’t ever mention that whenever they mention his name, they should, every time. I also noticed that rw posters seem to go off the charts on a DSM IV…
S'toon
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 5:13 pm
US Constitution Article 3 Section 3:
Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art...
fedded-up
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 7:36 pm
Seriously? Stuff like this doesn’t bother me much. Why? It’s called ‘desperation,’ and usually works about as well as any other desperate move to ward off the inevitable. They’ve been playing with these ‘big boy’ guns for quite some time now and have steadfastly refused to recognize that the widespread dissemination of these killing machines (which is ALL that these military weapons and jumbo clips are good for – the killing of human beings) have literally signed the death warrants for thousands of people. It is time and past time to stop this insanity, and they’re finally getting it – they are being shown up as the fools they are.
SinghX
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 12:37 am
Agreed. All well and good, but, if you were in the AG’s office what would you do with them?
They are inciting “fire in a theater” so to speak and are making “death threats” (as Nugent has in the past). So if you let these fools alone, it emboldens them to break the law. It sends a message to everyone else that the bad guys can walk into town with guns and push people around like it’s the 1800′s (the Sheriff looks weak).
If the FBI, Homeland Security, ATF all starts rounding up these “outlaws”, then the prediction of Limbaugh and the rest of the ilk becomes self-fulfilling. It’s been obvious all along that their motives have been per-meditated–poke, provoke, push the line harder and harder until arrest or martyrs are made (dictator-regime arrest people for exerting their 1st and 2nd Amendment rights).
The stench of desperation is growing ripe, more and more, as the days go by; soon, the rot will set in.
fedded-up
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 8:58 am
What would I do in the AG office? Hmmmm, probably exactly what the current one is doing, at least that we know about. My guess is that these loudmouth buffoons are being informed that a watch is being kept. If the riot happens? Look out below. In the meantime? Watch and wait to see if they’re really as stupid as they’re pretending to be.
When was the last time you saw any big-name loudmouth arrested for “incitement”? Doesn’t happen. (1) Gives unwarranted recognition of loudmouth as a ‘threat’; (2) Crystallizes ‘general malcontents’ to concrete action; (3) Encourages others to do the same; (4) Puts the stomper down on legitimate voices of protest. All of the above otherwise known as unconstitutional violation of the freedom of speech and, even worse, “unAmerican.”
KellySpeaks
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 8:36 pm
djchefron(Moderator)
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 8:49 pm
Thats a good one .Gun Hobbyist.I swear ,do frank luntz have a online course for double speak?LOL
inez
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 8:50 pm
There is a law against yelling “fire” in a crowded theater
when there
is no fire.
What is the legal penalty for
inciting a revolution?There are gun owners who have mental problems just waiting for a “trigger happy” leader.?????????????
KellySpeaks
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 9:24 pm
Mari
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 8:07 pm
There are also laws against inciting riots, hate speech, violence and the like, of which Nugent and McConnell are also guilty of in some capacity, besides being guilty of sedition.
Here’s a very good article that investigates inciting violence vs freedom of speech, using politicians and public figures as examples…
blog.ctnews.com/meehan/20...
If the link doesn’t take just google: “Inciting Violence and the First Amendment”
majii
Jan. 23rd, 2013 at 11:44 pm
Mitch McConnell has become Target #1 of the Tea Party groups in KY. They have come together for the express purpose of ridding the Senate of McConnell. You know a member of Congress is essentially useless when TPers say he’s done nothing for their state:
“Cathy Flaig, former president of the Northern Kentucky Tea Party, which covers Boone, Kenton, Campbell and Grant counties, said Tuesday her group “willingly signed” the news released issued by the United Kentucky Tea Party.”
“Truth be told, most Tea Party members I know in Kentucky are polite to Sen. McConnell but not enthusiastic at all about him,” said Flaig. “My question is, what has he done for Kentucky?”
“An issue of strong interest in Northern Kentucky, she said, is the building of a new bridge across the Ohio River that will require tolls.”
“The federal government can build a bridge in Afghanistan in eight months without tolls. Why not in Northern Kentucky?” she said. “He’s Senate minority leader. It seems like he could do something to help Kentucky.”
“Flaig said she does not know whether the Tea Party will find a candidate next year to run against McConnell.”
“I just know he’s not as well liked as he thinks he is,” she said.
Read more here: www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/...
I guess they’ve forgotten when PBO held an event in, iirc, 2010, in KY near the bridge that collapsed that McConnell refused to so anything about. While they’re trying to rid themselves of McConnell, I hope they’ll focus on Rand Paul, too. He’s dead weight in the Senate. I have been so happy to see RP getting hit today for his display of extreme idiocy in the Benghazi hearing with SoS Clinton. He and his supporters think he should be POTUS, but my prediction is that if he would win the GOP primary in 2016, he’d end up in the same place as Romney. The guy’s nutty as a fruitcake!
fedded-up
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 9:03 am
LOL!! Oh, I so love this. We should ask those lovely TP psychopaths WHY they believe themselves so deserving of a “free” bridge. Wouldn’t that make it a ‘welfare bridge’?!!?! Can you say ‘hypocrite,’ KY TPers?!?!
Ex-Dominionist
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 10:08 am
Poor Ted. If he doesn’t Put Up soon, he’s gonna have to Shut Up.
jason
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 11:22 am
the word you were probably looking for in your article was a “civil war.” not a revolution..
richard
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 11:22 am
do what washington did during the whiskey rebellion, take the army and squash it the point of the Militia is not to over throw the goverment but to promote domestic tranquilty and defend the goverment thats why we have the rite to bea arms not the other way around
Shiva(Moderator)
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 12:07 pm
Fortunately for many years now we have had the National Guard for that. No one is disputing your right to bear arms. It’s just that the Supreme Court has given the government the right to regulate assault style weapons.
A militia is completely unnecessary and uncalled for. It is usually uncontrolled as well
Rachel Payne
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 11:28 am
Well Ted admits that he’s a mental case and it’s on record. Wasn’t the GOP who said that people with Mental problems should not be allowed a gun. hmmmmmm
Shiva(Moderator)
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 12:05 pm
Big amen from this keyboard
Bonnie Lill
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Is there any way we can demand the Mitch McConnell undergo psychiatric evaluation since he is a political leader? He sounds like he may be on the verge of suffering psychotic break with reality! I feel like my safety is threatened by having this man in office…. ;)
Wonko The Sane
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 1:41 pm
First, Ted and friends need to go ahead and be given what they want. When Abrams tanks, apache helicopters and actual soldiers show up at his house, we can all laught at how quickly he craps himself and gives up.
Two, however, I really think we are soon going to see a real attempt by the right to take over our government in the name of “freedom”. Look at their websites and their rhetoric…it’s the same as Franco’s.
Mari
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 9:31 pm
Do you mind dropping some links to these right wing web sites? I’d love a look-see… just hope I can contain my anger when reading…
Reynardine
Jan. 30th, 2013 at 11:33 pm
You can go to a site called “Fundies Say the Darndest Things”, where they’ll compendize them for you. They’ll also give links to the original sites, which I seldom visit, because you don’t know what’s going to follow you home.
Reynardine
Jan. 30th, 2013 at 11:29 pm
I was thinking more like Pinochet. Same difference. But, yeah, it’s been on my mind too.
Dave
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 1:48 pm
Ted is trying to be revelant again. Metallica made him obsolete in 1983. Shut up old poser.
Terri Springer
Jan. 24th, 2013 at 4:09 pm
The DOJ might want to lay off, now deceased, 26 yr old Internet geniuses and address sedition. I know they won’t go after bankers but Ted is so obviously dangerous as well as nuts.
Personally, I’d put a drone on him 24/7.
David P. Turnbole
Jan. 25th, 2013 at 11:26 am
When you are a racist asshole you come up with shit like this. These morons didn’t want to secede from the Union when we had white presidents. The ONLY reason they want to secede is because they’re racists. Any one of them would like to use their 2nd amendment rights to own guns as a reason to have a civil war when the only reason they actually want one is to kill the black man in the White House. So, let me put this out there for any who wish to secede. Bring your guns and your balls because I fought for my country and will not give up one square inch of land to you assholes. I will be happy to take you out. Survival of the fittest boys and girls. Survival of the fittest.
Anne
Jan. 25th, 2013 at 9:06 pm
These 14-karat fools probably haven’t stopped to think about how they would be rebelling against a government with an arsenal of nuclear weapons that can blow up the world many times over. In addition, it’s painfully obvious that they are inordinately narcissistic and self-centered, to such a degree that they are insensitive to the daily carnage that comes from guns in the hands of dangerous and/or irresponsible people. They have nothing of value to offer to what should be serious, soul-searching discussions about how to balance gun ownership with the safety of us all.
Carla
Jan. 25th, 2013 at 9:32 pm
Whiners make threats, whiners leave, whiners can’t cope. These wimps don’t have the nerve or the maturity or the wits to be part of real rough-and-tumble democracy.
David Wasmer
Jan. 30th, 2013 at 10:08 pm
Count me among those who still have the courage to fight for FREEDOM!!!
The right of self defense is not a “Constitutional right.” The Constitution affirms that the right is a God given right, a natural right. The right precedes the Constitution and all governments. No government gave the people this right and no government can take it away. It is the birthright of every human being. It is an inalienable right that cannot be surrendered, transferred or stolen. The right of self defense is utterly beyond the reach of government.
James Madison was opposed to including the Bill of Rights in the Constitution because he felt they were unnecessary. The Constitution limits to federal government to its enumerated powers (We know how that worked out). Madison was also concerned that listing a few rights might lead some to believe that these were our only rights or worse that these rights were granted to us by the Constitution. Rights that are granted by the government are not rights; they are privileges and privileges can be revoked by that same government.
Our rights don’t come from government. The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is not to grant the people rights, but to restrict the government from infringing upon their rights. Any government that infringes on the right of self defense becomes illegitimate and should be resisted. If our government infringes on our right of self-defense, then it will be doing violence to God, to the Constitution and to the people. It will be our duty to resist.
Shiva(Moderator)
Jan. 30th, 2013 at 10:28 pm
Sorry but the natural law doesnt fly. The right to weapons is not godgiven, nor is god connected to natural law. You need to go back and study the thing you are trying to describe.
the god given part of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Not weapons. not self defense.
If you want to be a hippy in a commune go for it. The right to own weapons coming from a gods law or natural law is areal stretch. But I see you bought into it
By the way, we do live under laws. Sorry