Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
House Republicans Threaten to Shut Down Government Unless Women are Denied Contraception
It is not uncommon for people to repeat particular behaviors based on their life experience and environment to the point their actions and way of thinking becomes an ethos unto itself. People familiar with convicted felons recognize that the high rate of recidivism is based on a deeply entrenched culture that criminal behavior is normal and following accepted societal norms for behavior is foreign. For the past four years Republicans have adopted a style of governance that informs their obstructionism and hostage-taking, although outside political norms, has become part of their culture that doesn’t bode well for Americans or the government. This week, House Republicans proposed they will shut down the government unless they are allowed to restrict women’s access to contraception that defines their culture that governance entails threats to impose religion on government and the people.
On Tuesday, in advance of negotiations for a continuing resolution to prevent a government shutdown before March 27, fourteen Republicans wrote to Republican leadership demanding that the continuing resolution must repeal the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act. The Republicans also introduced (again) a bill to repeal the mandate to make their point that religious employers’ divine right to control women’s reproductive health, and their wont to inject religious dogmata into law, will be enforced under threat of holding government funding as a hostage.
Republicans used the absurd “religious liberty” argument to oppose contraception coverage since the President announced it was part of the Affordable Care Act, and they are again demanding that religious employers be allowed to exercise their religious liberty by denying women access to birth control. The legislators wrote that “This attack on religious freedom demands immediate congressional action. Nothing short of a full exemption for both nonprofit and for-profit entities will satisfy the demands of the Constitution and common sense” that means Christian fundamentalists demand the right to control women’s reproductive health. It is likely the religious freedom advocates are demanding contraception coverage repeal in support of craft store chain, Hobby Lobby, whose owners defied a court ruling in late December to provide copay-free birth control access to its employees. Apparently Hobby Lobby’s owner believes the law, judicial system, and women’s right to control their reproductive health is the purview of his religious inclinations, and Republicans are providing their support with threats to withhold funding for the government.
Women are already under attack with the enactment of sequester cuts that eliminates $86 million from family planning and reproductive health services, and to help Hobby Lobby’s founder and CEO, David Green, impose his religious belief on his employees, Republicans will use budget negotiations to continue Christian conservatives’ war on women. Hobby Lobby was “built and will continue to be built on strong values, and honoring the Lord in a manner consistent with Biblical principles,” and integral to consistency with biblical principles and honoring the lord is Green’s religious freedom to dictate that women are not entitled to contraceptives. Perhaps Green is unaware that his religious liberty already protects him from being forced by the government to use an IUD, diaphragm, or birth control pills, but not to force women to submit to his Draconian “strong values” founded in his religious beliefs.
One of the Republicans leading the charge to force the government to follow religious demands and repeal the contraceptive coverage mandate is Tennessee congresswoman Diane Black who early in the 113th Congress introduced a measure to defund Planned Parenthood. Several other House Republicans re-introduced Paul Ryan’s Sanctity of Human Life Act (again) that grants personhood to a single celled organism in a devious attempt to ban contraception. The measures religious Republicans are taking to ban contraception are counter-intuitive to their opposition to abortion, because better access to cost-free contraception reduces the number of unintended pregnancies, and by extension abortion, and it gives women financial freedom to decide when they begin having children, but women’s freedom and Christian fundamentalism cannot co-exist in a rapidly expanding theocracy that seeks insert biblical gender inequality into the law.
One of the features of the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate was that although it didn’t eradicate gender inequality in healthcare costs, it did level the playing field, and mandated contraceptive coverage was a major factor. However, Republicans oppose gender equality and they have a powerful weapon in religious liberty activists who will go to any means to deny women access to contraceptives as evidenced by Hobby Lobby’s refusal to follow the law and courts. For Hobby Lobby and religious liberty advocates, the contraceptive mandate is not an economic issue, it is purely religious because Hobby Lobby is paying $1.3 million in fines daily that far exceed the cost of following the law and the majority of Americans who do not agree the mandate infringes on fundamentalists’ religious liberty.
In Republican-controlled states, women’s reproductive health is under increasing assaults, and that House Republicans are threatening to hold government funding hostage unless fundamentalists are exempted from following the law, however despicable, is part of Republican culture and philosophy for ruling from the minority. It worked during 2011′s debt ceiling crisis that created sequestration cuts and America’s first credit downgrade, and it worked in 2010 when they held unemployment benefits and payroll tax reduction hostage to maintain Bush-era tax cuts for the richest Americans. Now, to control women’s reproductive health, and place religion above the Constitution and will of the people, they are demanding their perverted interpretation of religious liberty is enforced as a condition of funding the government. It is hostage taking, an attack on women’s rights, and worst of all, the continuing saga of how America becomes a theocracy, and although decent Americans are appalled and outraged, Dominionists and their Republican facilitators are celebrating and identifying their next hostage.
Every parent recognizes the time their young child first exhibits reluctance to follow directions, and a ...
Throughout mankind's recorded history, women have been relegated to subservient roles by men who use any ...
One of the inherent rights of American citizenship is individual freedom and it transcends nearly every ...
Throughout recorded history, religion has been responsible for most of the atrocities perpetrated agains ...
This week, among other over-the-top comments, Justice Antonin Scalia expressed his belief that ...
Sally
Mar. 14th, 2013 at 11:06 pm
When will women wake up? This party will not stop at banning contraception, which in itself is dangerous for women who need those hormones as medicine. My DIL had two kids, and had so many problems that she decided not to have more. She has an IUD, but that would be banned by the gOP, and probably any doctor who tried to remove it will be jailed. These people are insane!
Amy Wilson
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 11:30 am
I agree with the intent of the article, however, you really need to go back and change the phrase ‘single-celled organism’. A zygote starts out as one cell, but it divides very quickly. There’s a better way to put this.
Reynardine
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 9:07 pm
Two cell, four cell, eight cell, morula, blastula, gastrula, embryo (at cephalocaudal orientation), fetus (at assuming hominid form), natus (during birth process), neonate (at first breath, whether fully separated or not)
Reynardine
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 6:33 am
From zygote through natus, conceptus.
Arthur Giovanni
Mar. 14th, 2013 at 11:56 pm
Look on the bright side, if Republicans are threatening to do this, it means that they’re sweating. they’re offering to avoid a government shutdown if they can oppress women. That they think they have leverage is laughable.
The government shutdown scares them and the cracks are showing.
Jo Hargis
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 2:41 am
Yes, and because this strategy worked SO well for them in November. Uh huh.
Shut it down, that’s what I say. Do NOT give in, Dems! Sick of one GOP-manufactured crisis after another. Bunch of damn drama queens.
Mrs Gunka
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 12:01 am
Just ad Viagra to the restrictions and they may come around to reality.
gsb
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:03 am
Mrs Gunka:
to use a palinism,”also too” if these rethugs are so hot for no contraception,every Women in this country should say(with force and mean it) stay out of my bedroom.
These men, will not be content until all Women are kept, at home,unable to leave unless a male is with them, unable to shop alone,uneducated,hampered with quivers filled with children.Are they willing to pay tho? that is the shira law way of life they are so worried about.
Sandra
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:15 pm
Hard to tell the difference between the Taliban in the Middle East and the Taliban in the R’thug Party of the US of A. What next? Sharia Law? Fcuking scary I tell ya.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:30 pm
Sharia law?Nah thats them feornirs blasphemy.Now what we have are the 10 commandments and that good ole born again christian laws that is based on the old testament.Fire and brimstone, saying the lords prayer`repent now or you will see the glory of the rapture.Please send 9.99 for your handbook to help save this nation from gods wrath. deweycheathamand how.godnet
Margo Arrowsmith
Mar. 17th, 2013 at 10:57 am
The problem with that (and its been a tactic since the ancient Greeks) is that the women who would do this are not with the men who would do this. wp.me/p3c7d8-1g
Churchlady
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 12:49 am
Hobby Lobby is a business. As such it is not a religious institution no matter what. The “religious institutions” such as charities, hospitals, colleges and universities all take tax money to operate. In BOTH cases they are covered by the Civil Rights laws of equal accommodation.
No one thinks about the religious values that this draconian stupidity would trample. Protestants, Jews, Muslims (yes), Hidus, Seventh Day Adventists, and all secular humanists, atheists, and non-believers share moral values that put contraception front and center as a moral GOOD.
Morality is the power of YES, not just the power of NO.
For Protestants whom I represent in a large organization, contraception is a manifestation of family values, the preservation of marital intimacy, and our care for creation in not over populating and sharing our natural resources equitably.
So for any Hobby story or tax supported institution to decide they can dictate to their employees what THEIR religious and moral values are is ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENT FROM GEORGE WALLACE STANDING IN THE SCHOOLHOUSE DOOR. Religious bigotry is as repellent as racial bigotry.
Catholics and others running charities etc. can indeed discriminate if they are exclusively self funded totally religious organizations. So if Catholic Charities chooses to opt out of providing contraception, that’s fine. Just don’t take our tax dollars to do your work which requires you to hire diversely and to honor that diversity. You can self fund. You can serve ONLY Catholics. No one has a problem with that. But you cannot simultaneously take MY money and then discriminate against ME. What part of the civil rights movement have you overlooked? You stopped BEING exclusively Catholic when you opted IN for fedral and state money.
Hobby Lobby? As a faith organization we PROMISE not to sell model airplanes. YOU have to promise not to promote theology. Seems only fair. We’d win that one, hands down. You went into business not to promote faith but to make money. If you don’t want us competing – give up the bogus arguments, ‘Kay?
SinghX
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:40 am
…”So if Catholic Charities chooses to opt out of providing contraception, that’s fine. Just don’t take our tax dollars to do your work which requires you to hire diversely and to honor that diversity. You can self fund. You can serve ONLY Catholics. No one has a problem with that. But you cannot simultaneously take MY money and then discriminate against ME. What part of the civil rights movement have you overlooked? You stopped BEING exclusively Catholic when you opted IN for federal and state money…”
Well said! As you know, the Catholic church was asking and getting funds for their school programs supplemented by/from the public school coffers. And, when those funding dried up, they were told “You are more than welcome to use or facilities to run your programs the public schools, but we can no longer fund at your sites…we’ll give you bus passes, etc. to bring your students to our campus”…
But NO! The Catholic schools wanted that $$$! And, they (local nuns/priest) would show up at the crack of dawn, waiting in the parking lot and harass the local PS admin-office personnel relentlessly for a check. It was all gimme-gimme-gimme!
Daniel Berry, NYC
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 10:43 am
Churchlady, the majority of Roman catholics in the US are also on the side of contraception. Please don’t try to imply that Roman catholics oppose contraception just because their hypocritical, gay, pedophile-enabling leadership is against it.
Cate n 4
Mar. 20th, 2013 at 6:09 pm
You rock! May I use this in my current events/discussion class?
Lee Malcolm
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 12:54 am
They’re crazy!!! They act more like terrorists than politicians and they should be treated like terrorists.
Their blackmail and fear mongering are the tools of criminals and gangsters, not statesmen.
RX7
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:31 am
They want to take arms, shoot down the government and arm the children to the teeth like the Nazis (Nazi flags were even sold in gun shows alongside Confederate ones years ago). They want to trample on the rights of women, and impose religious dogma on the people just like the Taliban and other Muslim extremists. They have become a nasty form of deja vu, a “legitimate” terrorist organization.
robyn ryan
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 1:31 am
If this is what they want you to look at, what aren’t we looking at?
The fact that our common assets are being stolen. Businesses are taking the power grid, waterways and roads that our taxes paid for, then renting them back to us.
Our children have no means of fighting corporations except government – for the general welfare and common defense.”Enemies(of the
Constitution)foreign and domestic…” economic bubbles and vulture capitalism have brought down governments before.
Defense is more than military. It’s protecting our environment. It’s making sure our lands will be here for the next generation. Because, despite the preachers, the next generation has already arrived.
Defense is also making sure a lawyer-heavy-deep pockets global whatever can’t overwhelm the fundamental ownership of the natural resources of a free people.
They’re playing the shill, diverting attention from the crime. They need a scream button. Commies is over, 9/11 old, black president, meh.
Look over here!!!!We’re passing terrible laws! We are monsters,look at us!!!!
So what is it we aren’t supposed to be looking at?
Ann
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:04 am
It’s official this republican congress must go. How in the hell did we get ourselves into this predicament? Where they are TELLING US what we are going to live with. Where they are not listening to what we say regarding gun legislation, women’s rights and autonomy, passing the jobs bill so that we can get back to work building America and the economy…Where did we go wrong? When did we stop scaring the politicians that they give us their asses to kiss as they follow the will of the lobbyists and grover norquist?
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:43 am
How did we get here?
1.The President thinking that we were going to pull together in a kumbaya moment refused to engage in the 2010 mid-terms.Fatal error because not only could we have build our majorities but it was in a census year meaning redistricting.
2.The Democratic party refuse to nationalize the elections.There should have been an all out effort to inform the public on republicans.People are stupid,the republicans had the lies down pat and repeated them over and over again that the people voted against their economic interest.And people being people wont admit a mistake and double down thinking saneness will prevail
3.Democratic voters:The Democratic coalition which is our strength is also our weakness.If one group dont receive their unicorns they throw a hissy fit and stay home`saying I’ll show them for taking my vote for granted.We dont play the long game.Republicans to their credit plays that game well.We should take notes and learn.
Edward Reeve
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:34 am
Excuse me, but isn’t there supposed to be a separation of church and state? Also, wouldn’t it be cheaper to provide pills than to supporta child for 18-20 years?
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:47 am
Stop Making Sense
Paws
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:47 am
I really don’t understand what THEIR religion has to do with MY birth control.
Also, where was the uproar when 28 states mandated this coverage? Catholic hospitals and schools and what not are required to have this coverage in their insurance plans in over half of our states. Companies like Hobby Lobby do not get a pass either – they are not a church or any type of religious institution, they are a corporation.
So…someone explain to me why they are freaking out NOW when this has already been the case in so many states? Could it have something to do with the black guy in the White House? It sure as hell isn’t about the birth control because if it was, we’d have heard this uproar long ago.
charlie
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 12:53 pm
“So…someone explain to me why they are freaking out NOW when this has already been the case in so many states? Could it have something to do with the black guy in the White House?”
_____________________________________________
My understanding of the counter argument is that the state mandates are for the most part insurer mandates, not employer mandates and that the federal contraceptive mandate is broader in scope and narrower in its exemption than all of the 28 states’ comparable laws. Religious organizations in states with a mandate…even those where there is no express exemption…may opt out by simply self-insuring, dropping prescription drug coverage, or offering ERISA plans. The HHS mandate closes off all these avenues of relief.
And no, I don’t believe this has the least bit to do with the fact that there is a “black guy in the White House”. Religious/moral convictions tend to be rather important to many people…so it is a matter of conscience, not skin color.
Paws
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 2:48 pm
Again though, your religion and your moral convictions are not mine. Furthermore, the religious and moral convictions of certain religions are a little lax themselves, so I don’t think they should be lecturing anyone about birth control.
This is especially true when you consider that millions upon millions of people who call themselves Christians take birth control.
As for “forcing” employers to cover it, the HHS policy allows for the insurance company to provide a separate policy to employees to cover contraception – the employers don’t even have to touch it, yet they continue to resist.
And Hobby Lobby is still not a religious institution. I know a lot of people who have hobbies and their devotion to their hobby may border on being a religion for them, but Hobby Lobby is still a corporation and corporations are not churches, nor are they people.
charlie
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:40 pm
“Again though, your religion and your moral convictions are not mine.”
———————————-
I’m not a Catholic and they are not my convictions. I merely attempt to understand both sides of the argument and -on this issue- am not an advocate for either one.
But…for those that feel that the legal duties imposed on them by the contraception mandate conflict with the religious duties required by their faith, I do support their right to have their day in court.
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 11:28 pm
Do the 95% of catholics that use or have used contraceptives get their day in court? Nope.
charlie
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 12:30 am
Do the 95% of Catholics that use or have used contraceptives get their day in court?
___________________________________
They already did. On June 28,2012, the contraception mandate as written in the ACA, narrowed the definition of religious liberty on their behalf, no? So now we have employers all across the country that consider the issue important enough to file a whole new wave of federal lawsuits (many of which are coming down in their favor). But with all the conflicting rulings over the mandate, it likely means this is headed back to the Supreme Court. Looks like all those with a concerned claim…will again be represented.
Ann
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 9:18 am
This is about the fear of the GOWP becoming the GOP OF M.
The republicans have been losing their hold on sanity, since learning that in a few years they were going to become the minorities they were use to preying on and legislating against.
Chickens coming home to roost.
Just A Dumb Fireman
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 1:29 pm
How about not using acronyms so we don’t have to sit here wondering whether we’ve decoded them correctly?
Rita
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 9:52 am
As a criminologist, I find this sentence deeply troubling and flawed: “People familiar with convicted felons recognize that the high rate of recidivism is based on a deeply entrenched culture that criminal behavior is normal and following accepted societal norms for behavior is foreign.” This is one of many theories that explain criminal behavior. Further, the statement ignores all of the laws, rules, and social practices that make it nearly impossible for former prisoners to follow accepted norms (e.g., laws preventing former prisoners from living in subsidized housing; employer practices that automatically dismiss an applicant with a conviction or arrest, etc). Finally, decades of research shows that recidivism is heavily linked to these practices and not necessarily to attitudes towards societal norms. Making such a generalized comment is irresponsible and puts a damper on an otherwise well thought-out piece with astute social commentary.
patricia a krupica
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:27 am
Well, perhaps women should only have sex when they are wanting to get pregnant. How would the men like that.
MsPithy
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 12:36 pm
Ahh! A variant of the Lysistrata solution. Excellent!
www.sparknotes.com/drama/...
I have often wondered why heterosexual men are so quiet about a policy that has such a direct and negative impact on their sexual escapades.
oldenuf2know
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:37 am
It is my understanding that God gave us all freewill. However these people disagree with God so are trying to dictate the behavior of women. Not men, mine you, women only.
Eykis
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:50 am
Whenever you see Rep Diane Black (Witch-TN) you only need to know a couple of things:
1) She is R.N.
2) Became very wealthy on the backs of taxpayers using her husband’s drug-testing company Aegis’ no bid contracts: www.murfreesboropost.com/...
3) she is a RACIST: www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 10:59 am
what happens if an employer takes the same line of reasoning that some conservatives have, and say if you weren’t overweight you wouldn’t be diabetic. And I’m not going to allow our insurance to give you any diabetic drugs. First of all we know that you don’t have to be overweight to be diabetic and secondly that is one person whose bias and prejudice determines others lives. Now I good conservative would say quit your job. An American would probably try to understand why this person will not allow diabetic drugs in his insurance policy.
This may seem a little far-fetched, but it’s exactly what’s happening with contraceptives. The Catholic Church just reelected the previous pope under a different name and is against any type of contraception. Catholics may allow one man to determine how many children they have but people with any common sense would not.(hence 95% of American Catholics using contraceptives at one time or another).
It’s really hard for the Republicans and conservatives and the Catholic Church among others to punish women for being pregnant if contraceptives are freely floated about. I don’t feel for them and I hope that the Supreme Court doesn’t either. But then again I have less hope and a smaller opinion of the Supreme Court than I do for those who are afraid of contraception because they believe in a strict old world pile of bull dung
46A9MA
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 11:12 am
What many may feel about the current GOP:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=A...
knight4444
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 10:52 am
Great video! No more sorrow! the GOP needs to die already!
SidVA
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 11:22 am
And the plan to take care of all the unwanted children is?…(crickets)…(crickets)…That’s what I thought.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 11:45 am
They have a plan.The lord says men keep your zipper up and women your legs close till you’re married and only then you can do the dirty only for the purpose of procreation.
Like everything else they supposedly believe its not based on any reality known to this thing I like to call life.
Shiva(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Old men with wagging beards
j
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 2:30 pm
But it was just a day or so ago that the intolerable Ted Cruz threatened to shut down the government if Obamacare was not thrown out! Where did these idiots come from, they play silly games with the government and they are a disgrace, I don’t know what the rest of the world can think of us.
By the way, the contraception issue was settled in the 1950′s/
Paws
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 2:50 pm
I think a lot of the world laughs at us. Many nations have idiotic politicians but we seem to grow them extra stupid here.
knight4444
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 10:45 am
@Paws, I have posted those same comments here 100′s of times!! the world either laughs at us or hates us!! How far we have fallen!!
Sherlock
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 4:08 pm
Being a 67 year old who survived Catholic education and upbringing I disqualify myself from a moral opinion regarding birth control. I can’t believe we are still discussing the issue but I guess the Catholic Teapublicans have brought this up again and again.
I have one question—-
How can any institution continue to preach hell and damnation for users of birth control when 60% to 80% of the women of child bearing years use it? I won’t even get into the males part in this because we know that if men had babies birth control would be a sacrament.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 4:09 pm
Well it looks like the men who vote republican have their priorities in order.SMDH
North Carolina men strongly opposed to bill that would ban women from baring breasts:
www.publicpolicypolling.c...
EdS
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 7:52 pm
Republicans just continue to show how stupid and negative they can be. Their lives must be so bad that they have to bring everyone else down with them. We do not need such people in public office!
Elizabeth 44
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 8:39 pm
And CPAC is busy trying to figure out how to increase their share of the minority etc. vote. Dear CPAC, women is this country are over 50% of the voters. And you’re going to win big next time… HOW???
Gwenola
Mar. 15th, 2013 at 9:28 pm
Did the rethugs males come out of a va jj. Did a woman raise them?
Are they married to a woman
Do they allow them to abuse them
I would be in jail from abusing them
Gary
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 1:11 am
People, we have tyranny on our hands. Contraception is the least of my personal worries. The state I live in passed a bill that makes applying federal gun laws a crime for anyone trying to institute the laws, (if any are passed). Companies like Hobby Lobby or Chick-Fil-A should have their business license suspended if they don’t want to adhere to federal law. This is a Republic with elected representatives, a democracy of sorts LOL. If you only want to go by the laws YOU want, then where are we headed? Contraception was decided decades ago, along with abortion and other matters. If we the people don’t take back our republic, then we won’t have one, we will be in a theocracy, plutocracy or Oligarchy (depending on which special interest wins). Vote out any representative that votes for any of these.
Mary M Davis
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 2:18 am
ALL I want is names of the fourteen Republicans who wrote to the Republican leadership demanding that the continuing resolution must repeal the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act.
I personally am fed up with our elected officials (House and Senate especially), lobbyists, corporations, billionaires, banks, Wall Street, CEO’s and others blackmailing the government and citizens of United States. I believe their acts of financial terror, withholding job laws/bills, their acts of obstructionism (which resembles that of a child having a temper tantrum), and sheer acts of violating my rights as a woman to have equality, be offered life sustaining services and their attempts at withholding it just because it offends THEIR religious beliefs which BLATANTLY violates MY rights guaranteed by the first, third, fourth, fifth and ninth amendments (similar to Justice Douglas opinion of the Court in Griswold v. Connecticut (381 U.S. 479 (1965)). There a statute prohibiting use of contraceptives was voided as an infringement of the right of marital privacy.
By forcing their religious beliefs on me and all other women at the Federal and State levels, Congress IS in effect making law establishing religious parameters and forcing them on the citizens. THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND IMPEACHED!
Impeachment is analogous to indictment in regular court proceedings. Typically, the lower house of the legislature (House of Representatives) will impeach the official and the upper house (Senate) will conduct the trial. We all know unless we DEMAND they be held accountable they will cover each others backs.
Impeachment proceedings may be commenced by a member of the House of Representatives on their own initiative, either by presenting a listing of the charges under oath, or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be triggered by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal judge be impeached, a charge of what actions constitute grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutor, the President, a state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by PETITION.
knight4444
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 10:39 am
My question is, how can ANY woman vote republican????? WTF do these females find so damn attractive about this political group which is as diverse as a ALL WHITE country club!
Reynardine
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 11:16 am
Usually these republicunts are women who have circumscribed their own lives and accepted their own inferiority and subordination according to the Lard’s decrees, and now they are punitively furious at the idea that other women might get away with not doing it.
Reynardine
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 11:22 am
Well, I forgot the handful of wealthy Momneys who got themselves a sinecure through being well- born or well-married, and don ‘t one bit like that some common-born plebe could work her way up to an equal rank.
knight4444
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 1:19 pm
@Reynardine, as you so eloquently put it, these republican women need a wake up call! The republican party which is basically a club for OLD- RICH- WHITE GUYS! keep telling women, YOU DON’T MEAN BEANS to us!! My God! when the GOP foolishly tried to justify RAPE!, you’d think they’d get it!!!!??? I give up!! low self esteem combined with bible thumping logic is a recipe for disaster!!
Raeann
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 12:09 pm
Maybe someone has already brought this up, I skimmed the article and the comments, but it seems to me that this shows they simply don’t want women to have access to contraception. It has nothing at all to do with violating a religious employers principles, since an exemption has been made for religious employers to be able to opt out. All they want is to make women pay for having sex. It’s really obvious at this point.
djchefron(Moderator)
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 12:18 pm
I had this debate a while back with an anti choice fanatic about their ultimate goals.Hr swore up and down it wasn’t about contraceptives it was about the life of child.Now their true colors has been shown.No doing the do at all unless you are doing it for procreation.Its not what they say to deceive the gullible.Its their actions that should inform everyone of their policies.The American Taliban plain and simple
JJM
Mar. 16th, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Ban it; women pull a Lysistrata and refuse sex. Any resulting baby would be from a rape. Man should be charged.
Simple solution.
StarWarsHippie
Mar. 19th, 2013 at 9:59 pm
The rich get richer and the poor get babies.
Rose
Mar. 20th, 2013 at 4:15 pm
I don’t understand how they can be against abortion, but also against contraception. Birth control DECREASES the amount of abortions. It lessens the chances of having an unwanted baby! Oh, but you’re only supposed to have sex for the purpose of procreating. Just because they have those certain rules in their religion does not mean that everyone else in the U.S. has to live the same way.
So if you’re a married man, good luck only having sex with your wife if you’re going to have a kid. I hope you have a low sex drive or can afford to have as much babies as possible.