Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Schism In The GOP Causes A 2012 Three Way Split
The Iowa Caucus votes have come and gone and there were really no surprises. Republicans are struggling with finding a suitable candidate and right now “none of the above” would garner a majority vote, but instead we saw a 3-way split. This split is actually representative of the fracture that exists within the GOP – Romney/Santorum/Paul.
Romney is palatable to moderates but he is Mormon and is so uncomfortable mingling outside of his 1% zone that it is painful to watch him; Santorum appeals to the “Evangelical” base – the Dominionists who are not mainstream Christians, but rather extremists who pine for a day when America is structured as a theocracy; and Paul is a magnet for an eclectic group that ranges from the uber-conservative political Christian on the far right to the fringe left who only hear what they want to hear and leave the most heinous information on the table.
The result was that there was no clear front runner and a sign of the ideological schism among conservatives in America today. The Republican Party has been infested with various factions including Theocrats, Secessionists, Libertarians, Plutocrats, and a host of others who make being a proud Republican virtually impossible for many in 2012. Some of the GOP 2012 candidates embody one or more of these characteristics and beliefs, but there is one thing they all know, and that is they must court the Dominionist voting bloc in order to win.
All politicians are adept at glossing over their resumes and putting on a show face that fits the audience, but this is more about religion than politics. Even though it is nearly impossible to listen to political pundits, conservative or liberal, without the conversation dominated by discussions of the candidates religious views and pandering, I find it perplexing that I am still met with accusations of exaggerating the religious influence in American politics today. It could not be more overt.
Here is a brief reaction on Iowa from my co-researcher, Alex Bird to the rise of Santorum which many saw as a big surprise:
“As it is, part of the reason for coalescence around Santorum is simple–he, Gingrich, and Ron Paul are the only three candidates left in the GOP primaries seen as both “Dominionist friendly” and electable”.
They all have serious liabilities, but so far we are more familiar with Newt Gingrich’s issues that were broadcast in a multi-million dollar ad campaign in Iowa for all to see - (courtesy of Romney). As for Ron Paul, the deeper we wade into his world the more alarming the concerns and he could be seriously compromised in a general election unearthing of these facts. Paul jumped out in 2008 but there is speculation that he may launch a 3rd Party bid this time. If that happens we will see more information surface such as his associations and extensive linkage to neo-Conservative and racialist groups (see photo posing with the fellow who owns Stormfront.org) to the point he’s starting to earn the nickname “Klandicate”.
Paul is skillful at keeping the dialogue going about anti-War and legalizing drugs which is effective in distracting his audience and ingratiating a different group who are not political Christians. These diversions make it hard for most to recognize that his disdain for government has little to do with liberty and freedoms and far more to do with eliminating regulation that will allow for a fertile ground of religious Corporatocracy. He is simply seen as a bumbling country doctor who wants liberty for all and that is what makes this little 76 year-old con-artist so dangerous…people are actually buying into it.
Alex goes on to explain about the hidden side of Santorum:
“Basically Santorum is the only one left that hasn’t had his Dominionist cred seriously challenged even though he is an ultramontane Catholic, one of those who is actually a known Opus Dei member at that…
The major intersections of where the ultramontanes and the Dominionists/New Apostolic Reformationists (NAR) meet up are in two areas – general religio-nationalism or theocracy and especially anti-family-planning activism. (In fact, anti-abortion and anti-family-planning protests have been an area where NARasites have infiltrated Catholic churches.)
The best example I know of with that particular intersection is with the Duggar family (who are pretty much the public face of Quiverfull and particularly Bill Gothard’s Bible-based cult within that movement) explicitly endorsing Santorum–because both ultramontane Catholicism and Quiverfull Dominionism call for the establishment of a theocracy as well as activism against all known forms of family planning (even the rhythm method and other forms of “natural family planning”) in favor of having as many kids as possible to essentially “breed the heathens out”.
The really interesting thing on that is the Duggar family are apparently “independent fundamentalist Baptists”, (who according to some reports have incorporated their particular cell-church into a legal nonprofit using the “church loophole”), whilst Santorum is an ultramontane Catholic–these are groups that would normally be at each other’s throats like few other orgs, but in the name of theocracy and the War Against Family Planning they pretty much set their differences aside. With heavy use of “cell churches”–NARasites and groups heavy into Quiverfull–figure they’ll end up infiltrating the ultramontanes, while the ultramontanes figure they’ll eventually convert the Protestant heretics; seeing as NARasitic groups explicitly targeting Roman Catholic churches for steeplejack DO tend to do false conversions to Catholicism (for purposes of infiltration and steeplejack) they tend to think they have the upper hand in this).
That said–ultramontane Catholicism in the United States is intimately linked with Dominionist groups across the country, and not just in the anti-family-planning side of things”.
So as you might imagine, this is just the tip of a lengthier discussion about Rick Santorum and Ron Paul and their extreme religious nationalism world view. They truly believe that if you are not the right kind of believer then you essentially have no say and that it is their job to impose biblical guidelines and morals for us as they know what is best after all.
There was an informative article written today at AlterNet on “Rick Santorum’s 10 Most Outrageous Campaign Statements” by Igor Volsky. Read this and really consider that Santorum isn’t just a blunderer, he devoutly believes. I will keep writing about these candidates as the field narrows and this election year builds steam, but let’s not take our eyes off the ball because they will simply re-emerge in 2014 and 2016 and …
Here is an excerpt from an article on Theocracy Watch.org from the Bush era discussing elected Dominionists…including then-Senator Rick Santorum.
“Before the midterm elections of 2006, Dominionists controlled both houses of the U.S. Congress, the White House and four out of nine seats on the U.S. Supreme Court. They were one seat away from holding a solid majority on the Supreme Court. As of January 1, 2007, Dominionists will not control the leadership of either house of Congress, and the President will no longer be able to so easily appoint Dominionists to the federal courts.
Five of the Republican Senators who were unseated on November 7 received whopping scores of 100% from the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family Voter Scorecards. Those Senators are: Conrad Burns (R-MT), George Allen (R-VA), Rick Santorum (R-PA), James Talent (R-MO), and Mike DeWine (R-OH). Rick Santorum was the number three ranking Republican in the party. Santorum and Allen both had Presidential ambitions. (FRC and FOF are the most politically influential of Dominionist organizations.)
They are driven and persistent. Recognizing who they are now will serve us well in the future. Bill Moyers made this statement a couple of years back and it rings true today:
“It is true, people of faith have always tried to bring their interpretation of the Bible to bear on American laws and morals … it’s the American way, encouraged and protected by the First Amendment. But what is unique today is that the radical religious right has succeeded in taking over one of America’s great political parties. The country is not yet a theocracy but the Republican Party is, and they are driving American politics, using God as a a battering ram on almost every issue: crime and punishment, foreign policy, health care, taxation, energy, regulation, social services and so on.” - Bill Moyers, Journalist and television host.
It can be said that every politician has a motivating reason for running for office whether Democrat, Re ...
Over the course of one Iowa winter's night Mitt Romney went from the destined GOP to nominee to being th ...
It's not exactly breaking news to announce that Rick Santorum has made some ridiculous comments about ga ...
Look at the headline: this is increasingly the song sung by the proponents of theocracy in America. The ...
Apparently, Rick Santorum has decided that his "constituency of one" is insufficient for the highest office ...
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 4th, 2012 at 10:12 pm
I think its out of control.
I read today that three of the worst are meeting in Texas to pick a candidate they can support. The former leader of the Family Research Council and two others. Fischer is still holding out for Perry. I should have tweeted it so I could find it again. I am reading all kinds of stuff from the god people that is going on right now.
@RickSantorum is coming for your #birthcontrol www.salon.com/2012/01/04/...
Conservative Bible Project Cuts Out Liberal Passages – The Huffington Post www.huffingtonpost.com/mo...
#Santorum warns of “Eurabia,” issues call to “evangelize and eradicate” Muslims | Al Akhbar English english.al-akhbar.com/blo...
“As Kyle and Brian have reported, the Family Research Council is teaming up with “apostle” Cindy Jacobs’ Generals International in a major push to influence the 2012 elections. In Washington, DC, last night, the FRC, Jacobs and other “apostles” affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation launched “Fast Forward,” a year-long “prayer and action” campaign designed to influence the GOP caucuses and primaries as well as the November presidential election. The launch event, “A Gathering of Eagles,” was held at a Baptist church in northwest Washington. It featured plenty of prophecy and lots of rhetoric about the 2012 elections as war – a spiritual battleground against demons, marriage equality, and the Obama administration. ”
www.rightwingwatch.org/co...
Glad to see you here Leah, love reading your informative and extremely important articles
sovereign
Jan. 4th, 2012 at 10:43 pm
hmmmm, so attacking Ron Paul by saying he wants to make this a christian nation while he is bucking the republican system and trying to get government to stop killing muslims in useless wars, that’s what you have against the man? How come there are excerpts about santorum and not Paul? Just because he is religious you think his love for freedom is only a cover? Sounds like you yourself are discriminating against christians instead of seeing that Ron Paul’s voting record favors liberty above forced morality of religious institutions. And this is coming from an atheist too.
Shiva (Moderator)
Jan. 4th, 2012 at 10:54 pm
Please reread this. This is not about “Christians” but about Fundamentalists. They are far worse than christians. In fact to fundamentalists christians are not christians until they are reborn into the fundamentalist beliefs.
These are the people trying to take birth control away from women, and who support Santorum, Perry and Bachmann
Leah L Burton
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 2:20 am
It would be a twist for me to discriminate against something that I am…a mainstream Christian. Paul is a Dominionist…the distinction is remarkable. It is not about R Paul being religious, it is about extremism. I will be happy to provide excerpts about Paul…I have far too many to include in this post.
Deborah Montesano
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 12:32 am
I think that pursuit of the Dominionist vote is likely to lead to the extinction of the Republican Party, they are so far out in ‘right’ field. I also think it’s time for a replacement party to emerge. See “The Year of Irrelevancy”. thepoliticali.blogspot.co...
Leah L Burton
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 2:23 am
The Republican Party must re-invent itself or it will go the way of the Whig Party and many who pretend to be Republicans know that. Their goal is to see it fractured beyond repair and replace it with the Constitution Party…and that…is a very frightening proposition.
www.constitutionparty.com...
Floyd M. Orr
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 2:59 am
I am always glad to see your writing pop up, Leah, because your subject matter is so vital to the survival of us all. Let me try to sum up my feelings about Ron Paul. First of all, I do not think he has a prayer of being elected President, and for that matter, Santorum has only a little better chance than Paul. They are both extremist fruitcakes, Santorum with his ideas about birth control and other social issues, and Paul’s throw out the baby with the bathwater financial plans. Of course I love hearing Paul say we need to greatly reduce The War on Drugs, as well as all our foreign wars, and severely curtail foreign military spending in countries that have been peaceful for decades. The problem comes when I keep listening and hear him say he wants to dismantle the IRS and other major government entities and phase out the Federal Reserve. He may not be against all birth control like Santorum, but he is falling off the right wing pew with his attitude toward abortion, and this comes from a medical doctor! Fortunately for us all, I have little concern that any Texan is headed to The White House this year. Let’s hear it for Mittens and Flip-Flops because that’s who we are likely to get if the next Prez is a Republican.
niafs.blogspot.com/2011/0...
Leah L Burton
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 3:55 am
Oh…I hear all that you are saying…and you are spot on. I agree that Santorum is out of the running for 2012, but I caution us to sit back on our haunches because I truly see 2016 as the year that they have set in their sites. Great to hear from you Floyd!
Leah
KatzKids
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 8:50 am
Leah, have you done much/any research on the Mormons? They are in stealth mode, but are every bit as determined to take over the Country & the globe as much as the Dominionists.
Leah L Burton
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 6:32 pm
It is a sad fact that religious extremism exists in many forms. The Mormons are definitely well-funded and organized as we saw what they did in California on gay marriage…but there are too many political Christians in this country who will choose not to vote before supporting a Mormon candidate and government…at least for now.
KatzKids
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 11:59 pm
Yes, for now – the operative word. But the Dominionists started the same way & we didn’t pay enough attention then & look how far they’ve come. We need to start paying attention to the Mormons now, before they become the same problem. Just seeing how they’ve taken over Hawaii with every growing numbers, has caused me & many others great concern.
JavaEBoy
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 8:07 am
I guess when the Republican party has 3 people who garner the majority of votes it is a “Schism”, but when the Democrats did it in 2008 it wasn’t. The results of the 2008 Democratic Caucus were:
Barack Obama : 37.58%
John Edwards : 29.75%
Hillary Clinton : 29.47%
Granted Obama beat his closest enemy by nearly 8 percentage points, but it still shows that more than 60% wanted someone other than Obama. I am thinking that Obama’s percentage in the 2008 caucus, pretty much mirrors his current approval rating. Funny how things work out.
SinghX
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 9:35 am
No, your last paragraph is not true. The facts, the polls, the evidence says 67% of voters, to include independents/republicans are in favor of Obama in approval rating and voter choice, so far, in the 2012 election.
Funny how you have the stats backward, sort of like Newt telling his Christian Nation value votes that they are 80% of the population, the majority…as if, you wish, dream on Klingon…
SinghX
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 9:51 am
Actually, you’re not “guessing or granting” anything…is that you “Amish” trying to get in the back door without raising suspicion with your passive-aggressive attempts ah-gain?? Psht…nothing like a an obsessive-compulsive “Puritan” trying to push the current as if they are “guessing” or condescendingly “granting”…please…go over to Huf-Po where you get little stars and badges for your “guesses”.
Leah L Burton
Jan. 5th, 2012 at 6:27 pm
When you have 3 profoundly different platforms in the same Party – it is a schism.
Anne
Jan. 6th, 2012 at 12:14 am
I believe that the Republicans would like a candidate who would combine certain characteristics of all three of these RWNJ’s. They like Willard’s heartless devotion to corporations over people, Ron Paul’s anti-government sentiments although they find them a tad too extreme, and they like a lot of Santorum’s religious fanaticism and obsession with the sexuality of Americans. The racism that Santorum and Paul have openly expressed also resonates with a significant number of them, and so does the social Darwinism all believe in. The longer this goes on, and the more they attack one another, the worse the eventual nominee will look. In the case of all of them, Obama’s campaign should consist of using the eventual nominee’s own words against him. Each and every one of these three men has provided a treasure trove of material to use as ammunition against him.
A Walkaway
Jan. 6th, 2012 at 10:10 am
Let’s call “Social Darwinism” by a more appropriate name – Social Spencerism. Darwin rejected the misuse of evolution in society as an explanation or justification for racism and so on.
Spencer is the founder of the idea and he is the one who coined “Survival of the fittest”. His ideas were grabbed by the elites of the day to justify stratification and racism.
I just hope that the Democratic party DOES use the Republican candidates’ own words against them. Too often in the past, the party has “taken the high road” by not using valid information against an opponent and lost.