Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Fox News Embraces Palin and the Tea Party and Loses 120,000 Viewers
By: Guest ContributorJun. 8th, 2010more from Guest Contributor
The Tea Party Express has Derailed Fox News's Ratings
The ratings troubles at Fox News continue to mount as along with the collapse of Glenn Beck, the networks entire prime time lineup is down in down in total viewers over the past year. FNC embraced the Tea Party and saw its ratings fall 6%, while MSNBC’s have grown by 3%. In other words, since Fox News embraced the Tea Party, they have lost over 120,000 daily viewers.
According to www.alternet.org/media/14… Lesle Savan the entire FNC prime time lineup has declined from their 2009 numbers. In May, “Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Greta Van Susteren have each hit their lowest point in a year or more with the key 25- to 54-year-old demo.” O’Reilly and Hannity had his lowest numbers in the demo since January of 2009, and Greta Van Sustern did her worst numbers since May of 2009.
O’Reilly went from averaging 1 million viewers in the demo in November 2009 to 693,000 in May. This is a trend that is mirrored all through the Fox News lineup. However, none of the programs have fallen as hard or fast as Glenn Beck. Beck’s numbers have collapsed from a high of 3.4 million total viewers to averaging 2 million, and on his bad days 1.7 million. In daytime viewers, Fox News is down 6%. In prime time, FNC is down by 7%. In contrast, MSNBC has seen its daytime viewers increase by 3%, and its prime time drop by 1%. CNN was still hemorrhaging viewers. They were off 16% during the day and 22% in prime time.
The sample size being used here is year to year or longer, so the comparison is based on how the network did during the same time frame the previous year. In terms of total viewers, Fox News has lost 120,000-140,000 sets of eyeballs, so the question becomes, what happened? Last summer at this time the right wing was whipped into a fever over health care reform. It is possible that after their defeat, many FNC viewers became dejected and abandoned the cause, but I don’t think this provides a complete explanation.
Another possibility is that Fox News is the network equivalent of the boy who cried wolf. They managed to boost their ratings with a campaign of Obama based fear, but as time goes on, and none of their dire predictions come true, it could be that some Fox News viewers are tuning out the drumbeat of fear. This is plausible, but since FNC’s audience is anti-Obama, not very likely. The best explanation is that when FNC mirrored the Republican Party and moved farther to the right, they alienated moderate and independent conservatives.
Essentially, the same dynamic that is shrinking the Republican Party is decreasing the potential audience for Fox News. The network has shifted from being a big tent home for conservatives to being one of the main sponsors of the Tea Party. They are so entrenched in the movement that they went as far as to appoint one of their employees, Sarah Palin, as the Tea Party leader. As Fox News has echoed the divisive angry language of Palin and the Tea Party, their more extremist tone turned off potential viewers.
The logic of using someone as polarizing and unpopular as Palin as bridge between the network and the Tea Partiers is dubious at best. It is as if no one ever thought that Palin could become the same kind of anchor around the necks of Fox News and the Tea Party that she was to John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008. This isn’t to say that Palin herself is strictly to blame. She isn’t, but she is the embodiment of what has gone wrong for both Fox News and the Tea Party.
The notion that Fox News could shift even further to the right, hire Sarah Palin, and engage in overt political advocacy, while still increasing ratings was a pipe dream akin to George W. Bush’s dream that he could make the economy flourish by both increasing spending and cutting taxes. Fox News embraced Palin and the far right only to see their reward be declining ratings. The execs at FNC guessed wrong on the future direction of the country, and now they are paying the price. The Fox News freight train is still strong, but is losing steam, because in politics, anger is a fuel that burns quickly, and has limited effectiveness.
H/T: Alternet
The cable news ratings for the third quarter of 2010 were released today, and Fox News is showing signs ...
The ratings for January 2011 have been released, and while Fox News continues to dominate, Glenn Beck’s ...
Glenn Beck has been in denial about his ratings slide for weeks now. First, he claimed that there is no ...
Since we last checked on the viewership totals for Glenn Beck’s Fox News show viewers have continued to ...
By losing 9% of their audience in 2011, Fox News' prime time lineup now averages fewer viewers than Jon ...
Sarah Jones
Jun. 8th, 2010 at 5:04 pm
JE, is it Christmas in June?
Great post. Joyful tidings. Etc.
Trey Hamburger
Jun. 8th, 2010 at 6:47 pm
Do you ever feel like someone is being watched by you?
Shiva (Moderator)
Jun. 9th, 2010 at 4:14 pm
@Trey Hamburger,
don’t you mean do you ever feel like someone is watching you?
Dana
Jun. 9th, 2010 at 2:23 am
So when is the bitter quitter going to stop stalking President Obama?
Anonymous
Jun. 9th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Dana, Which bitter quitter? LOL. They don’t call it the Party of “No!” for a reason.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jun. 9th, 2010 at 4:02 pm
I have a feeling that the mainstream, if I may use that term, Fox viewership are really not interested in the tea party or Sarah Palin.
there are a few things that might scare Fox. Suppose for instance that MSNBC went to normal viewership instead of premium. I think that MSNBC is viewership would go much higher and be at least the equal of Fox news. I’m not going to pay for digital TV just to get MSNBC so they really can’t have me as a viewer that they can count. I do however watch it on my computer from various sundry outlets.
But the bad side of that is that the head of MSNBC wants to be more like Fox. I’m hoping he changes his tune real soon. I enjoy the news much more on MSNBC than I do CNN. I think CNN is trying to shoot itself anyways by being far more neutral.
My idea of a news source is one that never touts its own name, has anonymous broadcasters, shows raw uncensored video footage of stories and never tells you how good they are as a network. And sticks to the news rather than what Rush is saying today.
db
Jun. 14th, 2010 at 12:34 pm
what is your source on this story ? you do cite sources, yeah ? seriously….this article is no good without an original source of this info. to point moronic teabaggers to….
Jason Easley
Jun. 14th, 2010 at 1:06 pm
@db, No original source? Really is that all you have? I suggest you Google Alternet Fox News ratings drop, then you can google Fox news ratings may 2010, then you can search this site for the dozens of ratings posts that I have done. This stuff is common knowledge.
Jason Easley
Jun. 14th, 2010 at 1:10 pm
@db, Didn’t mean to sound rude in my comment above. For you, I have added a link to the Alternet story at the bottom of the post, but the basic ratings data can be found anywhere, and I am the original source for the rest of the material.
db
Jun. 14th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
try telling teabaggers that ! for them, you need a known, credible news source to cite.
and WTF ?! asshole ! I’m on your side….. I just had it out w/a family member over your article… but they “won”, because you gave no sources… and what do you mean by “Common knowledge” ? I’m very well informed and can find nothing else on the ‘net to back up your story. you’d think a google search “foxnews losing viewers” would produce some results, if it were true…
the story has to be big and covered by the major news outlets for any teabagging mentality to take it seriously….
and if you weren’t out to be rude, you could’ve fooled me…you misunderstood me at first, and were very rude ! admit it…
I’D LOVE FOR THIS TO BE TRUE ! why isn’t Neilsen agreeing with you ?
where is this “anywhere” that the ratings data can be found ? point me to it, please…. sincerely…THX !
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2010 at 6:56 pm
Db you seem to be very much out of control for every well-informed person.
You will have to do some work, but you can try here:
tvbythenumbers . com
of course you’ll have to add the appropriate HTTP to the link
I also notice that you gave no data from Nielsen while you are complaining to Jason about him giving no data.
Thank you for your time
db
Jun. 14th, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Roman
Jul. 9th, 2010 at 5:59 pm
Jason Easley, your spin is laughable. Here’s the reality:
Among cable-news channels, Fox News was the clear favorite in the second quarter of 2010.
Fox News was the winner for the total day and for prime time. The ratings, however, revealed that all the cable news channels were down from the second quarter last year.
In prime time, Fox News averaged 1.9 million viewers. It had a bigger audience than MSNBC (758,000), CNN (594,000) and HLN (487,000) combined. Fox was down 10 percent from the second quarter last year while MSNBC was off 4 percent, CNN was off 31 percent and HLN was down 12 percent.
Fox News was among the most popular cable channels in the second quarter. It ranked third, behind USA and TNT, in total viewers in prime time.
Among cable news channels in prime time, Fox was the clear winner in the 25-to-54 age group, which is most important to news advertisers. Fox had 468,000 viewers in that age group and outpaced MSNBC (237,000), CNN (174,000) and HLN (158,000). But there was falloff from the second quarter. Fox News had the smallest (down 9 percent); CNN had the greatest (down 28 percent).
Fox News also had the 13 most popular programs in cable news for the first half 2010.
The top five programs were “The O’Reilly Factor” (3.29 million total viewers), “Glenn Beck” (2.42 million), “Hannity” (2.36 million), ”Special Report With Bret Baier” (2.19 million) and “On the Record With Greta Van Susteren” (1.98 million).
Jason, you might be able to fool Kool Aid drinkers but that doesn’t mean that you are telling the truth. Better spin next time.
Hrafnkell
Jul. 9th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Ratings numbers aside, it is rather amusing to hear these charges of Kool Aid drinking from the camp that made Kool Aid drinking famous, or shall I say, infamous?
Shiva (Moderator)
Jul. 9th, 2010 at 6:54 pm
there is no doubt that Fox news is a clear winner in viewers. In any quarter you want to pick. However if you look at Glenn Beck right now he is averaging 1.9 million. On some Fridays he is lucky to get 1.5 million. His viewership has dropped considerably. In fact I believe he had a special Monday (5th)night in which he was lucky to get 1.5 million. in response to an article earlier on here I have been charting Becks ratings for the last four weeks and off the top of my head he has not went over two million more than once.
O’Reilly’s ratings are still up there around the 3 million mark. Hannity’s ratings are still up,Greta’s ratings seem to be holding steady, in fact on the seventh she beat Beck. Both Hannity and O’Reilly fluctuate wildly one day they may be at 1.6 the next day at 2.6 million. Last Wednesday O’Reilly was at 3 million
Sarah Jones
Jul. 9th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
I just want to know if Conservatives are so upset about “lame stream media”, how does that figure in the picture where Fox is the end all be all? It’s either one way or the other, no?
Also, too….Cable news in general has a VERY small segment of the viewing public. Cable is not the big money that network is.