Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
House Republicans Congratulate Themselves On Killing a Million Jobs
By: RmuseMar. 2nd, 2013more from Rmuse
It is customary to give one’s good wishes, or praise, when something special or pleasant has happened to someone, or for a particular achievement they persevered and worked hard to accomplish. For eight long years, Bush Republicans ran up the deficit with two unfunded wars, an unfunded Medicare prescription plan, and then bailed out banks as the economy tanked, and witnessed their handiwork eviscerate millions upon millions of Americans’ jobs and had the temerity to run against Barack Obama promising more of the same economic malfeasance. Apparently, they wanted the nation to give them a hearty “job well done” and “please continue” taking the economic life out of the people in 2008. After President Obama bailed the country out of the Bush Republican economic disaster, they swept into power in the House and directly proceeded attempting to return to their old ways of killing jobs and retarding growth, and yesterday they finally accomplished their goal.
Doubtless, Republicans are congratulating themselves for allowing the dreaded sequester to take effect knowing full well that in the first year of a ten year plan, about a million Americans will lose their jobs, the economy will contract, and hundreds-of-thousands of children, seniors, and the poor will be kicked off safety nets, because that has been their goal for four years. However, Republicans cannot expect many Americans not in the upper 1% of income earners to congratulate them for finally imposing their precious Draconian austerity on America, and with little options to avoid the certain economic hardship most American families are going to feel, it safe to say Republicans will be cursed from one end of the nation to the other and they deserve much worse. If they had a conscience, or morality, Republicans might be bothered that the people are going to pay for GOP’s austerity economic strategy, but they will collect their bloated salaries, and corporate contributions, and hit the talk shows to tell Americans that killing jobs and retarding GDP growth was the best way to build a vibrant economy; for the wealthy and their corporations.
One might be inclined to excuse the feckless Republican drive to send the nation back into a recession if there were no living examples of the devastation austerity wreaks on a recovering economy, but after most European nations suffered slow or no growth and double dip recessions as a result of severe austerity measures, and reduced GDP growth in the fourth quarter in America on account of spending cuts, they cannot be excused. Their austerity measures served one purpose and one purpose only; damage the economy and make the people suffer to protect the rich and for re-electing President Obama.
Republicans did pass a bill in the House to replace the sequester in the last session of Congress, but it would have kept all the domestic cuts and replaced the defense cuts with yet more domestic cuts to anti-poverty programs. Republicans hate programs that combat poverty, so they must be celebrating the sequester cuts to WIC, food stamps, meals on wheels, Head Start, and reduced school lunch programs, but they will not be getting kudos from half-a-million working-poor families deciding how to provide their hungry children with at least one daily meal. Seniors too, will not be singing the GOP’s praises as their food stamps dry up and those luxuries like Meals on Wheels stop bringing food to shut-ins, but they can rest assured Republicans fought diligently to continue big oil subsidies, corporate tax breaks, and tax loopholes for the richest 1% of Americans while complaining America’s broke and cannot afford to assist the generation that built the infrastructure the wealthy depend on to post record profits as middle class families face declining wages and job losses.
While most Americans are desperately looking for ways to survive another Republican economic onslaught, a million workers nervously await notice their job was eliminated due to spending cuts, and as 11,000 special education teachers await pink slips, and tens-of-thousands of others began receiving notices their jobs face elimination, it is safe to say educators and students will not be sending congratulatory notes to Republicans. The list of affected Americans includes 99% of the population in some way or another, and any American can peruse a comprehensive list to see precisely how they will be affected by austerity-drunk Republicans responsible for reductions in law enforcement, healthcare, disaster relief, aviation safety, and regulators keeping the food and medicine supply safe. One thing is assured, Republicans succeeded in adversely affecting every American negatively and they are quite pleased with themselves, but if they expect to be congratulated for deliberately and with malice aforethought damning Americans to unnecessary harm, they will be disappointed at the silence.
Republicans know, and promised faithfully in 2010, that creating jobs was the surest way to maintain President Obama’s economic recovery, and yet over two full years later, they have not created one job and deliberately attempted to kill millions, and on Friday they succeeded with the sequester. They may be congratulating each other, but they owe their success, in part, to EmoProgs and whiny Liberals who sat home during the 2010 midterm elections to punish the President for not exceeding the authority of his office and not waving a magic wand to repeal DADT, DOMA, or close Guantanamo without Congressional approval, and although many liberal and professional left pundits took pride in “teaching Obama a lesson,” they are to be congratulated for handing the House to teabaggers and Republicans running on a pro-poverty platform. Good job!
Yesterday President Obama said, “At a time when our businesses have finally begun to get some traction, hiring new workers, and bringing jobs back to America, we shouldn’t be making a series of dumb, arbitrary cuts to things that businesses depend on and workers depend on like education and research and infrastructure and defense,” but the President was not being honest. “We” didn’t make dumb arbitrary cuts, Republicans did, and in all honesty, they were not “dumb” or “arbitrary.” They were calculated cuts Republicans yearned, and fought, for from the day the President took office and they were imposed because Republicans love poverty and hate the poor, thrive on ignorance and hate education, love the rich and hate taxing them, but most of all, they hate America and only traitors congratulate America’s enemies, but a Secular Humanist damns them to their proverbial Hell, and may they rot there for eternity.
One of, but not limited to, the symptoms of depression is a feeling of hopelessness that can be exacerba ...
In criminal law, intent is when a person proposes and anticipates certain consequences they foresee will ...
Perspective is the subjective evaluation of relative significance, or point of view, and unfortunately ...
There are times when taking a new, untested approach to solve a problem after exhausting all other optio ...
One of the benefits of 21st century technological advances is the quick availability of government repor ...
Anne
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 10:38 am
These heartless jackals care nothing about the fact that countless Americans will be harmed in ways that will make recovery for them difficult if not impossible. All they care about is sabotaging the president out of anger and spite that he won the last presidential election. There is no doubt that there will be many Republican voters among those negatively impacted. I hope that for them, this will be a wake-up call to the reality of what they’ve been supporting.
Sammy
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 6:28 pm
I often wonder if republican voters are even capable of understanding that they, too, will be negatively impacted by the actions of their representatives?
Or, could it be that their hatred of the president is so strong that they will accept any unnecessary hardship placed on them?
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 7:06 pm
I go with door #2
We will not rest till we put the white back in the white house.
Jeff R
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 10:20 pm
In my experience they blame the bad effects on “the liberals.”
During the Reagan presidency I worked with a guy who worshiped Reagan. When I would point out a bad side effect that one of Reagan’s policies was having on HIM, he always said “the liberal Congress did that.” In his mind when his Social Security taxes went up “the liberals did that.” As homelessness increased my coworker parroted Reagan and said “they choose to live that way.”
That is the way with rightists. If GDP increases “conservatives” get the credit, but when even their own income falls because of that same policy, they blame their loss of income on “those tax and spend liberals.”
When bad things happen, in their minds, they are not responsible, “conservatism” is not responsible. There is really no way to get them to acknowledge that the ideology they promote has ever had a bad outcome. They are so self-deluded that they just cannot accept the damaging and often evil consequences of their own actions.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 10:29 pm
Jim H.
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 12:38 pm
I’ve had arguments with people like that. We could be discussing the health of the U.S. economy from 1980 to present day and he would alternately blame a Democratic president or Congress for everything bad and similarly praise a Republican president or Congress for everything good. When I brought up that the same Republican Congress that he believed should get all the credit for the budget surplus under Clinton was the same one that destroyed the economy under Bush, he went back and blamed Clinton.
The mental gymnastics required to be a conservative are mind-boggling.
Inez
Mar. 4th, 2013 at 10:00 pm
Right 100%…..don’t they know that will mean a millioin less people paying federal or state taxes, contribute to social Security and Medicare?
That the businesses will not withstand the lose of customers who willhold the dollar close to their vest to maintain a home. feed their family, pay utility bills, use less gasoline with no job to go to, no dining out effecting restaurants
More in need of food stamps, maybe even welfare.!
Out of work long enough…… foreclosures….
The GOP can count their dollars until 2014.WE ARE FED UP & WE”RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arthur Giovanni
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 11:29 am
I wonder if cutting off the Koch Brother’s heads and putting them on display will do anything to cure the economy?
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 12:38 pm
It would cheer many of us up, at any rate. How festive!
Reynardine
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:15 pm
Yep!
gsb
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 2:09 pm
Arthur, a little bit gory, but it might work
Mary James
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Their hatred of Obama and being total sell outs to their slave masters is beyond belief. ////////there really are no words.
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 12:39 pm
I prefer not to think of the people or corporations which control them so much as slave masters, but as johns.
Reynardine
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:17 pm
Oh, you took the words right out of my mouth, spit and all!
Anne
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 9:56 am
The hatred of Obama is based both on their hatred of Democratic presidents and Democratic ideology in general and of him in particular. There is no denying that racism is a significant part of that unreasoning hatred that causes them to keep voting against their own best interests on local, state, and national levels. Even in states with consistently Republican governance, where they already rate poorly in terms of quality of life issues as a result, they will blame the president when their standards of living are lowered even more because of the sequestration-induced cuts.
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 12:50 pm
A few counterpoints:
“For eight long years, Bush Republicans ran up the deficit with two unfunded wars, an unfunded Medicare prescription plan, and then bailed out banks as the economy tanked”
- The two wars, medicare part d, and bank bailouts were all bi-partisan measures. Democratic control of the House and Senate began in 2006. If we are currently blaming Republicans who control one house of Congress, it is more than fair to place at least some responsibility on the Democrats for the 2008 collapse
“After President Obama bailed the country out of the Bush Republican economic disaster, they swept into power in the House and directly proceeded attempting to return to their old ways of killing jobs and retarding growth, and yesterday they finally accomplished their goal.”
- It is your contention that the Republicans are only concerned with destructive policies? President Obama didn’t preside over the TARP bailout. The recession ended in March 2009. It is difficult to retard growth any further when GDP growth under President Obama is currently .1% for 2012 Q4
“If they had a conscience, or morality, Republicans might be bothered that the people are going to pay for GOP’s austerity economic strategy, but they will collect their bloated salaries, and corporate contributions”
- Is it your contention that the Republicans in Congress have no conscience or morality? People actually pay less when government expenditures are decreased because less tax revenue is spent. Also, Democrats collect as many, or more, corporate contributions as Republicans. Recently, we see President Obama’s OFA offer meetings with the President in exchange for $500,000 donations
“after most European nations suffered slow or no growth and double dip recessions as a result of severe austerity measures, and reduced GDP growth in the fourth quarter in America on account of spending cuts, they cannot be excused.”
- Austerity in Europe is coupled with higher taxes as well. To attribute austerity with the economic woes in the EU is to disregard the lead-up to austerity measures which was unsustainable economic spending. If spending were controlled, austerity would not be necessary. This is a cause-and-effect error
“While most Americans are desperately looking for ways to survive another Republican economic onslaught”
- Blame for the sequester is bi-partisan at least. President Obama offered the sequester, designed by Treasury Sec Jack Lew, as compromise for extending the debt ceiling in 2011
“President took office and they were imposed because Republicans love poverty and hate the poor, thrive on ignorance and hate education, love the rich and hate taxing them, but most of all, they hate America and only traitors congratulate America’s enemies, but a Secular Humanist damns them to their proverbial Hell, and may they rot there for eternity.”
- I ask, if compromise is the base of our country, how is demonizing someone with an opposing view effective?
Thank you
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:06 pm
How did the democrats kill jobs and I see you didnt take me up on my offer of I can show you how to raise 855billion over 10 years without hurting the 99% or raising anyones FEDERAL INCOME TAX
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:33 pm
I did not say Democrats kill jobs. Just pointing out that the author blames Republicans for all economic woes and absolves Democrats of any blame without considering that control in the Senate and House in 2006 went to the Democrats.
I responded to your revenue question on the other article, but I will simply state the following:
2012 Deficit: 1.1 Trillion
Proposed Revenue: 90 Billion
Even with this added revenue, we would still have over a $1 trillion deficit. For 2013, add in the 60 billion from tax rate increases from jan 1, sequester cuts of 85 billion, and 170 billion from previous cuts, we’re still looking at half a trillion dollars in the red even with your added revenue and with no mechanism to control spending growth.
I wish raising taxes would work and cuts didn’t have to be made but Washington is so full of special interests, lobbying groups, and labor unions that government expansion is necessary for political success. Taxes can make a small dent but don’t solve the structural drivers of our debt: social security, medicare, medicaid. Here is the problem I see with the size of government. Take a look at this link regarding the corporate contributions to my Congresswoman, Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat:
www.campaignmoney.com/com...
Over $800k just from corporations/ PAC and we’re talking about a far-left democrat who won reelection with almost 60% of the vote. Included are in donors are:
$9,000 Bank of America
$8,000 Bank of New York Mellon
$4,500 Citigroup
It makes me feel sick to see such corruption. That is why government needs to shrink. Too many corporations/ unions are getting fantastic returns from donations to our government officials. Democrats and Republicans who want to keep spending steady or increase spending are basically saying they don’t have a problem with the largess of government because it funds their campaigns.
This isn’t the corporations buying elections, it is politicians selling them. We can blame the people who give the money or we can blame the people who take it. I blame the members of government who take this money because it is their choice whether or not to say no.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:43 pm
No argument from me about the bribery “cough”I mean campaign contributions that has corrupted our system.I have always believe that road leads to fascism.But I think ,well I am confused.Are you advocating wiping out the deficit in one year?
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:53 pm
No, not at all. Doing it in one year is impossible but I am stating that since we have structural deficits in our cornerstone programs, we will always run a deficit until they are addressed. More revenue and the sequester are buckets that will help get water out of the boat but we’re still sinking and the hole is caused by the big three programs.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 2:16 pm
Thank you.You almost gave me a heart attack.Now lets look at the numbers.In 10 years the deficit will be 13 trillion dollars.Before the budget control act of 2011 the goal was 4 trillion www.npr.org/blogs/money/2... They agreed to 1.7 trillion. Our GDP is 15 trillion www.google.com/publicdata... As they say “Houston we have a problem”
That means we will have to cut 1.3 trillion a yean for the next 10 years.Let that sink in .You are taking 1.3 trillion out of the economy every year for the next 10 years to get our house in order.You want to destroy America?Well people that is what will happen.
So now we have to ask ourselves.Is the deficit all that important or is putting people to work to expand the workforce who then pay taxes to fund our obligations.I dont know the answers.I dont know if all of us are getting played but I do know we are not getting the full story and deep down this smells like divide and conquer, for further wealth transfer to the very top.
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 3:02 pm
It would definitely be gradual and it doesn’t have to be done in 10 years but the growth needs to be reversed. Getting the deficit to 500 billion and shrinking before Obama leaves office will be a success for him and I will give him kudos if that happens. It is possible to cut the deficit to 500 billion but he will have to tackle medicare/ medicaid reform and tax reform. If he doesn’t do both he will leave with a higher deficit than he inherited and debt almost 20 trillion.
Right now we basically have leaders in government that feel spending isn’t a problem and we shouldn’t cut or reform at all. On the other side, we have individuals who want to cut all safety-net and government programs. Both these courses are irresponsible in the long-term. We need to take care of the elderly, sick, and disabled as well as offer assistance when times are tough. In order to do this in the longterm, we have to reform the large government departments and programs. Let’s modernize and bring these programs into the 21st Century by making them more efficient and eliminating waste, fraud, and duplicative services.
We definitely need to curve the spending because increased spending leads to higher taxes which take more money from people and gives it to the government. How much of every dollar taken out of the economy and reinvested in government programs is wasted? I would guess between 25-40% on average with higher and lower amounts in different agencies.
We already have the highest corporate tax rate in the industrial world, 35%, and that already makes it difficult for new businesses to start and investors from other countries to choose to put money in US businesses and people. It’s a funny dynamic but a higher corporate tax rate is great for big, established business but terrible for small-startups and growth. The large corporations can afford to pay 35%-50% and still make it work but since the rate is so high it makes it exceedingly difficult to create new businesses and challenge the established corps. Why do you think the banks wrote Dodd-Frank? They wanted to make sure to cut out competition from new and smaller banks. Unfortunately, that’s what government does best is limit competition in industries that contribute to campaigns. We need government working for the people. Forgive me another comparison but currently the government is acting like the country’s coach when it should be acting like the referee.
Reynardine
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:30 pm
That too many Democrats went along with Bush’s war of empire, I acknowledge. Our own Senator Bob Graham (the *good* Graham) was one of the few to stand against it (and strangely, suffered unexpected heart trouble soon after). The rest were stampeded by the right wing noise machine and its attendant Mouths of Sauron into enabling Bush and his British yap dog to carry out their plans for an Anglo-American Raj in the Middle East. Other than that, your statements are remarkable for the grandiloquence of their speciosity.
Jeff R
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 10:34 pm
MikeOL
I’ll address only one of your questions
“- It is your contention that the Republicans are only concerned with destructive policies? President Obama didn’t preside over the TARP bailout. The recession ended in March 2009. It is difficult to retard growth any further when GDP growth under President Obama is currently .1% for 2012 Q4″
It IS my contention that during the period in question Republican’s PRIMARY concern was the destruction of the Obama presidency. I believe that because their leaders said that was their goal and no one in the rank and file contradicted those statements.
Given that, it is entirely fair and, I believe accurate, to say that AT THE TIME they were, indeed, determined to force policy to be as destructive as they could possibly make it and in large measure they succeeded in seeing that only destructive or ineffective economic policy was passed into law.
IMO the current .1% growth rate is is almost entirely the direct result of those destructive policies and the obstructive tactics of Republican elected officials and while “it is difficult to retard growth any further” I believe Republicans may have succeeded by assuring that the Sequester has gone into effect.
gsb
Mar. 3rd, 2013 at 2:17 pm
Mikeol that is my contention. republicans have no morality and no conscience.
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 1:40 pm
Just to clarify, are most on the far-left against both the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq war? Iraq I can understand because we didn’t find any weapons but this may change if/when the Syrian government falls and we find out if they were transported in Syrian like the Iraqi government officials who defected claimed Saddam did disguised as a humanitarian mission to construct a dam in Syria.
www.examiner.com/article/...
www.freerepublic.com/focu...
Whether they had weapons or not, it is okay to argue against that war and I will not challenge anyone on that point.
Afghanistan, in my opinion, was necessary to disarm and disrupt the Taliban. I was only 11 on 9/11 but I live 20 miles from NYC and remember that day so vividly. Many friends lost loved-ones and retribution and retaliation to prevent another attack was necessary I strongly feel.
Jeff R
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 11:11 pm
I am not on the “far-left,” but I will address your question.
I was not eleven at the time. I was 50ish. At the time all, literally ALL, evidence from the weapons inspectors on the ground in Iraq indicated that there were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that it had NO nuclear capability. Han Blix plead with the US Government, the UN, and many other governments for military action to be delayed or cancelled. That advice by him and his inspection teams was overwhelmed by an enormous propaganda machine that we now know fabricated “evidence” and quashed actual evidence that contradicted the “story” they were using to pressure the world into attacking Iraq all because as Shrub said Saddam Hussein “tried to kill my Daddy.”
As to the war in Afghanistan. There was credible evidence that the Taliban was sheltering Al Qaeda and those who planned and promoted the destruction of the Twin Towers. We went in, as we should have, and in very short order we defeated the Taliban, we had Al Qaeda on the run, and were within weeks of capturing Al Qaeda’s leaders and destroying its entire organization when… we essentially withdrew to attack Iraq.
Had we maintained our effort in Afghanistan it is likely that within a few weeks or months we would have destroyed Al Qaeda and killed or captured bin Ladin and brought him to the USA to stand trial for his crimes. Our military would have been out of Afghanistan in about two years and there would have been far fewer casualties both American and Afghani.
Another beneficial side effect of quick withdrawal would likely be that the program of unconstitutional, immoral, and dangerous “targeted killings” would never have gotten off the ground. As it is and because drone use is now spreading throughout our domestic law enforcement agencies, we are probably stuck with it forever
As things turned out we’ve been in Afghanistan, what is it, 12 years, thousands have died, hundreds of thousands have been maimed, our economy and the world economy have been severely damaged, and the Afghan government although at the moment less hostile to US interests, is almost certainly more corrupt and less effective than it was before we arrived.
BTW Al Qaeda’s crimes were not against the US alone, those were crimes against the entire world. IMO the biggest mistake Bush made in the days immediately after 9/11 was his failure to point out that nearly half of the victims were NOT Americans. That the victims came from nearly all of the world’s nations, that about 100 of the victims were Muslims killed as they worshiped in the prayer room on the 17th floor of the South tower. If we had allowed every nation with victims to claim it as an attack on and a tragedy for THAT NATION, Al Qaeda would now be long gone from the face of this Earth.
voice
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 2:16 pm
Good work! Have you seen these videos?
15-Year-Old Exposes Federal Reserve Corruption
www.youtube.com/watch?v=K...
CointelPro’s and The War Over Your Mind
www.youtube.com/watch?v=X...
Thanks, and thanks for letting me share.
Frost
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 5:33 pm
53 cents out of every dollar paid in taxes go to war-related spending (2011 numbers) www.youtube.com/watch?v=k...
So of course there’s no money to keep Americans eating and frivolous stuff like that, it all has to go to killing people abroad.
MikeOL
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 7:02 pm
Can you support this number? I clicked your link but only heard an anonymous voice state this number on a radio show. Do you have any official documentation?
Here is a link to the Federal budgets between 2011-2016:
www.usgovernmentspending....
As you can see, in 2011 we spend 25% of the Federal budget on Defense. This number is projected to drop to 20% by 2016. Conversely, in 2011 we spent 23% of the Federal budget on Social Security but by 2016 this number increases to 28%. By 2016, over half the Federal budget every year will go to medicare, medicaid, PPACA, and Social Security.
Jeff R
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 11:25 pm
TrueMajority.org laid out the numbers years ago. It updates them from time to time. True Majority has now gone on to do other things and split. Its other parts are now much larger and have other names.
The gist of their analysis is that additional defense related expenses roughly equal in amount to those listed under “defense” in the annual Federal budget are spread around in other budget categories.
The official Defense budget does not include many military-related items that are outside of the Defense Department budget, such as nuclear weapons research, maintenance, cleanup, and production, which is in the Department of Energy budget, Veterans Affairs, the Treasury Department’s payments in pensions to military retirees and widows and their families, interest on debt incurred in past wars, or State Department financing of foreign arms sales and militarily-related development assistance. Neither does it include defense spending that is not military in nature, such as the Department of Homeland Security, counter-terrorism spending by the FBI, and intelligence-gathering spending by NASA.
All-In the US government spends right around 53% of its annual budget on Defense.
Rudy Gonzales
Mar. 2nd, 2013 at 10:42 pm
Here’s the gist. Medical losses: $20 million cut from the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs
$10 million cut from the World Trade Center Health Program Fund
$168 million cut from Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
$75 million cut from the Aging and Disability Services Programs
Housing: $199 million cut from public housing
$96 million cut from Homeless Assistance Grants
$17 million cut from Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
$19 million cut from Housing for the Elderly
$175 million cut from Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Disaster and emergency: $928 million cut from FEMA’s disaster relief money
$6 million cut from Emergency Food and Shelter
$70 million cut from the Agricultural Disaster Relief Fund at USDA
$61 million cut from the Hazardous Substance Superfund at EPA
$125 million cut from the Wildland Fire Management
$53 million cut from Salaries and Expenses at the Food Safety and Inspection Service
Health Care: $13 million cut from the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan Program (Co-ops)
$57 million cut from the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control
$51 million cut from the Prevention and Public Health Fund
$27 million cut from the State Grants and Demonstrations
$44 million cut from the Affordable Insurance Exchange Grants program
Education: $633 million cut from the Department of Education’s Special Education programs
$184 million cut from Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research
$71 million cut from administration at the Office of Federal Student Aid
$116 million cut from Higher Education
$86 million cut from Student Financial Assistance
Immigration: $512 million cut from Customs and Border Protection
$17 million cut from Automation Modernization, Customs and Border Protection
$20 million cut from Border Security Fencing, Infrastructure, and Technology
Security: $79 million cut from Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance
$604 million cut from National Nuclear Security Administration
$232 million cut from the Federal Aviation Administration
$394 million cut from Defense Environmental Cleanup
Republicans, who refused to raise any additional revenue to avoid the budget cuts, have described the reductions as “modest” a “homerun” and something that “needs to happen” in order to “get this economy rolling again.”