Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Elizabeth Warren Enters MA Senate Race and Immediately Leads Scott Brown
If Republicans weren’t nervous about Elizabeth Warren before, they are now. In her first poll as a candidate for the US Senate seat in Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren leads Scott Brown, 46%-44%.
The PPP poll found that Elizabeth Warren’s favorability rating has almost doubled since June. Warren has gone from 21% favorable to 40%, while her opponent Scott Brown has seen his favorability rating plummet in the state. Last December Brown had a 53%/29% favorable/unfavorable split. While the senator has only lost 9 points off of his favorability rating, in just nine months his unfavorable rating has steadily climbed from 29% to 45%.
What could turn this race into a perfect storm against Scott Brown is rapidly growing disapproval rating among Democrats, where his favorable/unfavorable has gone from 35%/41%% to 25%/65%. The twenty four percent increase in Democratic disapproval combined with the fact that Democrats in the state now have a candidate that they can get behind add up to a troublesome race for Scott Brown.
The good news for Brown is that more of the state’s voters think that he is about right ideologically (45%) than think he is too conservative (38%). More voters still consider Brown an independent voice (47%) than consider him a partisan voice of the GOP (41%), but there is one out of state factor beyond all others that may cost Brown his Senate seat in 2012.
Barack Obama won Massachusetts 58%-32% in 2008. The bad news for Sen. Brown is that Obama will be on the ballot again in 2012, and Obama voters don’t like Scott Brown. His disapproval rating with Obama voters is 62%. Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren’s favorability rating with voters who voted for Obama in 2008 is 55%. Fifty eight percent of Obama voters think Brown is too conservative, and 58% of them think he is a partisan voice for the national GOP.
In the potential 2012 head to head match up, Obama voters support Warren over Brown, 68%-20%.
If the state’s Obama voters show up at the polls in 2012, Elizabeth Warren is likely to defeat Scott Brown. Massachusetts may be one of the states where the national anti-incumbent mood works against the Republican Party. In the early going, this poll indicates that Democrats feel like they have a candidate that they can get behind. A bad national mood, and a popular challenger are sure signs of danger for any incumbent. It also doesn’t help Brown that this particular popular challenger happens to have been affiliated with the Obama administration, and while this could hurt a candidate in another state, it may end up helping Warren in 2012.
I also have a hunch that Scott Brown’s odds for reelection also hinge on who the Republican Party nominates. If Rick Perry is the nominee, Brown is going to struggle to win reelection. If Mitt Romney is the nominee, and he proves popular with the state’s Independents, this Senate race could be a dogfight on Election Night.
All in all, Elizabeth Warren is a formidable candidate who represents the Democratic Party’s best chance to pick up a Republican Senate seat in 2012. A combination of Obama voters showing up and a Rick Perry nomination is all that it may take to doom the former tea party golden boy, Scott Brown.
A new Public Policy Polling poll of Massachusetts has found that Elizabeth Warren has increased her le ...
A new WMUR poll of Massachusetts finds Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren holding a narrow lead over ...
A new UMass Amherst Poll released today found that Elizabeth Warren has opened up a four point lead on S ...
According to the latest PPP poll, Massachusetts voters who supported President Obama in 2008 have powere ...
Sen. Scott Brown's personal attacks are getting him nowhere against Elizabeth Warren, as the Democrat co ...
Fran Joy
Sep. 20th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
Elizabeth Warren is the voice of the people in every way. Scott Brown slid into the “lion of the senate’s” seat while the DEMs slept. It was a costly loss. No Republicans are working on behalf of the people. We have lost many voices in the senate, congress and Governor’s state houses since the 2010 midterm elections. We lost another valuable seat in NY with the replacement of Anthony Weiner by the GOP. We don’t seem to have many loud voices in government on the Democratic side. We need Elizabeth Warren’s voice who speaks totally for the people. Her actions speak for themselves and she is not afraid to battle the GOP. We need more people like Elizabeth Warren.
And we definitely have to support her election to take back the seat of the hardest working senator in history, Edward Kennedy. She deserves the honor.
J Marx
Sep. 27th, 2011 at 11:15 pm
Elizabeth Warren is the voice of the people in every way.
She isn’t the voice of this person. Maybe her Socialist talk plays in Massachusetts, but not here in the Midwest.
Perhaps you could answer a question for me, Fran Joy. If European Socialism is so great, how come they’re in worse shape than the United States? How many foreign banks have we bailed out without our knowledge?
Voice of the people my ass.
Sarah Jones
Sep. 27th, 2011 at 11:19 pm
You do not speak for the midwest, friend. Believe me. Try that talk in Madison.
Shiva (Moderator)
Sep. 28th, 2011 at 12:38 am
Socialist? LOL!
There are no socialist countrys in Europe.
galactus6x
Sep. 20th, 2011 at 3:50 pm
Elizabeth Warren would be a real champion of the people in a sea of corrupt clowns and weirdos. May God Speed!
Rudy Gonzales
Sep. 20th, 2011 at 9:19 pm
Now let’s get everyone to vote for her, because the right wing will mobilize every TEA party-er and GOP-er they can. They desperately want to keep this seat. Do not under estimate this fringe faction of the Republican party, they can and will be very aware of the prospects of Scott Brown’s re-election. The American economy was and should still be the main focus of this election. We all must remember “Compassionate Conservatism” never was and “Trickle down Economics” never trickled and the “Moral majority” wasn’t and isn’t on both sides of the aisle!
kim
Sep. 20th, 2011 at 10:19 pm
From your keyboard to her campaign to the voters — GOTV!
Anne
Sep. 21st, 2011 at 11:28 am
Brown won partly because his Democrat opponent, Martha Coakley, was a terrible candidate who got complacent and slept on what was at first a sizeable lead over Brown. She must have thought that because that seat was in Democratic hands for so long (Ed Kennedy, from 1962 through 2009), it would always remain that way. It looks like Warner will not repeat Coakley’s costly mistakes.