Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
House Republicans Are Planning to Eliminate Food Assistance for 13 Million Americans
It is safe to say that all human beings have at one time or another experienced a compelling desire for food, and in extreme cases, hunger produces a painful sensations or a state of weakness caused by the lack of food that most Americans assume is not a problem in the richest nation in the history of the world. It is also safe to say that any American who deliberately withheld food from other Americans when they had resources to feed them would epitomize profound immorality or in the Christian biblical sense, sheer evil. There is an epidemic of evil in America characterized by Republicans who are intent on withholding food from Americans knowing full well that nearly 25% of children living in poverty and one out of six American adults experience hunger on a daily basis, and as part of the conservative agenda are on an active crusade to increase those numbers to enrich the wealthy.
In the waning months of the 112th Congress, House Republicans failed to pass a farm bill because they could not agree on steep enough cuts to the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP, food stamps) even after the Senate that Speaker John Boehner said had to “get off their asses” and get to work passed a bipartisan agreement cutting food stamps by $4.5 billion over the next decade. The Senate cuts were predicated on projections that as unemployment dropped, fewer Americans would require food assistance, but it was not nearly harsh enough for House Republicans. Since they failed to pass a bill in the last Congress, both the Senate and the House have to begin anew coming up with a new round of cuts to increase hunger among the working poor, children, and seniors who experience hunger every day of their lives. The issue for Republicans in the House last years was their proposed food stamp cuts of $16.5 billion that eliminated over 3 million recipients was not enough for fiscal hawks who determined that until they could reach Paul Ryan’s Path to Prosperity food stamp cuts of $125 billion over five years, they would let the farm bill languish and wait until this year to create despair for the working poor, farmers, and the economy.
In the new Congress, House Republicans are proposing that a new farm bill mandate at least $20 billion over five years in (SNAP) cuts as a temporary fix until they can convince Democrats and President Obama to accept the Ryan plan and cut $125 billion over five years as a starting point of a ten year plan and eliminate food assistance for 13 million more hungry working Americans and seniors in their version of common sense cuts. The good news for Republicans is that not only will their proposal increase hunger for Americans primarily in Republican states, but they can claim victory in creating harm for farmers and the American economy they have been yearning to deal a death knell to so they can portray President Obama as a failure for driving America into another recession. The Republican sequester will do enough damage to the economy and raise unemployment, but that is just the opening salvo in their drive to send the nation into deeper recession than their 8-year assault during the Bush administration.
When most economic experts are calling for increasing funding for food stamps to alleviate hunger and stimulate the economy, House Republicans are angry the Senate’s proposal last year was far too generous, and it is likely they were counting on a different election result and holding out for real damage inherent in the Ryan budget. Speaker John Boehner admitted the reason the House refused to pass any farm bill was “we’ve got people who believe there’s not enough reform (read cuts) in last year’s bill” coupled with their opposition to the President who they claim expanded food stamps as “the food stamp President” that Newt Gingrich parroted during last year’s Republican primaries. The rise in food stamp use is directly correlated to the rise in poverty as the result of massive job losses from Republican malfeasance, and created an inordinate amount of poverty-level Americans who were eligible for the program. What is curious, is that Republican counties are responsible for most of the food stamp growth in the nation and their support for Republican demands to enact deeper cuts is a crude manner of self-punishment for themselves and millions of other low-income working Americans who depend on food stamps to stave off hunger Republicans pant to increase.
There is an economic downside to cutting food stamps that Republicans seem oblivious to and it is another level of the evil inherent in the GOP fiscal lunacy preventing economic growth. For every dollar the government spends on food stamps, there is $1.84 in economic benefit, and the level of cuts Republicans are demanding will hit the Midwest particularly hard because it depresses food sales that hurt farmers who are typically Republican voters. As food sales slump, the downstream job losses will drive the number of Americans in poverty higher, but unfortunately for them, the program will be slashed and more Americans will be hungry which seems to be the intent of Republicans in Congress.
The level of immorality Republicans are demonstrating toward the American people who are struggling has not gone unnoticed in some Washington circles. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s communication director said, “Just when you think you’ve seen the extent of the House GOP’s misguided priorities, they strike at the ability of millions of low-income children, the elderly, and American families to put food on the table.” One of the Senate Republicans, Thad Cochran of Mississippi, who supported the Senate bill last year opposes the proposed House cuts because, like so many Republican states, their working poor, seniors, and child residents rely on nutrition assistance leading him to say, “I come from a state where we have higher-percentage participation than the national average, and I have never had to apologize in Mississippi for supporting it.” Democratic leaders in the House wasted little time assailing the Draconian cuts in the Republicans proposal and said, “SNAP doesn’t just offer much-needed support to vulnerable Americans, it provides a significant boost to the economy, nearly doubling the return of every dollar we put into it.” Still, House Republicans are unfazed by humanitarian calls to stop deliberately creating an epidemic of hunger, and the working poor, children, and seniors will be fortunate if only 3 million Americans are thrown off the food stamp program.
With such devastation inherent in cutting something as beneficial as food stamps that up until 2009 enjoyed wide bipartisan support, one can only conclude Republicans have begun a full-on shift toward following the Ayn Rand ideology of punishing the poor just because they are poor. Subsequently, Republicans will impose hunger on seniors, children, and poverty-level working Americans regardless they are white, Republicans, and farmers that typically support the Republicans who are creating hunger for millions of Americans for no apparent reason other than they lack an ounce of humanity, and that is, beyond a shadow of a doubt the definition of sheer evil; and the Republican Party.
John Boehner won't tell you this, but the "common sense cuts" he referred to that would avoid the seques ...
The House Appropriations Committee released their initial version of the $825 billion stimulus package, and ...
A statement released today by the nation's largest charitable hunger relief network stressed that the nation ...
Today, House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi issued a statement urging the President Bush to do more to help Ameri ...
For Americans who make it their business to follow politics, it is a recurring theme that every time a D ...
ARWKoppen
May. 6th, 2013 at 9:51 am
Better the world, give the good example, better thyselves. ->
House Republicans will get no food ever again.
WeimMom
May. 6th, 2013 at 5:11 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 6th, 2013 at 5:58 pm
Do you think a group thats a bastard child of the heritage foudation led by jim demented can be impartial?
Stock Bridge
May. 6th, 2013 at 7:51 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:01 pm
Well I see you havent read the Constitution and I will leave it at that
Shiva
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:50 pm
Screw that. Too many states are now corrupt like Mi, Wi
8^)
May. 6th, 2013 at 10:29 am
while way more then 13 million hungry american’s think cutting house rethuglicans, is OUR version of common sense cut’s!……….come on 2014!
Shiva
May. 6th, 2013 at 10:56 am
And some of the propaganda seems to be working. My friends from Michigan(former coworkers) on their Facebook pages are passing things like the poor need to be drug tested, they should have to go through all kinds of hoops and whistles to get any type of assistance and in general simply looking down on people. None of them are that well-educated, and none of them understand that they could be in that situation in a matter of seconds.
It is so incredible that people are so stupid that they would vote so often against themselves.
Mike Rubin
May. 6th, 2013 at 12:55 pm
This shows why you have to laugh when these degenerate phony right to lifers start crying about “innocent babies.” These people don’t give a shit about children whatsoever and it’s efforts like these that illustrate that point vividly. As hard as they work to ensure that no unwanted child is unborn, they work just as hard to ensure that no unwanted child is given prenatal care or is fed, clothed, housed, educated, or cured of disease on their dimes. Their only interest in these kids is to inflict them as modern day scarlet letters on women who dare have non-procreational sex. That is sexual pathology at its worse and it should be dealt with by therapists, not incorporated into 21st Century public policy. Because it’s the unwanted children who suffer the most when they are inflicted on people who don’t want them, there is a special place in hell for degenerate phony right to lifers. Monsters, keeping food from the mouths of babes for whom they care not one whit.
Laura Swan
May. 6th, 2013 at 10:39 pm
Mike you are so right. Most of these right to lifers I’ve ran across don’t even qualify to pay much tax. It is a vain attempt in making themselves feel better about themselves without – you know- doing anything.
Jo
May. 6th, 2013 at 1:22 pm
Many people believe that dumb, lazy, drug dealing/using brown people who just want everything handed to them are taking their hard earned money. They just love to hate and they are better than the “takers”. The true low life’s are the ones who are raping Americans of their ability to afford to provide food, housing, health care, etc.
Charlie F
May. 6th, 2013 at 1:28 pm
Don’t Republicans understand that more Americans need a food assistance not only because they are still unemployed, but those who have found jobs; are at wages that are below, slightly above or at the minumum wage.
When will Republicans be more concerned about the needs of the people and not the needs of the big corporations.
Sharon
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:24 pm
Unfortunately, the answer is never.
Daniel B
May. 6th, 2013 at 1:51 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
lm945
May. 6th, 2013 at 4:42 pm
Matthew 25:37-40 — Jesus tells us to feed the poor and give drink to the thirsty. He says that what we do for the least of his people we do for him.
I believe in feeding the poor and the hungry. And I’m an atheist.
What does that say when a “heathen” is more Christ-like than Christians?
Paws
May. 6th, 2013 at 5:11 pm
I won’t tell you what I think of your comment but I will say that even in spite of your brain dead, moronic, nitwit of a post, I hope you and your family never, ever fall on hard times and need assistance and only have a charity organization to help you – charity organizations that are providing for so many already, that providing for you, too, may be more than they can bear.
Oh, wait…I did tell you what I think of your comment. Well, at least I did temper it somewhat by telling you that I still hope you don’t wind up poor and hungry and having to stare into the eyes of your children and not be able to tell them when they’ll get to eat next.
Jo
May. 6th, 2013 at 5:20 pm
People like you are the white trash. We can’t take care of our families on ten dollars an hour. You try it. If charities could provide food, housing, and health care that’s needed we wouldn’t have such great need. You may not want to pay for other people’s needs, but you will pay through ever increasing prices for your own needs. Not caring for other people is a shame. The greedy one percent are the same or worse than serial killers. What some of them donate to just one law maker would pay for every debit we have and lot of other people like us.
Sharon
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Perfect example of a brain dead, heartless, moronic, soulless Republican who pretends to love his country while not understanding the first thing about it.
“We the people” is not just a feel good phrase.
Trash.
tz
May. 6th, 2013 at 1:54 pm
Yes, it is time to cut off those “takers”. These children, elderly, handicapped, & those down on their luck are parasites and bankrupting the nation and are picking hard working taxpayers’ pockets.
Get a job and wean yourself away from your slavery to the government dole, you lazy @#$%^&s.
My money is MINE damn it, I deserve to keep for ME!
snark
Doris~
May. 6th, 2013 at 2:05 pm
After all said….WE MUST OUST THE TGOP & SAVE OUR PEOPLE..from these heartless & brainless scums of the earth….OUST THE TGOP! before it’s too late!
Paws
May. 6th, 2013 at 2:05 pm
Sometimes I think the word “evil” is used far too much in our political discourse. In the case of assistance to the poor getting cut, however, it is the only word to use. Cutting aid to those who are most in need IS evil and those who vote to do something like that when it does NOT have to be done, are evil themselves.
I don’t understand how people who are not more than a few paychecks away from starving themselves, get on this bandwagon being drawn by the GOP and echo the idea that these people are just lazy takers and don’t deserve any help. It’s okay to let others go hungry, including children, because they’re TAKERS.
I have a sister like that. If they miss a couple of paychecks, they’re done. But they voted for Romney and think people on assistance are deadbeats.
The fright wing has done such a good job at it that I cannot convince her otherwise no matter what I say.
Sugapea
May. 6th, 2013 at 4:35 pm
Thank you Rmuse, you write so well.
All we hear from the Right is: “Too many Taker’s, that is the ONLY reason America is failing”.
Because of the Republican well-funded-brainwashing, these people never, ever hear about the horrendous Corporate Welfare! They never hear of the Rich paying lower Taxes in over 60-Years…or all the money the Mega-Rich have hidden off-shore.
Just look at the current Tax Rate compared to thirty years ago:
s158.photobucket.com/user...
This absolutely why we cannot afford new Roads, Bridges or Schools. Why is the supposedly Liberal Media not mentioning this fact?
503me
May. 6th, 2013 at 6:55 pm
GOP equals gods of poverty and they are on a ‘god’ like trip to see just how far they can ride the ‘poverty’ boat. Please people, wake up and vote these monsters out of office.
sarah
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:13 pm
I have a great idea instead of putting taxpayer money into food stamps we cut the pay of every fkn political person in Congress when they arnt working 40hrs a week like they should and put that money into all the programs for the poor then everyone would be ok
Sharon
May. 6th, 2013 at 8:30 pm
Yet one more example of why I hate Republicans.
They’re evil right down to their hollow cores.
lageorgia
May. 6th, 2013 at 10:13 pm
I personally think it’s a grand idea. Pair this idea with having the poor children work for their free lunch at schools and we will turn this country around. Just think, no food stamps for deadbeats and their deadbeat in waiting. Children will have to work for their simple midday meal at school. This will give poor children the opportunity to pull themselves up from poverty. And being smaller and more flexible than adults they can shimmy up and down the school buildings cleaning windows and fixing the roof. In fact they probably shouldn’t even attend class but rather can spend the whole day working. They can carry the rich kid’s books from class to class and by just dint of being in the rich kid’s presence they can glean what it takes to become a one %er. Maybe we can allow the rich kids to take home one or two poor kids and work there too. What a wonderful chance for the poor to witness the good life and what great entertainment for the rich to learn to order around the lesser…
Denise
May. 6th, 2013 at 11:25 pm
I usually like what you publish, but this is very poorly edited and I gave up reading it after the first few lines
Maat Men Nefer
May. 6th, 2013 at 11:30 pm
I am glad to see the word ‘evil’ finally used when confronting these inhuman policies by the Rethuglicans. Their motto should be ‘The greatest evil for the greatest number’ What else can you expect from the party with three reversed pentagrams (five pointed stars) on its official elephant logo? P.S. It started with Nixon and I have the campaign button to prove it!
Pam G
May. 7th, 2013 at 3:17 pm
Yet no one comments on the fact that every politition voting is eating well, out of the pockets of taxpayers…will they cut their food budget? I hear everyone going on about not wanting to support welfare and SNAP, but with every paycheck you make your government employees very wealthy indeed
IGotAComment
May. 8th, 2013 at 8:48 pm
USDA statistics show that participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) increased 93.38 percent from George Bush’s first year in 2001 compared to President Obama’s first year in 2009.
When President Bush took office in 2001, there were 17.3 million people on food stamps. During his last full year in office, 2008, there were 28.2 million on food stamps — an increase of 10.9 million – or a 63 percent increase over an 8-year period.
But from the last full year of Bush’s presidency (2008) through 2011, just three years into President Obama’s presidency, the number of people on food stamps increased 16.5 million — going from 28.2 million to 44.7 million — an increase of 59 percent in just a 3-year period.
If you compare the average increase per year of the number of people on food stamps during the Bush administration (1.5 million) versus the average increase per year during the Obama administration (5.5 million) – food stamps have increased nearly 4…
IGotAComment
May. 8th, 2013 at 8:50 pm
– food stamps have increased nearly 4 times more per year under Obama than under Bush.
In addition, if you compare statistics from 2003 (three years into President Bush’s first term) with numbers from 2011 (three years into President Obama’s presidency) the number of people on food stamps jumped 111 percent — from 21.2 million to 44.7 million.
The food stamp program doled out $50.36 billion in benefits in 2009; $64.7 billion in 2010; and $71.81 billion in 2011.
The most the benefits doled out in any given year under Bush’s presidency was $34.6 billion in 2008. The lowest amount was $15.5 billion in 2001.
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 8th, 2013 at 9:05 pm
The trouble with wingnuts is they dont understand cause and effect.Bush crash the economy.people lost jobs so since they have to receive assistance its the Presidents fault.Go figure.BTW its poetic justice that the fastest growing segment thats receiving assistance are the idiots that votes republican.
Shiva
May. 8th, 2013 at 9:26 pm
I wonder if that had anything to do with losing 750,000 jobs a month as Obama was being sworn in?
djchefron(Moderator)
May. 8th, 2013 at 9:33 pm
That causes one to think.Blame the blah.That registers.