Submitted by Hudmang (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 18:20.
Why is it that those in oil exploration refer to much more oil being located and possible to be drilled for than those opposed to this drilling are willing to admit would be added to our supply if the restrictions on drilling were lifted.
One field in US territory has been determined to contain more crude that all of Saudia Arabia's had from the start. This comes from an exploration group that works in both locations.
Could it be that increasing available oil supplies and lowering the cost of gas is not what they are interested in? I am sure that keeping this oil from the U.S. consumer advances their position at the expense of the U.S. consumer.
What I am not completely sure about is why they really want. Not conservation, not alternative energy but something else that looks like killing the U.S. economy for the sake of their POWER PLAY.
oil deposits
Why is it that those in oil exploration refer to much more oil being located and possible to be drilled for than those opposed to this drilling are willing to admit would be added to our supply if the restrictions on drilling were lifted.
One field in US territory has been determined to contain more crude that all of Saudia Arabia's had from the start. This comes from an exploration group that works in both locations.
Could it be that increasing available oil supplies and lowering the cost of gas is not what they are interested in? I am sure that keeping this oil from the U.S. consumer advances their position at the expense of the U.S. consumer.
What I am not completely sure about is why they really want. Not conservation, not alternative energy but something else that looks like killing the U.S. economy for the sake of their POWER PLAY.