In 1966 I was working for the poverty program in Utah when Consuela begged one of our neighborhood workers for help. Her 16 year old daughter, herself the mother of a 2 year-old son, was a patient at the State Training Center in American Fork. The Center, a residential facility for mentally challenged youth, was located about 40 miles from the woman’s home and our neighborhood office.
For reasons I never completely understood and which were certainly not clear to Consuela, the daughter was being held against her and her mother’s will until her mother consented to her sterilization. Consuela, who spoke little English and lacked the resources to travel to American Fork was attempting to fight for her daughter long distance and losing the battle. I moved east while this was being litigated by a lawyer volunteer and stonewalled by the state so I never knew what happened, but I often thought about this as emblematic of the anti-women society in which I grew up.
Well my apologies to Utah. A few years ago John Railey, a Winston-Salem Journal reporter, unearthed the history of North Carolina’s Eugenics Board which ordered involuntary sterilization of over 7,600 citizens over a 40 plus year period. About half of the other states also followed this practice, many as late as the mid-1970s. Railey’s work resurfaced recently when the state legislature refused to compensate the 3,000 or so remaining victims of this practice, most living out virtually ruined lives.
Elaine Riddick Jessie’s story was typical of what Railey found. She was sterilized at age 14, shortly after the birth of her only child, the product of statutory rape. Another victim was Janice Black, 18 when she was sterilized because of developmental disabilities. Rita Thompson Swords, mother of two at 21, was unwed and poor, a combination that made her unfit for more children in the eyes of the Eugenics Board.
The stories are chilling on their own, but in light of the official Republican Platform, and statements and actions by Republican legislators on both the state and federal levels over the last 19 months every woman with a brain in her head should be terrified about the future of her own rights and those of her daughters and granddaughters.
Plenty has already been said about one aspect of these rights. We know that our access to both contraception and abortion are being eroded and women are increasingly facing a scenario of forced birth regardless of their economic or emotional situation, health consequences, or the manner in which they became pregnant. Paul Ryan recently called rape “just another method of conception.” This threat is clear, but the stories told by Jessie, Swords, and Black are instructive. I am beginning to wonder if forced birth is all we have to worry about.
Since we know it is possible we may soon be told we must give birth, how much of a stretch is it to imagine someone might tell us we can’t? The Eugenics Board once published glossy brochures that bragged, “North Carolina offers its citizens protection in the form of selective sterilization” and “The job of parenthood is too much to expect of feebleminded men and women.”
Swords and Jessie were deprived of their ability to be mothers because they were poor; Black for having developmental disabilities (a term that can cover everything from Autism Spectrum disorders, Cerebral Palsy, and hearing loss to intellectual disabilities and vision impairment). If these were reason enough for half of U.S. states to forcibly remove a person’s ability to reproduce, couldn’t the same be said about other perceived defects, like practicing an unsanctioned religion, getting a tattoo or being a liberal?
Even our actual as opposed to our potential parenthood could be up for grabs. A Wisconsin state senator introduced a bill in the last session to label the fact of single motherhood a contributing factor in child abuse and neglect. Three weeks ago Bryan Fisher of the American Family Association supported the concept of an underground railroad to abet the kidnapping of children from gay couples. Fisher is an odious nutcase, but he has lots of influence with other duly elected nutcases. It has been alleged that as a Mormon bishop Mitt Romney unsuccessfully pressured a young, pregnant, and unmarried member of his flock to surrender her child to the church.
Thirty-five states now require pre-abortion counseling, many mandating it be done in one of 4,000 crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs). In 2009 Kathryn Joyce wrote in The Nation that these CPCs are run by anti-abortion crusaders who have been accused of promoting “shotgun” adoptions. The centers are supported, under rules passed under the Bush administration, by an estimated $60 million in federal abstinence and marriage-promotion funds.
So, in a country less than half a century removed from legalized involuntary sterilization there are loud voices attacking contraceptive usage as wrong. We are supporting with our own tax dollars religious fanatics running thousands of CPCs which, in more than half of the states, form a gauntlet through which our access to Roe v Wade winds and where we may be pressured into becoming a baby factory for more deserving parents.
And Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan stand a good chance of controlling this cluster$%@!
You had better vote.
History Provides an Ominous Precedent for War on Women was written by Yellow Dog Yankee for PoliticusUSA.
From July 1972 until June 1973, I worked as a secretary for a doctors’ office. Just up the block was a large hospital. Like all U.S . hospitals in 1972, this hospital had a ward reserved for women who were suffering the effects of (illegal) septic abortions. One of my jobs was to move patient files from the “active” to the “deceased” area. Those were usually of women who had died at that hospital because abortions were illegal. Do you know that, before 20 January 1973, such septic abortion was the leading cause of death among women of childbearing age? After that date, that ward closed, and I never again had to move those files, but I will never forget it. I also will never forget a 13-year-old girl who came into that office in February 1973 for an abortion. It was finally legal, and her story went well, not like the story of my 13-year-old, 7th grade friend many years before, who had died in one of those abortion wards. If Roe is overturned, which it will be with the Republican ticket naming anti-choice justices to the Supreme Court, we will have those wards and those deaths again, absolutely no doubt. I have problems with Obama, but I know for a fact that he would never let his daughters die in one of those abortion wards. For that reason, if no other, I will vote for him.
What do you think? 00
Reynardine
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 8:36 pm
In fact, some time back I published an account given me by a co-worker of mine about a roommate she had during the time period you mentioned. She came home to find a trail of blood leading from where the roommate’s car was parked to the interior of the house, where she had fallen from fresh hemmorhaging. That was, in a way, fortunate: she was rushed to Jackson Memorial and treated before sepsis could set in. They saw a lot of that stuff at Jackson. Yet I have heard people say that any woman, or even girl, who has an abortion deserves to be punished with sepsis, sterility, even death. They’ll even say that if she dies of an ectopic pregnancy, “well, she shouldn’t have spread her legs”. Too many of the people who say this are women.
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 8:30 pm
“Ironically, while middle- class white America applauded a new-found freedom over reproductive rights during the 1960s and 1970s, many policy makers and physicians targeted Native women for involuntary birth control and sterilization. Estimates indicate that, from the early to mid-1960s up to 1976, between 3,400 and 70,000 Native Women— out of only 100,000 to 150,000 women of childbearing age— were coercively, forcibly, or unwittingly sterilized permanently by tubal ligation or hysterectomy. Native women seeking treatment in Indian Health Service (IHS) hospitals and with IHS- contracted physicians were allowed neither the basic right of informed consent prior to sterilization nor the right to refuse the operation. IHS also subjected mentally retarded Indian girls and women to a contraceptive known as DepoProvera before it received approval from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in 1992.”
(Citation from pgs 71-72)
From: Dr. Marie Ralstin-Lewis
2005 “The Continuing Struggle against Genocide: Indigenous Women’s Reproductive Rights”, Wicazo Sa Review pgs 71-95
“Native Americans accused the Indian Health Service of sterilizing at least 25 percent of Native American women who were between the ages of fifteen and forty-four during the 1970s. The allegations included: failure to provide women with necessary information regarding sterilization; use of coercion to get signatures on the consent forms; improper consent forms; and lack of an appropriate waiting period (at least seventy-two hours) between the signing of a consent form and the surgical procedure.”
(Citation from page 400)
From: Jane Lawrence
2000 “The Sterilization of Native American Women”, American Indian Quarterly, Vol 24 No3 pgs 400-419
The low number in the first quote is the admitted number of cases, and the higher number (nearly a quarter of our womenfolk) is an estimate by NA researchers.
(Quotes slightly edited to remove endnote numbers.)
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 8:34 pm
If you will note, both of those quotes referred to a period before it was legal for a lot of us to just exist. There are a lot more of us, but most (including my own family) were hiding and denying their identity until we gained freedom of religion and the right to exist in 1980 – roughly 4 years after I’d graduated from High School.
They have no respect for anyone except the rich, and this is another point where the Republican party resembles the Nazis.
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 8:36 pm
Correction: The low number in the first quote is the number of cases of involuntary sterilization admitted to by the US government.
What do you think? 00
Yellow Dog Yankee
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 9:57 pm
All three of you posting above have taught me things I did not know. I was horrified when I wrote the article – I am more so now.
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 10:48 pm
If you can get the articles, read them. It’s worse.
Something most people don’t know… the Eugenics movement did NOT start in Germany. It started right here in the good ole USA. They got it from AMERICANS.
What do you think? 00
Reynardine
Sep. 6th, 2012 at 11:02 pm
In fact, Edwin Black said as much, both in the book cited and in “IBM and the Holocaust”. Hitler found us inspiring.
A Native American friend of mine reported that some tribal women were sterilized by deliberately rough curetting after delivery, by the injection of a caustic “antiseptic” into the uterus at that time, or by both. Neither she nor I have any way of verifying that; she heard it by word of mouth.
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 7th, 2012 at 1:09 pm
I’ve heard similar. More often you’ll hear of women going in for something that will put them under (such as tonsils removed) and come out with a hysterectomy (or whatever) as well. The articles discuss things like that.
We studied the eugenics movement in our “Foundations” class, which covered the history of anthropological theory. “Papa Franz” Boas and others fought against it, and it was very popular for a big portion of the 20th century – still supported even after learning what that nutcase Hitler and his supporters did during WWII.
There are still supporters around today…
What do you think? 00
Ilene Flannery Wells
Sep. 7th, 2012 at 8:37 am
Given the hold the religious fundamentalists have over the federal and state governments in this country, forced births, not forced sterilizations are more likely. Girls and women will be forced to bring a pregnancy to term, no matter the “method of conception” or their “health” concerns, or their age, or whatever the reason…if the religious fundamentalists continue on their path, we will lose our rights to control our bodies. It is scary.
What do you think? 00
A Walkaway
Sep. 7th, 2012 at 1:03 pm
Depends on the race of the parents. They want more white and black children (if you listen to some of the rhetoric, they want more white children for political cannon fodder and black children for servants and slaves). Other minorities… they want dead or deported (for instance, some have called for sending all of the Jews to Israel… so they can be God’s cannon fodder).
What do you think? 00
Diane
Sep. 7th, 2012 at 9:33 am
Perhaps our slogan should be;
Women. Either your bodies belong to you or the government.
They will, along with the religious fanatics, decide if you can use birth control, which birth control and when you will die if pregnant with severe medical problems that threaten the pregnancy.
Vote in Nov.!
What do you think? 00
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
We will send a confirmation email after submitting.
13 Responses to History Provides an Ominous Precedent for War on Women