Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Ronald Reagan Won the Gulf War and Other Myths as Told by Dick Cheney
more from Jason Easley and Sarah Jones
Dick Cheney at the Reagan 100 Celebration
Frank Donatelli, the Reagan Ranch Board of Governors Chairman introduced Dick Cheney as someone who while in Congress, “Formed a good and coherent minority with Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, and Jack Kemp.” Donatelli gives Cheney credit for keeping America safe from terrorism, “Due to his policies and his determination, our country was not attacked again after 9-11.” Oh my God. But we were attacked on 9-11 under his watch. And we haven’t been attacked under Obama’s watch and yet they are the folks who are “strong” on defense. Okay, I need to adjust my orientation here.
Dick Cheney, who is sitting down for the entire speech after which he will take interview questions, is reading from his book like a grandfather reading to his family at Christmas. The juxtaposition with the Palin stump speech last night is striking. As much as I don’t like Cheney, I am struck by how intelligent he is compared to Sarah Palin. How composed and civil he seems. This frightens me.
Reflecting on President Reagan and what he meant to the country, Cheney talks about when he knew Reagan. Cheney discussed his presence at Ford and Reagan’s first meeting in 1974. Cheney was Chief of Staff to President Ford when Ford met Reagan on the way to a Republican fundraiser, in a prelude to 1976 nomination. Cheney saw enough of Governor Reagan to know he would give those in the White House a run.
Cheney discussed the tension among Republicans as Reagan geared up to challenge Ford, noting that he was on the other side, but he support the idea of adding Reagan to the GOP ticket in 1976, but it didn’t happen. He says it took the Carter presidency to really set the stage for a Reagan presidency – “by 1980 all of us were Reaganites.” These days at a distance of a generation pundits say things were more civil back then, but he doesn’t remember it that way.
Cheney says that the Reagan years were not a gentler time in politics. Reagan had a tough time with Congress with major policy differences re Iran Contra. (With good reason, when a presidential administration is breaking the law, with an illegal scheme to secretly fund the Contras, things should get a little rough. However, Iran Contra would end up looking tame compared to the George W. Bush years).Cheney’s rarely seen politics get any rougher than it did in that period. He says that civility the 1980′s are known for is not because Reagan’s opponents conducted themselves well but because a gentleman was in the White House.
Cheney fully engaged in the Reagan mythology that gives Reagan credit for singularly ending the Cold War. Cheney takes a shot at liberals for not supporting the Reagan military buildup. Cheney said that The Reagan military buildup achieved the victory in spite of the constant hectoring of the left – that military build up that assured our victory in the Cold War. Cheney expanded the Reagan myth by giving Ronald Reagan credit for the US victory in the Gulf War.
Cheney closes with an uplifting note, saying that thank you is a good place to start with Reagan, as he was an idealist. Reagan inspired affection that goes to only the truly good- kindness, decency marked his life. We should be thankful he came along when this nation and all the world needed him most.
Whew. That was a lot different than transcribing while live blogging Palin’s garbled speech. Cheney’s speech actually managed to discuss Reagan, which put it light years ahead of Palin’s speech in content, but his tone was also a marked difference from the screeching hate we have grown accustomed to.
Things have gotten so bad among the Right that Dick Cheney appeared civil and comforting tonight simply because he comported himself with proper decorum as the circumstances warranted and he honored the man he was supposed to honor instead of using this as an opportunity to spread more senseless hate poisoned red meat to his base.
Of course, the former vice president’s remarks were filled with full blown tributes to the Reagan mythology, but Cheney came off more as a grandpa waxing nostalgically to the kids about the good old days, and the way things used to be than a current politician angling for future political riches.
It could have been his frail health, but Dick Cheney looked and sounded like a retired politician. We all know that politicians are like boxers, in that no retirement is ever permanent, but if there was ever a politico who looked out of the game even for one night, it was Cheney.
When looked at through the context of even the brief history that Cheney discussed, it is easy to see why the right idolizes Reagan. The modern political era is littered with failed Republican presidents. Cheney himself worked for three of them, Ford, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush. Except for Ike, Reagan is the only popular Republican president of the last half century.
In contrast, despite having fewer presidents, Democrats have three personally popular current and former occupants of the White House, Kennedy, Clinton, and Obama. Reagan looks like an ever bigger giant because the pickings are so slim on the Republican side.
Dick Cheney could have shown us his partisan side, but unlike Palin, Cheney understood the legacy that he was honoring, so for one night, Dick “go f**k yourself” Cheney took a backseat, and what took it’s place was an old man who was reliving some of the rare glory days of Republican politics. The contrast between Palin and Cheney highlights the fact that these are indeed strange days.
Former vice president Dick Cheney kept up the bad blood between himself and former Sec. of State Colin Powel ...
Former VP Dick Cheney gave an interview to The Weekly Standard, in which he claimed that he publicly critic ...
The New York Times is reporting that the ol’ gang from the Bush administration is getting together for a reu ...
While campaigning for Virginia gubernatorial candidate, and Clinton insider, Terry McAuliffe, former Preside ...
On Meet the Press today, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich engaged in a little bit of Republican rev ...
novenator
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 1:11 am
I hear Reagan freed the slaves too!
Reynardine
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 7:01 am
He was old enough.
A concerned Texas music teacher
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 1:36 am
That was a good read.
la Zingaro
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 9:48 am
Its funny how retrospection seems to clarify. I was a mere child when Reagan was president, but I am a full blown adult politiphile now and in looking back it seems the majority of “historical” assessments on both sides of the aisle are based on popularity rather than accomplishments. I mean, yes Kennedy rallied for Civil Rights but gd it Carter is building houses all over the world with Habitat for Humanity. Clinton gave us deficit relief but he is known for charming his way out of a WH sex scandal. Reagan sold arms illegally to Iran Contras, implemented Trickle Down (aka Piss On Poor People) Economics, ended the Cold War (?) but started the War On Drugs (yeah, thanks asshole) but everyone agrees he was the “Great Communicator” who just HAPPENED to be a gd ACTOR.
What the hell people? This system is a joke and it is no better than the politics of High School where the “most popular” coincidentally are the “most qualified”. If anything, Palin and W prove this. Sadly, I’d take a great communicator over a dude I wanted to drink a beer with or a shrew I could share lip gloss with.
This does not bode well. I know its not new, but until we begin choosing leaders by their accomplishments, and not their personalities, our politics will be forever flawed.
BTW. People need to start giving Carter more credit. He has represented this country better than Kennedy (scruples), Nixon (don’t get me started) Ford (intelligence), Reagan (compassion, intelligence, willingness to help others), either Bush (too many ways), Clinton (scruples) ever did by sheer longevity, compassion and hard work. I am tired of him getting shat on because he wasn’t “popular”. If he did nothing but H4H, the world owes him great gratitude. And what about LBJ??? We love him here in Texas recognizing the horrific unenviable task he was forced to undertake, yet still was able to remain faithful to his family and country. So screw Reagan, he was an asshole who was out of his mind for 75% of his terms and ignorantly corrupt for 100%. Ok, I’m done now.
Nasty Liberal
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 9:55 am
In other news, Dubya has cancelled his trip to Geneva Switzerland; wonder why?
FixNews cites security concerns. Yeah. That’s one way of putting it.
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 10:01 am
Other sources put it as far too many in Switzerland want his ass arrested. Then they went on to explain how he would still enjoy diplomatic immunity for being a former celebrity. How you can kill over 100,000 people, 4000+ american soliders and over 1000 American contractors and still have immunity is a question whose answer is questionable
Nasty Liberal
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 10:26 am
The issues you cite are terrible Shiva, that’s true, but it’s only the torture issue making him subject to arrest and incarceration; security concerns, indeed!
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 10:34 am
Yes. Isnt it amazing that people can skip over mass murder and only cite torture? Hitler would have a field day
Shiva (Moderator)
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 10:22 am
Lets not forget that Cheney was in on every republican admin since Nixon. A person with his intelligence could be a problem or a blessing to his country. He turned out to be a problem for us. Cheney was a war hawk neo-conservative to whom lives were and are meaningless.
Cheney did exactly what Reagan would have done were he there honoring someone else. Being the consumerist politician Cheney easily outshone Palin who has no awareness of her surroundings or the people she is trying to squash. He didn’t even have to try. This is why any republican running for president in 2012 will have no problem demolishing her in debate.
losamigos
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 4:18 pm
After reading the article, I am still unclear as to how Reagan won the Gulf War. This was not specified, although I suppose the implication cited is the military buildup during the Cold War, which actually started as far back as the Truman years (late 40s).
I am also weary of the statements that “our country was not attacked again after 9-11″. This is selective history that has been repeatedly debunked. Of course 9/11 was the major case, which cannot be ignored, as evidence such as the Presidential Daily Briefings stated an attack was imminent, but then there is Anthrax (~Oct 2001), JDL plot and the Shoe Bomber (Dec 2001), El Al Los Angeles shootings (Jul 2002), DC sniper (Oct 2002), and the list goes on….
Rmuse
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 5:07 pm
There is nothing Dick Cheney can ever do to appear civil. It frightens me also. Good point about Reagan being their best and brightest. Now, Palin et al are posturing to see who emulates Reagan the most. How terrifying. Great Article!!
Joanne
Feb. 6th, 2011 at 5:40 pm
Such is life, even among the supposedly sane…