Comments on: David Barton Says We’ve Got to Have the Same Guns the Government Has

By: mjh

mjh — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:40:22 +0000

“While I may not need a 50 cal or a Blackhawk I still do not feel comfortable thinking a rogue president might one day cede to the U.N. our protection and the blue helmets will come walking in.”

Well, Ken, don’t vote a rightwingnut republican into office, and you’ll have no worries . . .

What do you think? 0 0

By: SinghX

SinghX — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:22:46 +0000

That’s right, Harf…not only that, we were still coming out of the Depression and didn’t have a “modern army” as everything was in old, underfunded.

Try reading a little history, “Ken”, in terms of how Roosevelt had to go after “big business” Republicans to pitch in and help get the military on track. The “patriotic” big business republicans didn’t want THEIR government using THEIR private factories to rebuild anything! The Republicans were totally “F-U-I-got- mine-jack” patriots during that era…there were no “guns” behind any blades of grass because we didn’t have the infrastructure to make bullets, you moron!

Try reading history before you “shoot off” your mouth.

What do you think? 0 0

By: SinghX

SinghX — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:03:26 +0000

Ummm…

In the literal sense, it could be a rock that happens to fall off Red Mountain while he’s trying to convert Yaviapia or Apache. He’d probably thinks that is what “originally” happened via the “Founding Fathers” (I’m sure he would have the original documentation/biblical justification somewhere in his vast collection of Jefferson’s letters)…only this time, the end of his fairy tale history doesn’t quite end as he’s planned.

Or, it could be metaphorical…

Because “David” (or Bad Bart as I like to call him) has turned out to be one of America’s largest, one-eyed, myopic vision “Goliath” monsters, I believe it would be appropriate to use the “sling” containing the secular law.

The bigger they are, the harder they fall; I read that in the bible under Rock of Ages…

What do you think? 0 0

By: Hrafnkell Haraldsson

Hrafnkell Haraldsson — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:35:17 +0000

Ken, logistically, Japan could not have sustained an invasion of the mainland United States and they knew it. The bulk of their land forces were tied up in China, which further limited how far they could project their strength. They didn’t even bring troop ships to try to invade the Hawaiian islands. “Guns behind very blade of grass” didn’t enter into it.

What do you think? 0 0

By: Shiva (Moderator)

Shiva (Moderator) — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:18:16 +0000

Actually because they didnt have the troops to do it with and they were getting beat across too big of a line

Trust me, no matter what you wouldnt have a chance. None of us would

What do you think? 0 0