Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Herman Cain Makes Light of Sexual Harassment on Jimmy Kimmel
Herman Cain on Jimmy Kimmel Live
Nothing says good times like sexual harassment, right? Snort.
Herman Cain made sexual assault funny on Jimmy Kimmel Live! Also, isn’t it funny that some of these “women” go by the name “anonymous”, which clearly implies that they are not human and also, liars? Oh, he didn’t have to say that; it was implied in his Sarah Palin-esque expression of befuddled martyrdom and smug condescension. So funny, right?!
If you don’t get the joke, you too may be suffering from a failure to have a sense of humor, just like the women who apparently didn’t find it funny when Cain allegedly tried to push their head down to his genitals (really?).
“At least this one didn’t have the first name of anonymous,” Cain dead-panned to great hilarity. “The feelings that you have when you know that all of this is completely fabricated… you go from anger to disgust…there’s not an ounce of truth in all of these allegations.”
Watch here if you dare:
I don’t think we can blame Herman for being happy that the latest woman has a name other than Anonymous, as I imagine he had a hard enough (pardon the pun) time remembering all of the their names at the time, let alone years later, and imagine the confusion when they are going by the same “name”. Isn’t that cute? Hey, anonymous, there’s zero tradition of allowing sources and whistle blowers to be anonymous, so you are obviously worthless scum! Where does the Republican Party find these erudite charmers?
Still, we have to believe Herman is sincere when he urges us to take his word against these media attacks, which are obviously fabricated, since he points out the lack of journalistic integrity in using anonymous sources (Deep Throat) while not offering a shred of evidence save his own word to prove his own innocence against multiple charges from different women of sexual harassment (his word = gold, everyone else’s word = crap. Get on the bus!)
Cain went on to take visceral pleasure in how his martyrdom (aka: a Republican being held accountable) has led to him raising tons of money, and he and Jimmy got a huge laugh out of the idea that other candidates would hire women to charge them with sexual harassment if they were smart. Oh, snap! What’s a little sexual assault if you can’t make a joke about how it’s helping you raise money?
How to raise money as a Republican (be accused of doing horrible things):
You think that’s disrespectful? He’d be doing the same thing if it were his daughter some loser had groped because nothing gives men more hilarity than thinking of their daughters and wives being treated like a piece of meat by some clown and watching him laugh it up at her expense on late night TV. Snort. Anonymous! As if.
We all know Jesus was accused multiple times of waving a fish around and sneering, “You want to eat?” as he pushed a woman’s head toward his genitals. Seriously. Why you mad?
Asked about his smoking ad, Cain explained, “We have a saying in my campaign – let Herman be Herman!” Ah, that does explain everything. Let Herman be Herman no matter who gets hurt, you killjoy.
In fact, we should elect Cain as President because let’s face it, things have been way too serious over the last few years. What this country really needs is a person who can take the notion of sexual assault on to late night TV and really give the country something to snicker about. We lost Anthony Weiner, perhaps due to his failure to find the humor in his misdeeds. Must we lose Herman to the Gropenator legend that ended so badly when we discovered that multiple accusations of sexual harassment and assault really did say something about his character that perhaps ought to have been heeded?
Still, imagine the good times when Cain is in the White House and the baby from the maid comes out. Snort! We’re talking pure American exceptionalism here. And if you don’t think that’s funny, then it’s obviously a moral failing on your part and proof that Cain really is Jesus.
Boiling frogs:
Also, for all you naysayers out there, the Right has discovered dirt on the woman who came forward yesterday and while some may say that since it does nothing to disprove her allegations as it’s nothing more than a desperate ad hominem, we have to concede that if they smear one person, all four allegations are automatically false and Cain is innocent. See? Who said Republicans can’t do math or logic. Snort.
Things are a lot easier when y’all just roll with it and stop asking so many questions. 9-9-9!
I hope this late night TV joke fest answered all your questions about the character of the man running for President. You have to give him props, he has learned well from Sarah, Michele, and Ricky. He knows how to play the base, use the press asking him questions as a way to raise money and play the martyr. My only beef with the guy is that in the last clip, he used the boiling frog metaphor, an anecdote I have been assured is not exactly 100% accurate; in fact, a Doctor of Zoology declared, “The legend is entirely incorrect!”
The boiling frogs legend seems a perfect metaphor for Mr Cain’s persecution complex; only possibly accurate under extremely specific conditions that do not usually occur.
Herman Cain now believes that all women who have made accusations against him are being paid off as part ...
Notice to Herman Cain: Gloria Allred is in the house. Less than two weeks after we were assured that ...
Sarah Palin recently turned up on Fox News and attempted to coach Herman Cain on how to play victim and ...
On his Fox News show, Mike Huckabee attempted to defend Herman Cain by comparing sexual harassment to or ...
Death panels have been replaced by 9-9-9 as Herman Cain will be taking over Sarah Palin's role as the vo ...
Carrie
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:20 am
Such disrespect for women! F you Herm!
Ole Ole Olson
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:35 am
“You want your job, don’t you?” is going to stick to this man for the rest of his political career. It is precisely the type of thing that will happen all over the place if conservatives regain full power and further deregulate/defund regs.
Anne
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:37 am
I’m not surprised the GOP “found dirt” on this lady. They are a bunch of bottom feeders who have no respect for women, and they will try to discredit anyone who doesn’t go along with their okey doke. The anti-woman legislation they try to push clearly shows that disrespect. Regardless of whether Sharon Bialek is an angel, she and all other women have the right to be respected as fellow human beings and not like a piece of meat. After this, she should rethink her allegiance to the GOP.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:43 am
If the same dirt they have on this lady was attributed to Herman Cain, the same people would say that he just fell on hard times
Matt Dunham
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:40 am
An awesome example of the republican ideal!
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:46 am
most people understand that if you get a buyout of a years salary than your claims are not unsubstantiated. Most companies would investigate the claims and either tell the woman we find no problem, or yes there is a problem and to compensate you we will buy you out. The more you proclaim your innocence Herman the more obvious it is that you are guilty. You are in a position of importance and you have to come out with the truth.
Why don’t you offer to take a polygraph test? That should tell us if you’re innocent.
neil
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 11:02 am
I’d like to know why the people in the audience are appaulding this dickweed It’s very obvious that the strategy here is to deny and and accuse the accuser.Ain’t gonna work there,Herbie.You are a very transparent little bagger.Your 15 minutes are up.
Rudy Gonzales
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 11:46 am
Now another fifth woman has come forward proving Herman Cain was and is a womanizer! It doesn’t disqualify him from the presidency, but it give us a better look at where his real desires are. To disparage these women is their first tactic, to address this infidelity issue trends towards the Newt Gingerich ideology!
dem9586792844592
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 12:02 pm
I’d like to urge some caution here, people.
Cain’s case is not so dissimilar to Clinton’s. Back then, we insisted on cutting Clinton some slack, and were furious that the conservatives dwelt on the topic at such extraordinary length.
Do we repudiate Clinton now? Our charges of hypocrisy against the Republicans will ring hollow if we behave like hypocrites ourselves.
Carrie
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Really? So he settled with two women while 3 others cane forward? I don’t think so. Monica l was adamant that she didn’t want to come forward and it wasn’t sexual harassment. It does make a difference.
Shiva (Moderator)
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Nonsense. The gop has been on Clinton since the day he got into office. Clinton is just a subject change for those who fail to see through Cain.
You be cautious. The rest of us will live in 2011
dem9586792844592
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
There was also Gennifer Flowers, and possibly others; I don’t claim to be an expert.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gen...
By the way, in the national polls, Romney is clearly the grater threat.
dem9586792844592
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 12:48 pm
Sorry, greater.
Sarah Jones
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 2:53 pm
For me, the issue is not about who is the front-runner, but rather the values of the party. We see them all defending this behavior and smearing the woman who came forward – that’s wrong. The issue for me is that sexual harassment is a work place issue – a women’s rights issue – that has routinely been treated as time to attack the woman instead of treating her like a human being with dignity. I’ve been consistent on this issue.
majii
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 1:31 pm
I know you’re wrong in your assertion because I didn’t cut Clinton ANY slack when his indiscretions were exposed. I thought he was wrong then, and I still think to this day that he was wrong. I’m one who thinks wrong is wrong, no matter who it is. Clinton was not accused of sexual harassment, but he was a serial adulterer. There’s a difference. One implies that there was an unwanted advance made on someone, the other implies the participant gave his/her consent to the action. None of these women are saying they welcomed Cain’s sexual advances, so it’s sexual harassment.
dem9586792844592
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 2:16 pm
Let me ask: Did you vote for Clinton anyway, as I did?
Let me be clear, I’m not endorsing Cain. In particular, I think his economic plan is nutty.
Anne
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 3:04 pm
I voted for Clinton, but that doesn’t alter the fact that his behavior was inexcusable. He was a married man who also knew that any indiscretion would provide ammunition for his political enemies. Although his affairs were consensual, he was dead wrong. I believe that GW’s “election” was partly a reaction to Clinton’s personal morals. His behavior was highly inappropriate, but was not sexual harassment.
Cain, on the other hand, has a reputation for subjecting women to unwanted, uninvited, and crude sexual advances. There are numerous reasons to reject his candidacy including his economic plan, his ignorance, and his lack of empathy for the less fortunate. But the revelations about his sexual misconduct should be the final nail in the coffin of his political ambitions.
crystalwolfakacaligrl
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 1:10 pm
I hope Gloria Aldred sues him!
Hey Herm! You mean you don’t want to give
Get a BJ from GloriaGloria Aldred a job?He is a PIG!
Anyone who vote GOP is Braindead!
Billybob
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 5:15 pm
Three unidentified women joined the ranks of those who insist they’ve never been sexually harassed by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney on Tuesday, despite claims by the candidate that he might have acted inappropriately towards them in the past.
“People might think of me as a stick in the mud, but I can be quite a jokester sometimes. No seriously, I really mean that,” Romney said in reaction. “It’s possible I might’ve said something that was misconstrued as sexual harassment in the past, we just haven’t found anyone to make that claim yet.”
The move is an unusual one for Romney. While a clean-cut image is typically seen as an asset, especially for someone trying to attract Republican primary voters, Romney has been trying to tarnish his image ever since rival Herman Cain became wracked by allegations of sexual harassment. So far, the allegations against Cain have had a contrarian effect by making it easier for the former pizza executive to raise funds.
Since then, the Romney campaign has tried unsuccessfully to find former colleagues or staffers to whom the former governor might have said something remotely offensive or off-color. The three women on Tuesday were only identified as having worked for Romney when he was governor and later on his campaign staff.
www.thechicagodope.com/20...
AKRNHSNC
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 5:19 pm
I’m watching the beginning of the press conference. Whoever told Cain to lead with his attorney sure as hell didn’t know what he was doing. We’re supposed to believe this guy?? How dare they complain about “anonymous” sources when they know damn well a settlement was signed that made sure they couldn’t speak about it?! Why did the NRA settle with women if their claims were unsubstantiated? Because if they didn’t settle, they were afraid these women would go to their attorney and settle it in a court of law. They opted for what would be a far less expensive settlement and this idiot knows it. His expensive attorney does nothing for him.
Cain is arrogant and pompous. The high polling he has been favored by has given him a false sense of security. Now he’s denying he even knows this woman?? Give it up, Herman, that can be proven to be false. We know how bad your memory is, we saw that on the first day these charges came to light as your story changed throughout the day. I wouldn’t believe a word out of this jerk’s mouth.
He’s full of shit, doing this for the American people? He’s doing this for himself and a sense of entitlement he feels because he’s done well in the polls for a little over a month.
So now it’s the Democratic party?? What happened to blaming Perry? And just where is your wife, Herman? She remains in hiding. Let her speak out now on her own.
Character? Integrity? He’s bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, he has no soul.
Conservative Heart
Nov. 8th, 2011 at 10:32 pm
Sexual harrassment…oh geez… another victim-less crime made into a big deal by women…
Let’s face it, sexual harrassment is always brought forward by women. And we all know how credible THAT gender is. These claims against Cain, God’s chosen candidate, is nothing more than REVERSE SEXISM.
That’s what it is–REVERSE SEXISM!!!!
Can’t even be a man anymore in this god forsaken Liberal world… can’t she take a joke? What’s wrong with grabbing her thigh with one hand and then, with the other, trying to force her head down into my lap? It’s all just an innocent joke…
REVERSE SEXISM!
Damn this BS…when do privileged white men get to act like privileged white men again?
KarenJ
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 12:24 am
Remember when the right wing nutjobs, especially Sarah Palin, got all uppity and incensed when President Obama went on Leno’s Tonight show and quipped that his average score of 129 in bowling “was like the Special Olympics or something.”
They about had a stroke over that, and ranted for weeks. You’d think he’d murdered Trig. Or sexually harassed Bristol, the secretly serially pregnant Palin daughter.
But when a GOP Presidential CANDIDATE actually does sexually harass not just one but at least FIVE women, it’s like “ho hum, yawn” in GOP circles.
robert chapman
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 7:05 am
Like the comedy show character George Costanza, Herman Cain believes a statement is true as long as the speaker believes it.
He clearly is a bufoon and the Cain sideshow will continue to provide low comic relief for the GOP nomination campaign.
Bondwooley
Nov. 9th, 2011 at 9:53 am
It’s time for Herman Cain to go back to his original career in stand up comedy. Scroll to about 1:35 to see him in action:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=X...