7 Responses to “MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann Celebrates Glenn Beck’s Latest Flop”

  1. [...] First Tweet: 1 hour ago politicususa Influential Jason Easley MSNBC's Keith #Olbermann Celebrates Glenn Beck’s Latest Flop http://www.politicususa.com/en/Olbermann-Beck-Flop #liberal #left #prog #p2 retweet [...]

    [Reply]

  2. Anonymous says:

    I believe Olbermann was using cherry picked data in his analysis. Specifically the evening of December 3, where Olbermann also points out that he was not on his show. Beckies like him, they do not like the Judge (who typically fills in for him). It is no wonder that this one night had a drop of 30% ratings. Or just maybe a large portion of his viewers were at the thousands of other theaters Olbermann didn’t cherry pick from.

    [Reply]

  3. Anonymous says:

    He’s right, if you count a 2000$ margin of error.

    [Reply]

  4. Anonymous says:

    Olbermann gave false stats but that’s ok you liberal hatemonger…. why let facts get in the way? In fact lets just randomly pull numbers from some unknown blog and let other bloggers rewrite the bad facts into new articals, pretty soon it might become true (thats what Olbermann is asking Santa for for Christmas… please let Glenn Beck have one bad day where he actually shows up, please Santa)

    [Reply]

  5. Anonymous says:

    Ummmm. Olbermann got most of his data on Glenn’s Xmas Sweater tour from a blogger. It actually did incredible well. The 9/12 project was a huge success and Beck is crushing Olbermann in terms of ratings. Whether you like him or not Beck is a huge success and Olbermann is not doing well comparatively.

    [Reply]

  6. Anonymous says:

    I think there is an easy way to establish “star power” or popularity today, it’s called “searches” I thought I’d share some data that shows that keith is only doing what libs do.. “project” his own failure onto others (Glenn Beck)

    Just the top 3

    glenn beck 2,240,000
    glenn beck radio 40,000
    glenn beck show 40,000
    ————————————–
    ———————————————9+ mill page results on google

    At first I thought that perhaps I had misspelled his name, clearly I’m not a fan. I realized that the spelling was in fact correct and that only error was in his remark on Glenn’s decline.

    Again, he was doing what all libs do “projecting”.
    ——————————————————–
    now for Keith
    ————
    keith olbermann 246,000
    olbermann keith 246,000
    keith olbermann book 590 ( that’s only Five Hundred and ninety)
    ———————————————— 636,000 pages results

    Keith is totally irrelevant, and amazingly enough, he knows it!!.
    sing along now keith lol

    Karl

    [Reply]

  7. Anonymous says:

    When you knowingly gather numbers to misrepresent attendance figures to illustrate a point you want to make you are a liar. Unless of course you want to admit you are an entertainment figure, with no connection to real news production.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply